Fosfomycin for Treatment of Prostatitis: New Tricks for Old Dogs.

Treatment options for prostatitis caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli are limited. We report two cases cured with oral fosfomycin and provide a pharmacokinetic analysis of fosfomycin predose concentrations during treatment.

Optimal timing of oral fosfomycin administration for pre-prostate biopsy prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVES: As the optimal administration time for fosfomycin peri-procedural prophylaxis is unclear, we sought to determine optimal administration times for fosfomycin peri-procedural prophylaxis. METHODS: Plasma, peripheral zone and transition zone fosfomycin concentrations were obtained from 26 subjects undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), following a single oral dose of 3 g of fosfomycin. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was completed with the Nonparametric Adaptive Grid (NPAG) algorithm (Pmetrics package for R), with a four-compartment model. Plasma and tissue concentrations were simulated during the first 24 h post-dose, comparing these with EUCAST susceptibility breakpoints for Escherichia coli, a common uropathogen. RESULTS: Non-compartmental-determined pharmacokinetic values in our population were similar to those reported in the package insert. Predicted plasma concentrations rapidly increased after the first hour, giving more than 90% population coverage for organisms with an MIC ≤4 mg/L over the first 12 h post-dose. Organisms with higher MICs fared much worse, with organisms at the EUCAST breakpoint being covered for <10% of the population at any time. Transitional zone prostate concentrations exceeded 4 mg/L for 90% of the population between hours 1 and 9. Peripheral zone prostate concentrations were much lower and only exceeded 4 mg/L for 70% of the population between hours 1 and 4. CONCLUSIONS: Until more precise plasma and tissue data are available, we recommend that fosfomycin prophylaxis be given 1-4 h prior to prostate biopsy. We do not recommend fosfomycin prophylaxis for subjects with known organisms with MICs >4 mg/L.

Hyperfiltration in Indigenous Australians with and without diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Hyperfiltration (HF) has been linked to the development of diabetic kidney disease (DKD), but the causative or predictive role of HF in the pathogenesis of DKD still remains unclear. To date, there have been no studies of HF in Indigenous Australians, a population with high rates of both diabetes and end-stage kidney disease. We aimed to compare the characteristics and frequency of HF in Indigenous Australians with and without type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Indigenous Australian participants, recruited across five pre-defined strata of health, diabetes status and kidney function, had a reference glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measured using plasma disappearance of iohexol [measured GFR(mGFR)] over 4 h. HF was defined in various ways: (i) mGFR > 144 mL/min/1.73 m(2), which is mGFR > 1.96 × SD above the mean of the mGFR in non-diabetic participants with normal albuminuria and normal renal function (mGFR > 90 mL/min/1.73 m(2)); (ii) age-corrected mGFR (>144 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) to account for the effect of ageing on GFR in subjects over 40 years of age with cut-off 1 mL/min/1.73 m(2) lower for every year; (iii) mGFR > 144 mL/min, without correction for body surface area or age, as well as (iv) mGFR > 125 mL/min/1.73 m(2), without adjustment for age. RESULTS: A total of 383 Indigenous participants, 125 with and 258 without diabetes, with mGFR > 90 mL/min/1.73 m(2) were studied. The proportion of participants with HF was 7% using mGFR > 144 mL/min/1.73 m(2), 11% using the age-adjusted definition, 19% using mGFR > 144 mL/min and 27% using mGFR > 125 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Diabetes was more common in participants with HF (40-74%) compared with normofiltering participants (28-31%), regardless of the definition of HF. CONCLUSIONS: HF exists in Indigenous Australians with and without diabetes. A greater proportion of participants had diabetes in HF group compared with normofiltration group. Long-term follow-up of this cohort is necessary to determine if HF plays a role in the development of DKD and non-DKD.

Cure of Limb-Threatening XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection: Combining Genome Sequencing, Therapeutic Drug Level Monitoring, and Surgical Debridement.

We describe a case of limb-threatening osteomyelitis and metalware infection with carbapenemase-producing extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa successfully cured with aggressive surgical debridement and combined intravenous fosfomycin and colistin. Real-time therapeutic drug monitoring was used to maximize probability of efficacy and minimize potential for toxicity.

Study Protocol--accurate assessment of kidney function in Indigenous Australians: aims and methods of the eGFR study.

BACKGROUND: There is an overwhelming burden of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease among Indigenous Australians. In this high risk population, it is vital that we are able to measure accurately kidney function. Glomerular filtration rate is the best overall marker of kidney function. However, differences in body build and body composition between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians suggest that creatinine-based estimates of glomerular filtration rate derived for European populations may not be appropriate for Indigenous Australians. The burden of kidney disease is borne disproportionately by Indigenous Australians in central and northern Australia, and there is significant heterogeneity in body build and composition within and amongst these groups. This heterogeneity might differentially affect the accuracy of estimation of glomerular filtration rate between different Indigenous groups. By assessing kidney function in Indigenous Australians from Northern Queensland, Northern Territory and Western Australia, we aim to determine a validated and practical measure of glomerular filtration rate suitable for use in all Indigenous Australians. METHODS/DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of Indigenous Australian adults (target n = 600, 50% male) across 4 sites: Top End, Northern Territory; Central Australia; Far North Queensland and Western Australia. The reference measure of glomerular filtration rate was the plasma disappearance rate of iohexol over 4 hours. We will compare the accuracy of the following glomerular filtration rate measures with the reference measure: Modification of Diet in Renal Disease 4-variable formula, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation, Cockcroft-Gault formula and cystatin C- derived estimates. Detailed assessment of body build and composition was performed using anthropometric measurements, skinfold thicknesses, bioelectrical impedance and a sub-study used dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. A questionnaire was performed for socio-economic status and medical history. DISCUSSION: We have successfully managed several operational challenges within this multi-centre complex clinical research project performed across remote North, Western and Central Australia. It seems unlikely that a single correction factor (similar to that for African-Americans) to the equation for estimated glomerular filtration rate will prove appropriate or practical for Indigenous Australians. However, it may be that a modification of the equation in Indigenous Australians would be to include a measure of fat-free mass.

