Artificial intelligence assisted pterygium diagnosis: current status and perspectives.

Pterygium is a prevalent ocular disease that can cause discomfort and vision impairment. Early and accurate diagnosis is essential for effective management. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promising potential in assisting clinicians with pterygium diagnosis. This paper provides an overview of AI-assisted pterygium diagnosis, including the AI techniques used such as machine learning, deep learning, and computer vision. Furthermore, recent studies that have evaluated the diagnostic performance of AI-based systems for pterygium detection, classification and segmentation were summarized. The advantages and limitations of AI-assisted pterygium diagnosis and discuss potential future developments in this field were also analyzed. The review aims to provide insights into the current state-of-the-art of AI and its potential applications in pterygium diagnosis, which may facilitate the development of more efficient and accurate diagnostic tools for this common ocular disease.

Pterygium Screening and Lesion Area Segmentation Based on Deep Learning.

A two-category model and a segmentation model of pterygium were proposed to assist ophthalmologists in establishing the diagnosis of ophthalmic diseases. A total of 367 normal anterior segment images and 367 pterygium anterior segment images were collected at the Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet18, and ResNet50 models were used to train the two-category pterygium models. A total of 150 normal and 150 pterygium anterior segment images were used to test the models, and the results were compared. The main evaluation indicators, including sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve, kappa value, and receiver operator characteristic curves of the four models, were compared. Simultaneously, 367 pterygium anterior segment images were used to train two improved pterygium segmentation models based on PSPNet. A total of 150 pterygium images were used to test the models, and the results were compared with those of the other four segmentation models. The main evaluation indicators included mean intersection over union (MIOU), IOU, mean average precision (MPA), and PA. Among the two-category models of pterygium, the best diagnostic result was obtained using the VGG16 model. The diagnostic accuracy, kappa value, diagnostic sensitivity of pterygium, diagnostic specificity of pterygium, and F1-score were 99%, 98%, 98.67%, 99.33%, and 99%, respectively. Among the pterygium segmentation models, the double phase-fusion PSPNet model had the best results, with MIOU, IOU, MPA, and PA of 86.57%, 78.1%, 92.3%, and 86.96%, respectively. This study designed a pterygium two-category model and a pterygium segmentation model for the images of the normal anterior and pterygium anterior segments, which could help patients self-screen easily and assist ophthalmologists in establishing the diagnosis of ophthalmic diseases and marking the actual scope of surgery.

Automated measurement of the disc-fovea angle based on DeepLabv3.

Purpose: To assess the value of automatic disc-fovea angle (DFA) measurement using the DeepLabv3+ segmentation model. Methods: A total of 682 normal fundus image datasets were collected from the Eye Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. The following parts of the images were labeled and subsequently reviewed by ophthalmologists: optic disc center, macular center, optic disc area, and virtual macular area. A total of 477 normal fundus images were used to train DeepLabv3+, U-Net, and PSPNet model, which were used to obtain the optic disc area and virtual macular area. Then, the coordinates of the optic disc center and macular center were obstained by using the minimum outer circle technique. Finally the DFA was calculated. Results: In this study, 205 normal fundus images were used to test the model. The experimental results showed that the errors in automatic DFA measurement using DeepLabv3+, U-Net, and PSPNet segmentation models were 0.76°, 1.4°, and 2.12°, respectively. The mean intersection over union (MIoU), mean pixel accuracy (MPA), average error in the center of the optic disc, and average error in the center of the virtual macula obstained by using DeepLabv3+ model was 94.77%, 97.32%, 10.94 pixels, and 13.44 pixels, respectively. The automatic DFA measurement using DeepLabv3+ got the less error than the errors that using the other segmentation models. Therefore, the DeepLabv3+ segmentation model was finally chosen to measure DFA automatically. Conclusions: The DeepLabv3+ segmentation model -based automatic segmentation techniques can produce accurate and rapid DFA measurements.