ASP210: a potent oligonucleotide-based inhibitor effective against TKI-resistant CML cells.

Clinical experience with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) over the past two decades has shown that, despite the apparent therapeutic benefit, nearly 30% of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) display primary resistance or intolerance to TKIs, and approximately 25% of those treated are forced to switch TKIs at least once during therapy due to acquired resistance. Safe and effective treatment modalities targeting leukemic clones that escape TKI therapy could hence be game changers in the professional management of these patients. Here, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of a novel therapeutic oligonucleotide of unconventional design, called ASP210, to reduce BCR-ABL1 mRNA levels in TKI-resistant CML cells, with the assumption of inducing their apoptosis. Imatinib- and dasatinib-resistant sublines of BCR-ABL1-positive MOLM-7 and CML-T1 cells were established and exposed to 0.25 and 2.5 µM ASP210 for 10 days. RT-qPCR showed a remarkable reduction of the target mRNA level by >99% after a single application. Cell viability was monitored daily by trypan blue staining. In response to the lack of driver oncoprotein BCR-ABL1, TKI-resistant CML cells underwent apoptosis regardless of the presence of the clinically relevant T315I mutation by day 5 after redosing with ASP210. The effect was selective for cancer cells, indicating a favorable safety profile for this therapeutic modality. Furthermore, the spontaneous uptake and high intracellular concentrations of ASP210 suggest its potential to be effective at relatively low doses. The present findings suggest that ASP210 is a promising therapeutic avenue for patients with CML who fail to respond to TKI therapy.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Effective treatment modalities targeting leukemic clones that escape tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy could be game changers in the professional management of patients displaying primary resistance, intolerance, or acquired resistance to TKIs. Although delivering authentic innovations today is more complex than ever, we developed a highly potent and safe oligonucleotide-based modality against BCR-ABL1 mRNA named ASP210 that effectively induces cell death in BCR-ABL1-positive TKI-resistant cells while sparing BCR-ABL1-negative healthy cells.

Fungal infection frequency in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia patients treated with venetoclax plus azacitidine with or without antifungal prophylaxis.

Our observational study analysed fungal infection frequency within cohorts with versus without antifungal prophylaxis (AFP) among newly diagnosed first-line venetoclax and azacitidine (VEN + AZA)-treated acute myeloid leukaemias in Czech, Austrian and Slovak haematology centres. Among 186 patients, 85 (46%) received antifungal prophylaxis, while 101 (54%) received no prophylaxis. Fungal infections occurred in 1/85 patients with prophylaxis (1%) and 5/101 patients without prophylaxis (5%) (p = 0.222). No significant difference was recorded between cohorts with and without AFP in terms of death rate (p = 0.296) and overall survival (p = 0.844). In conclusion, most infections were not severe, developing during the first treatment-cycle and did not affect patients' overall outcome.

The beneficial effect of probiotics in the prevention of irinotecan-induced diarrhea in colorectal cancer patients with colostomy: a pooled analysis of two probiotic trials (Probio-SK-003 and Probio-SK-005) led by Slovak Cooperative Oncology Group.

Background: Probiotics could decrease irinotecan-induced diarrhea due to the reduction of intestinal beta-d-glucuronidase activity. This study included a combined analysis of two clinical trials aimed to determine the effectiveness of the probiotics in the prophylaxis of irinotecan-induced diarrhea in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Methods: This combined analysis included 46 patients with CRC enrolled in the Probio-SK-003 (NCT01410955) and 233 patients from Probio-SK-005 (NCT02819960) starting a new line of irinotecan-based therapy with identical eligibility criteria. Patients were randomized in a ratio 1:1 to probiotic formulas vs. placebo administered for 12 and 6 weeks, respectively. Due to the different durations of study treatments, only the first 6 weeks of therapy were used for analysis. Results: In total, 279 patients were randomized, including 142 patients in the placebo and 137 participants in the probiotic arm. Administration of probiotics did not significantly reduce the incidence of grade 3/4 diarrhea compared to placebo (placebo 12.7% vs. probiotics 6.6%, p = 0.11). Neither the overall incidence of diarrhea (placebo 48.6% vs. probiotics 41.6%, p = 0.28) nor the incidence of enterocolitis (placebo 4.2% vs. probiotics 0.7%, p = 0.12) was different in the placebo vs. probiotic arm. However, subgroup analysis revealed that patients with a colostomy who received a placebo had a significantly higher incidence of any diarrhea (placebo 51.2% vs. probiotics 25.7%, p = 0.028) and grade 3/4 diarrhea (placebo 14.6% vs. probiotics 0.0%, p = 0.03) compared to the probiotic arm. Conclusions: This combined analysis suggests that probiotics could be beneficial in the prevention of irinotecan-induced diarrhea in colorectal cancer patients with colostomy.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infections Presenting with Septic Shock in Neutropenic Cancer Patients: Impact of Empirical Antibiotic Therapy.

This large, multicenter, retrospective cohort study including onco-hematological neutropenic patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection (PABSI) found that among 1213 episodes, 411 (33%) presented with septic shock. The presence of solid tumors (33.3% vs. 20.2%, p < 0.001), a high-risk Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) index score (92.6% vs. 57.4%; p < 0.001), pneumonia (38% vs. 19.2% p < 0.001), and infection due to multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa (MDRPA) (33.8% vs. 21.1%, p < 0.001) were statistically significantly higher in patients with septic shock compared to those without. Patients with septic shock were more likely to receive inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy (IEAT) (21.7% vs. 16.2%, p = 0.020) and to present poorer outcomes, including a need for ICU admission (74% vs. 10.5%; p < 0.001), mechanical ventilation (49.1% vs. 5.6%; p < 0.001), and higher 7-day and 30-day case fatality rates (58.2% vs. 12%, p < 0.001, and 74% vs. 23.1%, p < 0.001, respectively). Risk factors for 30-day case fatality rate in patients with septic shock were orotracheal intubation, IEAT, infection due to MDRPA, and persistent PABSI. Therapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and BSI from the urinary tract were associated with improved survival. Carbapenems were the most frequent IEAT in patients with septic shock, and the use of empirical combination therapy showed a tendency towards improved survival. Our findings emphasize the need for tailored management strategies in this high-risk population.