Neurochemical fingerprinting of amygdalostriatal and intra-amygdaloid projections: a tracing-immunofluorescence study in the rat.

Amygdalostriatal and intra-amygdaloid fiber connectivity was studied in rats via injections of one of the tracers Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHA-L) or biotinylated dextran amine (BDA) into various amygdaloid nuclei. To determine the neurotransmitter identity of labeled fibers we combined tracer detection with immunofluorescence staining, using antibodies against vesicular transporters (VTs) associated with glutamatergic (VGluT1, VGluT2) or GABAergic (VGAT) neurotransmission. High-magnification confocal laser scanning images were screened for overlap: occurrence inside tracer labeled fibers or axon terminals of immunofluorescence signal associated with one of the VTs. Labeled amygdalostriatal fibers were seen when tracer had been injected into the magnocellular and parvicellular portions of the basal amygdaloid nucleus and the lateral amygdaloid nucleus (nuclei belonging to 'cortical type' amygdaloid nuclei). Intra-amygdaloidal projection fibers were mostly found after tracer injections in the central and medial amygdaloid nuclei ('striatal type' amygdaloid nuclei). Terminals of tracer-labeled amygdalostriatal fibers contained immunofluorescence signal associated mostly with VGluT1 and to a lesser degree with VGluT2 or VGAT. Intra-amygdaloid labeled fibers showed colocalization mostly of VGluT1, followed by VGAT. VGluT2 co-occurred in a minority of intra-amygdaloid tracer-containing fiber terminals. We conclude from our observations that both amygdalostriatal and intra-amygdaloid projections, arising from, respectively, 'cortical type' and 'striatal type' amygdaloid nuclei contain strong glutamatergic and modest GABAergic components. The glutamatergic fibers express either VGluT1 or VGluT2. The absence in large numbers of tracer labeled fibers of expression of one of the selected VTs leads us to suspect that amygdalostriatal projection fibers may contain hitherto neglected neurotransmitters in these connections, e.g., aspartate.

MK-801 alters the effects of priming with L-DOPA on dopamine D1 receptor-induced changes in neuropeptide mRNA levels in the rat striatal output neurons.

In a previous study, we have shown in unilaterally dopamine-depleted rats that increased behavioral responsiveness to the dopamine D1-receptor agonist SKF-38393, which was induced by pretreatment with L-DOPA, is paralleled by specific alterations in striatal neuropeptide mRNA levels. The behavioral 'priming' effect of L-DOPA is prevented if L-DOPA is preceded by the NMDA-receptor antagonist MK-801. In the present study, the question is addressed whether blockade of the increased behavioral responsiveness with MK-801 also prevents the observed changes in striatal neuropeptide mRNA levels. After a challenge with SKF-38393 (3 mg/kg, s.c.), the striatal levels of preprodynorphin, preprotachykinin, and preproenkephalin mRNA were compared between unilaterally dopamine-depleted rats that were either primed with a single administration of L-DOPA (50 mg/kg, i.p.) or with L-DOPA preceded by MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.). Priming with L-DOPA enhanced the increase in dynorphin mRNA levels in the dorsolateral part of the dopamine-depleted striatum that occurred after SKF-38393. On the other hand, it had no significant effect on substance P or enkephalin mRNA levels. MK-801 prior to L-DOPA prevented the increased responsiveness of dynorphin regulation. However, it induced a decreased response to dopamine D1-receptor stimulation in the substance P mRNA levels in dorsal regions of the dopamine-depleted striatum. The levels of enkephalin mRNA after challenge with SKF-38393 were not affected by the MK-801 administration. These results demonstrate that the increased behavioral responsiveness to the D1-receptor agonist SKF-38393 after priming with L-DOPA is primarily related to the upregulation of dynorphin mRNA levels in the dopamine-depleted striatum.