RESUMO
Exosome-derived long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are extensively engaged in recovery and repair of the injured spinal cord, through different mechanisms. However, to date no study has systematically evaluated the differentially expressed lncRNAs involved in the development of spinal cord injury. Thus, the aim of this study was to identify key circulating exosome-derived lncRNAs in a rat model of spinal cord injury and investigate their potential actions. To this end, we established a rat model of spinal cord hemisection. Circulating exosomes were extracted from blood samples from spinal cord injury and control (sham) rats and further identified through Western blotting and electron microscopy. RNA was isolated from the exosomes and sequenced. The enrichment analysis demonstrated that there were distinctively different lncRNA and mRNA expression patterns between the two groups. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis and Gene Ontology (GO) functional analysis were performed to determine the possible involvements of upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs in various pathways and different biological processes, as well as their cellular locations and molecular functions. Furthermore, quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction showed that the expression of five lncRNAs--ENSRN0T00000067908, XR_590093, XR_591455, XR_360081, and XR_346933--was increased, whereas the expression of XR_351404, XR_591426, XR_353833, XR_590076, and XR_590719 was decreased. Of note, these 10 lncRNAs were at the center of the lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA coexpression network, which also included 198 mRNAs and 41 miRNAs. Taken together, our findings show that several circulating exosomal lncRNAs are differentially expressed after spinal cord injury, suggesting that they may be involved in spinal cord injury pathology and pathogenesis. These lncRNAs could potentially serve as targets for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of spinal cord injury.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Dendritic cells (DCs) are antigen presenting cells capable of inducing specific immune responses against microbial infections, transplant antigens, or tumors. Interestingly, microenvironment conditions such as those present in tumor settings might induce a DC phenotype that is poorly immunogenic and with the capability of promoting angiogenesis. We hypothesize that this plasticity may be caused not only by the action of specific cytokines or growth factors but also by the properties of the surfaces with which they interact, such as extracellular matrix (ECM) components. RESULTS: Herewith we studied the effect of different surfaces and soluble factors on the biology of DCs. To accomplish this, we cultured murine myeloid(m) DCs on surfaces coated with fibronectin, collagen I, gelatin, and Matrigel using poly-D-lysine and polystyrene as non-biological surfaces. Further, we cultured these cells in the presence of regular DC medium (RPMI 10% FBS) or commercially available endothelial medium (EGM-2). We determined that mDCs could be kept in culture up to 3 weeks in these conditions, but only in the presence of GM-CSF. We were able to determine that long-term DC cultures produce an array of angiogenic factors, and that some of these cultures still retain the capability to induce T cell responses. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether these data indicate that in order to design DC-based vaccines or treatments focused on changing the phenotype of DCs associated with diseases such as cancer or atherosclerosis, it becomes necessary to fully investigate the microenvironment in which these cells are present or will be delivered.