RESUMO
PURPOSE: The neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer (NABC) is a rapidly changing area that benefits from guidelines integrating evidence with expert consensus to help direct practice. This can optimize patient outcomes by ensuring the appropriate use of evolving neoadjuvant principles. METHODS: An expert panel formulated evidence-based practice recommendations spanning the entire neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment journey. These were sent for practice-based consensus across Canada using the modified Delphi methodology, through a secure online survey. Final recommendations were graded using the GRADE criteria for guidelines. The evidence was reviewed over the course of guideline development to ensure recommendations remained aligned with current relevant data. RESULTS: Response rate to the online survey was almost 30%; representation was achieved from various medical specialties from both community and academic centres in various Canadian provinces. Two rounds of consensus were required to achieve 80% or higher consensus on 59 final statements. Five additional statements were added to reflect updated evidence but not sent for consensus. CONCLUSIONS: Key highlights of this comprehensive Canadian guideline on NABC include the use of neoadjuvant therapy for early stage triple negative and HER2 positive breast cancer, with subsequent adjuvant treatments for patients with residual disease. The use of molecular signatures, other targeted adjuvant therapies, and optimal response-based local regional management remain actively evolving areas. Many statements had evolving or limited data but still achieved high consensus, demonstrating the utility of such a guideline in helping to unify practice while further evidence evolves in this important area of breast cancer management.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Adjuvantes Imunológicos , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Canadá , Consenso , Feminino , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this implementation study were to (i) address the evidentiary, contextual, and facilitative mechanisms that serve to retard or promote the transfer and uptake of consultation recording use in oncology practice and (ii) follow patients during the first few days following receipt of the consultation recording to document, from the patient's perspective, the benefits realized from listening to the recording. METHODS: Nine medical and nine radiation oncologists from cancer centers in three Canadian cities (Calgary, Vancouver, and Winnipeg) recorded their primary consultations for 228 patients newly diagnosed with breast (n = 174) or prostate cancer (n = 54). The Digital Recording Use Semi-Structured Interview was conducted at 2 days and 1 week postconsultation. Each oncologist was provided a feedback letter summarizing the consultation recording benefits reported by their patients. RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent of patients listened to at least a portion of the recording within the first week following the consultation. Consultation recording favorableness ratings were high: 93.6% rated the intervention between 75 and 100 on a 100-point scale. Four main areas of benefit were reported: (i) anxiety reduction; (ii) enhanced retention of information; (iii) better informed decision making; and (iv) improved communication with family members. Eight fundamental components of successful implementation of consultation recording practice were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Further randomized trials are recommended, using standardized measures of the patient-reported benefit outcomes reported herein, to strengthen the evidence base for consultation recording use in oncology practice.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Satisfação do Paciente , Relações Médico-Paciente , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Encaminhamento e Consulta/organização & administração , Gravação em Fita/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ansiedade/prevenção & controle , Canadá , Comunicação , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Oncologia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , MédicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Older women with breast cancer are underrepresented in clinical trials, and data on the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in such patients are scant. We tested for the noninferiority of capecitabine as compared with standard chemotherapy in women with breast cancer who were 65 years of age or older. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with stage I, II, IIIA, or IIIB breast cancer to standard chemotherapy (either cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin) or capecitabine. Endocrine therapy was recommended after chemotherapy in patients with hormone-receptor-positive tumors. A Bayesian statistical design was used with a range in sample size from 600 to 1800 patients. The primary end point was relapse-free survival. RESULTS: When the 600th patient was enrolled, the probability that, with longer follow-up, capecitabine therapy was highly likely to be inferior to standard chemotherapy met a prescribed level, and enrollment was discontinued. After an additional year of follow-up, the hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death in the capecitabine group was 2.09 (95% confidence interval, 1.38 to 3.17; P<0.001). Patients who were randomly assigned to capecitabine were twice as likely to have a relapse and almost twice as likely to die as patients who were randomly assigned to standard chemotherapy (P=0.02). At 3 years, the rate of relapse-free survival was 68% in the capecitabine group versus 85% in the standard-chemotherapy group, and the overall survival rate was 86% versus 91%. Two patients in the capecitabine group died of treatment-related complications; as compared with patients receiving capecitabine, twice as many patients receiving standard chemotherapy had moderate-to-severe toxic effects (64% vs. 33%). CONCLUSIONS: Standard adjuvant chemotherapy is superior to capecitabine in patients with early-stage breast cancer who are 65 years of age or older. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00024102.)
