RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To improve the confidence and competence of newly qualified dentists in Wales in undertaking orthodontic assessments and making orthodontic referrals. DESIGN: Quality improvement project. SETTING: Study days arranged by the Wales Deanery. PARTICIPANTS: The 2018-2019 cohort of dental foundation trainees (DFTs) and dental core trainees (DCTs) in Wales. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively between January and February 2019 utilising a 20-item questionnaire based around knowledge and clinical ability in orthodontic assessment and referrals (Stage 1). In May 2019, the trainees were provided with an e-learning package tailored to the results of the clinical questions and the feedback received in Stage 1. After this, trainees repeated the questionnaire with a simplified Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN; Stage 2). RESULTS: There was increased self-reported confidence in 'conducting orthodontic assessments' from 67% to 95% and 'competence in completing orthodontic referrals' from 81% to 92%. At baseline, this cohort were only able to correctly determine dental age and orthodontic treatment need for 40.7% (mean) of the presented linical cases. Following the teaching intervention, this was improved with an average of 70.9% of clinical cases answered correctly. CONCLUSION: Despite the noted improvement in the self-reported confidence and competence in undertaking orthodontic assessments and referrals in this cohort, there is still room for improvement. Hands-on orthodontic experience during dental training improved the self-reported confidence and competence with assessments and referrals. The results of this quality improvement project emphasise the need for regular continuing professional development in the field of orthodontics to maintain competence in utilising IOTN and referring appropriately.
Assuntos
Má Oclusão , Ortodontia , Humanos , Índice de Necessidade de Tratamento Ortodôntico , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Purpose: It is known that radiation to dentofacial structures during childhood can lead to developmental disturbances. However, this appears to be a relatively subordinated research subject. For this reason, this review aims to establish the current evidence base on the effect of PBT on dentofacial development in paediatric patients treated for cancer in the head and neck region. Materials and methods: A comprehensive search was undertaken to identify both published and unpublished studies or reports. A single reviewer completed initial screening of abstracts; 2 independent reviewers completed secondary screening and data extraction. A narrative synthesis was then conducted. Results: 82 records were screened in total, resulting in 11 included articles. These articles varied in terms of study design and reporting quality. Owing to both poor study reporting and limited patient numbers, it is not possible to determine the effect of cancer diagnosis, chronological age at treatment, radiation dose or treatment modality on the incidence of facial deformation or dental development anomalies. Conclusion: Disturbances in dentofacial development are an under-reported toxicity in paediatric cancer survivors treated with PBT to the head and neck. There is a need for more research on dentofacial toxicity reporting, focused on the impact of treatment age, radiation dose, concurrent therapies, and the subsequent impact on quality of life.
RESUMO
Purpose: Radiation therapy is an independent risk factor for adverse sequelae to the oral cavity and dentition in childhood cancer survivors. However, dental toxicities after radiation therapy often are underreported and there are minimal published data on disturbances in tooth development after proton beam therapy (PBT). We present the long-term clinical and radiographic dental findings 8 years after treatment completion for a patient treated with PBT and chemotherapy for rhabdomyosarcoma. Materials and Methods: Clinical follow-up data of patients treated with PBT within the Proton Overseas Programme (POP) is stored in a National Database and curated by a dedicated outcomes unit at the Christie NHS PBT center. This case report was identified from the extraction and analysis of data for pediatric head and neck cancer patients in this database for a service evaluation project. Results: The permanent dentition in this patient aged 3.5 years at the time of treatment was severely affected with abnormal dental development first observed 3.5 years after treatment completion. PBT delivered mean doses of 30 Gy(RBE = 1.1) to the maxilla and 25.9 Gy(RBE = 1.1) to the mandible. Conclusion: Significant dental development abnormalities occurred in this pediatric patient, despite doses in areas being lower than the proposed thresholds in the literature. Improved descriptions of dental toxicities and routine contouring of the maxilla and mandible are needed to correlate dosimetric data. The dose to teeth should be kept as low as reasonably possible in younger patients until the dose thresholds for dental toxicities are known.
RESUMO
Introduction Intentional replantation (IR) may offer a solution for persistent periapical lesions associated with endodontically treated teeth in select cases. This case series demonstrates the use of IR as an alternative treatment approach to both orthograde and surgical endodontic retreatment. The indications, contraindications, benefits and risks of IR are discussed, and the clinical procedure is outlined.Setting Restorative Department, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, UK.Case reports Of the 13 cases presented, the follow-up period before discharge ranged from 3-28 months. Only one tooth which presented intra-operative challenges required extraction three months after IR due to post-operative mobility.Conclusion In select cases, IR may provide a simple, less invasive and cost-effective alternative to both endodontic retreatment and extraction alone following appropriate training.