Expected Duplex Ultrasound Results in Distal Revascularization and Interval Ligation Conduits.

BACKGROUND: There are no published standards for the expected findings on noninvasive testing following distal revascularization and interval ligation (DRIL). This study evaluated the hemodynamic results and duplex ultrasound characteristics of DRIL. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent DRIL using autogenous vein between 2008 and 2019 was performed. Patients with both preoperative and follow-up noninvasive testing were included. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included in the study. Median time to first follow-up was 30 days (range 1-226 days), where 12 had complete resolution of their symptoms and 26 had partial resolution. Of the 27 patients that had preoperative and postoperative testing, the wrist brachial index improved from 0.56 to 0.90 with the median finger pressure improving from 56 to 73 (P < 0.001). Seventeen patients had a second follow-up (sFU) at a median time from DRIL of 196 days (range 106-843 days). There was no significant difference in wrist brachial index or finger pressures between first follow-up and sFU. Duplex ultrasound of the DRIL conduits (n = 32) showed a very consistent pattern with elevated median velocities proximally (inflow 235 cm/sec, proximal anastomosis 217.7 cm/sec) and distinctly slower median velocities distally (midconduit 46.4 cm/sec, distal anastomosis 78.3 cm/sec, outflow 59.3 cm/sec). The same pattern of velocities was held constant at the sFU (n = 16). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, velocities at the proximal anastomosis were significantly higher than velocities more distal in the DRIL bypass without evidence of stenosis. This may be due to hemodynamic changes in the brachial artery associated with presence of a fistula. Elevated velocities at the proximal anastomosis do not necessarily warrant further evaluation or intervention without other evidence of conduit compromise.

Distal revascularization and interval ligation for dialysis access-related ischemia is best performed using arm vein conduit.

OBJECTIVE: Distal revascularization and interval ligation (DRIL) is an effective approach to the management of hemodialysis access-related ischemia that offers both symptom relief and access salvage. The great saphenous vein (GSV) has been the most commonly used conduit. However, the use of an ipsilateral arm vein will allow for performance of the operation with the patient under regional anesthesia and might result in lower harvest site morbidity than the GSV. We sought to determine the suitability of DRIL using an arm vein compared with a GSV conduit. METHODS: All patients who had undergone DRIL from 2008 to 2019 were retrospectively identified in the electronic medical records. The characteristics and outcomes of those with an arm vein vs a GSV conduit were compared using the Wilcoxon log-rank and χ2 tests. Access patency was examined using Kaplan-Meier methods, with censoring at lost to follow-up or death. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients who had undergone DRIL for hand ischemia were included in the present study. An arm vein conduit was used in 40 patients (median age, 65 years; 25% male) and a GSV conduit in 26 patients (median age, 58 years; 19% male). No significant differences in comorbidities were found between the two groups, with the exception of diabetes mellitus (arm vein group, 78%; GSV group, 50% GSV; P = .02). No difference in the ischemia stage at presentation was present between the groups, with most patients presenting with stage 3 ischemia. Also, no differences in patency of hemodialysis access after DRIL between the two groups were found (P = .96). At 12 and 24 months after DRIL, 86.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.3%-94.9%) and 82.0% (95% CI, 61.3%-92.3%) of patients with an arm vein conduit had access patency compared with 93.8% (95% CI, 63.2%-99.1%) and 76.9% (95% CI, 43.0%-92.2%) of those with a GSV conduit, respectively. All but one patient had symptom resolution. The incidence of wound complications was significantly greater in the GSV group than in the arm vein group (46% vs 11%; P = .003). DRIL bypass had remained patent in all but one patient in each group, with a median follow-up of 18 months (range, 1-112 months) in the arm vein conduit group and 15 months (range, 0.25-105 months) in the GSV conduit group. CONCLUSIONS: DRIL procedures using an arm vein have advantages over those performed with the GSV. In our series, symptom resolution and access salvage were similar but distinctly fewer wound complications had occurred in the arm vein group. Additionally, the use of an arm vein conduit avoids the need for general anesthesia. If an ipsilateral arm vein is available, it should be the conduit of choice when performing DRIL.

Cognitive dietary restraint, disinhibition, and hunger are associated with 24-h energy expenditure.

BACKGROUND: Higher energy expenditure (EE) is associated with greater food intake, possibly because the human body senses EE and modifies eating behaviors to regulate food intake and ultimately achieve energy balance. As eating behaviors are also influenced by social and cultural factors, any association between EE and eating behavior may differ between ethnicities and sexes. OBJECTIVE: To assess relationships between EE and eating behavior constructs of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ). SUBJECTS/METHODS: In all, 307 healthy adults (201 M/106 F, 160 Native Americans) completed the TFEQ and had measures of 24-h EE in a whole-room calorimeter during energy balance. Body composition was assessed by DXA. RESULTS: On average, adjusted 24-h EE was lower (ß = -229 kcal/day, CI: -309 to -148, p < 0.001) but cognitive restraint (Δ = + 1.5; CI: 0.5 to 2.5, p = 0.003) and disinhibition (Δ = + 2.1, CI: 1.3 to 2.8, p < 0.001) scores were higher in women compared with men. In Native Americans, adjusted 24-h EE (ß = + 94 kcal/day, CI: 48 to 139, p < 0.001) and disinhibition scores (Δ = + 1.0, CI: 0.1 to 2.0, p = 0.003) were higher compared with other ethnicities. Higher 24-h EE associated with lower cognitive restraint in women (ρ = -0.20, p = 0.04), but not men (p = 0.71; interaction term p = 0.01) with no ethnic differences. Greater 24-h EE associated with higher disinhibition (ρ = 0.20, p = 0.001) and hunger cues (ρ = 0.16, p = 0.004) with no gender differences. These associations were primarily present in non-Native Americans (ρ = 0.23, p = 0.006 and ρ = 0.25, p = 0.003) but not observed in Native Americans (both p > 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Higher EE is associated with psychological constructs of eating behaviors that favors overeating including lower cognitive restraint, higher dietary disinhibition, and greater susceptibility to hungers cues, supporting the existence of energy-sensing mechanisms influencing human eating behavior. These associations were observed in ethnicities other than Native Americans, possibly explaining the contradictory relationships reported between EE and weight change in different ethnic groups. We propose that increased EE may alter eating behaviors, potentially leading to uncontrolled overeating and weight gain.

Perseveration augments the effects of cognitive restraint on ad libitum food intake in adults seeking weight loss.

As executive function may influence eating behaviors, our aim was to determine whether measures of executive function predict ad libitum food intake in subjects seeking weight loss. 78 obese, healthy individuals (40 female/38 male; age 36 ± 10 y; BMI 37.8 ± 7.2 kg/m(2)) completed the Iowa Gambling Task to evaluate decision making, the Stroop Word Color Task to assess attention, the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task to measure perseveration, and the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire to measure disinhibition and cognitive restraint. Ad libitum energy intake over 3-days was then collected using a validated vending paradigm. When expressed as a percentage of an individual's weight maintaining energy needs (%WMEN), intake correlated positively with perseveration (r=0.24, p=0.03) and negatively with restraint (r=-0.51, p<0.0001). In a regression model of %WMEN (r(2)=0.59, p<0.0001), an interaction between perseveration and restraint was observed (p=0.05). Increased perseveration intensified the effect of restraint such that subjects with both high restraint and perseveration ate the least (median (IQR)=70 (62, 94) %WMEN), while those with low restraint and high perseveration ate the most (130 (102, 153) %WMEN). Subjects with low perseveration and high versus low restraint ate a median of 84 (70, 86) and 112 (98, 133) %WMEN, respectively. The effects of perseveration on food intake are conditional on restraint, and may contribute to extremes of dietary intake in some individuals.

Using Live Imaging to Examine Early Cardiac Development in Zebrafish.

Visualizing dynamic cellular behaviors using live imaging is critical to the study of cell movement and to the study of cellular and embryonic polarity. Similarly, live imaging can be vital to elucidating the pathology of genetic disorders and diseases. Model systems such as zebrafish, whose in vivo development is accessible to both the microscope and genetic manipulation, are particularly well-suited to the use of live imaging. Here we describe an overall approach to conducting live-imaging experiments with a specific emphasis on investigating cell movements during the early stages of heart development in zebrafish.

Exenatide has a pronounced effect on energy intake but not energy expenditure in non-diabetic subjects with obesity: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