Assuntos
Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Fluoruracila/análogos & derivados , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Capecitabina , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Ciclofosfamida/efeitos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Desoxicitidina/efeitos adversos , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Metotrexato/administração & dosagem , Metotrexato/efeitos adversos , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Metástase Neoplásica , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Receptores de Estrogênio/análise , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
To determine if higher bone mineral density (BMD) is a risk factor for breast cancer in women age 50 years and older. 37,860 women ≥ 50-year old with no previous breast cancer diagnosis had baseline BMD assessment between January 1999 and December 2007. Cox proportional hazards models were created for time to a new breast cancer as a function of lumbar spine or femoral neck BMD quartile (1st = lowest as reference) with adjustment for relevant covariates. A secondary analysis was performed to look for an association with estrogen receptor-positive (ER-positive) breast cancers. 794 invasive and in situ breast cancers (484 ER-positive) occurred with a median follow up of 5.4 years. Increased breast cancer risk was seen for the 3rd and 4th quartiles of lumbar spine BMD with hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.01-1.58) and 1.45 (95% CI, 1.16-1.81), respectively and for the 3rd quartile of femoral neck BMD with a HR of 1.33 (95% CI, 1.07-1.64). A test for linear trend showed that lumbar spine BMD (P < 0.001) and femoral neck BMD (P = 0.04) were associated with increased risk. Higher lumbar spine BMD was also associated with increased risk of ER-positive breast cancer with HR of 1.45 (95% CI, 1.08-1.94), and 1.68 (95% CI, 1.24-2.27) for women in the 2nd and 4th quartiles, respectively. A test for linear trend showed lumbar spine BMD was associated with increasing risk of ER-positive breast cancer (P = 0.003). Increased ER-positive breast cancer risk was seen for the 3rd quartile of femoral neck BMD with a HR of 1.43 (95% CI, 1.08-1.89). Higher lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD are associated with higher risk of breast cancer in women ≥50-year old. Lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD are associated with increased risk of ER-positive breast cancer.
Assuntos
Densidade Óssea , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/metabolismo , Manitoba , Menopausa , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/complicações , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Receptores de Estrogênio/biossíntese , Sistema de Registros , RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Globally there is a move to adopt competency-based medical education (CBME) at all levels of the medical training system. Implementation of a complex intervention such as CBME represents a marked paradigm shift involving multiple stakeholders. METHODS: This article aims to share tips, based on review of the available literature and the authors' experiences, that may help educators implementing CBME to more easily navigate this major undertaking and avoid "black ice" pitfalls that educators may encounter. RESULTS: Careful planning prior to, during and post implementation will help programs transition successfully to CBME. Involvement of key stakeholders, such as trainees, teaching faculty, residency training committee members, and the program administrator, prior to and throughout implementation of CBME is critical. Careful and selective choice of key design elements including Entrustable Professional Activities, assessments and appropriate use of direct observation will enhance successful uptake of CBME. Pilot testing may help engage faculty and learners and identify logistical issues that may hinder implementation. Academic advisors, use of curriculum maps, and identifying and leveraging local resources may help facilitate implementation. Planned evaluation of CBME is important to ensure choices made during the design and implementation of CBME result in the desired outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although the transition to CBME is challenging, successful implementation can be facilitated by careful design and strategic planning.
