How Generalizable Are Findings from a Community-Based Prospective Cohort Study? Extending Estimates from the Adult Changes in Thought Study to Its Source Population.

Background: The Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) study is a cohort of Kaiser Permanente Washington members ages 65+ that began in 1994. Objective: We wanted to know how well ACT participants represented all older adults in the region, and how well ACT findings on eye disease and its relationship with Alzheimer's disease generalized to all older adults in the Seattle Metropolitan Region. Methods: We used participation weights derived from pooling ACT and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data to estimate prevalences of common eye diseases and their associations with Alzheimer's disease incidence. Cox proportional hazards models accounted for age, education, smoking, sex, and APOE genotype. Confidence intervals for weighted analyses were bootstrapped to account for error in estimating the weights. Results: ACT participants were fairly similar to older adults in the region. The largest differences were more self-reported current cholesterol medication use in BRFSS and higher proportions with low education in ACT. Incorporating the weights had little impact on prevalence estimates for age-related macular degeneration or glaucoma. Weighted estimates were slightly higher for diabetic retinopathy (weighted 5.7% (95% Confidence Interval 4.3, 7.1); unweighted 4.1% (3.6, 4.6)) and cataract history (weighted 51.8% (49.6, 54.3); unweighted 48.6% (47.3, 49.9)). The weighted hazard ratio for recent diabetic retinopathy diagnosis and Alzheimer's disease was 1.84 (0.34, 4.29), versus 1.32 (0.87, 2.00) in unweighted ACT. Conclusions: Most, but not all, associations were similar after participation weighting. Even in community-based cohorts, extending inferences to broader populations may benefit from evaluation with participation weights.

Eye Adult Changes in Thought (Eye ACT) Study: Design and Report on the Inaugural Cohort.

Background: Conflicting research on retinal biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD) is likely related to limited sample sizes, study design, and protocol differences. Objective: The prospective Eye Adult Changes in Thought (Eye ACT) seeks to address these gaps. Methods: Eye ACT participants are recruited from ACT, an ongoing cohort of dementia-free, older adults followed biennially until AD/ADRD, and undergo visual function and retinal imaging assessment either in clinic or at home. Results: 330 participants were recruited as of 03/2023. Compared to ACT participants not in Eye ACT (N = 1868), Eye ACT participants (N = 330) are younger (mean age: 70.3 versus 71.2, p = 0.014), newer to ACT (median ACT visits since baseline: 3 versus 4, p < 0.001), have more years of education (17.7 versus 16.2, p < 0.001) and had lower rates of visual impairment (12% versus 22%, p < 0.001). Compared to those seen in clinic (N = 300), Eye ACT participants seen at home (N = 30) are older (77.2 versus 74.9, p = 0.015), more frequently female (60% versus 49%, p = 0.026), and have significantly worse visual acuity (71.1 versus 78.9 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, p < 0.001) and contrast sensitivity (-1.9 versus -2.1 mean log units at 3 cycles per degree, p = 0.002). Cognitive scores and retinal imaging measurements are similar between the two groups. Conclusions: Participants assessed at home had significantly worse visual function than those seen in clinic. By including these participants, Eye ACT provides a unique longitudinal cohort for evaluating potential retinal biomarkers of dementia.

Neuropathologic Burden and Dementia in Nonagenarians and Centenarians: Comparison of 2 Community-Based Cohorts

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare 2 large clinicopathologic cohorts of participants aged 90+ and to determine whether the association between neuropathologic burden and dementia in these older groups differs substantially from those seen in younger-old adults. METHODS: Autopsied participants from The 90+ Study and Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) Study community-based cohort studies were evaluated for dementia-associated neuropathologic changes. Associations between neuropathologic variables and dementia were assessed using logistic or linear regression, and the weighted population attributable fraction (PAF) per type of neuropathologic change was estimated. RESULTS: The 90+ Study participants (n = 414) were older (mean age at death = 97.7 years) and had higher amyloid/tau burden than ACT <90 (n = 418) (mean age at death = 83.5 years) and ACT 90+ (n = 401) (mean age at death = 94.2 years) participants. The ACT 90+ cohort had significantly higher rates of limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE-NC), microvascular brain injury (µVBI), and total neuropathologic burden. Independent associations between individual neuropathologic lesions and odds of dementia were similar between all 3 groups, with the exception of µVBI, which was associated with increased dementia risk in the ACT <90 group only (odds ratio 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.8, p < 0.001). Weighted PAF scores indicated that eliminating µVBI, although more prevalent in ACT 90+ participants, would have little effect on dementia. Conversely, eliminating µVBI in ACT <90 could theoretically reduce dementia at a similar rate to that of AD neuropathologic change (weighted PAF = 6.1%, 95% CI 3.8-8.4, p = 0.001). Furthermore, reducing LATE-NC in The 90+ Study could potentially reduce dementia to a greater degree (weighted PAF = 5.1%, 95% CI 3.0-7.3, p = 0.001) than either ACT cohort (weighted PAFs = 1.69, 95% CI 0.4-2.7). DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that specific neuropathologic features may differ in their effect on dementia among nonagenarians and centenarians from cohorts with different selection criteria and study design. Furthermore, microvascular lesions seem to have a more significant effect on dementia in younger compared with older participants. The results from this study demonstrate that different populations may require distinct dementia interventions, underscoring the need for disease-specific biomarkers.