RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate risk factors associated with long-term mortality in patients with stage II and III tuberculous meningitis (TBM). METHODS: This retrospective analysis examined patients who were first diagnosed with stage II and III TBM at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 1, 2018 and October 1, 2019. Patients were followed via telephone and categorized into survival and mortality groups based on 4-year outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression identified independent risk factors for long-term mortality in stage II and III TBM. RESULTS: In total, 178 patients were included, comprising 108 (60.7%) males and 36 (20.2%) non-survivors. Mean age was 36 ± 17 years. Compared to survivors, non-survivors demonstrated significantly higher age, heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, blood glucose, rates of headache, neurological deficits, cognitive dysfunction, impaired consciousness, hydrocephalus, and basal meningeal inflammation. This group also exhibited significantly lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, blood potassium, albumin, and cerebrospinal fluid chloride. Multivariate analysis revealed age (OR 1.042; 95% CI 1.015-1.070; P = 0.002), GCS score (OR 0.693; 95% CI 0.589-0.814; P < 0.001), neurological deficits (OR 5.204; 95% CI 2.056-13.174; P < 0.001), and hydrocephalus (OR 2.680; 95% CI 1.081-6.643; P = 0.033) as independent mortality risk factors. The ROC curve area under age was 0.613 (95% CI 0.506-0.720; P = 0.036) and 0.721 (95% CI 0.615-0.826; P < 0.001) under GCS score. CONCLUSION: Advanced age, reduced GCS scores, neurological deficits, and hydrocephalus were identified as independent risk factors for mortality in stage II and III TBM patients.
Assuntos
Tuberculose Meníngea , Humanos , Masculino , Tuberculose Meníngea/mortalidade , Tuberculose Meníngea/complicações , Feminino , Adulto , Fatores de Risco , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , China/epidemiologia , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , AdolescenteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Predicting the short-term prognosis and severity of tuberculosis meningitis (TBM) patients without HIV infection can be challenging, and there have been no prior studies examining the neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a potential predictor of short-term prognosis or its relationship to TBM severity. We hypothesized that NLR might serve as an independent indicator of short-term prognostic significance and that there might be a correlation between NLR and severity. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of NLR as a predictor of short-term prognosis and its relationship to severity of tuberculosis meningitis patients without HIV infection. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from patients diagnosed with TBM in the West China Hospital, Sichuan University, from the period between January 1st, 2018 and August 1st, 2019. Multivariable analysis was executed by the logistic regression model to verify the independence of the 28-day mortality, the discriminative power for predicting short-term prognosis was evaluated using a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Pearson's correlation analysis was performed to discuss correlation between NLR and the severity of TBM. RESULTS: We collected data from 231 TBM patients without HIV infection. 68 (29.4%) patients are classified as stage (I) 138(59.8%) patients are stage (II) 25(10.8%) patients are stage (III) 16(6.9%) patients died during the follow-up period of 28 days. By multiple logistic regression analyses, the NLR (OR = 1.065, 95% CI = 1.001-1.133, P = 0.045), peripheral neurological deficit (OR 7.335, 95% CI 1.964-27.385, P = 0 0.003) and hydrocephalus (OR 11.338, 95% CI 2.397-53.633, P = 0 0.002) are independent risk factors of 28-day mortality. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for predicting short prognosis using NLR is 0.683 (95% CI 0.540-0.826, P = 0.015), the optimal cutoff value is 9.99(sensitivity: 56.3%, specificity: 80.9%). The Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients with higher NLR(>9.99) had significantly worse survival outcomes(P<0.01).Pearson's correlation analysis presents a significant positive correlation between the severity of TBM and NLR (r = 0.234, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: NLR, peripheral neurological deficit, and hydrocephalus are independent risk factors of 28-day mortality, NLR can predict the short-term prognosis of TBM patients without HIV infection. NLR is also found to be significantly and positively correlated with the severity of TBM.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Hidrocefalia , Tuberculose Meníngea , Humanos , Neutrófilos , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Tuberculose Meníngea/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Prognóstico , Linfócitos , Curva ROCAssuntos
