Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage of First Intent With a Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent vs Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study (ELEMENT Trial).

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy with a lumen-apposing metal stent (EUS-CDS) is a promising modality for management of malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) with potential for better stent patency. We compared its outcomes with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with metal stenting (ERCP-M). METHODS: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, we recruited patients with MDBO secondary to borderline resectable, locally advanced, or unresectable peri-ampullary cancers across 10 Canadian institutions and 1 French institution. This was a superiority trial with a noninferiority assessment of technical success. Patients were randomized to EUS-CDS or ERCP-M. The primary end point was the rate of stent dysfunction at 1 year, considering competing risks of death, clinical failure, and surgical resection. Analyses were performed according to intention-to-treat principles. RESULTS: From February 2019 to February 2022, 144 patients were recruited; 73 were randomized to EUS-CDS and 71 were randomized to ERCP-M. The mean (SD) procedure time was 14.0 (11.4) minutes for EUS-CDS and 23.1 (15.6) minutes for ERCP-M (P < .01); 40% of the former was performed without fluoroscopy. Technical success was achieved in 90.4% (95% CI, 81.5% to 95.3%) of EUS-CDS and 83.1% (95% CI, 72.7% to 90.1%) of ERCP-M with a risk difference of 7.3% (95% CI, -4.0% to 18.8%) indicating noninferiority. Stent dysfunction occurred in 9.6% vs 9.9% of EUS-CDS and ERCP-M cases, respectively (P = .96). No differences in adverse events, pancreaticoduodenectomy and oncologic outcomes, or quality of life were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Although not superior in stent function, EUS-CDS is an efficient and safe alternative to ERCP-M in patients with MDBO. These findings provide evidence for greater adoption of EUS-CDS in clinical practice as a complementary and exchangeable first-line modality to ERCP in patients with MDBO. CLINICALTRIALS: gov, Number: NCT03870386.

Predictive Factors for Successful Same-Day Discharge After Minimally Invasive Colectomy and Stoma Reversal.

BACKGROUND: Same-day discharge after minimally invasive colorectal surgery is a safe, effective practice in specific patients that can enhance the efficiency of enhanced recovery pathways. OBJECTIVE: To identify predictive factors associated with success or failure of same-day discharge. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study from January 2020 to March 2023. SETTINGS: Tertiary colorectal center. PATIENTS: Adult patients eligible for same-day discharge with remote postdischarge follow-up included those with minimal comorbidities, residing near the hospital, having sufficient home support, and owning a mobile device. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were discharged on the day of surgery upon meeting specific criteria, including adequate pain control, tolerance of oral intake, independent mobility, urination, and the absence of complications. Successful same-day discharge was defined as discharge on the day of surgery without unplanned visits in the first 72 hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Factors associated with successful or failed same-day discharge after minimally invasive colorectal surgery. RESULTS: A total of 175 patients (85.3%) were discharged on the day of surgery, with 14 patients (8%) having an unplanned visit within 72 hours. Overall, 161 patients (78.5%) were categorized as same-day discharge success and 44 patients (21.5%) as same-day discharge failure. The same-day discharge failure group had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.7 vs 2.8, p = 0.03). Mean length of stay (0.8 vs 3.0, p = 0.00), 30-day complications (10% vs 48%, p = 0.00), and readmissions (8% vs 27%, p = 0.00) were higher in the same-day discharge failure group. Regression analysis showed that failed same-day discharge was associated with higher comorbidities (OR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.95) and prolonged postanesthesia care unit time (OR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.99-0.99). Individuals who received a regional nerve block (OR 4.1; 95% CI, 1.2-14) and those who did not consume postoperative opioids (OR 4.6; 95% CI, 1-21) were more likely to have successful same-day discharge. LIMITATIONS: Single-center study. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that comorbidities and prolonged postanesthesia care unit stays were associated with same-day discharge failure, whereas regional nerve blocks and minimal postoperative opioids were related to success. These factors may inform future research aiming to enhance colorectal surgery recovery protocols. See Video Abstract . FACTORES PREDICTIVOS PARA UN ALTA EXITOSA EL MISMO DA DESPUS DE UNA COLECTOMA MNIMAMENTE INVASIVA Y REVERSIN DEL ESTOMA: ANTECEDENTES:El alta el mismo día después de una cirugía colorrectal mínimamente invasiva es una práctica segura y eficaz en pacientes específicos que puede mejorar la eficiencia de las vías de recuperación mejoradas.OBJETIVO:Identificar factores predictivos asociados con el éxito o fracaso del alta el mismo día.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte prospectivo del 01/2020 al 03/2023.AJUSTES:Centro colorrectal terciario.PACIENTES:Los pacientes adultos elegibles para el alta el mismo día con seguimiento remoto posterior al alta incluyeron aquellos con comorbilidades mínimas, que residían cerca del hospital, tenían suficiente apoyo en el hogar y poseían un dispositivo móvil.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes fueron dados de alta el día de la cirugía al cumplir con criterios específicos, incluido un control adecuado del dolor, tolerancia a la ingesta oral, movilidad independiente, micción y ausencia de complicaciones. El alta exitosa el mismo día se definió como el alta el día de la cirugía sin visitas no planificadas en las primeras 72 horas.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Factores asociados con el alta exitosa o fallida el mismo día después de una cirugía colorrectal mínimamente invasiva.RESULTADOS:Un total de 175 (85,3%) pacientes fueron dados de alta el día de la cirugía y 14 (8%) pacientes tuvieron una visita no planificada dentro de las 72 horas. En total, 161 (78,5%) pacientes se clasificaron como éxito del alta el mismo día y 44 (21,5%) pacientes como fracaso del alta el mismo día. El grupo de fracaso del alta el mismo día tuvo un índice de comorbilidad de Charlson más alto (3,7, 2,8, p = 0,03). La duración media de la estancia hospitalaria (0,8, 3,0, p = 0,00), las complicaciones a los 30 días (10%, 48%, p = 0,00) y los reingresos (8%, 27%, p = 0,00) fueron mayores en el mismo día grupo de fallo de descarga. El análisis de regresión mostró que el alta fallida el mismo día se asoció con mayores comorbilidades (OR 0,79; IC del 95 %: 0,66; 0,95) y tiempo prolongado en la unidad de cuidados postanestésicos (OR 0,99; IC del 95 %: 0,99; 0,99). Las personas que recibieron un bloqueo nervioso regional (OR 4,1; IC del 95 %: 1,2, 14) y aquellos que no consumieron opioides posoperatorios (OR 4,6, IC del 95 %: 1-21) tuvieron más probabilidades de tener éxito en el mismo día -descarga.LIMITACIONES:Estudio unicéntrico.CONCLUSIONES:Nuestros hallazgos indican que las comorbilidades y las estancias prolongadas en la unidad de cuidados postanestésicos se asociaron con el fracaso del alta el mismo día, mientras que los bloqueos nerviosos regionales y los opioides postoperatorios mínimos se relacionaron con el éxito. Estos factores pueden informar investigaciones futuras destinadas a mejorar los protocolos de recuperación de la cirugía colorrectal. (Traducción-Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).

