Influence of implantation of a total hip endoprosthesis on the ipsilateral leg alignment: the effect of sex and dysplasia of the hip.

INTRODUCTION: Differences in leg and hip morphology exist between sexes and developmental hip dysplasia is known to alter proximal femoral morphology. The purpose of this study was to determine whether existing differences in leg alignment due to sex or developmental hip dysplasia have an effect on changes in leg alignment after total hip arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 30 hip osteoarthritis patients underwent biplanar full-length radiography in the standing position preoperatively and 3 months after total hip arthroplasty. Differences in leg alignment between men and women and between patients with primary hip osteoarthritis and patients with developmental dysplasia before and after surgery were tested using a general linear model for repeated measures. RESULTS: Implantation of a hip prosthesis had no differential effect on ipsilateral leg alignment in patients with hip osteoarthritis due to dysplasia and in patients with primary hip osteoarthritis. However, patients with hip osteoarthritis due to dysplasia had a 2.1° higher valgus both before and after surgery. After total hip arthroplasty, women had a significantly greater increase in varus angle (1.6° vs. 0°) and femoral offset (10.5 vs. 4.6 mm) compared with men. Because the change in acetabular offset was smaller (2.2 vs. 6.2 mm), the global femoral offset was only increased in women. Femoral torsion was constant for men (15.0° and 16.5°), whereas femoral torsion was significantly reduced in women (19.9° and 13.2°). CONCLUSIONS: Hip arthroplasty has a greater effect on leg axis in women than in men. The axial leg alignment of women could change from a natural valgus to a varus alignment. Therefore, surgeons should consider the effects of total hip arthroplasty on leg alignment in patients with hip osteoarthritis. Whether these changes in leg alignment are also clinically relevant and lead to premature medial or lateral knee osteoarthritis should be investigated in future work. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with DRKS (German Clinical Trials Register) under the number DRKS00015053. Registered 1st of August 2018.

Accuracy of Preoperative Templating in Total Hip Arthroplasty With Special Focus on Stem Morphology: A Randomized Comparison Between Common Digital and Three-Dimensional Planning Using Biplanar Radiographs.

BACKGROUND: Accurate preoperative planning is a key component of successful total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of the present study was to compare the accuracy and reliability of three-dimensional (hipEOS) and common digital two-dimensional (TraumaCad) templating with special focus on stem morphology. METHODS: 51 patients undergoing THA were randomized to two groups. Preoperative planning was performed on 23 patients with hipEOS (3D) and on 28 patients with TraumaCad (2D) planning software. Planning results were compared with the implanted component size. Inter- and intraobserver reliability as well as planning accuracy of both planning methods with special focus on straight and short stem design were recorded. RESULTS: Intraobserver reliability of both planning methods was good for component planning (ICC2,1: 0.835-0.967). Interobserver ICC2,1 for stem and cup planning were higher for 3D templating (3D ICC2,1: 0.906-0.918 vs. 2D ICC2,1: 0.835-0.843). Total stem and cup size predictions were within 2 sizes for 3D and within 3 sizes for 2D planning. Comparing short stem planning accuracy of both planning methods, absolute difference between implanted and planned component size was significantly lower in 3D planning (P = .029). There was no significant difference in straight stem (P = .935) and cup (P = .954) planning accuracy. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that 3D templating with hipEOS software has a good overall reliability and may have a better planning accuracy of short stem prostheses than digital templating with TraumaCad software. Assuming that the number of implanted short stem prostheses will further increase in coming years, a more precise planning with 3D technique can contribute to improve surgery outcome.

Influence of Hip Geometry Reconstruction on Frontal Plane Hip and Knee Joint Moments During Walking Following Primary Total Hip Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Following total hip replacement (THR), hip geometry reconstruction parameters such as the femoral offset (FO) correlate with hip stability and wear. The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between hip geometry parameters and knee and hip joint loading during walking. METHODS: Forty-one patients were examined before and a minimum of 1 year after primary THR. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was performed to identify relationships between radiographic parameters and gait data. In addition, we divided patients into 2 groups according to the restoration of the FO (within ±5 mm vs more than 5 mm increment). RESULTS: The FO and global offset (GO) showed a positive correlation with the first (r = 0.469, P = .002; r = 0.542, P < .001) and second (r = 0.365, P = .019; r = 0.484, P = .001) knee adduction moment (KAM). The neck-shaft angle revealed a negative correlation with the first hip adduction moment (r = -0.375, P = .047). The reconstruction of FO with an increment of more than 5 mm was associated with a significant higher first KAM (+16%, P = .045) compared to the restored group. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that abnormal hip and knee joint loading during walking after THR have a biomechanical background originating from hip geometry reconstruction. Patients with a high FO/GO were more likely to have an increased KAM during walking or vice versa. Surgeons need to be aware that an accurate control of FO, GO, and neck-shaft angle restoration in THR has an impact on hip and knee joint loading that may influence degenerative changes of the knee and higher wear of the artificial hip joint, respectively.

[Thromboembolic prophylaxis in orthopaedics: update on the current S3 guideline, effective 2015]. / Thromboembolieprophylaxe in der Orthopädie ­ Update zur aktuellen S3-Leitlinie Stand 2015.

BACKGROUND: Thromboembolism is one of the most significant complications in many orthopaedic treatments and illnesses. Therefore, prevention is of vital importance. CURRENT STATUS: The existing S3 guideline, revised in 2015, investigates the various symptoms and treatments in great detail, and thus provides very good recommendations. The difficulties of thrombosis prophylaxis in orthopaedics were ever-present in 2018, which is shown by the large number of publications on the topic. These new findings can be incorporated into further versions of the guideline, thereby adapting them to the current status. Finally, the fact that is especially important for everyday practice should be mentioned, that is, in particular when patients are transferred or discharged, information about the necessary prophylaxis is communicated to the colleagues who will be carrying out further treatment to guarantee uninterrupted prophylaxis.

Effect of Stem Design and Positioning on the Leg Axis after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Secondary Analysis.

Background/Objectives: Various parameters, like femoral offset and leg length, are associated with good patient outcomes after total hip arthroplasty. In this prospective study, the effects of stem design, its placement in the proximal femur and the resulting femoral offset on the total leg axis were investigated. Methods: The 27 patients included in this study received biplanar radiography (EOS®, EOS Imaging) with 3D reconstruction using sterEOS® both preoperatively and postoperatively. For all leg alignment parameters obtained from the 3D reconstruction and from measurements using mediCAD, the deltas between the postoperative and preoperative values were determined. Patients were divided into those who received a short-stem prosthesis and those who received a straight-stem prosthesis. Results: The change in femoral offset with the implantation of a short-stem prosthesis was significantly greater than that with the implantation of a straight-stem prosthesis (11.4 ± 5.9 vs. 4.6 ± 7.4 mm, p = 0.014). Compared with the straight-stem implantation, short-stem implantation caused a significantly greater increase in the varus orientation of the leg (-1.4 ± 0.9 vs. -0.4 ± 1.4°, p = 0.048). There was no significant difference in the positioning of the short-stem prosthesis compared to the straight-stem prosthesis in the proximal femur (3.6 ± 3.1 vs. 2.6 ± 1.9°, p = 0.317). Conclusions: These findings substantiate the impact of prosthesis design on offset and leg alignment. The implantation of short-stems is more variable and requires precise planning. Intraoperative non-physiological offset changes and varus deviation of the leg axis should be avoided. Trial registration: This study was retrospectively registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) under the number DRKS00015053 on the 1 August 2018.