RESUMO
Morbidity and mortality (M&M) conferences serve as a forum for the discussion of adverse events and errors in the treatment of patients. In the United States M&M conferences are an established part of medical training programs. While being state of the art in specialities like surgery and anesthesiology, they were established later on in internal medicine. To date, no reports have been published on M&M conferences in departments of internal medicine in Germany. Since August 2010 a morbidity and mortality conference takes place once per month in the Department I of Internal Medicine of the university hospital of Cologne. Cases with unexpected death, unexpected complications or medical errors are discussed. The primary goal is to create an open and confidential forum for doctors, where errors can be discussed without any assignment of guilt. The uncovering of structural problems frequently leads to direct improvements in patient care. Furthermore, the conference can play an important role in medical education.
Assuntos
Congressos como Assunto , Educação Médica Continuada , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Medicina Interna/educação , Medicina Interna/normas , Erros Médicos , Morbidade , Alemanha , Humanos , Controle de QualidadeRESUMO
The effectiveness of the novel hematopoietic stem cell mobilizing agent plerixafor was evaluated in nationwide compassionate use programs in 13 European countries. A total of 580 poor mobilizers with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and multiple myeloma (MM) were enrolled. All patients received plerixafor plus granulocyte CSF with or without chemotherapy. Overall, the collection yield was significantly higher in MM patients (>2.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 81.6%; >5.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 32.0%) than in NHL patients (>2.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 64.8%; >5.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 12.6%; P<0.0001) and also significantly higher in HL patients (>2.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 81.5%; >5.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 22.2%) than in NHL patients (P=0.013). In a subgroup analysis, there were no significant differences in mobilization success comparing patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma. Our data emphasize the role of plerixafor in poor mobilizers, but further strategies to improve the apheresis yield especially in patients with NHL are required.
Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/administração & dosagem , Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Compostos Heterocíclicos/administração & dosagem , Doença de Hodgkin/terapia , Linfoma não Hodgkin/terapia , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Benzilaminas , Remoção de Componentes Sanguíneos/métodos , Criança , Ciclamos , União Europeia , Feminino , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos , Doença de Hodgkin/sangue , Humanos , Contagem de Leucócitos , Linfoma não Hodgkin/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/sangue , Transplante HomólogoRESUMO
The CXCR4-inhibitor plerixafor mobilizes hematopoietic stem cells amplifying the effects of granulocyte-CSF (G-CSF). Before approval plerixafor was used in a compassionate use program (CUP) for patients who failed a previous mobilization. In the German CUP 60 patients from 23 centers (median age 56.5 years (2-75)) were given 240 µg/kg plerixafor SC 9-11 h before apheresis. A total of 78.3% (47/60) received G-CSF for 4 days before plerixafor administration; 76.6% of those (36/47) yielded at least 2.0 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/µL. The median cell yield was 3.35 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (0-29.53). Nine patients received plerixafor alone or with G-CSF for less than 4 days mobilizing a median of 3.30 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (1.6-5.6). There was no significant difference between G-CSF application for 4 days and for a shorter period of time (P=0.157). A total of 47 patients received plerixafor plus G-CSF combined with chemotherapy yielding a median of 3.28 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (0-24.79). In all, 40 of 60 patients (66.7%) proceeded to transplantation, and achieved a timely and stable engraftment. Side effects were rare and manageable. In conclusion, mobilization with plerixafor in poor mobilizers is safe and results in a sufficient stem cell harvest in the majority of patients.