RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Biliary self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) play an important role in the quality of life and palliative treatment in unresectable pancreatic cancer patients. We aimed to determine the factors affecting the patency of biliary SEMS and the survival in unresectable pancreatic cancer with obstructive jaundice. METHODS: Considering the competing risk and survival, we retrospectively evaluated the patency in 107 unresectable pancreatic cancer patients with obstructive jaundice who were successfully treated with biliary SEMS from January 2000 to April 2010. RESULTS: There were 107 incidents of biliary drainage that were clinically successful and the overall survival period was a median of 133 days. Stent occlusion before death was observed in 36 (33.6%) of 107 patients. Cumulative stent obstruction rates were 4.7%, 16.8%, and 24.4% at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. Lower cancer stage (<5 month's hazard ratio [HR] = 2.327, >5 month's HR = 0.108) was only associated with the longer patency of the stents in a multivariable analysis using a Fine and Gray model that considered competing risk. In multivariable analysis, lower cancer stage, uncovered stent and normalized serum bilirubin level were associated with a longer survival period (HR = 2.335, 1.906 and 1.795 respectively, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The patency of biliary SEMS in unresectable pancreatic cancers might be affected by the stage. Lower cancer stage and normalized bilirubin are associated with longer survival.
Assuntos
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Icterícia Obstrutiva/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Stents , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Icterícia Obstrutiva/etiologia , Masculino , Metais , Cuidados Paliativos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicações , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Qualidade de Vida , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Effective bowel preparation is essential for accurate diagnosis of colon disease. We investigated efficacy and safety of 2 L polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution with 90 mL sodium phosphate (NaP) solution compared with 4 L PEG method. METHODS: Between August 2009 and April 2010, 526 patients were enrolled who visited Seoul National University Bundang Hospital for colonoscopy. We allocated 249 patients to PEG 4 L group and 277 patients to PEG 2 L with NaP 90 mL group. Detailed questionnaires were performed to investigate compliance, satisfaction and preference of each method. Bowel preparation quality and segmental quality were evaluated. Success was defined as cecal intubation time less than 20 minutes without any help of supervisors. RESULTS: Both groups revealed almost the same baseline characteristics except the experience of operation. PEG 4 L group's compliance was lower than PEG 2 L with NaP 90 mL group. Success rate and cecal intubation time was not different between two groups. Overall bowel preparation quality of PEG 2 L with NaP 90 mL group was better than PEG 4 L group. Segmental bowel preparation quality of PEG 2 L with NaP 90 mL group was also better than PEG 4 L group in all segments, especially right side colon. Occurrence of hyperphosphatemia was higher in PEG 2 L with NaP 90 mL group than PEG 4 L group. However, significant adverse event was not reported. CONCLUSIONS: PEG 2 L with NaP 90 mL method seems to be more effective bowel preparation than PEG 4 L method.
Assuntos
Colonoscopia/métodos , Fosfatos/administração & dosagem , Polietilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Doenças do Colo/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cooperação do Paciente , Soluções , Inquéritos e Questionários , Irrigação TerapêuticaRESUMO
AIM: To investigate the prognostic factors determining the success rate of non-surgical treatment in the management of post-operative bile duct injuries (BDIs). METHODS: The study patients were enrolled from the pancreatobiliary units of a tertiary teaching hospital for the treatment of BDIs after hepatobiliary tract surgeries, excluding operations for liver transplantation and malignancies, from January 1999 to August 2010. A total of 5167 patients underwent operations, and 77 patients had BDIs following surgery. The primary end point was the treatment success rate according to different types of BDIs sustained using endoscopic or percutaneous hepatic approaches. The type of BDI was defined using one of the following diagnostic tools: endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, computed tomography scan, and magnetic resonance cholangiography. Patients with a final diagnosis of BDI underwent endoscopic and/or percutaneous interventions for the treatment of bile leak and/or stricture if clinically indicated. Patient consent was obtained, and study approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board in accordance with the legal regulations of the Human Clinical Research Center at the Seoul National University Hospital in Seoul, South Korea. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients were enrolled in the study. They were divided into three groups according to type of BDI. Among them, 55 patients (71%) underwent cholecystectomy. Thirty-six patients (47%) had bile leak only (type 1), 31 patients had biliary stricture only (type 2), and 10 patients had both bile leak and biliary stricture (type 3). Their initial treatment modalities were non-surgical. The success rate of non-surgical treatment in each group was as follows: BDI type 1: 94%; type 2: 71%; and type 3: 30%. Clinical parameters such as demographic factors, primary disease, operation method, type of operation, non-surgical treatment modalities, endoscopic procedure steps, type of BDI, time to diagnosis and treatment duration were evaluated to evaluate the prognostic factors affecting the success rate. The type of BDI was a statistically significant prognostic factor in determining the success rate of non-surgical treatment. In addition, a shorter time to diagnosis of BDI after the operation correlated significantly with higher success rates in the treatment of type 1 BDIs. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic or percutaneous hepatic approaches can be used as an initial treatment in type 1 and 2 BDIs. However, surgical intervention is a treatment of choice in type 3 BDI.
Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica/terapia , Ductos Biliares/lesões , Ductos Biliares/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Biliar/efeitos adversos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Colestase/terapia , Drenagem , Esfinterotomia Endoscópica , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fístula Anastomótica/diagnóstico , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Catéteres , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efeitos adversos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/instrumentação , Colangiopancreatografia por Ressonância Magnética , Colestase/diagnóstico , Colestase/etiologia , Constrição Patológica , Dilatação , Drenagem/efeitos adversos , Drenagem/instrumentação , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , República da Coreia , Esfinterotomia Endoscópica/efeitos adversos , Stents , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
A 42-years-old woman had undergone operation for cholecochal cyst with gallbladder cancer 9 years ago. Pathology revealed a polypoid mass in the gallbladder with liver infiltration as poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and endoscopic ultrasound showed a newly developed suspected solid nodule in the peripheral portion of cystic lesion in the pancreas head. She underwent a pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for the suspected mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas. Pathology revealed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. The remnant choledochal cyst had developed to cholangiocarcinoma, which mimicked cystic neoplasm of the pancreas.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and low dose leucovorin (LV) combination in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable or recurrent colorectal carcinomas were prospectively accrued. Up to one prior chemotherapy regimen was allowed. Patients received oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m(2), administered as a 2-hour infusion on day 1, followed by LV, 20 mg/m(2), as a bolus and 5-FU, 1,500 mg/m(2), via continuous infusion for 24 hours on days 1 and 2. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression or adverse effects prohibited further therapy. RESULTS: Between August 1999 and May 2004, 31 patients were enrolled in this study. Of the patients enrolled, 24 and 31 were evaluable for tumor response and survival analysis, respectively. The patients' characteristics included a median age of 59, with 6 (19%) having had prior chemotherapy. No patient achieved a complete response, but nine (38%) attained a partial response. Seven (29%) patients maintained a stable disease and 8 (33%) experienced increasing disease. The median duration of the response was 6 months. After a median follow-up of 9.6 months, the median time to progression was 3.8 months, with a median survival of 10.7 months. The hematological toxicities were mild to moderate, with no treatment-related mortality or infection. The major non-hematological toxicity was gastrointestinal toxicity. CONCLUSION: The combination chemotherapy of oxaliplatin, low dose LV and continuous infusion of 5-FU is safe and has a cost-benefit, but is a moderately effective regimen in advanced colorectal cancer. A randomized trial comparing low and high dosages of leucovorin in the FOLFOX regimen is warranted.