CONTEXTE: Partout dans le monde, on observe une tendance en faveur de l'éducation médicale axée sur les compétences (EMAC) à tous les niveaux du système d'éducation médicale. Une intervention complexe comme l'élaboration d'un programme d'EMAC représente un important changement de paradigme qui nécessite l'implication de plusieurs parties prenantes. MÉTHODE: L'objectif de cet article est de partager des conseils dégagés par les auteurs d'une revue de la littérature et de leur propre expérience afin d'aider les éducateurs à mieux s'orienter dans cette entreprise de taille qu'est la mise en Åuvre de l'EMAC et à éviter les écueils. RÉSULTATS: Une planification minutieuse avant, pendant et après la transition des programmes vers l'EMAC contribue à garantir son succès. L'implication des principales parties prenantes, telles que les stagiaires, le corps enseignant, les membres du comité du programme de résidence et l'administrateur du programme, avant et pendant la mise en Åuvre est essentielle. La sélection attentive des éléments clés, comme les activités professionnelles confiables, les évaluations et l'utilisation appropriée de l'observation directe, favorisera l'adoption de l'EMAC. Des tests pilotes peuvent permettre la participation du corps professoral et des apprenants, et à déceler les problèmes logistiques qui peuvent entraver la mise en Åuvre. Les conseillers pédagogiques, le recours à la cartographie des programmes d'études et le repérage et la mobilisation de ressources locales peuvent faciliter la mise en Åuvre des programmes d'EMAC. L'évaluation planifiée de ces programmes est importante pour garantir que les choix faits lors de leur conception et mise en Åuvre aboutissent aux résultats souhaités. CONCLUSION: Puisque la transition vers l'EMAC peut comporter de nombreux défis, elle peut néanmoins être opérée avec succès grâce à une conception et une planification stratégique minutieuses.
RESUMO
Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) is a rare but potentially fatal immune-related adverse event (irAE). In this multicentre retrospective cohort study, we describe the characteristics of ICI-induced IDDM in patients treated across five Canadian cancer centres, as well as their tumor response rates and survival. In 34 patients identified, 25 (74%) were male and 19 (56%) had melanoma. All patients received anti-programed death 1 (anti-PD1) or anti-programmed death ligand-1 (anti-PD-L1)-based therapy. From ICI initiation, median time to onset of IDDM was 2.4 months (95% CI 1.1-3.6). Patients treated with anti-PD1/PD-L1 in combination with an anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 antibody developed IDDM earlier compared with patients on monotherapy (1.4 vs. 3.9 months, p = 0.05). Diabetic ketoacidosis occurred in 21 (62%) patients. Amongst 30 patients evaluable for response, 10 (33%) had a complete response and another 10 (33%) had a partial response. Median overall survival was not reached (95% CI NE; median follow-up 31.7 months). All patients remained insulin-dependent at the end of follow-up. We observed that ICI-induced IDDM is an irreversible irAE and may be associated with a high response rate and prolonged survival.
RESUMO
Endocrine therapy is underutilized to reduce breast cancer incidence among women at increased risk. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) assessing 77 breast cancer genetic susceptibility loci personalizes risk estimates. We examined effect of personalized PRS breast cancer risk prediction on intention to take and endocrine therapy uptake among women at increased risk. Eligible participants had a 10-year breast cancer risk ≥5% by Tyrer-Cuzick model [International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS)] or ≥3.0 % 5-year Gail Model risk with no breast cancer history or hereditary breast cancer syndrome. Breast cancer risk was estimated, endocrine therapy options were discussed, and endocrine therapy intent was assessed at baseline. After genotyping, PRS-updated breast cancer risk estimates, endocrine therapy options, and intent to take endocrine therapy were reassessed; endocrine therapy uptake was assessed during follow-up. From March 2016 to October 2017, 151 patients were enrolled [median (range) age, 56.1 (36.0-76.4 years)]. Median 10-year and lifetime IBIS risks were 7.9% and 25.3%. Inclusion of PRS increased lifetime IBIS breast cancer risk estimates for 81 patients (53.6%) and reduced risk for 70 (46.4%). Of participants with increased breast cancer risk by PRS, 39 (41.9%) had greater intent to take endocrine therapy; of those with decreased breast cancer risk by PRS, 28 (46.7%) had less intent to take endocrine therapy (P < 0.001). On multivariable regression, increased breast cancer risk by PRS was associated with greater intent to take endocrine therapy (P < 0.001). Endocrine therapy uptake was greater among participants with increased breast cancer risk by PRS (53.4%) than with decreased risk (20.9%; P < 0.001). PRS testing influenced intent to take and endocrine therapy uptake. Assessing PRS effect on endocrine therapy adherence is needed.Prevention Relevance: Counseling women at increased breast cancer risk using polygenic risk score (PRS) risk estimates can significantly impact preventive endocrine therapy uptake. Further development of PRS testing to personalize breast cancer risk assessments and endocrine therapy counselling may serve to potentially reduce the incidence of breast cancer in the future.
