Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Transplant Proc ; 54(5): 1236-1241, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35643831

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite progressive improvements in graft and patient survival after kidney transplantation over the last decades, an increasing number of patients are waitlisted for retransplantation. Identifying the risk factors for second graft failure can help us improve management for such patients. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of kidney retransplantation with those of first transplantation. METHODS: This retrospective study included all the recipients of a second kidney transplant between January 2008 and December 2019. For each patient with a second kidney transplant, we selected the paired recipient from the same donor. We excluded recipients of donations from living donors, patient-and-donor pairs with more than 1 transplant, and patients without a pair. The follow-up took place December 31, 2020. We included 152 patients, corresponding to 76 pairs of recipients. RESULTS: Patients who underwent a second transplant had significantly higher panel reactive antibody values and longer waiting time for retransplantation. Biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes were doubled in patients undergoing a second transplant (P = .12). There was a lower survival of second grafts at the first, fifth, and 10th year (P < .05). The main factor influencing graft loss for both groups was acute rejection, and, in patients, with a second transplant, acute rejection increased the risk of graft loss by 17 times (odds ratio, 17.5; 95% confidence interval, 4.19-98). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical results of second kidney transplants still fall short of first transplants, with the main factor of poor prognosis being acute rejection. In young patients, allocation and immunosuppression management should consider this risk to improve long-term outcomes.


Assuntos
Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Doadores Vivos , Rejeição de Enxerto/etiologia , Humanos , Rim , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Case Rep Nephrol Dial ; 11(1): 48-54, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33708799

RESUMO

Nutcracker syndrome, whose prevalence and natural history are still poorly known, is a clinical syndrome caused by left renal vein compression between the superior mesenteric artery and the aorta. Long-term results and treatment outcomes are not well known. Our group aimed to characterize 7 patients diagnosed with nutcracker syndrome in childhood and to describe their clinical manifestations, diagnostic approaches, and mostly their clinical evolution, rate of complications, and treatment outcomes.

3.
Case Rep Nephrol Dial ; 11(3): 340-347, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35083289

RESUMO

Deficiency of adenosine deaminase 2 (DADA2) is a unique monogenic autoinflammatory disease caused by autosomal recessive loss-of-function mutations in the CECR1 gene which presents as childhood-onset small- and medium-vessel vasculitis. Previously, many of these patients were misdiagnosed and thought to have clinical features of systemic polyarteritis nodosum, which negatively influenced its outcome, since TNF inhibitors seem to have efficacy on the vasculitic phenotype of DADA2. We present a case of a 28-year-old woman with a lifelong unknown syndrome and unique clinical manifestations recently recognized as DADA2. The first manifestation, at 3 months of age, was an episode of facial paralysis during which renovascular hypertension was diagnosed. Later, she developed episodes of prolonged fever, polyarthritis, Raynaud's phenomenon, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracerebral hemorrhage. This inflammatory state ultimately led to the development of amyloid A amyloidosis and renal insufficiency.

4.
Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis ; 14: 421-426, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34887676

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The development of vaccines to prevent COVID-19 breakouts came with highly positive results but some unexpected side effects. Rare side effects have been seen with the BNT162b2 SARS-CoV 2 vaccine. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 45-year-old female patient who developed an acute kidney injury needing urgent hemodialysis one week after the second administration of the BNT162b2 SARS-CoV 2 vaccine. She developed a macular rash on her lower limbs and palms as well. A kidney biopsy was performed 10 days after vaccine inoculation, diagnosing acute interstitial nephritis and acute tubular necrosis with cellular casts. The patient was treated with three corticosteroid pulses followed by daily prednisolone. We witnessed clinical improvement 4 days after the initial corticosteroid treatment with progressive recovery of kidney function and hemodialysis withdrawal. After 2 weeks, the patient had recovered her kidney function. Immunophenotyping was performed, diagnosing a hypersensitivity to the vaccine and the polyethylene glycol excipient. CONCLUSION: Patients may develop acute reactions to vaccines. In this case, symptoms seem to correlate significantly with its inoculation and, although this case had a favourable outcome, these side effects must be made aware for clinicians and patients.

5.
J Vasc Access ; 21(6): 1049-1052, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31856637

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Angiosarcomas are rare tumors, comprising less than 1% of all sarcomas. However, they portend a poor prognosis, as they tend to metastasize early, being of uttermost importance a prompt diagnosis and treatment. CASE DESCRIPTION: We present the case of a 55-year-old female with history of kidney transplantation, immunosuppressed with tacrolimus, prednisolone, and mofetil mycophenolate. Fifteen years after the transplant, she developed an ulcerated lesion on the site of a nonfunctioning arteriovenous graft, which was excised. Histology was compatible with a high grade angiosarcoma that invaded the margins, and immunosuppression was switched to everolimus. Staging imaging exams revealed lymph node, muscle, and lung metastases. Shortly after, nodular lesions appeared compatible with local recurrence of the disease, and the patient showed severe deterioration of her clinical condition, being proposed for palliative chemotherapy. However, the disease showed an explosive progression and the patient died before starting the treatment. CONCLUSION: This case emphasizes the importance of including inspection of the vascular access (functioning or not) in regular post-transplant consultation and value any alterations in the attempt of a timely diagnosis. Although rare, angiosarcoma is an important entity that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of soft tissue masses arising from a vascular access, especially in immunocompromised patients. Aggressive treatment should be offered whenever possible.


Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Hemangiossarcoma/etiologia , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/etiologia , Progressão da Doença , Evolução Fatal , Feminino , Hemangiossarcoma/imunologia , Hemangiossarcoma/secundário , Hemangiossarcoma/cirurgia , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/imunologia , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/patologia , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA