Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Ano de publicação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 13: 111, 2013 Feb 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23448529

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Published models predicting nasal colonization with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among hospital admissions predominantly focus on separation of carriers from non-carriers and are frequently evaluated using measures of discrimination. In contrast, accurate estimation of carriage probability, which may inform decisions regarding treatment and infection control, is rarely assessed. Furthermore, no published models adjust for MRSA prevalence. METHODS: Using logistic regression, a scoring system (values from 0 to 200) predicting nasal carriage of MRSA was created using a derivation cohort of 3091 individuals admitted to a European tertiary referral center between July 2007 and March 2008. The expected positive predictive value of a rapid diagnostic test (GeneOhm, Becton & Dickinson Co.) was modeled using non-linear regression according to score. Models were validated on a second cohort from the same hospital consisting of 2043 patients admitted between August 2008 and January 2012. Our suggested correction score for prevalence was proportional to the log-transformed odds ratio between cohorts. Calibration before and after correction, i.e. accurate classification into arbitrary strata, was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow-Test. RESULTS: Treating culture as reference, the rapid diagnostic test had positive predictive values of 64.8% and 54.0% in derivation and internal validation corhorts with prevalences of 2.3% and 1.7%, respectively. In addition to low prevalence, low positive predictive values were due to high proportion (> 66%) of mecA-negative Staphylococcus aureus among false positive results. Age, nursing home residence, admission through the medical emergency department, and ICD-10-GM admission diagnoses starting with "A" or "J" were associated with MRSA carriage and were thus included in the scoring system, which showed good calibration in predicting probability of carriage and the rapid diagnostic test's expected positive predictive value. Calibration for both probability of carriage and expected positive predictive value in the internal validation cohort was improved by applying the correction score. CONCLUSIONS: Given a set of patient parameters, the presented models accurately predict a) probability of nasal carriage of MRSA and b) a rapid diagnostic test's expected positive predictive value. While the former can inform decisions regarding empiric antibiotic treatment and infection control, the latter can influence choice of screening method.


Assuntos
Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Modelos Biológicos , Cavidade Nasal/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Calibragem , Portador Sadio/diagnóstico , Portador Sadio/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dinâmica não Linear , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prevalência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA