Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 49
Filtrar
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(1): 81-86, 2020 06 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31628838

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Endogenous antibodies (eAbs) against Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile toxins may protect against recurrence of C. difficile infection (rCDI). This hypothesis was tested using placebo group data from MODIFY (Monoclonal Antibodies for C. difficile Therapy) I and II (NCT01241552 and NCT01513239, respectively), global, randomized phase 3 trials that assessed the efficacy and safety of the antitoxin monoclonal antibodies bezlotoxumab and actoxumab in participants receiving antibiotic therapy for CDI. METHODS: A placebo infusion (normal saline) was administered on study day 1. Serum samples were collected on day 1, week 4, and week 12, and eAb-A and eAb-B titers were measured by 2 validated electrochemiluminescence immunoassays. Rates of initial clinical cure and rCDI were summarized by eAb titer category (low, medium, high) at each time point. RESULTS: Serum eAb titers were available from a total of 773 participants. The proportion of participants with high eAb-A and eAb-B titers increased over time. Rates of initial clinical cure were similar across eAb titer categories. There was no correlation between eAb-A titers and rCDI rate at any time point. However, there was a negative correlation between rCDI and eAb-B titer on day 1 and week 4. rCDI occurred in 22% of participants with high eAb-B titers at baseline compared with 35% with low or medium titers (P = .015). CONCLUSIONS: Higher eAb titers against toxin B, but not toxin A, were associated with protection against rCDI. These data are consistent with the observed efficacy of bezlotoxumab, and lack of efficacy of actoxumab, in the MODIFY trials. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01241552 and NCT01513239.


Assuntos
Antitoxinas , Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Antitoxinas/uso terapêutico , Clostridioides , Infecções por Clostridium/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Recidiva
2.
N Engl J Med ; 376(4): 305-317, 2017 01 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28121498

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile is the most common cause of infectious diarrhea in hospitalized patients. Recurrences are common after antibiotic therapy. Actoxumab and bezlotoxumab are human monoclonal antibodies against C. difficile toxins A and B, respectively. METHODS: We conducted two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials, MODIFY I and MODIFY II, involving 2655 adults receiving oral standard-of-care antibiotics for primary or recurrent C. difficile infection. Participants received an infusion of bezlotoxumab (10 mg per kilogram of body weight), actoxumab plus bezlotoxumab (10 mg per kilogram each), or placebo; actoxumab alone (10 mg per kilogram) was given in MODIFY I but discontinued after a planned interim analysis. The primary end point was recurrent infection (new episode after initial clinical cure) within 12 weeks after infusion in the modified intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: In both trials, the rate of recurrent C. difficile infection was significantly lower with bezlotoxumab alone than with placebo (MODIFY I: 17% [67 of 386] vs. 28% [109 of 395]; adjusted difference, -10.1 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -15.9 to -4.3; P<0.001; MODIFY II: 16% [62 of 395] vs. 26% [97 of 378]; adjusted difference, -9.9 percentage points; 95% CI, -15.5 to -4.3; P<0.001) and was significantly lower with actoxumab plus bezlotoxumab than with placebo (MODIFY I: 16% [61 of 383] vs. 28% [109 of 395]; adjusted difference, -11.6 percentage points; 95% CI, -17.4 to -5.9; P<0.001; MODIFY II: 15% [58 of 390] vs. 26% [97 of 378]; adjusted difference, -10.7 percentage points; 95% CI, -16.4 to -5.1; P<0.001). In prespecified subgroup analyses (combined data set), rates of recurrent infection were lower in both groups that received bezlotoxumab than in the placebo group in subpopulations at high risk for recurrent infection or for an adverse outcome. The rates of initial clinical cure were 80% with bezlotoxumab alone, 73% with actoxumab plus bezlotoxumab, and 80% with placebo; the rates of sustained cure (initial clinical cure without recurrent infection in 12 weeks) were 64%, 58%, and 54%, respectively. The rates of adverse events were similar among these groups; the most common events were diarrhea and nausea. CONCLUSIONS: Among participants receiving antibiotic treatment for primary or recurrent C. difficile infection, bezlotoxumab was associated with a substantially lower rate of recurrent infection than placebo and had a safety profile similar to that of placebo. The addition of actoxumab did not improve efficacy. (Funded by Merck; MODIFY I and MODIFY II ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01241552 and NCT01513239 .).


