Optimization of manual ventilation quality using respiratory function monitoring in neonates: A two-phase intervention trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was the evaluation of the impact of a respiratory function monitor (RFM, Neo100, Monivent AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) on the quality of ventilation in neonates. METHODS: This single-center two-phase intervention study was conducted at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and the delivery room of the Medical University of Vienna. Patients with clinical need for positive pressure ventilation were included in either of two consecutive study phases: (i) patients were ventilated with a hidden RFM (control) or (ii) visible RFM (intervention) during manual positive pressure ventilations. The duration of each phase was approximately six months. The primary outcome was the percentage of ventilations within a tidal volume range of 4-8 ml/kg (pVTe). RESULTS: A total of 90 patients (GA 22-66 weeks) were included. The primary outcome was significantly higher in the intervention group with a visible RFM (53.7%, SD 22.6) than in the control group without the monitor (37.3%, SD 20.5); (p < 0.001, mean difference [i.e., change in percentage points]: 16.95% CI: 7.4-35). In terms of secondary outcomes, excessive tidal volumes (>8ml/kg), potentially associated with an increased risk of brain injury, could be significantly reduced when a RFM was visible during ventilation (10.9% [IQR 26.4] vs. 29.5% [IQR 38.1]; p = 0.004). Furthermore, mask leakage could be significantly decreased (37.3% [SD 22.7] vs. 52.7% [SD 23.0]; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the clinical application of a RFM for manual ventilation of preterm and term infants leads to a significant improvement in ventilation parameters.

Real-Time Intubation and Ventilation Feedback: A Randomized Controlled Simulation Study.

BACKGROUNDS: This study aimed to determine the best educational application of a respiratory function monitor and a video laryngoscope. METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled simulation-based trial, including 167 medical students. Participants had to execute ventilation and intubation maneuvers on a newborn manikin. Participants were randomized into 3 groups. In group A (no-access), the feedback devices were not visible but recording. In group B (supervisor-access), the feedback devices were visible to the supervisor only. In group C (full-access), both the participant and the supervisor had visual access. RESULTS: The two main outcome variables were the percentage of ventilations within the tidal volume target range (4-8mL/kg) and the number of intubation attempts. Group C achieved the highest percentage of ventilations within the tidal volume target range (full-access 63.6%, supervisor-access 51.0%, no-access 31.1%, P < .001) and the lowest mask leakage (full-access 34.9%, supervisor-access 46.6%, no-access 61.6%; A to B: P < .001, A to C: P < .001, B to C: P = .003). Overall, group C achieved superior ventilation quality regarding primary and secondary outcome measures. The number of intubation attempts until success was lowest in the full-access group (full-access: 1.29, supervisor-access: 1.77, no-access: 2.43; A to B: P = .001, A to C: P < .001, B to C: P = .015). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that direct visual access to feedback devices for supervisor and trainees alike considerably benefits outcomes and can contribute to the future of clinical education.