Appendectomy by Pediatric Surgeons in North Carolina is Associated With Higher Charge Than General Surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: The delivery of pediatric surgical care for acute appendicitis involves general surgeons (GS) and pediatric surgeons (PS), but the differences in clinical practice are primarily undescribed. We examined charge differences between GS and PS for the treatment of pediatric acute appendicitis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the North Carolina hospital discharge database (2013-2017) in pediatric patients (≤18 y) who had surgery for appendiceal pathology (acute or chronic appendicitis and other appendiceal pathology). We performed a bivariate analysis of surgical charges over the type of surgical providers (GS, PS, other specialty, and unassigned surgeons). RESULTS: Over the study period, 21,049 patients had appendicitis or other diseases of the appendix, and 15,230 (72.4%) underwent appendectomy. Patients who were operated on by PS were younger (10 y, interquartile range (IQR): 6-13 versus 13 y, IQR: 9-16, P < 0.001). Acute appendicitis was diagnosed in 2860 (44.3%) and 3173 (49.2%) of the PS and GS cohorts, respectively, P = 0.008. PS compared to GS performed a higher percentage of laparoscopic (n = 2,697, 89.4% versus n = 2,178, 65.5%) than open appendectomies (n = 280, 9.3% versus n = 1,118, 33.6%), P < 0.001. The overall hospital charges were $28,081 (IQR: $21,706-$37,431) and $24,322 (IQR: $17,906-$32,226) for PS and GS, respectively, P < 0.001. Surgical charges where higher for PS than GS, $12,566 (IQR: $9802-$17,462) and $8051 (IQR: $5872-$2331), respectively. When controlling for diagnosis, surgical approach, emergent status, age, and surgical cost of appendiceal surgery, and hospital charges following appendiceal surgery were $4280 higher for PS than GS (95% CI: 3874-4687). CONCLUSIONS: The total charge for operations for appendiceal disease is significantly higher for PS compared to GS. Pediatric surgeons had increased surgical charges compared to GS but decreased radiology charges. The specific reasons for these differences are not clearly delineated in this data set and persist after controlling for relevant covariates. However, these data demonstrate that increasing value in pediatric appendicitis may require specialty-based targets.

The Effect of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol on Pediatric Colorectal Surgical Patient Outcomes at a Single Institution.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) have been associated with fewer postoperative complications in adult colorectal surgery patients, but there is a paucity of data on pediatric patients. Our aim is to describe the effect of an ERP, compared to conventional care, on pediatric colorectal surgical complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a single institution, retrospective cohort study (2014-2020) on pediatric (≤18 years old) colorectal surgery patients pre- and post-implementation of an ERP. Bivariate analysis and logistic regression were used to assess the effect of an ERP on return visits to the emergency room, reoperation, and readmission within 30-days. RESULTS: There were 194 patients included in this study, with 54 in the control cohort and 140 in the ERP cohort. There was no significant difference in the age, BMI, primary diagnosis, or use of laparoscopic technique between the cohorts. The ERP cohort had a significantly shorter foley duration, postoperative stay, and had nerve blocks performed. After controlling for pertinent covariates, the ERP cohort experienced higher odds of reoperation within 30 days (OR 5.83, P = .04). There was no significant difference in the other outcomes analyzed. CONCLUSION: In this study, there was no difference in the odds of overall complications, readmission or return to the ER within 30-days of surgery. However, although infrequent, there were higher odds of returns to the OR within 30 days. Future studies are needed to analyze how adherence to individual components may influence patient outcomes to ensure patient safety during ERP implementation.

Difference in Postoperative Outcomes and Perioperative Resource Utilization Between General Surgeons and Pediatric Surgeons: A Systematic Review.

Background: Both general surgeons (GS) and pediatric surgeons (PS) perform a high volume of appendectomies in pediatric patients, but there is a paucity of data on these outcomes based on surgeon training. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare postoperative outcomes and perioperative resource utilization for pediatric appendectomies.Methods: We searched PubMed to identify articles examining the association between surgeon specialization and outcomes for pediatric patients undergoing appendectomies. Study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and quality assessment were performed by one reviewer, with another reviewer to resolve discrepancies.Results: We identified 4799 articles, with 98.4% (4724/2799) concordance after initial review. Following resolution of discrepancies, 16 studies met inclusion criteria. Of the studies that reported each outcome, GS and PS demonstrated similar rates of readmission within 30 days (pooled RR 1.61 95% CI 0.66, 2.55) wound infections (pooled RR 1.07, 95% CI .55, 1.60), use of laparoscopic surgery (pooled RR 1.87, 95% CI .21, 3.53), postoperative complications (pooled RR 1.40, 95% CI .83, 1.97), use of preoperative imaging (pooled RR .98,95% CI .90, 1.05), and intra-abdominal abscesses (pooled RR .80, 95% CI .03, 1.58). Patients treated by GS did have a significantly higher risk of negative appendectomies (pooled RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.10, 1.84) when compared to PS.Discussion: This is the first meta-analysis to compare outcomes for pediatric appendectomies performed by GS compared to PS. Patient outcomes and resource utilization were similar among PS and GS, except for negative appendectomies were significantly more likely with GS.