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/uso terapêutico , Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Amplamente Neutralizantes , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevenção Secundária , Adulto Jovem
3.
Anaerobe ; 61: 102137, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31846705

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bezlotoxumab has been shown to prevent Clostridium difficile infection recurrence (rCDI) in high-risk patients. METHODS: We used whole genome sequencing to estimate the impact of bezlotoxumab on same-strain relapse or new-strain reinfection in MODIFY I/II trials. Reinfection with a new strain and relapse with the same strain were differentiated by the comparison of ribotype (RT) and pair-wise single-nucleotide whole genome sequencing (WGS) variations (PWSNV). Relapse was assigned if the baseline RT and the RT isolated during rCDI were the same, and if PWSNVs were ≤ 2. Reinfection was assigned if the baseline RT and the RT isolated during rCDI were different, or if the RT was the same but PWSNVs were > 10. Unknown status was assigned if the RT was the same but PWSNVs were 3-10. RESULTS: 259 rCDI events were evaluable (50 [19.3%] reinfection; 198 [76.4%] relapse). The proportion of relapses was higher for ribotype 027 (84.5%) compared with other ribotypes (74.1%). Cumulative incidence of relapse was significantly lower for bezlotoxumab versus no bezlotoxumab (p < 0.0001), with a non-significant trend towards reduction for reinfection (p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: Bezlotoxumab treatment significantly reduced the rate of CDI relapse versus a regimen without bezlotoxumab. (NCT01241552/NCT01513239).


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Amplamente Neutralizantes/uso terapêutico , Clostridioides difficile/efeitos dos fármacos , Clostridioides difficile/genética , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/prevenção & controle , Genoma Bacteriano , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/imunologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/farmacologia , Anticorpos Amplamente Neutralizantes/imunologia , Anticorpos Amplamente Neutralizantes/farmacologia , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Clostridioides difficile/imunologia , Infecções por Clostridium/imunologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Recidiva , Ribotipagem
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 67(5): 649-656, 2018 08 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29538686

RESUMO

Background: Bezlotoxumab is a human monoclonal antibody against Clostridium difficile toxin B indicated to prevent C. difficile infection (CDI) recurrence (rCDI) in adults at high risk for rCDI. This post hoc analysis of pooled monocolonal antibodies for C.difficile therapy (MODIFY) I/II data assessed bezlotoxumab efficacy in participants with characteristics associated with increased risk for rCDI. Methods: The analysis population was the modified intent-to-treat population who received bezlotoxumab or placebo (n = 1554) by risk factors for rCDI that were prespecified in the statistical analysis plan: age ≥65 years, history of CDI, compromised immunity, severe CDI, and ribotype 027/078/244. The proportion of participants with rCDI in 12 weeks, fecal microbiota transplant procedures, 30-day all cause and CDI-associated hospital readmissions, and mortality at 30 and 90 days after randomization were presented. Results: The majority of enrolled participants (75.6%) had ≥1 risk factor; these participants were older and a higher proportion had comorbidities compared with participants with no risk factors. The proportion of placebo participants who experienced rCDI exceeded 30% for each risk factor compared with 20.9% among those without a risk factor, and the rCDI rate increased with the number of risk factors (1 risk factor: 31.3%; ≥3 risk factors: 46.1%). Bezlotoxumab reduced rCDI, fecal microbiota transplants, and CDI-associated 30-day readmissions in participants with risk factors for rCDI. Conclusions: The risk factors prespecified in the MODIFY statistical analysis plan are appropriate to identify patients at high risk for rCDI. While participants with ≥3 risk factors had the greatest reduction of rCDI with bezlotoxumab, those with 1 or 2 risk factors may also benefit. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT01241552 (MODIFY I) and NCT01513239 (MODIFY II).