Outcomes reported in randomised trials of surgical prehabilitation: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity of reported outcomes can impact the certainty of evidence for prehabilitation. The objective of this scoping review was to systematically map outcomes and assessment tools used in trials of surgical prehabilitation. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychInfo, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane were searched in February 2023. Randomised controlled trials of unimodal or multimodal prehabilitation interventions (nutrition, exercise, psychological support) lasting at least 7 days in adults undergoing elective surgery were included. Reported outcomes were classified according to the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research framework. RESULTS: We included 76 trials, mostly focused on abdominal or orthopaedic surgeries. A total of 50 different outcomes were identified, measured using 184 outcome assessment tools. Observer-reported outcomes were collected in 86% of trials (n=65), with hospital length of stay being most common. Performance outcomes were reported in 80% of trials (n=61), most commonly as exercise capacity assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Clinician-reported outcomes were included in 78% (n=59) of trials and most frequently included postoperative complications with Clavien-Dindo classification. Patient-reported outcomes were reported in 76% (n=58) of trials, with health-related quality of life using the 36- or 12-Item Short Form Survey being most prevalent. Biomarker outcomes were reported in 16% of trials (n=12) most commonly using inflammatory markers assessed with C-reactive protein. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial heterogeneity in the reporting of outcomes and assessment tools across surgical prehabilitation trials. Identification of meaningful outcomes, and agreement on appropriate assessment tools, could inform the development of a prehabilitation core outcomes set to harmonise outcome reporting and facilitate meta-analyses.

Towards a common definition of surgical prehabilitation: a scoping review of randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: There is no universally accepted definition for surgical prehabilitation. The objectives of this scoping review were to (1) identify how surgical prehabilitation is defined across randomised controlled trials and (2) propose a common definition. METHODS: The final search was conducted in February 2023 using MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of unimodal or multimodal prehabilitation interventions (nutrition, exercise, and psychological support) lasting at least 7 days in adults undergoing elective surgery. Qualitative data were analysed using summative content analysis. RESULTS: We identified 76 prehabilitation trials of patients undergoing abdominal (n=26, 34%), orthopaedic (n=20, 26%), thoracic (n=14, 18%), cardiac (n=7, 9%), spinal (n=4, 5%), and other (n=5, 7%) surgeries. Surgical prehabilitation was explicitly defined in more than half of these RCTs (n=42, 55%). Our findings consolidated the following definition: 'Prehabilitation is a process from diagnosis to surgery, consisting of one or more preoperative interventions of exercise, nutrition, psychological strategies and respiratory training, that aims to enhance functional capacity and physiological reserve to allow patients to withstand surgical stressors, improve postoperative outcomes, and facilitate recovery.' CONCLUSIONS: A common definition is the first step towards standardisation, which is needed to guide future high-quality research and advance the field of prehabilitation. The proposed definition should be further evaluated by international stakeholders to ensure that it is comprehensive and globally accepted.

The impact of patient activation on the effectiveness of digital health remote post-discharge follow-up and same-day-discharge after elective colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Low patient activation (PA) is associated with worse postoperative outcomes, however, its impact on the effectiveness of digital health interventions is unknown. We sought to determine the impact of PA on the effectiveness of digital health application for remote post-discharge follow-up for patients undergoing elective colectomy. METHODS: Data analysis included a control cohort (CC) of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery from 10/2017 to 04/2018 without the digital health intervention and a digital application cohort (DAC) that received a smart phone application for remote post-discharge follow-up from 03/2021 to 08/2022, including a subset of same-day discharge (SDD) patients. PA was measured using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM; score 0-100) and categorized into low (< 55.1) and high (≥ 55.1). The PAM was administered 4-6 weeks before surgery in the DAC group and on postoperative day (POD) 1 in the CC group. The main outcome measure was 30-day emergency department (ED) visits. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients were included (89DAC with 50 SDD, 75CC), with no differences in patient characteristics other than more stoma closures in the DAC group. Overall, 77% of patients had high PA level, with no difference between CC and DAC (77% vs. 81%, p = 0.25). There was no difference in ED visits between CC and DAC (19% vs. 18%, p = 0.90). Overall, low PA was associated more ED visits (29% vs 14%, p = 0.04). In the SDD subgroup, low PA patients had more ED visits (38% vs. 7%, p = 0.015). PA level did not affect app usage metrics. On multiple regression, only low PA remained independently associated with ED visits (OR 3.42, 95%CI 1.27, 9.24). CONCLUSION: Low PA remains an important predictor of surgical outcomes after elective colorectal surgery regardless of the use of a digital health application for remote post-discharge follow-up. This suggests that improving PA levels may improve postoperative outcomes.

Opioid prescribing practices in breast oncologic surgery-A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In breast oncologic surgery, 75% of patients receive a postoperative opioid prescription at discharge, and 10%-20% will develop persistent opioid use. To inform future institutional guidelines, the objective of this study was to determine baseline opioid prescribing patterns in a single high-volume, referral-based breast center. We hypothesized that opioid prescribing practices varied between procedures and operating surgeons. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all women undergoing breast cancer surgery between January and December 2019. Opioid prescriptions at discharge were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME). The primary outcome of interest was MME prescribed at discharge. Multiple linear regression was used to identify factors independently associated with MME prescribed. RESULTS: 392 patients met inclusion criteria; 68.3% underwent partial mastectomy. Median age was 61 (interquartile range [IQR] 51-70). Median MME prescribed at discharge was 112.5 (IQR 75-150); 83.9% of patients were prescribed co-analgesia. The prescriber was a trainee in 37.7% of cases. 15 patients (3.8%) required opioid renewal. On multivariate analysis, axillary procedure was associated with increased MME (ß = 17, 95% CI 5.5-28 and ß = 32, 95% CI 17-47, for sentinel node and axillary dissection, respectively). However, the factor with the greatest impact on MME was operating surgeon (ß = 72, 95% CI 58-87). Residents prescribed less MME compared to attending surgeons (ß = 11, 95% CI -22; -0.06). CONCLUSION: In a tertiary care center, the operating surgeon had the greatest influence on opioid prescribing practices, and trainees tended to prescribe less MME. These findings support the need for a standardized approach to optimize prescribing and reduce opioid-related harms after oncologic breast surgery.

Opioid versus opioid-free analgesia after surgical discharge: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: Excessive opioid prescribing after surgery has contributed to the current opioid crisis; however, the value of prescribing opioids at surgical discharge remains uncertain. We aimed to estimate the extent to which opioid prescribing after discharge affects self-reported pain intensity and adverse events in comparison with an opioid-free analgesic regimen. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, AMED, Biosis, and CINAHL from Jan 1, 1990, until July 8, 2021. We included multidose randomised controlled trials comparing opioid versus opioid-free analgesia in patients aged 15 years or older, discharged after undergoing a surgical procedure according to the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity definition (minor, moderate, major, and major complex). We screened articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials) in duplicate. The primary outcomes of interest were self-reported pain intensity on day 1 after discharge (standardised to 0-10 cm visual analogue scale) and vomiting up to 30 days. Pain intensity at further timepoints, pain interference, other adverse events, risk of dissatisfaction, and health-care reutilisation were also assessed. We did random-effects meta-analyses and appraised evidence certainty using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations scoring system. The review was registered with PROSPERO (ID CRD42020153050). FINDINGS: 47 trials (n=6607 patients) were included. 30 (64%) trials involved elective minor procedures (63% dental procedures) and 17 (36%) trials involved procedures of moderate extent (47% orthopaedic and 29% general surgery procedures). Compared with opioid-free analgesia, opioid prescribing did not reduce pain on the first day after discharge (weighted mean difference 0·01cm, 95% CI -0·26 to 0·27; moderate certainty) or at other postoperative timepoints (moderate-to-very-low certainty). Opioid prescribing was associated with increased risk of vomiting (relative risk 4·50, 95% CI 1·93 to 10·51; high certainty) and other adverse events, including nausea, constipation, dizziness, and drowsiness (high-to-moderate certainty). Opioids did not affect other outcomes. INTERPRETATION: Findings from this meta-analysis support that opioid prescribing at surgical discharge does not reduce pain intensity but does increase adverse events. Evidence relied on trials focused on elective surgeries of minor and moderate extent, suggesting that clinicians can consider prescribing opioid-free analgesia in these surgical settings. Data were largely derived from low-quality trials, and none involved patients having major or major-complex procedures. Given these limitations, there is a great need to advance the quality and scope of research in this field. FUNDING: The Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

A Mobile Phone App Improves Patient-Physician Communication and Reduces Emergency Department Visits After Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Emergency visits after colorectal surgery are common and require significant health care resources. However, many visits may be avoidable with alternative access to care. Mobile health technologies can facilitate patient access to health care providers. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that a mobile app for postdischarge monitoring with patient-provider communication ability would reduce emergency visits after elective abdominopelvic colorectal surgery. DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study with a regression analysis after coarsened exact matching. SETTING: The study was conducted at a single colorectal referral center from May 2019 to September 2020. PATIENTS: A total of 114 patients were recruited to the intervention and were matched to a retrospective cohort of 608 patients from the 24 months before the study. All patients were managed according to an enhanced recovery pathway. INTERVENTIONS: A mobile phone app comprised of patient education material, daily questionnaires assessing postdischarge recovery, and patient-provider chat function was used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes included potentially preventable 30-day emergency visits defined according to a validated algorithm. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, complications, total emergency department visits, readmissions, and app usability. RESULTS: Coarsened-exact matching resulted in a matched sample of 94 prospective intervention patients and 256 retrospective control patients. The prospective group was associated with fewer preventable emergency department visits (incidence rate ratio 0.34; p = 0.043) and shorter length of stay (-1.62 days; p = 0.011). There were no differences in 30-day complications, total number of emergency visits, or readmissions. Patient-reported usability of the mobile app was high, with 88% of patients reporting that the app improved their ability to communicate with their surgeon. LIMITATIONS: We did not account for patient activation or perform a cost-analysis. CONCLUSION: Use of a mobile app was associated with fewer potentially preventable emergency visits and shorter length of stay after major elective colorectal surgery, which may be due to enhanced postdischarge monitoring and patient-provider communication. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B878 . APLICACIN DE TELFONO MVIL MEJORA LA COMUNICACIN ENTRE MDICO Y PACIENTE Y REDUCE LAS VISITAS AL DEPARTAMENTO DE EMERGENCIAS DESPUS DE CIRUGA COLORECTAL: ANTECEDENTES:Las visitas de emergencia después de la cirugía colorrectal son frecuentes y requieren importantes recursos sanitarios. Sin embargo, muchas visitas pueden evitarse con un acceso alternativo a la atención. Las tecnologías de salud móviles pueden facilitar el acceso de los pacientes a los proveedores de atención médica.OBJETIVO:Se planteó la hipótesis de que una aplicación móvil para el seguimiento posterior al alta con capacidad de comunicación entre el paciente y el médico reduciría las visitas de emergencia después de cirugía colorrectal abdominopélvica electiva.DISEÑO:Este es un estudio de cohorte prospectivo con un análisis de regresión después de un emparejamiento exacto aproximado.ENTORNO CLINICO:El estudio se llevó a cabo en un solo centro de referencia colorrectal entre 05/2019 y 09/2020.PACIENTES:Se reclutó un total de 114 pacientes para la intervención y se emparejaron con una cohorte retrospectiva de 608 pacientes de los 24 meses anteriores al estudio. Todos los pacientes fueron tratados con protocolo de enhanced recovery .INTERVENCIONES:Se utilizó una aplicación para teléfono móvil compuesta de material educativo para el paciente, cuestionarios diarios que evalúan la recuperación posterior al alta y una función de chat entre el paciente y el médico.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los resultados primarios incluyeron visitas a la emergencia en 30 días potencialmente prevenibles, definidas según un algoritmo validado. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron la duración de la estancia, complicaciones, total de visitas al departamento de emergencias, reingresos y la usabilidad de la aplicación.RESULTADOS:El emparejamiento aproximado-exacto resultó en una muestra emparejada de 94 APP + y 256 APP-. APP + se asoció con menos visitas evitables al servicio de urgencias (IRR 0,34, p = 0,043) y una estancia más corta (-1,62 días, p = 0,011). No hubo diferencias en las complicaciones a los 30 días, número total de visitas de emergencia y reingresos. La usabilidad de la aplicación móvil informada por los pacientes fue alta, y el 88% de los pacientes informaron que la aplicación mejoró su capacidad para comunicarse con su cirujano.LIMITACIONES:No contabilizamos la activación del paciente ni realizamos un análisis de costos.CONCLUSIÓNES:El uso de una aplicación móvil se asoció con menos visitas a la emergencia potencialmente prevenibles y una estadía más corta después de una gran cirugía colorrectal electiva, lo que puede deberse a una mejor monitorización posterior al alta y a la comunicación entre el paciente y el médico. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B878 . (Traducción-Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).

Understanding the Impact of Bowel Dysfunction on Quality of Life After Rectal Cancer Surgery From the Patient's Perspective.

