RESUMO
The aim of this systematic review was to establish the current status of the subject and find out what scientific evidence we have on the use of autologous plasma concentrates (APCs) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) as complementary therapies at the management of Medication-related Osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). We performed a literature search of articles published between December 2019 to January 2020 in electronic databases, in accordance to PRISMA system. The variables analyzed were: the number of patients, age, sex, medical history, origin of MRONJ, imaging studies, treatment performed, and evolution of MRONJ. The articles included in the review were grouped into two groups (Group A "Therapy with APCs" and Group B "Therapy with APCs and MSCs"). Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the articles. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate eventual differences between groups. Of the 306 patients who were included, 297 belonged to Group A and 9 to Group B. In our sample, women predominated against men and no significant differences in age were observed. Osteoporosis was the most frequent underlying disease in both groups. The most common origin of MRONJ was oral surgery in group A. Conservative surgery was performed in all patients, but complementary treatment was applied in different ways in each group. The resolution of the pathology was achieved in 90% of cases in both groups without significant differences between them. The mean score of the reviewed studies at NOS was 4. There are currently no published scientific data that can sufficiently support the use of APCs and MSCs for the treatment of established MRONJs.
Assuntos
Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Células-Tronco Mesenquimais , Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos/cirurgia , Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Transplante AutólogoRESUMO
We performed a systematic review of the literature about descending necrotising mediastinitis (DNM) of odontogenic origin. In parallel, a retrospective review of this pathology was carried out in an Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Service of a reference hospital for a population of 1,100,000 inhabitants. The main objectives were to determine changes in mortality and prevalence of this serious complication. The systematic review included 51 articles with 89 patients and our study comprised seven patients. The period of time with the highest number of cases was between 2000-2009 (38 patients). The percentage of mortality observed was 20.2% in diffuse DNM and 4.9% in localised DNM. Thirty-one patients with DNM in our review were admitted for more than 41 days. Despite evidence of a decrease in DNM cases, publications have increased over the years, but it does not appear to be due to an increase in those of odontogenic origin. The survival of DNM has improved since 1998 and remained stable since then. Despite the low prevalence of this disease, multicentre control studies are needed to achieve better evidence about this entity.
Assuntos
Mediastinite , Drenagem , Humanos , Mediastinite/epidemiologia , Mediastinite/etiologia , Necrose , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to review the characteristics of 'implant presence-triggered osteonecrosis' (IPTO) in the literature and identify possible differences between IPTOs and 'implant surgery-triggered osteonecrosis' (ISTO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reviews using PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were performed from 2009-2018; the focus was on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) and dental implants. In addition, the hospital records of all patients presented in our department with IPTO were retrospectively reviewed. In both studies, the following data were collected: the number of patients with ISTO or IPTO, age, gender, location, stage of MRONJ, number of implants involved in MRONJ, the elapsed time between the placement of the implants and the development of MRONJ, applied treatment and the presence of mandibular fractures and progress. RESULTS: The literature review provided 111 articles. Nine of the articles were selected for bibliographic review. The number of osteonecrosis cases was significantly higher in the IPTO group (74 cases) compared with the ISTO group (27 cases). The duration of the anti-resorptive treatment (oral and intravenous) was also longer in the IPTO group. In our centre, seven patients with IPTO were chosen; however, no patients with ISTO were selected. The significant differences between the patients in our series and the information collected in the literature for the IPTO group were the time of ingestion of alendronate, the elapsed time from the placement of the implants to the development of the MRONJ and the number of implants linked to the development of a complication. CONCLUSIONS: The use of antiresorptives causes osteonecrosis in patients with implants that are subjected to functional loading, and this occurs at a higher frequency than what is observed after implant placement surgery.