Assuntos
Inibidores da Aromatase/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Adulto , Assistência ao Convalescente , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Aconselhamento/métodos , Feminino , Loci Gênicos , Testes Genéticos , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Background The incidence and management of trastuzumab-mediated cardiotoxicity outside of clinical trials has not been well described. Objective and methods The aim of the study was to retrospectively evaluate the incidence of cardiac dysfunction, characterize its natural history, and identify the degree of reversibility using cardiac MRI, in a population of HER-2 positive breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting. Results Out of 152 patients (mean age 52 +/- 10 years), 36 (24%) developed trastuzumab mediated cardiomyopathy, the majority asymptomatic. Factors that predicted the development of trastuzumab mediated cardiac dysfunction were a pre-existing history of hypertension, smoking history, and a family history of coronary artery disease. Within 3 months of treatment with trastuzumab, there was a difference in LVEF between the normal cohort and those patients who developed LV systolic dysfunction (61 +/- 5% vs. 51 +/- 8%, P < 0.01). During the 6-month-followup, 34/36 patients demonstrated subepicardial linear delayed enhancement of the lateral wall of the left ventricle on cardiac MRI, suggesting trastuzumab induced myocarditis. Conclusion Approximately 1 in 4 women may develop LV systolic dysfunction after treatment with adjuvant trastuzumab, necessitating careful patient selection and close serial monitoring using noninvasive cardiac imaging.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Cardiomiopatias/induzido quimicamente , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , TrastuzumabRESUMO
PURPOSE: Older women with breast cancer remain under-represented in clinical trials. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B 49907 trial focused on women age 65 years and older. We previously reported the primary analysis after a median follow-up of 2.4 years. Standard adjuvant chemotherapy showed significant improvements in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival compared with capecitabine. We now update results at a median follow-up of 11.4 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients age 65 years or older with early breast cancer were randomly assigned to either standard adjuvant chemotherapy (physician's choice of either cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin) or capecitabine. An adaptive Bayesian design was used to determine sample size and test noninferiority of capecitabine. The primary end point was RFS. RESULTS: The design stopped accrual with 633 patients at its first sample size assessment. RFS remains significantly longer for patients treated with standard chemotherapy. At 10 years, in patients treated with standard chemotherapy versus capecitabine, the RFS rates were 56% and 50%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; P = .03); breast cancer-specific survival rates were 88% and 82%, respectively (HR, 0.62; P = .03); and overall survival rates were 62% and 56%, respectively (HR, 0.84; P = .16). With longer follow-up, standard chemotherapy remains superior to capecitabine among hormone receptor-negative patients (HR, 0.66; P = .02), but not among hormone receptor-positive patients (HR, 0.89; P = .43). Overall, 43.9% of patients have died (13.1% from breast cancer, 16.4% from causes other than breast cancer, and 14.1% from unknown causes). Second nonbreast cancers occurred in 14.1% of patients. CONCLUSION: With longer follow-up, RFS remains superior for standard adjuvant chemotherapy versus capecitabine, especially in patients with hormone receptor-negative disease. Competing risks in this older population dilute overall survival benefits.
