Evaluation of a Cardiovascular Disease/Diabetes Mellitus Expansion Program for Community Health Workers Employed by Rhode Island Community Health Teams.

CONTEXT: The integration of certified community health workers (CCHWs) with specialty chronic disease training into clinical care teams has demonstrated improvements in chronic disease quality of care, management, and outcomes. PROGRAM: Rhode Island Department of Health's Diabetes, Heart Disease, and Stroke Program expanded the roles of CCHWs employed by Community Health Teams for chronic disease with a focus on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes mellitus (DM) from 2020 to 2023. Rhode Island Department of Health's Diabetes, Heart Disease, and Stroke Program sought to determine whether patient health behaviors and clinical outcomes improved with specialty trained CCHW support. IMPLEMENTATION: Community Health Teams identified high-risk or rising-risk patients with hypertension, high cholesterol, and/or diabetes. During an infrastructure phase, patients were assigned a CCHW who had not received CVD/DM specialty training. During a performance phase, a separate cohort of patients was assigned a CVD/DM specialty-trained CCHW. In each phase, patients were seen by the CCHWs at least twice and completed baseline and follow-up health assessments. The trained CCHWs utilized the baseline assessment to offer health coaching specific to the patient's chronic disease-related needs. EVALUATION: Improvements in blood pressure readings and cholesterol were observed at an individual level for CVD patients. However, a significant difference was not observed for hypertension or high cholesterol when comparing phases. Individual-level results indicated improved HbA1c values for DM patients; however, the differences in clinical values were not significant. Although there were no significant differences for clinical values between the phases, the proportion of patients who reported confidence in managing their condition(s) increased from baseline to follow-up for both phases. DISCUSSION: It cannot be concluded that specialty-trained CCHWs have significant impact on patient behaviors and clinical outcomes. However, overall CCHW intervention did result in improved self-efficacy in patients to manage their chronic conditions. Further evaluation is needed to understand what factors led to improved patient confidence levels.

Comparing electronic health record portals to obtain patient-entered family health history in primary care.

BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in developing systems to overcome barriers for acquiring and interpreting family health histories in primary care. OBJECTIVE: To examine the capacity of three different electronic portals to collect family history from patients and deposit valid data in an electronic health record (EHR). DESIGN: Pilot trial. PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTION: Patients were enrolled from four primary care practices and were asked to collect family health history before a physical exam using either telephone-based interactive voice response (IVR) technology, a secure Internet portal, or a waiting room laptop computer, with portal assigned by practice. Intervention practices were compared to a "usual care" practice, where there was no standard workflow to document family history (663 participants in the three intervention arms were compared to 296 participants from the control practice). MAIN MEASURES: New documentation of any family history in a coded EHR field within 30 days of the visit. Secondary outcomes included participation rates and validity. KEY RESULTS: Demographics varied by clinic. Documentation of new family history data was significantly higher, but modest, in each of the three intervention clinics (7.5 % for IVR clinic, 20.3 % for laptop clinic, and 23.1 % for patient portal clinic) versus the control clinic (1.7 %). Patient-entered data on common conditions in first degree relatives was confirmed as valid by a genetic counselor for the majority of cases (ranging from 64 to 82 % in the different arms). CONCLUSIONS: Within primary care practices, valid patient entered family health history data can be obtained electronically at higher rates than a standard of care that depends on provider-entered data. Further research is needed to determine how best to match different portals to individual patient preference, how the tools can best be integrated with provider workflow, and to assess how they impact the use of screening and prevention.

Diabetes and BMI: Health Equity through Early Intervention on Dysglycemia, and How Providers Can Help.

Like most states in the U.S., Rhode Island's rate of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is rising as its population has both aged and become heavier. Risk of both BMI>=30 and DM has risen across almost all demographics, but disparities continue to exist in both conditions. We analyzed state health survey data to assess race/ethnicity-stratified DM and BMI and the age-adjusted rate of DM by weight status relative to the late 1990s. The prevalence of obesity increased across almost all demographic groups relative to 15 years ago, but the rise was greatest among non-Hispanic whites. The age-adjusted rate of DM had a similar increase across racial/ethnic categories where BMI>=30, but black adults were still at higher risk of DM even at a BMI<30. In sum, non-Hispanic whites and Hispanics are "catching up" to blacks' historically higher prevalence of obesity and DM, but disparities remain in both conditions. We describe two ways providers can collaborate with the Department of Health to address these growing health problems. [Full article available at http://rimed.org/rimedicaljournal-2016-11.asp].