Research Note: Water applied direct-fed microbial reduced mortality in heat stressed broilers.

Pressure to reduce the use of antibiotics in the poultry industry has intensified research on alternative solutions to support intestinal health, including but not limited to direct fed microbials (DFM). Heat stress is known to impact intestinal health and function. The aim of this study was to determine efficacy of a water applied DFM product on broiler performance during the summer period. One of two treatments were randomly allocated to 12 replicate floor pens each: a control treatment and a treatment provided daily with a dual strain DFM comprised of Lactobacillus acidophilus AG01 and Bifidobacterium animalis AG02 at 1 × 108 CFU/bird/d. Each pen contained 20 Ross 308 broilers. All birds were fed the same three-phased wheat- and soybean meal-based diets. Body weight, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, and mortality were measured at d 0, 10, 24, 35, and 42. Due to natural extreme external temperature conditions, all birds were subject to heat stress during the end of the grower phase up to and including the finisher phase. Temperature was on average 5°C higher compared to industry recommendation. No significant differences were found in growth performance between the control and DFM treatment, yet BW at d 42 in both treatments was reduced by 19% compared to the breed standard. The DFM treatment significantly reduced mortality among the birds. Overall mortality from d 1 to d 35 was reduced from 4.58% to 0.42% (P = 0.023) and overall mortality from d 1 to d 42 was reduced from 5.83 to 0.83% (P = 0.027). This was driven by the difference in heat-stress related mortality in the finisher phase from d 25 to d 42, where mortality reached only 0.44% in the DFM treatment versus 2.88% in the unsupplemented control treatment. Post-mortem analysis confirmed heat-stress related hypoxia. In conclusion, the dual strain DFM may have provided improved (intestinal) homeostasis and barrier function allowing increased resilience to heat stress in broilers.

Elucidating the Varying Impact of Necrotic Enteritis Using Performance and Health Indicators in Broiler Infection Models.

Necrotic enteritis (NE) continues to be a significant burden to the poultry industry, compounded by pressure to reduce antibiotic use. Researchers use NE-challenge models to study the infection biology of NE and as screening tools to develop potential novel interventions. Currently, data are limited comparing such models between research establishments, and few indicate which quantitative metrics provide the most accurate measure for determining the efficacy of interventions. We compared data from 10 independent NE-challenge trials incorporating six challenge models employed in four geographical regions to determine the extent of variability in bird responses and to determine, using principal component analysis (PCA), which variables discriminated most effectively between nonchallenged control (NC) and challenged control (CC) groups. Response variables related to growth performance (weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion), health (mortality, lesion scores, NE induction rate), and, in three trials only, gut integrity (tight junction protein claudin-1, claudin-2, and zonula occludens-1 expression, coccidia counts, and intestinal permeability [assessed by FITC-dextran assay]). Treatments included a CC, which varied between trials (for example, in Eimeria predisposition, Clostridium perfringens strain, and days of inoculation), and a NC. The degree of response to challenge in CC birds varied significantly among models and trials. In all trials, lesion scores 1 to 4 days postchallenge were increased in CC vs. NC birds and varied both within and among models (by 0.29-1.17 points and 0.05-2.50 points, respectively). In addition, NE-related mortality at day 28 was increased in CC vs. NC, both within and among models (by 1.79%-4.72% and 0.02%-16.70%, respectively), and final (day 35 or 42) body weight was reduced by 3.9%-14.4% and overall FCR increased by up to 27% across trials (P , 0.05). A PCA on the combined dataset including only performance indicators failed to adequately differentiate NC and CC groups. However, the combination of performance and gut integrity variables and standardization of data by trial and phase achieved greater resolution between groups. This indicated that the inclusion of both types of variables in future NE-challenge studies would enable the generation of more robust predictions about intervention efficacy from different types of infection models. A final PCA based on a subset of key indicator variables, including body weight, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, mortality, and lesion score, achieved a good level of separation between NC and CC status of birds and could, with further research, be a useful supplement to existing approaches for assessing and predicting the NE status of birds in the field.

Determinación del impacto variable de la enteritis necrótica mediante indicadores de rendimiento y salud en modelos de infección de pollos de engorde. La enteritis necrótica (EN) sigue siendo un problema importante para la industria avícola, que se ha agudizado por la presión para reducir el uso de antibióticos. Los investigadores utilizan modelos de desafío de enteritis necrótica para estudiar la biología de la infección de este problema y como herramientas de detección para desarrollar posibles intervenciones novedosas. Actualmente, los datos que comparan dichos modelos entre grupos de investigación son limitados y pocos indican qué métricas cuantitativas proporcionan la medida más precisa para determinar la eficacia de las intervenciones. Comparamos datos de 10 ensayos independientes de desafío para enteritis necrótica que incorporan seis modelos de desafío empleados en cuatro regiones geográficas para determinar el grado de variabilidad en las respuestas de las aves y determinar, utilizando el análisis de componentes principales (PCA), qué variables discriminaron más efectivamente entre el control no desafiado (NC) y grupos de control desafiados (CC). Variables de respuesta relacionadas con el rendimiento del crecimiento (aumento de peso, consumo de alimento, conversión alimenticia), salud (mortalidad, puntuaciones de lesiones, tasa de inducción de enteritis necrótica) y, en sólo tres ensayos, la integridad intestinal (proteína de unión estrecha claudina-1, claudina-2, y expresión de zonula occludens-1, recuentos de coccidias y permeabilidad intestinal [evaluada mediante ensayo FITC-dextrano]). Los tratamientos incluyeron un control desafiado, que fue variable entre los ensayos (por ejemplo, en la predisposición a Eimeria, la cepa de Clostridium perfringens y los días de inoculación) y un control no desafiado. El grado de respuesta al desafío en aves del grupo control desafiado varió significativamente entre modelos y ensayos. En todos los ensayos, las puntuaciones de lesiones de 1 a 4 días después del desafío aumentaron en las aves del grupo control desafiado en comparación con el control no desafiado y variaron tanto dentro como entre los modelos (entre 0.29 y 1.17 puntos y entre 0.05 y 2.50 puntos, respectivamente). Además, la mortalidad relacionada con enteritis necrótica en el día 28 aumentó en el control desafiado en comparación con el control no desafiado, tanto dentro como entre modelos (entre un 1.79% y un 4.72% y entre un 0.02% y un 16.70%, respectivamente), y el peso corporal final (día 35 o 42). se redujo entre un 3.9% y un 14.4% y la conversión alimenticia en general aumentó hasta un 27% en todos los ensayos (P ,0.05). El análisis de componentes principales sobre el conjunto de datos combinado que incluye solo indicadores de desempeño no logró diferenciar adecuadamente los grupos control no desafiado y desafiado. Sin embargo, la combinación de variables de rendimiento e integridad intestinal y la estandarización de los datos por ensayo y fase lograron una mayor resolución entre los grupos. Esto indicó que la inclusión de ambos tipos de variables en futuros estudios de desafío para enteritis necrótica permitiría la generación de predicciones más sólidas sobre la eficacia de la intervención a partir de diferentes tipos de modelos de infección. Un análisis de componentes principales final basado en un subconjunto de variables indicadoras clave, incluido el peso corporal, el consumo de alimento, el índice de conversión alimenticia, la mortalidad y la puntuación de las lesiones, logró un buen nivel de separación entre el estado de las aves no desafiadas y desafiadas y podría, con más investigación, ser un complemento útil a los enfoques existentes para evaluar y predecir el estado de enteritis necrótica de las aves en el campo.