RESUMO
Background: Non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs) represent a rare yet the most prevalent malignancy among young men. Bone metastases (BMs) are exceedingly uncommon in this neoplasm, and available data regarding the initial disease presentation, survival outcomes, and prognostic significance of BMs are limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 40 NSGCT patients with BMs treated between 2001 and 2021 in our tertiary care center. The cohort was stratified into synchronous (n = 29) and metachronous (n = 11) groups based on the presence of BM at diagnosis or only at relapse, respectively. We assessed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease presentation, and treatments. Results: After a median follow-up of 93 months, the 5-year PFS and OS rates were 37.6% and 53.9% in the synchronous group and 18.2% and 36.4% in the metachronous group, respectively. At the initial diagnosis, most patients were classified into the IGCCCG poor prognostic group (n = 34, 85%). BMs were mostly asymptomatic (n = 23, 57.5%), involved the spine (n = 37, 92.5%), and could become visible only after disease response (n = 4, 10%). A pathological examination of resected bone lesions after first-line treatment revealed necrosis (n = 5, 71.4%), teratoma, or seminoma (both n = 1, 14.3%). At first relapse, eight patients in the synchronous group did not experience bone recurrence, while eight patients experienced recurrence at the initial affected bone site. Conclusions: In NSGCT patients, BMs often present asymptomatically and may initially be unnoticed. However, these patients may have a poorer prognosis compared to those in the IGCCCG poor prognostic group. Further studies including control groups are needed to assess the independent prognostic significance of BMs.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Metastatic non clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) is an heterogenous group, usually excluded from phase 3 trials. We report real life data of prognosis and systemic management of those patients. METHODS: We retrospectively included 102 metastatic nccRCC patients (unspecified papillary, n = 10; type 1 and 2 papillary n = 10 and n = 32; translocation RCC, n = 9; chromophobe, n = 14; collecting duct, n = 14) treated between 2006 and 2020. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. RESULTS: Among patients who underwent pathological review, 40.8% presented a complete histological discordance. First line treatments were mainly tyrosine kinase inhibitor (60.8%), combination including immunotherapy (7.8%) or combination of chemotherapy (13.7%). Median ORR ranged from 0% in unspecified papillary RCC to 42.9% in type 1 papillary RCC. Median PFS ranged from 2.9 months in collecting duct carcinoma to 10.9 months in type 1 papillary RCC. Median OS ranged from 6.8 months in collecting duct carcinoma to 29.1 months in MiT family translocation RCC. Thirty (29.4%) patients were included in a treatment trial during their treatment course. CONCLUSION: Metastatic nccRCC patients have variable prognosis due to heterogeneity of histological subtypes. Their diagnosis and access to therapeutic innovation remain suboptimal. Dedicated prospective trials are needed.