BACKGROUND: Bowel dysfunction is an important consequence of rectal cancer surgery' and the specific quality-of-life domains that are affected remain unclear and unaddressed by generic surveys. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify quality-of-life domains most affected by rectal cancer surgery. DESIGN: Qualitative content analysis. SETTINGS: Semistructured interviews conducted by telephone with patients recruited from a single university-affiliated colorectal referral center. PATIENTS: Adult patients were included if they underwent rectal cancer surgery with sphincter preservation from July 2017 to July 2020. Patients were excluded if their surgery was <1 year since the recruitment date, received a permanent stoma, or developed recurrence or metastasis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bowel dysfunction was evaluated via the low anterior resection syndrome score. Interview transcripts were coded by 2 independent reviewers and evaluated for concordance. Qualitative content analysis was used to identify themes, and their frequency of occurrence was quantified (percent total number of interviews). RESULTS: A total of 54 patient interviews were conducted. Analysis revealed 5 quality-of-life-related themes impacted by bowel dysfunction: experiencing psychological and emotional stress, challenging roles and relationships within society, encountering physical limitations, restricting leisure and recreational activities, and learning self-empowerment and adapting to change. Patients with minor and major bowel dysfunction were more likely to report disruption to their social activities and their role as a sexual partner versus those with no bowel dysfunction. Patients with major bowel dysfunction were more likely to report effects on sleep versus those with no and minor bowel dysfunction. LIMITATIONS: Single center, self-reported, and observer bias. CONCLUSION: The impact of bowel dysfunction on quality of life includes a wide range of themes that extend beyond traditional measures. These results may help better inform patients in the preoperative setting and serve as a basis for the development of a more patient-centered quality-of-life survey. COMPRENDER EL IMPACTO DE LA DISFUNCIN INTESTINAL EN LA CALIDAD DE VIDA DESPUS DE LA CIRUGA DE CNCER DE RECTO DESDE LA PERSPECTIVA DEL PACIENTE: ANTECEDENTES:La disfunción intestinal es una consecuencia importante de la cirugía del cáncer de recto y los dominios específicos de la calidad de vida que se ven afectados siguen sin estar claros y sin abordarse en las encuestas genéricas.OBJETIVO:Identificar los dominios de calidad de vida más afectados por la cirugía del cáncer de recto.DISEÑO:Análisis cualitativo de contenido.ÁMBITOS:Entrevistas semiestructuradas realizadas por teléfono con pacientes reclutados de un único centro de referencia colorrectal afiliado a una universidad.PACIENTES:Pacientes adultos intervenidos de cáncer de recto con preservación de esfínter del 07/2017 al 07/2020. Los pacientes fueron excluidos si su cirugía fue <1 año desde la fecha de reclutamiento, recibieron un estoma permanente o desarrollaron recurrencia o metástasis.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La disfunción intestinal se evaluó a través de la puntuación del síndrome de resección anterior baja. Dos revisores independientes codificaron las transcripciones de las entrevistas y evaluaron su concordancia. Se utilizó el análisis de contenido cualitativo para identificar los temas, cuantificando su frecuencia de aparición (porcentaje del número total de entrevistas).RESULTADOS:Se realizaron un total de 54 entrevistas a pacientes. El análisis reveló cinco temas relacionados con la calidad de vida afectados por la disfunción intestinal: experimentar estrés psicológico y emocional, roles y relaciones desafiantes dentro de la sociedad, encontrar limitaciones físicas, restringir actividades recreativas y de ocio, y autoempoderamiento y adaptación al cambio. Los pacientes con disfunción intestinal menor y mayor tenían más probabilidades de informar la interrupción de las actividades sociales y el papel como pareja sexual en comparación con aquellos sin disfunción intestinal. Los pacientes con disfunción intestinal importante tenían más probabilidades de informar efectos sobre el sueño en comparación con aquellos sin disfunción intestinal o con disfunción intestinal menor.LIMITACIONES:Sesgo de un solo centro, autoinformado y observador.CONCLUSIÓN:El impacto de la disfunción intestinal en la calidad de vida incluye una amplia gama de temas que se extienden más allá de las medidas tradicionales. Estos resultados pueden ayudar a informar mejor a los pacientes en el entorno preoperatorio y servir como base para el desarrollo de una encuesta de calidad de vida más centrada en el paciente. (Traducción-Dr. Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).

Patients' experiences undergoing cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to understand patients' experiences undergoing cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. In response to COVID-19, many elective cancer surgeries were delayed creating a massive backlog of cases. Patients' experiences with surgical delays may inform healthcare systems' responses to the backlog of cases and guide preparations for future healthcare emergencies. METHODS: This was a qualitative description study. Patients undergoing general surgery for cancer at two university-affiliated hospitals between March 2020 and January 2021 were invited to one-to-one interviews. Patients were purposefully selected using quota sampling until interviews produced no new information (i.e., thematic saturation). Interviews were conducted using a semi-structured guide and analyzed according to inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included [mean age 64 ± 12.9; male (n = 10); surgical delay (n = 14); cancer sites: breast (n = 8), skin (n = 4), hepato-pancreato-biliary (n = 4), colorectal (n = 2), and gastro-esophageal (n = 2)]. When determining their willingness to undergo surgery, patients weighed the risk of COVID-19 infection against the urgency of their disease. Changes to the hospital environment (e.g., COVID-19 preventative measures) and deviations from expected treatment (e.g., alternative treatments, remote consultations, rescheduled care) caused diverse psychological responses, ranging from increased satisfaction to severe distress. Patients employed several coping strategies to mitigate distress, including eliciting reassurance from care providers, seeking information from unconventional sources, and reframing care interruptions. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in care during the pandemic elicited diverse psychological responses from patients undergoing cancer surgery. Coping was facilitated by consistent communication with providers, emphasizing the importance of patient-centered expectation setting as we prepare for the future within and beyond the pandemic.

A retrospective analysis of early discharge following minimally invasive colectomy in an enhanced recovery pathway.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence to support discharge prior to gastrointestinal recovery following colorectal surgery. Furthermore, many patients are discharged early despite being excluded from an ambulatory colectomy pathway. The objective of this study was to determine the outcomes of patients discharged early following laparoscopic colectomy in an enhanced recovery pathway (ERP). METHODS: A retrospective review of all adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colectomy at a single university-affiliated colorectal referral center (08/2017-06/2021) was performed. Patients were included if they had undergone elective laparoscopic colectomy or ileostomy closure and excluded if they had been enrolled in an ambulatory colectomy pathway. Patients were then divided into three groups: LOS =1 day, LOS 2-3 days, and LOS 4+ days. The main outcomes were 30-day emergency room (ER) visits and readmissions. Reasons for inpatient stay per post-operative day (POD) were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 497 patients were included [LOS1 n = 63 (13%), LOS2-3 n = 284 (57%), and LOS4+ n = 150 (30%)]. There were no differences in patient characteristics, diagnosis, or procedure between the groups. Patients were discharged with gastrointestinal recovery (GI-3) in 54% LOS1 vs. 98% LOS2-3 vs. 100% LOS4+ (p<0.001). Shorter procedure duration, transversus abdominus plane block, and lower opioid requirements were associated with shorter LOS (p<0.001). The absence of flatus was the most common reason to keep patients hospitalized: 61% on POD1, 21% on POD2, and 8% on POD3 (p<0.001). There were no differences in 30-day emergency visits, or readmission between the groups. In the LOS1 group, there were no differences in outcomes between patients with full return of bowel function at discharge compared to those without. CONCLUSION: Discharge on POD1 was not associated with increased emergency department use, complications, or readmissions. Importantly, full return of bowel function at discharge did not affect outcomes. There may be potential to expand eligibility criteria for ambulatory colectomy protocol.

Validity of video-based general and procedure-specific self-assessment tools for surgical trainees in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Self-review of recorded surgical procedures offers new opportunities for trainees to extend technical learning outside the operating-room. Valid tools for self-assessment are required prior to evaluating the effectiveness of video-review in enhancing technical learning. Therefore, we aimed to contribute evidence regarding the validity of intraoperative performance assessment tools for video-based self-assessment by general surgery trainees when performing laparoscopic cholecystectomies. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Using a web-based platform, general surgery trainees in a university-based residency program submitted recorded laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures where they acted as the supervised primary surgeon. Attending surgeons measured operative performance at the time of surgery using general and procedure-specific assessment tools [Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) and Operative Performance Rating System (OPRS), respectively] and entrustability level (O-SCORE). Trainees self-evaluated their performance from video-review using the same instruments. The validity of GOALS and OPRS for trainee self-assessment was investigated by testing the hypotheses that self-assessment scores correlate with (H1) expert assessment scores, (H2) O-SCORE, and (H3) procedure time and that (H4) self-assessment based on these instruments differentiates junior [postgraduate year (PGY) 1-3] and senior trainees (PGY 4-5), as well as (H5)simple [Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ≤ 4] versus complex cases (VAS > 4). All hypotheses were based on previous literature, defined a priori, and were tested according to the COSMIN consensus on measurement properties. RESULTS: A total of 35 videos were submitted (45% female and 45% senior trainees) and self-assessed. Our data supported 2 out of 5 hypotheses (H1 and H4) for GOALS and 3 out of 5 hypotheses (H1, H4 and H5) for OPRS, for trainee self-assessment. CONCLUSIONS: OPRS, a procedure-specific assessment tool, was better able to differentiate between groups expected to have different levels of intraoperative performance, compared to GOALS, a general assessment tool. Given the interest in video-based learning, there is a need to further develop valid procedure-specific tools to support video-based self-assessment by trainees in a range of procedures.

Impact of enhanced recovery pathways on patient-reported outcomes after abdominal surgery: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence supports that enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) reduce length of stay and complications; however, these measures may not reflect the perspective of patients who are the main stakeholders in the recovery process. This systematic review aimed to appraise the evidence regarding the impact of ERPs on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after abdominal surgery. METHODS: Five databases (Medline, Embase, Biosis, Cochrane, and Web of Science) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) addressing the impact of ERPs on PROs after abdominal surgery. We focused on distinct periods of recovery: early (within 7 days postoperatively) and late (beyond 7 days). Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's RoB 2.0. Results were appraised descriptively as heterogeneity hindered meta-analysis. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. RESULTS: Fifty-six RCTs were identified [colorectal (n = 18), hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) (n = 11), upper gastrointestinal (UGI) (n = 10), gynecological (n = 7), urological (n = 7), general surgery (n = 3)]. Most trials had 'some concerns' (n = 30) or 'high' (n = 25) risk of bias. In the early postoperative period, ERPs improved patient-reported general health (colorectal, HPB, UGI, urological; very low to low certainty), physical health (colorectal, gynecological; very low to low certainty), mental health (colorectal, gynecological; very low certainty), pain (all specialties; very low to moderate certainty), and fatigue (colorectal; low certainty). In the late postoperative period, ERPs improved general health (HPB, UGI, urological; very low certainty), physical health (UGI, gynecological, urological; very low to low certainty), mental health (UGI, gynecological, urological; very low certainty), social health (gynecological; very low certainty), pain (gynecological, urological; very low certainty), and fatigue (gynecological; very low certainty). CONCLUSION: This review supports that ERPs may have a positive impact on patient-reported postoperative health status (i.e., general, physical, mental, and social health) and symptom experience (i.e., pain and fatigue) after abdominal surgery; however, data were largely derived from low-quality trials. Although these findings contribute important knowledge to inform evidence-based ERP implementation, there remains a great need to improve PRO assessment in studies focused on postoperative recovery.

Prescription and consumption of opioids after bariatric surgery: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: In the current opioid crisis, bariatric surgical patients are at increased risk of harms related to postoperative opioid overprescribing. This study aimed to assess the extent to which opioids prescribed at discharge after bariatric surgery are consumed by patients. METHODS: This multicenter prospective cohort study included adult patients (≥ 18yo) undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Preoperative assessments included demographics and patient-reported measures. Information regarding surgical and perioperative care interventions (including discharge prescriptions) was obtained from medical records. Self-reported opioid consumption was assessed weekly up to 30 days post-discharge. Number of opioid pills prescribed and consumed was compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Zero-inflated negative binomial regression was used to identify predictors of post-discharge opioid consumption. RESULTS: We analyzed 351 patients (mean age 44 ± 11 years, BMI 45 ± 8.0 kg/m2, 77% female, 71% sleeve gastrectomy, length of stay 1.6 ± 0.6 days). The quantity of opioids prescribed at discharge (median 15 pills [IQR 15-16], 112.5 morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) [IQR 80-112.5]) was significantly higher than patient-reported consumption (median 1 pill [IQR 0-5], 7.5 MMEs [IQR 0-37.5]) (p < 0.001). Overall, 37% of patients did not take any opioids post-discharge and 78.5% of the opioid pills prescribed were unused. Increased post-discharge opioid consumption was associated with male sex (IRR 1.54 [95%CI 1.14 to 2.07]), higher BMI (1.03 [95%CI 1.01 to 1.05]), preoperative opioid use (1.48 [95%CI 1.04 to 2.10]), current smoking (2.32 [95%CI 1.44 to 3.72]), higher PROMIS-29 depression score (1.03 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.04]), anastomotic procedures (1.33 [95%CI 1.01 to 1.75]), and number of pills prescribed (1.04 [95%CI 1.01 to 1.06]). CONCLUSION: This study supports that most opioid pills prescribed to bariatric surgery patients at discharge are not consumed. Patient and procedure-related factors may predict opioid consumption. Individualized post-discharge analgesia strategies with minimal or no opioids may be feasible and should be further investigated in future research.