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Clostridium/prevenção & controle , Prevenção Secundária , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Amplamente Neutralizantes , Clostridioides difficile/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Clostridium/mortalidade , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal , Feminino , Fidaxomicina/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Masculino , Metronidazol/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco , Vancomicina/administração & dosagem , Adulto Jovem
5.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 73(9): 2524-2528, 2018 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29788418

RESUMO

Background: The fully human monoclonal antibody bezlotoxumab binds Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile toxin B and reduces recurrence rates in patients with C. difficile infection (CDI) receiving antibacterial treatment for a primary or recurrent episode. Objectives: To investigate whether the timing of bezlotoxumab administration relative to the onset of antibacterial treatment affected clinical outcome in the Phase 3 trials MODIFY I (NCT01241552) and MODIFY II (NCT01513239). Methods: Initial clinical cure and CDI recurrence rates of participants who received bezlotoxumab or placebo were summarized by timing of infusion relative to the start of antibacterial drug treatment for CDI: 0-2, 3-4 and ≥5 days after onset. Results: Of 1554 total participants, 649 (41.8%), 469 (30.1%) and 436 (28.1%) received an infusion 0-2, 3-4 and ≥5 days after onset of antibacterial treatment for CDI, respectively. Regardless of timing of administration, there were no differences in initial clinical cure rates between participants receiving bezlotoxumab (range 77.8% to 81.4%) or placebo (77.8% to 81.7%). Bezlotoxumab efficacy was unaffected by timing of administration; rates of CDI recurrence were lower versus placebo in all subgroups (range 19.3% to 22.8% for bezlotoxumab and 31.7% to 35.8% for placebo). Timing of administration also had no effect on time to resolution of diarrhoea, which was achieved by the end of antibacterial treatment in ∼95% of participants in both bezlotoxumab and placebo groups. Conclusions: Bezlotoxumab is effective in preventing CDI recurrence and can be administered at any time before ending antibacterial drug treatment.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/administração & dosagem , Antitoxinas/administração & dosagem , Infecções por Clostridium/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Amplamente Neutralizantes , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Placebos/administração & dosagem , Recidiva , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 63(6): 730-734, 2016 09 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27365387

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although newer studies have evaluated risk factors for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), the vast majority did not measure important biomarkers such as endogenous anti-toxin A and anti-toxin B antibody levels. METHODS: Data from the placebo group of a phase 2 trial testing monoclonal antibodies to C. difficile toxins A and B for preventing CDI recurrence (rCDI) were analyzed to assess risk factors associated with rCDI. Patients with symptomatic CDI taking metronidazole or vancomycin were enrolled. The primary outcome was rCDI within 84 days of treatment start. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to examine associations between potential risk factors and rCDI. At baseline, demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded; endogenous antibody levels were assessed using 2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. RESULTS: A predictor of recurrence was age ≥65 years, and an antibody-mediated immune response to toxin B appears to be protective against rCDI. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate the importance of clinical as well as immunological risk factors in rCDI and provide more robust evidence for the protective effects of antibody to toxin B in the prevention of rCDI. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00350298.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antibacterianos , Proteínas de Bactérias/imunologia , Toxinas Bacterianas/imunologia , Clostridioides difficile/imunologia , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa , Idoso , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/imunologia , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/epidemiologia , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/imunologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco
7.
J Infect Dis ; 210(2): 192-9, 2014 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24495910

