Clinical and bacteriological efficacy of pivmecillinam treatment for uncomplicated urinary tract infections caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli: a prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study.

Objectives: To compare the clinical and bacteriological outcomes of pivmecillinam treatment for community-acquired urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli versus non-ESBL-producing E. coli in an outpatient setting. Methods: A prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study of women aged ≥16 years, with pivmecillinam-treated community-acquired UTIs caused by E. coli with or without ESBL production, recruited from primary care, was conducted in the period from April 2013 to August 2016. Eighty-eight women (mean age 49.4 years) with community-acquired UTIs caused by ESBL-producing E. coli were compared with a control group of 74 women (mean age 50.1 years). Trial registration: Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REC) in Norway, ID 2011/2214, and ClinicalTrials.gov, ID NCT01531023. Results: The median time until symptom resolution after treatment initiation was 5 days for the ESBL cases and 3 days for the non-ESBL controls (P < 0.01). The proportion of women warranting a second antibiotic prescription in the follow-up period was higher for the ESBL cases [30/88 (34.1%) versus 10/72 (13.9%), P < 0.01]. Persistent bacteriuria was non-significantly more common among ESBL cases than in the control group [15/81 (18.5%) versus 6/67 (9.0%), P = 0.10]. A pivmecillinam dosage of 200 mg given three times daily for ≤5 days was associated with treatment failure (OR 4.77, 95% CI 1.40-19.44, P = 0.03) for the ESBL E. coli group. For the subgroup treated with 400 mg of pivmecillinam given three times daily there was no significantly increased OR for treatment failure between ESBL cases and the control group irrespective of treatment duration. Conclusions: Pivmecillinam given at 400 mg three times daily gave comparable clinical and bacteriological cure rates in women with community-acquired E. coli UTIs irrespective of ESBL production.

Thymectomy via open surgery or robotic video assisted thoracic surgery: Can a recommendation already be made?

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RVATS) is a relatively new technique applied for thymectomies. Only few studies directly compare RVATS to the mainstay therapy, open surgery (sternotomy). METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was performed in October 2016. The meta-analysis includes studies comparing robotassisted and open thymectomy regarding operation time, length of hospitalization, intraoperative blood loss, and chest-in-tube days, postoperative complications, reoperation, arrhythmic events, pleural effusion, and postoperative bleeding. RESULTS: Of 626 studies preliminary screened, 7 articles were included. There were no significant differences in comparison of operation time (-3.19 minutes [95% confidence interval, 95% CI -112.43 to 106.05]; P = .94), but patients undergoing RVATS spent significantly less time in hospital (-4.06 days [95% CI -7.98 to -0.13], P = .046). There were fewer chests-in-tube days (-2.50 days [95% CI -15.01 to 10.01]; P = .24) and less intraoperative blood loss (-256.84 mL [95% CI -627.47 to 113.80]; P = .10) observed in the RVATS group; due to a small number of studies, these results were not statistically significant. There were also less post-operative complications in the RVATS group (12 complications in 209 patients vs 51 complications in 259 patients); however, this difference was not statistical significant (odds ratio 0.27, 95% CI 0.07-1.12; P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing RVATS spent less time in hospital than patients treated by open surgery (sternotomy). These patients tended to have less postoperative complications, less intraoperative blood loss, and fewer chest-in-tube days. We found evidence for the safety and feasibility of RVATS compared with open surgery, which has to be further confirmed in randomised controlled trials.