Predictors of post-discharge pain and satisfaction with pain management after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pain management after bariatric surgery remains challenging given the risk for analgesia-related adverse events (e.g., opioid use disorder, marginal ulcers). Identifying modifiable factors associated with patient-reported pain outcomes may improve quality of care. We evaluated the extent to which patient and procedural factors predict 7-day post-discharge pain intensity, pain interference, and satisfaction with pain management after bariatric surgery. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included adults undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery at two university-affiliated hospitals and one private clinic. Preoperative assessments included demographics, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (score range 0-52), Patient Activation Measure (low [< 55.1] vs. high [≥ 55.1]), pain expectation (0-10), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) anxiety and depression scales. At 7 days post-discharge, assessments included PROMIS-29 pain intensity (0-10) and pain interference scales (41.6-75.6), and satisfaction with pain management (high [10-9] vs. lower [8-0]). Linear and logistic regression were used to assess the association of pain outcomes with potential predictors. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-one patients were included (mean age = 44 ± 11 years, BMI = 45 ± 8 kg/m2, 77% female, 71% sleeve gastrectomy). At 7 days post-discharge, median (IQR) patient-reported pain intensity was 2.5 (1-5), pain interference was 55.6 (52.0-61.2), and 76% of patients reported high satisfaction with pain management. Pain intensity was predicted by preoperative anxiety (ß + 0.04 [95% CI + 0.01 to + 0.07]) and pain expectation (+ 0.15 [+ 0.05 to + 0.25]). Pain interference was predicted by preoperative anxiety (+ 0.22 [+ 0.11 to + 0.33]), pain expectation (+ 0.47 [+ 0.10 to + 0.84]), and age (- 0.09 [- 0.174 to - 0.003]). Lower satisfaction was predicted by low patient activation (OR 1.94 [1.05-3.58]), higher pain catastrophizing (1.03 [1.003-1.05]), 30-day complications (3.27 [1.14-9.38]), and age (0.97 [0.948-0.998]). CONCLUSION: Patient-related factors are important predictors of post-discharge pain outcomes after bariatric surgery. Our findings highlight the value of addressing educational, psychological, and coping strategies to improve postoperative pain outcomes.

S110-Opioid-free analgesia after outpatient general surgery: A qualitative study focused on the perspectives of patients and clinicians involved in a pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Opioid-free analgesia (OFA) may mitigate opioid-related harms after outpatient general surgery; however, the comparative effectiveness of this approach should be assessed in robust randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Undertaking an RCT on OFA raises important practical concerns, including surgeon and patient hesitation regarding pain management without opioids. We conducted a qualitative study to explore patients' and clinicians' perspectives and experiences with a pilot trial focused on OFA after outpatient general surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing outpatient abdominal and breast procedures were randomized to receive post-discharge opioid analgesia (OA) or OFA. Semi-structured interviews with patients and clinicians involved in the trial were conducted to elicit personal perspectives and experiences. Purposive sampling for maximum variation was used to recruit participants with diverse characteristics. Transcribed interviews were assessed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Ten patients (5 abdominal, 5 breast) and 10 clinicians (6 surgeons, 2 anesthesiologists, 2 nurses) were interviewed. Five major themes emerged: readiness for trial engagement, pre-trial thoughts about the interventions, postoperative pain experiences, intervention acceptability, and trial refinement. Most patients were open to OFA. Clinicians expressed willingness to prescribe OFA, particularly after less invasive procedures and when using peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs). Concerns were raised regarding the adequacy of pain control and side effects of non-opioid drugs (e.g., NSAID-induced bleeding, kidney injury). Overall, participants were enthusiastic about the trial and recognized its relevance; clinicians praised the study design and organization; and patients valued the use of electronic questionnaires. Suggestions for improvements included preventing potential bias arising from the use of PNBs (i.e., via standardization or stratification) and reducing patient burden (i.e., decreasing postoperative questionnaires). CONCLUSION: Patients and clinicians who participated in a pilot RCT generally accept the clinical equipoise between OA versus OFA after outpatient general surgery and recognize the need for methodologically robust trials to inform evidence-based analgesia prescribing.

Enhanced Recovery 2.0 - Same Day Discharge With Mobile App Follow-up After Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of SDD protocol with postdischarge follow-up using a mobile phone app in patients undergoing elective minimally-invasive colectomy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Discharge before gastrointestinal recovery and use of mobile health technology for remote follow-up may allow for SDD after minimally-invasive colectomy within an ERP. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colectomy or loop ileostomy reversal from February 2020 to November 2020 were screened for eligibility. Patients were eligible if they lived within a 30-minute drive from the hospital, had an adequate support system at home, and owned a smart phone. Patients were discharged from the recovery room on the day of surgery based on set criteria with postdischarge remote follow-up using a mobile application. Feasibility was defined as discharge on the day of surgery without emergency department (ED) visit or readmission within the first 3 days. 30-day complications, ED visits, and readmissions were compared to a non-SDD historical cohort (May 2019-March 2020) also remotely followed-up using the same mobile phone app (standard ERP group). RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were recruited to SDD, of which 77% were discharged on the day of surgery without subsequent ED visit in the first 72 hours. There were 11 patients that could not be discharged, including 7 for failure of discharge criteria and 4 for intraoperative complications/concerns. Overall 30-day complications in the SDD group (17%) was similar to the standard ERP group (15%, P = 0.813). ED visits (SDD10% vs standard ERP8%, P = 0.664) and readmissions (6% vs 4%, P = 0.681) were also similar. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Findings from this study support the feasibility of a SDD protocol in select patients undergoing minimally-invasive colorectal resection. SDD colectomy protocols may represent the next evolution of ERP and postoperative recovery.

The impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on the exposure of general surgery trainees to operative procedures.

INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the redeployment of operating room (OR) staff resulted in a significant ramp-down of elective surgery. To mitigate the negative effects of the pandemic on surgical education, this study was planned to estimate the impact of the first wave of the pandemic on the participation of general surgery residency and fellowship trainees in operative procedures. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of all adult general surgery procedures performed at 3 sites of an academic health care network. Cases performed during the first wave of the pandemic (March-June 2020) were compared to the same period of the previous year pre-pandemic (March-June 2019). Trainees were categorized as junior (Post-Graduate-Year [PGY] 1-2), senior (PGY3-5), or fellows (PGY6-7). Operating exposure was defined as (1) the total number of cases attended by at least one trainee and (2) total time spent in the OR by all trainees (hours). The impact of the pandemic was estimated as percentage of baseline (2019). RESULTS: During the first wave of the pandemic, a total of 914 cases were performed, compared to 1328 in the pre-pandemic period (69%). Junior trainees were more affected than senior trainees with reductions in both case volume (68% versus 78% of baseline attendance) and time (68% versus 77% of baseline operating time). Minimally invasive surgery fellows were most severely affected trainees and colorectal fellows were least affected (14% and 75% of baseline cases, respectively). Participation in emergency surgery cases and surgical oncology cases was relatively preserved (87% and 105% of baseline, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic reduced operative exposure for general surgery trainees by approximately 30%. Procedure-specific patterns reflected institutional policies for prioritizing cancer operations and emergency surgeries. These findings may inform the design of remediation activities to mitigate the impact of the pandemic on surgical training.

Considerations for designing and implementing a surgical peer coaching program: an international survey.

BACKGROUND: Surgical peer coaching has been associated with high rates of practice change but remains largely unutilized. The purpose of this study was to survey surgeons internationally to investigate attitudes regarding peer coaching and to identify any international differences to inform the design of future coaching programs. METHODS: Practicing surgeons in general surgery or related subspecialties were eligible to participate. Invitations to complete the survey were distributed through 13 surgical associations, social media, and personal e-mail invitations. Responses were obtained between June 1st and August 31st, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 521 surveys were collected. The majority of participants practiced in North America (263; 50%) with remaining respondents from Asia (81; 16%), Europe (34;7%), South America (21; 4%), Africa (17; 3%), and Oceania (6; 1%). Duration of practice was equally distributed across 4 intervals (0-5 years; 6-15 years; 16-25 years; > 25 years). Respondents most frequently identified as general surgeons (290; 67%) and 325 (75%) were male. Awareness of peer coaching was reported by 275 (53%) respondents, with 197 (44%) never seeking formal feedback from peers. The majority of respondents (372; 84%) would be willing to participate in a peer coaching program, with monthly interactions the most desirable frequency reported (193; 51%). Coaching in the operating room was preferred by most participants (360; 86%). Few respondents (67; 14%) would accept coaching from someone unknown to them. Participants identified key coaching program elements as: feedback kept private and confidential (267; 63%); opportunity to provide feedback to the coach (247; 59%); personalized goal setting (244; 58%); and the option to choose one's own coach (205; 49%). The most commonly cited potential barrier to participation was logistical constraints (334; 79%). CONCLUSION: This international survey of practicing surgeons demonstrated that peer feedback is rarely used in practice, but there is high interest and acceptance of the peer coaching model for continuous professional development. Findings regarding preferred program structure may be useful to inform the design of future peer coaching programs.

The association between video-based assessment of intraoperative technical performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Efforts to improve surgical safety and outcomes have traditionally placed little emphasis on intraoperative performance, partly due to difficulties in measurement. Video-based assessment (VBA) provides an opportunity for blinded and unbiased appraisal of surgeon performance. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review the existing literature on the association between intraoperative technical performance, measured using VBA, and patient outcomes. METHODS: Major databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Database, and Web of Science) were systematically searched for studies assessing the association of intraoperative technical performance measured by tools supported by validity evidence with short-term (≤ 30 days) and/or long-term postoperative outcomes. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results were appraised descriptively as study heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 11 observational studies were identified involving 8 different procedures in foregut/bariatric (n = 4), colorectal (n = 4), urologic (n = 2), and hepatobiliary surgery (n = 1). The number of surgeons assessed ranged from 1 to 34; patient sample size ranged from 47 to 10,242. High risk of bias was present in 5 of 8 studies assessing short-term outcomes and 2 of 6 studies assessing long-term outcomes. Short-term outcomes were reported in 8 studies (i.e., morbidity, mortality, and readmission), while 6 reported long-term outcomes (i.e., cancer outcomes, weight loss, and urinary continence). Better intraoperative performance was associated with fewer postoperative complications (6 of 7 studies), reoperations (3 of 4 studies), and readmissions (1 of 4 studies). Long-term outcomes were less commonly investigated, with mixed results. CONCLUSION: Current evidence supports an association between superior intraoperative technical performance measured using surgical videos and improved short-term postoperative outcomes. Intraoperative performance analysis using video-based assessment represents a promising approach to surgical quality-improvement.