Female gender does not increase perioperative risk in coronary bypass surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Female gender has been identified as an independent risk factor for perioperative mortality in several risk scores for cardiac surgery. Since no explanation has been given for this, this study aimed to evaluate potential differences in the distribution of other risk factors between the genders. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 10 714 consecutive coronary bypass patients were analyzed retrospectively. The distribution of the risk factors as used in the EuroSCORE was evaluated. Diabetes mellitus was added to the analysis as an additional risk factor. Patients aged between 60 and 70 years without any additional risk factors were directly compared in a subgroup analysis. Statistical analysis was done using the T-test or chi-square test where appropriate. RESULTS: Female patients were significantly older compared to male ones (69.1 ± 8.5 vs. 65.4 ± 4 years, P < 0.05). The distribution of the analyzed risk factors did not differ except for diabetes mellitus: female patients were more likely to present with diabetes (42 % vs. 29 %, P < 0.05) and in diabetic patients, the incidence of insulin dependency was higher in female patients (50 % vs. 33 %, P < 0.05). Overall perioperative mortality was higher in female patients (2.7 % vs. 1.8 %, P < 0.05). This difference increased when diabetes was present (3.9 % vs. 1.8 %, P < 0.05) and was even higher in insulin-dependent patients (4.9 % vs. 1.9 %, P < 0.05). However, when adjusting for age and diabetes, the differences were reduced. This was most evident when subgroups of age-adjusted patients without any additional risk factors were analyzed: no gender-specific difference in perioperative mortality was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Female gender itself did not present as an independent risk factor. The presence of diabetes mellitus increased the risk in female patients significantly more than in male patients. The higher prevalence of diabetes in female patients in combination with the older age at presentation might result in the higher overall mortality observed in female patients compared to men.

Coronary artery surgery: now and in the next decade.

In coronary artery surgery the superiority of the internal mammary artery graft in 10-year survival was documented in 1986. In 1999 it was demonstrated that death, reoperation and percutaneous transluminary coronary angioplasty were more frequent in patients undergoing single rather than bilateral internal mammary artery grafting. Today coronary artery bypass grafting surgery is challenged by the success story of modern interventional cardiology. The Syntax Study, however, clearly underlined the better outcome for patients with triple-vessel and/or left main disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in terms of repeat revascularization. Another point of ongoing discussion is the comparison between on-pump and off-pump coronary artery revascularization techniques. Even if mixed results exists in the literature, in experienced hands the combination of aortic no-touch and total arterial revascularization, probably leads to the superiority in off pump coronary artery bypass grafting in terms of significantly decreased rates of mortality, stroke, major adverse cardiac and cerebral vascular events. Coronary artery surgery in the next decade will be influenced by the further progression of minimally invasive surgical principles and by a variety of other factors. The role of robotics and hybrid surgery has yet to be defined. Alternatives within surgery will not only need to move to a less disruptive strategy (e.g. from on-pump to off-pump bypass) but also have to secure sustained innovation, as we can be sure that the current coronary artery bypass grafting activity will change substantially.

Management of sterno-mediastinitis.

With an incidence rate of 1-4%, mediastinitis following cardiac surgery is a rarely occurring complication, but may show a mortality rate of up to 50%. Risk factors for sternal instability are insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, obesity, immunosuppressed state, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteoporosis, history of radiation, renal failure, body height, smoking and nutritional state. The aim of this paper is to show an overview of this clinical picture, present the risk factors and elucidate the therapy options chronologically. As a result of interdisciplinary cooperation, a therapy concept has developed which is adapted to the patient individually. Therapy begins with the simplest measures and, if deemed necessary, this is then escalated step by step. The aim of the treatment is to bring the infection under control, which requires radical surgical debridement, removal of infected and necrotic tissue, removal of all foreign bodies (including wires and osteosynthesis material) and the removal of all infected, necrotic osseous material if necessary followed by vacuum-assisted closure therapy. The reconstruction of defects of the anterior chest wall is achievable using different muscle flaps. Mostly the muscle pectoralis major is used unilaterally or bilaterally with or without disinsertion of the tendon. Other options are the omental flap, the muscle latissimus dorsi flap or the muscle rectus abdominis flap. A combined approach comprising surgical debridement, short-term vacuum therapy and subsequent myoplastic coverage has proved successful and can be carried out with a high standard of safety.