Comparison of creatinine and cystatin C based eGFR in the estimation of glomerular filtration rate in Indigenous Australians: The eGFR Study.

BACKGROUND: The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation that combines creatinine and cystatin C is superior to equations that include either measure alone in estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR). However, whether cystatin C can provide any additional benefits in estimating GFR for Indigenous Australians, a population at high risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is unknown. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional analysis from the eGFR Study of 654 Indigenous Australians at high risk of ESKD, eGFR was calculated using the CKD-EPI equations for serum creatinine (eGFRcr), cystatin C (eGFRcysC) and combined creatinine and cystatin C (eGFRcysC+cr). Reference GFR (mGFR) was determined using a non-isotopic iohexol plasma disappearance technique over 4h. Performance of each equation to mGFR was assessed by calculating bias, % bias, precision and accuracy for the total population, and according to age, sex, kidney disease, diabetes, obesity and c-reactive protein. RESULTS: Data were available for 542 participants (38% men, mean [sd] age 45 [14] years). Bias was significantly greater for eGFRcysC (15.0mL/min/1.73m2; 95% CI 13.3-16.4, p<0.001) and eGFRcysC+cr (10.3; 8.8-11.5, p<0.001) compared to eGFRcr (5.4; 3.0-7.2). Accuracy was lower for eGFRcysC (80.3%; 76.7-83.5, p<0.001) but not for eGFRcysC+cr (91.9; 89.3-94.0, p=0.29) compared to eGFRcr (90.0; 87.2-92.4). Precision was comparable for all equations. The performance of eGFRcysC deteriorated across increasing levels of c-reactive protein. CONCLUSION: Cystatin C based eGFR equations may not perform well in populations with high levels of chronic inflammation. CKD-EPI eGFR based on serum creatinine remains the preferred equation in Indigenous Australians.

Atypical pharmacokinetics and excretion of new platinum analogues in rodents.

PURPOSE: Two new series of platinum complexes with cytotoxic activity in vivo are [Pt(NRCH2)2L2], (R=polyfluorophenyl, L=pyridine or substituted pyridine) and [Pt(NRCH2CH2NR'2)2L(X)], (R, L as before; R'=Me or Et, X=halogen). The aim of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics and excretion in mice and in isolated perfused rat livers of a representative compound from each class, respectively: Pt103 (R=p-HC6F4, L=pyridine) and Pt109 (R, L as for Pt103, R'=Et, X=I). METHODS: Mice were given intraperitoneal injections of active doses of Pt103, Pt109, or cisplatin in a variety of vehicles. Blood was sampled at several times to 48 h. Some mice were placed in metabolic cages where urine and feces were collected. In isolated, perfused rat livers, perfusate and bile were collected following a dose of Pt103, cisplatin or carboplatin. Platinum was measured in blood, urine, feces, or perfusate by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Three vehicles used were peanut oil, dimethyl sulphoxide, and saline/Tween 20. RESULTS: In contrast to renal excretion of over 70% for cisplatin in saline, urinary excretion of platinum was less than 24% of a dose of Pt109 in peanut oil, less than 21% of P103 in DMSO, and only 4% for Pt103 in peanut oil. Over 60% of Pt103 was eliminated in mouse feces, and 57% was excreted in bile from rat liver. Plasma protein binding of Pt109 was greater than 90% at 6 h following administration in mice. CONCLUSION: In contrast to cisplatin and carboplatin, representatives of two new classes of platinum anticancer agents undergo minimal renal elimination, but are excreted mainly in the bile and feces. If a platinum complex with a similar excretion profile was introduced into the clinic, there might be a therapeutic advantage in terms of drug toxicity and combination therapy with other cytotoxics.

A randomized cross-over trial to determine the effect of Cremophor EL on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of carboplatin chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Paclitaxel, when combined with carboplatin, exhibits a platelet-sparing effect. Paclitaxel is formulated in Cremophor EL (CrEL), which has been shown in preclinical models to reduce haematological toxicity from radiotherapy and chemotherapy. We sought to determine the effect of a 3-h infusion of 20 ml/m2 (equivalent to 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel) CrEL on myelosuppression following carboplatin chemotherapy, and the effect of CrEL on carboplatin pharmacokinetics. METHODS: A total of 16 patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer were randomized to receive either CrEL or saline over 3 h prior to carboplatin (area under the curve, AUC, 5-7). Each patient was subsequently crossed over to the other treatment. Blood samples were collected at selected time-points for estimation of platinum AUC and 24-h platinum levels. Full blood counts were obtained three times per week. RESULTS: Of the 16 patients randomized, 15 were evaluable. Myelosuppression was measured by percentage fall at nadir and nadir levels. No significant differences were obtained when comparing CrEL and saline with respect to the above end-points after adjusting for multiple testing. There was no evidence to indicate that CrEL altered the pharmacokinetics of carboplatin. CONCLUSION: CrEL at this dose and schedule does not appear to be a major contributory factor to the platelet-sparing effect of paclitaxel when combined with carboplatin, nor does it alter the pharmacokinetics of carboplatin.