Prevalence of axial symptoms after posterior cervical decompression: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence of axial symptoms (AS) in patients following posterior cervical decompression. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for relevant studies that reported the incidence of AS after posterior cervical decompression, and manually screened reference lists for additional studies. Relevant prevalence estimates were calculated. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and publication bias assessment were also performed. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included 44 studies, with 893 AS cases in 2984 patients. The pooled AS prevalence was 28 % (95 % CI 24-32). The prevalence of AS was higher after expansive open-door laminoplasty (39 %) than after modified open-door laminoplasty (MOLP, 23 %) and laminectomy instrumented fusion (29 %). AS prevalence was also higher in those that wore a neck collar for 2-3 months (34 %) compared with 2 weeks (21 %). The lowest AS prevalence (9 %) was found in patients who underwent MOLP with C3 laminectomy and C7 spinous processes conserved. There was an intermediate AS prevalence after MOLP with C7 spinous processes conserved (16 %), MOLP with preservation of the unilateral posterior muscular-ligament complex (19 %), MOLP with C3 laminectomy (22 %), and MOLP with plate fixation (23 %). Prevalence of AS might be higher in patients <60 years and increased in populations with a higher proportion of females. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior cervical surgery carries a high risk of postoperative AS. Postoperative AS may be reduced through preserving posterior muscles and structures, stabilizing cervical vertebrae, and reducing external cervical immobilization time.

Clinical outcomes of two types of cages used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases: n-HA/PA66 cages versus PEEK cages.

This study reports the clinical effects of nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide66 cages (n-HA/PA66 cages) and compares the clinical outcomes between n-HA/PA66 and polyetheretherketone cages (PEEK cages) for application in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). A retrospective and case-control study involving 124 patients using n-HA/PA66 cages and 142 patients using PEEK cages was conducted. All patients underwent TLIF and had an average of 2-years of follow-up. The Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale were selected to assess the pain of low back and leg, as well as neurological status. The intervertebral space height and segmental angle were also measured to estimate the radiological changes. At the 1-year and final follow-ups, the fusion and subsidence rates were evaluated. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding clinical and radiological results. At the final follow-up, the bony fusion rate was 92.45 and 91.57 % for the n-HA/PA66 and PEEK groups, respectively, and the subsidence rate was 7.55 and 8.99 %, respectively. The study indicated that both n-HA/PA66 and PEEK cages could promote effective clinical and radiographic outcomes when used to treat degenerative lumbar diseases. The high fusion and low subsidence rates revealed that n-HA/PA66 cages could be an alternative ideal choice as the same to PEEK cages for lumbar reconstruction after TLIF.