Does the adenosine deaminase (ADA) gene confer risk of sleepwalking?

Sleepwalking is a common non-rapid eye movement (NREM) parasomnia and a significant cause of sleep-related injuries. While evidence suggest that the occurrence of this condition is partly determined by genetic factors, its pattern of inheritance remains unclear, and few molecular studies have been conducted. One promising candidate is the adenosine deaminase (ADA) gene. Adenosine and the ADA enzyme play an important role in the homeostatic regulation of NREM sleep. In a single sleepwalking family, genome-wide analysis identified a locus on chromosome 20, where ADA lies. In this study, we examined if variants in the ADA gene were associated with sleepwalking. In total, 251 sleepwalking patients were clinically assessed, and DNA samples were compared to those from 94 unaffected controls. Next-generation sequencing of the whole ADA gene was performed. Bio-informatic analysis enabled the identification of variants and assessed variants enrichment in our cohort compared to controls. We detected 25 different coding and non-coding variants, of which 22 were found among sleepwalkers. None were enriched in the sleepwalking population. However, many missense variants were predicted as likely pathogenic by at least two in silico prediction algorithms. This study involves the largest sleepwalking cohort in which the role of a susceptibility gene was investigated. Our results did not reveal an association between ADA gene and sleepwalking, thus ruling out the possibility of ADA as a major genetic factor for this condition. Future work is needed to identify susceptibility genes.

Reassessing GWAS findings for the shared genetic basis of insomnia and restless legs syndrome.

Two genome-wide association studies (GWAS) suggest that insomnia and restless legs syndrome (RLS) share a common genetic basis. While the identified genetic variation in the MEIS1 gene was previously associated with RLS, the two GWAS suggest a novel and independent association with insomnia symptoms. To test the potential pleiotropic effect of MEIS1, we genotyped three MEIS1 variants in 646 chronic insomnia disorder (CID) patients with and without RLS. To confirm our results, we compared the allelic and genotypic distributions of the CID cohort with ethnically matched controls and RLS cases in the French Canadian cohort. The CID cohort was diagnosed by sleep medicine specialists and 26% of the sample received the combined diagnosis of CID+RLS. We find significant differences in allele and genotype distributions between CID-only and CID+RLS groups, suggesting that MEIS1 is only associated with RLS. Genotype distributions and minor allele frequencies of the three MEIS1 SNPs of the CID-only and control groups were similar (rs113851554: 5.3% vs. 5.6%; rs2300478: 25.3% vs. 26.5%; rs12469063: 23.6% vs. 24.4%; all p > 0.05). Likewise, there were no differences between CID+RLS and RLS-only groups (all p > 0.05). In conclusion, our data confirms that MEIS1 is a genetic risk factor for the development of RLS, but it does not support the pleiotropic effect of MEIS1 in CID. While a lack of power precluded us from refuting small pleiotropic effects, our findings emphasize the critical importance of isolating CID from other disorders that can cause sleep difficulties, particularly RLS, for future genetic studies.