Assuntos
Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Capecitabina/uso terapêutico , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Capecitabina/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Ciclofosfamida/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Doxorrubicina/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Metotrexato/administração & dosagem , Metotrexato/efeitos adversos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Data on the comparative efficacy of fulvestrant and other endocrine treatments are inconsistent. Clinical markers predictive of greater benefit from fulvestrant compared to the alternate endocrine agents have not been identified. METHODS: We searched the literature from inception to May 2015, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and major conference proceedings. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared fulvestrant containing arm to either tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitors (AI) and presented results for subgroup analyses as Hazard Ratios (HR) for Time to Progression (TTP) or Progression Free Survival (PFS). Subgroup analyses reported in at least two RCTs were included. Data were then weighted using generic inverse variance approach and pooled in meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 software. Difference between sub-groups was tested with chi(2) statistics. RESULTS: Analysis included 4 RCTs comparing fulvestrant-based therapy to AI alone and comprising 2382 patients (1190 on fulvestrant and 1192 on control arms). TTP/PFS was the primary endpoint in all included studies. Four sub-groups fulfilled our criteria. Fulvestrant was associated with greater benefit in patients with visceral metastasis (HR 0.85 vs 1.02 for no visceral disease, p for difference=0.05) and in those patients with a time to recurrence >5 years (HR 0.80 vs 1.09 for recurrence ⩽5 years, p for difference=0.02). There was no apparent difference in benefit based on age >65 years (HR 0.86 vs 0.96, p for difference=0.32) or HER2/neu status (HR 0.36 vs 0.92, p for difference=0.09). CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced breast cancer with visceral involvement and longer time from diagnosis to recurrence had significantly better TTP/PFS with the use of fulvestrant. These results may have implications for selection of patients in the design of future clinical trials and to inform treatment decisions in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Estradiol/análogos & derivados , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/farmacologia , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Estradiol/farmacologia , Feminino , Fulvestranto , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
HER2 overexpression is associated with poor breast cancer prognosis and is the target for the humanized monoclonal antibody trastuzumab. This novel agent, when administered until disease progression in combination with chemotherapy, extends the survival of women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the optimal duration of trastuzumab therapy remains to be confirmed. We conducted a retrospective case review study of women with HER2-positive MBC who continued to receive trastuzumab beyond disease progression. Objectives were to assess whether treatment beyond disease progression shows any evidence of efficacy and to evaluate the feasibility of this approach. One hundred five patients (median age, 47 years; range, 24-77 years) were identified in 13 centers. Women had received =6 chemotherapy regimens (median, 1) before trastuzumab therapy. Median survival from first trastuzumab dose was 29 months. The overall response rate to trastuzumab alone or with a taxane as the first regimen was 39%; a further 30% of patients had stable disease as the best response. These rates were 36% and 38% after a second regimen of trastuzumab alone or with paclitaxel or vinorelbine was administered. Some patients responded to both the first and second regimens; others responded to the second regimen after the first had failed. Twenty-two patients experienced cardiac events, of whom 18 received >/=1 more trastuzumab regimen. Trastuzumab treatment beyond progression appears to be of value, producing responses and clinical benefit, and is well tolerated without significant cardiac toxicity. The feasibility of this approach warrants examination in prospective trials.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Trastuzumab , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The time period from diagnosis to the end of treatment is challenging for newly diagnosed cancer patients. Patients have a substantial need for information, decision aids, and psychosocial support. Recordings of initial oncology consultations improve information recall, reduce anxiety, enhance patient satisfaction with communication, and increase patients' perceptions that the essential aspects of their disease and treatment have been addressed during the consultation. Despite the research evidence supporting the provision of consultation recordings, uptake of this intervention into oncology practice has been slow. The primary aim of this project is to conduct an implementation study to explicate the contextual factors, including use of evidence, that facilitate and impede the transfer and uptake of consultation-recording use in a sample of patients newly diagnosed with breast or prostate cancer. METHODS: Sixteen oncologists from cancer centres in three Canadian cities will participate in this three-phase study. The preimplementation phase will be used to identify and address those factors that are fundamental to facilitating the smooth adoption and delivery of the intervention during the implementation phase. During the implementation phase, breast and prostate cancer patients will receive a recording of their initial oncology consultation to take home. Patient