Queimaduras/classificação , Incidentes com Feridos em Massa/classificação , Triagem/métodos , Adulto , Algoritmos , Queimaduras/diagnóstico , Queimaduras/mortalidade , Queimaduras/terapia , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Incidentes com Feridos em Massa/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Purpose: At present, simple, accurate, and efficient prognostic tools for the evaluation of cases with early-stage sepsis in the emergency department (ED) are lacking. An increased blood urea nitrogen to albumin ratio (BAR) has previously been shown to be a valuable biomarker with predictive utility in several diseases. The relationship between BAR and sepsis patient outcomes, however, is not well-understood. This exploration was thus developed for the exploration of the link between BAR values and the short-term prognosis of cases with sepsis. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort research of sepsis cases admitted to the West China Hospital of Sichuan University ED from July 2015 to June 2016. Laboratory data were collected upon ED admission, and 7-day all-cause mortality was the primary study endpoint. Relationships between BAR values and APACE II and SOFA scores were generated assessed with correlation coefficient heatmaps. Independent risk factors were identified through multivariate analyses, with the curves of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) being employed to gauge the value of BAR as a predictor of the risk of mortality in sepsis cases. Results: In sum, 801 patients participated in the present investigation. BAR values were strongly correlated with APACHE II and SOFA scores. In a multivariate logistic regression assessment, BAR was identified as an independent predictor of mortality among patients with sepsis (HR=1.032, 95% CI: 1.010-1.055, P=0.004). BAR exhibited an AUC of 0.741 (95% CI: 0.688-0.793, P<0.001) when used to predict patient mortality risk, with 5.27 being the optimal BAR cut-off. Conclusion: We found that BAR can be used as a reliable biomarker to predict mortality in patients with sepsis.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have showed that anti-acid therapy with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can inhibit pancreatic secretion and it may be used in treating acute pancreatitis (AP). But at present, there is no systematic reviews for the evidence and the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of anti-acid therapy with PPIs in AP were not unclear. Therefore, we will undertake a systematic review of the literature to summarize previous evidence regarding this topic, in order to clarify the effectiveness and safety of anti-acid therapy with PPIs in AP. METHODS: We will search the EMBASE, WANFANG DATA, Web of Knowledge, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Library from inception to June 30,2021 to retrieve relevant studies using the search strategy: ("Proton pump inhibitors" OR "PPI" OR "PPIs" OR "Omeprazole" OR "Tenatoprazole" OR "Pantoprazole" OR "acid suppression therapy" OR "acid suppression drugs") AND ("pancreatitis" OR "pancreatitides"). Two authors independently judged study eligibility and extracted data. Heterogeneity will be examined by computing the Q statistic and I2 statistic. RESULTS: This study assessed the efficiency and safety of proton pump inhibitors for treating acute pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS: This study will provide reliable evidence-based evidence for the clinical application of PPIs for treating AP. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is unnecessary as this protocol is only for systematic review and does not involve privacy data. The findings of this study will be disseminated electronically through a peer-review publication or presented at a relevant conference.
Assuntos
Pancreatite/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , 2-Piridinilmetilsulfinilbenzimidazóis/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Omeprazol/uso terapêutico , Pantoprazol/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Metanálise como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Liuhedan is a famous traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formula used to treat acute pancreatitis (AP) in China. However, there is no systematic reviews for the evidence and the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of Liuhedan for treating AP. The aim of this study is to summarize previous evidence, assessing the efficacy and safety of Liuhedan in the treatment of AP. METHODS: We will search the EMBASE, WANFANG DATA, Web of Knowledge, CNKI, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Library from inception to June 30, 2021 to retrieve relevant studies using the search strategy: ("Liuhedan" OR "Liuhe Pill" OR "Liu-He-Dan") AND ("pancreatitis" OR "pancreatitides"). Two authors independently judged study eligibility and extracted data. Heterogeneity will be examined by computing the Q statistic and I2 statistic. RESULTS: This study assessed the efficiency and safety of Liuhedan for treating acute pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS: This study will provide reliable evidence-based evidence for the clinical application of Liuhedan for treating AP. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is unnecessary as this protocol is only for systematic review and does not involve privacy data. The findings of this study will be disseminated electronically through a peer-review publication or presented at a relevant conference.