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In this analysis, we examine the incidence and clearance of external genital human papillomavirus (HPV) infection among heterosexual males aged 16-24 years. METHODS: A total of 1732 males aged 16-24 years old in the placebo arm of a quadrivalent HPV vaccine trial were included in this analysis. Participants were enrolled from 18 countries in Africa, the Asia-Pacific region, Europe, Latin America, and North America. Subjects underwent anogenital examinations and sampling of the penis, scrotum, and perineal/perianal regions. RESULTS: The incidence rate of any HPV DNA genotype 6, 11, 16, and/or 18 detection was 9.0 cases per 100 person-years. Rates of HPV DNA detection were highest in men from Africa. Median time to clearance of HPV genotypes 6, 11, 16, and 18 DNA was 6.1, 6.1, 7.7, and 6.2 months, respectively. Median time to clearance of persistently detected HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18 DNA was 6.7, 3.2, 9.2, and 4.7 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: The study results suggest that the acquisition of HPV 6, 11, 16, and/or 18 in males is common and that many of these so-called infections are subsequently cleared, similar to findings for women. Nevertheless, given the high rate of HPV detection among young men, HPV vaccination of males may reduce infection in men and reduce the overall burden of HPV-associated disease in the community.


Assuntos
Condiloma Acuminado/epidemiologia , Neoplasias dos Genitais Masculinos/epidemiologia , Heterossexualidade , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Condiloma Acuminado/complicações , DNA Viral/genética , DNA Viral/isolamento & purificação , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Genótipo , Saúde Global , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Papillomaviridae/classificação , Papillomaviridae/genética , Pênis/patologia , Pênis/virologia , Períneo/patologia , Períneo/virologia , Escroto/patologia , Escroto/virologia , Adulto Jovem
8.
N Engl J Med ; 365(17): 1576-85, 2011 Oct 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22029979

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The rate of anal cancer is increasing among both women and men, particularly men who have sex with men. Caused by infection with human papillomavirus (HPV), primarily HPV type 16 or 18, anal cancer is preceded by high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (grade 2 or 3). We studied the safety and efficacy of quadrivalent HPV vaccine (qHPV) against anal intraepithelial neoplasia associated with HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18 infection in men who have sex with men. METHODS: In a substudy of a larger double-blind study, we randomly assigned 602 healthy men who have sex with men, 16 to 26 years of age, to receive either qHPV or placebo. The primary efficacy objective was prevention of anal intraepithelial neoplasia or anal cancer related to infection with HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18. Efficacy analyses were performed in intention-to-treat and per-protocol efficacy populations. The rates of adverse events were documented. RESULTS: Efficacy of the qHPV vaccine against anal intraepithelial neoplasia associated with HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18 was 50.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.7 to 67.2) in the intention-to-treat population and 77.5% (95% CI, 39.6 to 93.3) in the per-protocol efficacy population; the corresponding efficacies against anal intraepithelial neoplasia associated with HPV of any type were 25.7% (95% CI, -1.1 to 45.6) and 54.9% (95% CI, 8.4 to 79.1), respectively. Rates of anal intraepithelial neoplasia per 100 person-years were 17.5 in the placebo group and 13.0 in the vaccine group in the intention-to-treat population and 8.9 in the placebo group and 4.0 in the vaccine group in the per-protocol efficacy population. The rate of grade 2 or 3 anal intraepithelial neoplasia related to infection with HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18 was reduced by 54.2% (95% CI, 18.0 to 75.3) in the intention-to-treat population and by 74.9% (95% CI, 8.8 to 95.4) in the per-protocol efficacy population. The corresponding risks of persistent anal infection with HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18 were reduced by 59.4% (95% CI, 43.0 to 71.4) and 94.9% (95% CI, 80.4 to 99.4), respectively. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the qHPV vaccine reduced the rates of anal intraepithelial neoplasia, including of grade 2 or 3, among men who have sex with men. The vaccine had a favorable safety profile and may help to reduce the risk of anal cancer. (Funded by Merck and the National Institutes of Health; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00090285.).


Assuntos
Doenças do Ânus/prevenção & controle , Carcinoma in Situ/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Adolescente , Adulto , Doenças do Ânus/virologia , Neoplasias do Ânus/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Ânus/virologia , Carcinoma in Situ/virologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Vacina Quadrivalente Recombinante contra HPV tipos 6, 11, 16, 18 , Papillomavirus Humano 11 , Papillomavirus Humano 16 , Papillomavirus Humano 18 , Papillomavirus Humano 6 , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Jovem
9.
N Engl J Med ; 364(5): 401-11, 2011 Feb 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21288094

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) and diseases caused by HPV are common in boys and men. We report on the safety of a quadrivalent vaccine (active against HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18) and on its efficacy in preventing the development of external genital lesions and anogenital HPV infection in boys and men. METHODS: We enrolled 4065 healthy boys and men 16 to 26 years of age, from 18 countries in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. The primary efficacy objective was to show that the quadrivalent HPV vaccine reduced the incidence of external genital lesions related to HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18. Efficacy analyses were conducted in a per-protocol population, in which subjects received all three vaccinations and were negative for relevant HPV types at enrollment, and in an intention-to-treat population, in which subjects received vaccine or placebo, regardless of baseline HPV status. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat population, 36 external genital lesions were seen in the vaccine group as compared with 89 in the placebo group, for an observed efficacy of 60.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.8 to 73.8); the efficacy was 65.5% (95% CI, 45.8 to 78.6) for lesions related to HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18. In the per-protocol population, efficacy against lesions related to HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18 was 90.4% (95% CI, 69.2 to 98.1). Efficacy with respect to persistent infection with HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18 and detection of related DNA at any time was 47.8% (95% CI, 36.0 to 57.6) and 27.1% (95% CI, 16.6 to 36.3), respectively, in the intention-to-treat population and 85.6% (97.5% CI, 73.4 to 92.9) and 44.7% (95% CI, 31.5 to 55.6) in the per-protocol population. Injection-site pain was significantly more frequent among subjects receiving quadrivalent HPV vaccine than among those receiving placebo (57% vs. 51%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Quadrivalent HPV vaccine prevents infection with HPV-6, 11, 16, and 18 and the development of related external genital lesions in males 16 to 26 years of age. (Funded by Merck and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00090285.).


Assuntos
Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Adolescente , Adulto , Alphapapillomavirus , Método Duplo-Cego , Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/epidemiologia , Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/virologia , Vacina Quadrivalente Recombinante contra HPV tipos 6, 11, 16, 18 , Humanos , Incidência , Injeções/efeitos adversos , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Masculino , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
10.
JAMA ; 309(13): 1368-78, 2013 Apr 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23549582