interviews will be conducted in the days following the consultation to gather feedback on the benefits of the intervention. Patients will complete the Digital Recording Use Semi-Structured Interview (DRUSSI) and be invited to participate in focus groups in which their experiences with the consultation recording will be explored. Oncologists will receive a summary letter detailing the benefits voiced by their patients. The postimplementation phase includes a conceptual framework development meeting and a seven-point dissemination strategy. DISCUSSION: Consultation recording has been used in oncology, family medicine, and other medicine specialties, and despite affirming evidence and probable applications to a large number of diseases and a variety of clinical contexts, clinical adoption of this intervention has been slow. The proposed study findings will advance our conceptual knowledge of the ways to enhance uptake of consultation recordings in oncology.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Oncologia , Relações Médico-Paciente , Neoplasias da Próstata/psicologia , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Gravação em Fita/instrumentação , Canadá , Comunicação , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Educação de Pacientes como AssuntoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether cardiac biomarkers, tissue velocity (TVI) and strain imaging, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging can predict early left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in human epidermal growth factor receptor II-positive breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting. BACKGROUND: Early indexes of LV systolic dysfunction with noninvasive cardiac imaging would be useful for addressing the cardiac safety profile of trastuzumab, potentially avoiding the detrimental effects of heart failure. METHODS: We used cardiac biomarkers, TVI and strain imaging, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to detect pre-clinical changes in LV systolic function, before conventional changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in human epidermal growth factor receptor II-positive breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting. RESULTS: Of 42 patients (mean age 47 ± 9 years) prospectively followed between 2007 and 2009, 10 (25%) developed trastuzumab-mediated cardiomyopathy (CM). Troponin T, C-reactive protein, and brain natriuretic peptide did not change over time. Within 3 months of adjuvant therapy with trastuzumab, there was a significant difference in the lateral S' between the normal cohort and the CM group (9.1 ± 1.6 cm/s and 6.4 ± 0.6 cm/s, respectively, p < 0.05). Similarly, the peak global longitudinal and radial strain decreased as early as 3 months in the trastuzumab-mediated cardiotoxicity group. As compared with both global longitudinal and radial strain, only S' was able to identify all 10 patients who developed trastuzumab-mediated CM. The LVEF subsequently decreased at 6 months of follow-up in all 10 patients, necessitating discontinuation of the drug. All 10 patients demonstrated delayed enhancement of the lateral wall of the LV within the mid-myocardial portion, consistent with trastuzumab-induced CM. CONCLUSIONS: Both TVI and strain imaging were able to detect pre-clinical changes in LV systolic function, before conventional changes in LVEF, in patients receiving trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Ecocardiografia Doppler/métodos , Imagem Cinética por Ressonância Magnética , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Biomarcadores/sangue , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Feminino , Coração/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peptídeo Natriurético Encefálico/análise , Peptídeo Natriurético Encefálico/sangue , Fragmentos de Peptídeos/sangue , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Medição de Risco/métodos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Trastuzumab , Troponina T/sangue , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/induzido quimicamente , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Patient adherence is critical in evaluating the effectiveness of an oral therapy. We sought to measure adherence among women randomly assigned to capecitabine in a preplanned substudy of a multicenter clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cancer and Leukemia Group B study CALGB 49907 was a randomly assigned trial comparing standard chemotherapy versus oral chemotherapy with capecitabine in patients age 65 years or older with early-stage breast cancer. We used microelectronic monitoring system (MEMS) caps on participants' capecitabine bottles to record pill bottle openings. Capecitabine was given in two divided daily doses for 14 consecutive days of a 21-day cycle for six cycles. Adherence was calculated as the number of doses taken divided by doses expected, taking into account toxicity-related dosing changes. A participant was defined as adherent if 80% or more of expected doses were recorded by MEMS. RESULTS: Overall, 161 patients were enrolled. Median age was 71 years (range, 65 to 89 years); 124 patients (83%) persisted with capecitabine to completion of planned protocol therapy. Adherence was 78% across all cycles, and adherence did not vary by cycle (P = .32). Twenty-five percent of participants took fewer than 80% of expected doses and were nonadherent. In a logistic regression model, participants with node-negative disease (P = .01) and mastectomy (P = .01) were more likely to be nonadherent. Adherence was not related to age, tumor stage, or hormone receptor status. Adherence was not significantly associated with relapse-free survival or grade 3 or 4 toxicity. CONCLUSION: Most older women with early-stage breast cancer were adherent to short-term oral chemotherapy in a randomized clinical trial. Age was not associated with adherence.