AIMS: Exenatide is a glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) mimetic which induces weight loss predominantly, it is presumed, via decreased food intake. However, circulating GLP-1 is also a determinant of energy expenditure. We sought to quantify the effect of exenatide on energy expenditure (EE) and energy intake. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center, randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial, we randomized 80 healthy, non-diabetic volunteers with obesity (46 women, age: 34.4 ±â€¯8.7 y, body fat by DXA: 44.2 ±â€¯7.8%) to subcutaneous exenatide 10 µg twice daily or placebo. Subjects were admitted to our clinical research unit for measurement of 24 h-EE in a whole-room indirect calorimeter and ad libitum food intake using an automated vending machine paradigm before and after randomization. Furthermore, energy expenditure and ad libitum food intake measures were repeated at 24-week after readmission for 7-day inpatient stay. Body weight was obtained weekly for up to 5 weeks and was recorded at each monthly follow up visit up to 24 weeks. RESULTS: Prior to randomization, participants over ate during the 3-day vending machine period in the whole study group (114.6 ±â€¯35.2%), expressed as percentage of weight maintaining energy needs (WMEN) with those who were eventually randomized to exenatide overeating more (121.6 ±â€¯37.7%) compared to placebo group (107.6 ±â€¯31.5%). In the exenatide group, ad libitum absolute energy intake decreased by 1016.1 ±â€¯724.5 kcal/day (95% CI: -1250.9 to -781.2) versus a 245.1 ±â€¯710.5 kcal/day (95% CI: -475.4 to -14.7) decrease in placebo (Δ = -624.8 Kcal/day, p < 0.0001) whereas the reduction in ad libitum caloric intake relative to WMEN was a more modest 366.8 ±â€¯752.1 kcal/day (95% CI: -614.0 to -119.6) decrease compared to 8.0 ±â€¯860.1 kcal/day (95% CI: -286.8 to 270.8) reduction in placebo (Δ = -382.3 Kcal/day, p = 0.03). The decrease was uniform across all macronutrients groups. No differences in 24hEE or substrate oxidation rates were found. In the exenatide group, body weight decreased more over the 5 weeks (ß = -0.039 kg/week, p = 0.02) and was lower compared to placebo at the end of fifth week (-1.48 ±â€¯0.77 kg; 95% CI: -3.02 to 0.05, p = 0.06). At the 24-week follow up, there was no difference in energy intake between exenatide group and placebo group and the treatment group decreased 24-h EE more compared to placebo (ß = -160.6 Kcal/day, 95% CI: -307.6 to 13.6, p = 0.03) compared to their pre-randomization measurement. However, this reduction was not present after adjustment for changes in FM and FFM (ß = -87 kcal/day, p = 0.14). No difference was observed in body weight (Δ = -1.72 kg, 95% CI: -5.77 to 2.30, p = 0.39) in exenatide versus placebo over 24 weeks. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, exenatide decreased early ad libitum energy intake but did not change 24 h-EE. However, the reduction was more modest in relative versus absolute terms (i.e. below that needed for WMEN). Thus, although rate of weight change was greater in the exenatide treated subjects at 5 weeks, the absolute difference in weight was not significant. These findings indicate that although exenatide reduces food intake, it may be more beneficial in blunting overeating and thus may serve to more prevent weight regain following initial weight loss.

The Consistency in Macronutrient Oxidation and the Role for Epinephrine in the Response to Fasting and Overfeeding.

Context: In humans, dietary vs intraindividual determinants of macronutrient oxidation preference and the role of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) during short-term overfeeding and fasting are unclear. Objective: To understand the influence on metabolic changes of diet and SNS during 24 hours of overfeeding. Design, Setting, Participants, and Interventions: While residing on a clinical research unit, 64 participants with normal glucose regulation were assessed during energy balance, fasting, and four 24-hour overfeeding diets, given in random order. The overfeeding diets contained 200% of energy requirements and varied macronutrient proportions: (1) standard (50% carbohydrate, 20% protein, and 30% fat); (2) 75% carbohydrate; (3) 60% fat; and (4) 3% protein. Main Outcome Measures: Twenty-four-hour energy expenditure (EE) and macronutrient oxidation rates were measured in an indirect calorimeter during the dietary interventions, with concomitant measurement of urinary catecholamines and free cortisol. Results: EE decreased with fasting (-7.7% ± 4.8%; P < 0.0001) and increased with overfeeding. The smallest increase occurred during consumption of the diet with 3% protein (2.7% ± 4.5%; P = 0.001) and the greatest during the diet with 75% carbohydrate (13.8 ± 5.7%; P < 0.0001). Approximately 60% of macronutrient oxidation was determined by diet and 20% by intrinsic factors (P < 0.0001). Only urinary epinephrine differed between fasting and overfeeding diets (Δ = 2.25 ± 2.9 µg/24h; P < 0.0001). During fasting, higher urinary epinephrine concentrations correlated with smaller reductions in EE (ρ = 0.34; P = 0.01). Conclusions: Independent from dietary macronutrient proportions, there is a strong individual contribution to fuel preference that remains consistent across diets. Higher urinary epinephrine levels may reflect the importance of epinephrine in maintaining EE during fasting.