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Infections due to Staphylococcus aureus are serious complications of cardiothoracic surgery. A novel vaccine candidate (V710) containing the highly conserved S. aureus iron surface determinant B is immunogenic and generally well tolerated in volunteers. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative vaccination in preventing serious postoperative S. aureus infection in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Double-blind, randomized, event-driven trial conducted between December 2007 and August 2011 among 8031 patients aged 18 years or older who were scheduled for full median sternotomy within 14 to 60 days of vaccination at 165 sites in 26 countries. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to receive a single 0.5-mL intramuscular injection of either V710 vaccine, 60 µg (n = 4015), or placebo (n = 4016). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy end point was prevention of S. aureus bacteremia and/or deep sternal wound infection (including mediastinitis) through postoperative day 90. Secondary end points included all S. aureus surgical site and invasive infections through postoperative day 90. Three interim analyses with futility assessments were planned. RESULTS: The independent data monitoring committee recommended termination of the study after the second interim analysis because of safety concerns and low efficacy. At the end of the study, the V710 vaccine was not significantly more efficacious than placebo in preventing either the primary end points (22/3528 V710 vaccine recipients [2.6 per 100 person-years] vs 27/3517 placebo recipients [3.2 per 100 person-years]; relative risk, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.44-1.48; P = .58) or secondary end points despite eliciting robust antibody responses. Compared with placebo, the V710 vaccine was associated with more adverse experiences during the first 14 days after vaccination (1219/3958 vaccine recipients [30.8%; 95% CI, 29.4%-32.3%] and 866/3967 placebo recipients [21.8%; 95% CI, 20.6%-23.1%], including 797 [20.1%; 95% CI, 18.9%-21.4%] and 378 [9.5%; 95% CI, 8.6%-10.5%] with injection site reactions and 66 [1.7%; 95% CI, 1.3%-2.1%] and 51 [1.3%; 95% CI, 1.0%-1.7%] with serious adverse events, respectively) and a significantly higher rate of multiorgan failure during the entire study (31 vs 17 events; 0.9 [95% CI, 0.6-1.2] vs 0.5 [95% CI, 0.3-0.8] events per 100 person-years; P = .04). Although the overall incidence of vaccine-related serious adverse events (1 in each group) and the all-cause mortality rate (201/3958 vs 177/3967; 5.7 [95% CI, 4.9-6.5] vs 5.0 [95% CI, 4.3-5.7] deaths per 100 person-years; P = .20) were not statistically different between groups, the mortality rate in patients with staphylococcal infections was significantly higher among V710 vaccine than placebo recipients (15/73 vs 4/96; 23.0 [95% CI, 12.9-37.9] vs 4.2 [95% CI, 1.2-10.8] per 100 person-years; difference, 18.8 [95% CI, 8.0-34.1] per 100 person-years). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery with median sternotomy, the use of a vaccine against S. aureus compared with placebo did not reduce the rate of serious postoperative S. aureus infections and was associated with increased mortality among patients who developed S. aureus infections. These findings do not support the use of the V710 vaccine for patients undergoing surgical interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00518687.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/prevenção & controle , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Antiestafilocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Antiestafilocócicas/efeitos adversos , Esternotomia/efeitos adversos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardiovasculares , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Infecções Estafilocócicas/mortalidade , Staphylococcus aureus , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Torácicos/efeitos adversos , Vacinação , Adulto Jovem
11.
J Infect Dis ; 203(1): 58-65, 2011 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21148497

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We examined the baseline prevalence of penile, scrotal, and perineal/perianal human papillomavirus (HPV) in heterosexual men (HM). We also evaluated baseline characteristics of HM to assess factors associated with prevalent HPV detection. METHODS: We tested serum samples from 3463 HM aged 16-24 years with 1-5 lifetime female sexual partners for antibodies to HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18. We collected baseline swab specimens for the detection of DNA of HPV 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, and 59 from 3 areas: penile, scrotal, and perineal/perianal. Risk factors for prevalent HPV DNA detection were evaluated. RESULTS: The prevalence of any tested HPV type was 18.7% at the penis, 13.1% at the scrotum, 7.9% at the perineal/perianal region, and 21.0% at any site. Having >3 lifetime female sexual partners had the greatest impact on HPV prevalence: odds ratio (OR) 3.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1-4.9) for HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18; and OR 4.5 (95% CI 3.3-6.1) for all HPV types tested. HPV DNA detection was highest in Africa. Neither condom usage nor circumcision was associated with HPV DNA prevalence. CONCLUSION: Genital-HPV DNA detection is common in young, sexually active HM. We found HPV to be most prevalent in African men and least prevalent in men from the Asia-Pacific region. Increased numbers of sexual partners was an important risk factor for HPV DNA prevalence.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/epidemiologia , Heterossexualidade , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Canal Anal/virologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , DNA Viral/genética , DNA Viral/isolamento & purificação , Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/virologia , Humanos , Masculino , Papillomaviridae/classificação , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Pênis/virologia , Períneo/virologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Escroto/virologia , Adulto Jovem
12.
J Infect Dis ; 203(1): 66-74, 2011 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21148498

