RESUMO
Recent studies suggest human-derived intestinal epithelial cell (IEC) lines cultured as polarized monolayers on permeable Transwell® filters are effective at differentiating between hazardous and non-hazardous proteins following a single exposure. In this study, IEC polarized monolayers were subjected to hazardous or non-hazardous proteins in nine exposures over 30 days and compared to a single exposure of the same protein. The objective was to evaluate whether repeated exposures to a protein differently alter barrier integrity or compromise cell viability compared to single exposures. Proteins tested included Clostridium difficile toxin A, Streptolysin O, Wheat Germ Agglutinin, Phaseolus vulgaris Hemagglutinin-E, bovine serum albumin, porcine serum albumin, and fibronectin. Evidence of diminished barrier integrity and/or cell viability following exposure to hazardous proteins was more pronounced in magnitude when IECs were subjected to multiple rather than single exposures. In some cases, an effect on IEC monolayers was observed only with repeated exposures. In general, IEC responses to non-hazardous proteins following either single or repeated exposures were minimal. Results from these studies support the utility of using cultured human IEC polarized monolayers to differentiate between hazardous and non-hazardous proteins and suggest that repeated exposures may reveal a greater magnitude of response when compared to single exposures.
Assuntos
Mucosa Intestinal/patologia , Proteínas/toxicidade , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Células Epiteliais/metabolismo , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Mucosa Intestinal/metabolismoRESUMO
Recent studies suggest that human derived intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) cultured as polarized monolayers on Transwell® filters may respond differently when exposed to hazardous and non-hazardous proteins. This experimental platform was based on apical exposure of IEC monolayers to test proteins for 24â¯h followed by assessment of barrier integrity and cell viability. In this study, Caco-2 and T84 IEC polarized monolayers were evaluated for barrier integrity and cytotoxicity following exposure to hazardous and non-hazardous proteins for 24, 48 and 72â¯h. Hazardous proteins included Clostridium difficile toxin A (ToxA), Streptolysin O (SLO), Wheat Germ Agglutinin (WGA), and Phaseolus vulgaris haemagglutinin-E (PHA-E). Non-hazardous proteins included bovine serum albumin (BSA), porcine serum albumin (PSA), and fibronectin (Fbn). In general, evidence of diminished barrier integrity or cell viability observed following exposure to hazardous proteins for 24â¯h was more pronounced after 48 and 72â¯h for both IEC monolayers. Non-hazardous proteins exhibiting no impact following 24â¯h of exposure elicited minimal effects over longer exposure durations. These results support the utility of using cultured human IEC polarized monolayers to differentiate between hazardous and non-hazardous proteins and suggest that longer durations of exposure may further improve the ability to distinguish between them.
Assuntos
Mucosa Intestinal/efeitos dos fármacos , Proteínas/farmacologia , Proteínas/toxicidade , Células CACO-2 , Permeabilidade da Membrana Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , HumanosRESUMO
An experimental platform employing human derived intestinal epithelial cell (IEC) line monolayers grown on permeable Transwell® filters was previously investigated to differentiate between hazardous and innocuous proteins. This approach was effective at distinguishing these types of proteins and perturbation of monolayer integrity, particularly transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER), was the most sensitive indicator. In the current report, in vitro indicators of monolayer integrity, cytotoxicity, and inflammation were evaluated using primary (non-transformed) human polarized small intestinal epithelial barriers cultured on Transwell® filters to compare effects of a hazardous protein (Clostridium difficile Toxin A [ToxA]) and an innocuous protein (bovine serum albumin [BSA]). ToxA exerted a reproducible decrease on barrier integrity at doses comparable to those producing effects observed from cell line-derived IEC monolayers, with TEER being the most sensitive indicator. In contrast, BSA, tested at concentrations substantially higher than ToxA, did not cause changes in any of the tested variables. These results demonstrate a similarity in response to certain proteins between cell line-derived polarized IEC models and a primary human polarized small intestinal epithelial barrier model, thereby reinforcing the potential usefulness of cell line-derived polarized IECs as a valid experimental platform to differentiate between hazardous and non-hazardous proteins.
Assuntos
Toxinas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Enterotoxinas/metabolismo , Células Epiteliais/metabolismo , Intestino Delgado/metabolismo , Soroalbumina Bovina/metabolismo , Transporte Biológico , Permeabilidade da Membrana Celular , Impedância Elétrica , Células Epiteliais/química , Humanos , Intestino Delgado/química , Intestino Delgado/citologiaRESUMO
The intestinal immune system discriminates between potentially harmful and harmless foreign proteins. The basis for this differential response may be related to the conditions of antigen presentation by antigen-presenting cells, as determined by their phenotype or activation state. How these conditions affect specific immunologic unresponsiveness to later challenge with an antigen is not known. Two possible mechanisms are the induction of anergy or deletion of responsive cells and the activation of regulatory cells or mediators, and the mechanism may very depending on the tolerizing regimen used. Should regulatory cells be involved, they are speculated to induce tolerance through their production of inhibitory cytokines, such as IL-4, IL-10, and TGF-beta. Studies using specific antibodies and selective genetic knockout (KO) strains of mice, however, have provided conflicting data. A final intriguing possibility is that tolerance results from cognate interactions between T cells and APCs, so that tolerant T cells or APCs prime T cells they contact to deliver a tolerogenic signal to the next T cell they encounter, possibly through a function dependent on interactions between Notch family receptors and their ligands. As with many questions in mucosal immunology, definition of the mechanisms of oral tolerance (OT) has proved difficult to address experimentally, but promising approaches include study of the distribution of fed antigen, of targeted genetic KOs, and of transgenic strains.