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We examined the baseline prevalence of penile, scrotal, perineal/perianal, and intra-anal human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seronegative men who have sex with men (MSM). METHODS: Data were analyzed from 602 MSM aged 16-27 years with ≤ 5 lifetime sexual partners. Serum samples were tested for antibodies to HPV6/11/16/18. Swab samples were collected separately from several anogenital areas for detection of HPV6/11/16/18/31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59 DNA. RESULTS: The prevalence of any tested HPV type was 18.5% at the penis, 17.1% at the scrotum, 33.0% at the perineal/perianal region, 42.4% in the anal canal, and 48.0% at any site. Overall, 415 MSM (69.7%) were negative to HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18 at enrollment by both serology and DNA detection. Men residing in Europe and Latin America had significantly increased risk of HPV infection at external genital sites and the anal canal compared to men from Australia. Tobacco use and greater number of lifetime sexual partners was associated with higher HPV infection prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HPV infection is high among young sexually active MSM, with the anal canal being the most common site of infection. Lifetime number of sexual partners was the most important modifiable risk factor for anogenital HPV infection.


Assuntos
Doenças do Ânus/epidemiologia , Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/epidemiologia , Homossexualidade Masculina , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Canal Anal/virologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Doenças do Ânus/virologia , Austrália , DNA Viral/genética , DNA Viral/isolamento & purificação , Europa (Continente) , Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/virologia , Humanos , América Latina , Masculino , Papillomaviridae/classificação , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Pênis/virologia , Períneo/virologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Escroto/virologia , Adulto Jovem
13.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 18(5): 2073747, 2022 11 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35653552

RESUMO

Vaccination against hepatitis B (HepB) provides long-term protection against infection. This is despite a reduction in HepB surface antibody (anti-HBs) concentrations over time to levels below the well-accepted correlate of protection of ≥10 mIU/mL. Continued evidence of immune memory and protection despite declined anti-HBs concentrations can be demonstrated by HepB virus surface antigen challenge studies. Long-term immune memory and protection against HepB infection has not been demonstrated previously for the pediatric hexavalent vaccine DTaP5-IPV-HepB-Hib. This phase 3, multicenter, single-group, open-label challenge study (NCT04490499; EudraCT: 2020-000126-26) evaluated immune memory against HepB infection in children who had received DTaP5-IPV-HepB-Hib at 2, 4, and 11-12 months of age, or at 2, 3, 4, and 12 months of age. At age 8-9 years, they were each challenged with 5 µg of monovalent HepB vaccine. Anti-HBs levels were measured on pre-challenge day 1 and post-challenge day 30. At baseline, 45.4% (93 of 205) had anti-HBs levels ≥10 mIU/mL. On post-challenge day 30, 99.5% (201 of 202) had anti-HBs levels ≥10 mIU/mL, regardless of initial vaccination schedule. Post-challenge, geometric mean concentrations increased 71-fold over baseline and 96.0% of children had a ≥4-fold rise in anti-HBs concentrations with similar results across both dosing schedules. The challenge dose was well tolerated. The robust anti-HBs responses after a single 5-µg dose of HepB vaccine confirm the persistence of a HepB immune memory and demonstrate that DTaP5-IPV-HepB-Hib provides long-term protection against HepB.


Assuntos
Vacinas Anti-Haemophilus , Haemophilus influenzae tipo b , Hepatite B , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche , Hepatite B/prevenção & controle , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite B , Vacinas contra Hepatite B , Humanos , Memória Imunológica , Lactente , Vacina Antipólio de Vírus Inativado , Vacinas Combinadas
14.
EBioMedicine ; 82: 104138, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35809371

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Vaccines against COVID-19 are needed to overcome challenges associated with mitigating the global pandemic. We report the safety and immunogenicity of V590, a live recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus-based COVID-19 vaccine candidate. METHODS: In this placebo-controlled, double-blind, three-part phase 1 study, healthy adults were randomised to receive a single intramuscular dose of vaccine or placebo. In Part 1, younger (18-54 years) and, in Part 2, older (≥55 years) adults seronegative for SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid received one of four V590 dose levels (5.00 × 105; 2.40 × 106; 1.15 × 107; or 5.55 × 107 plaque-forming units [pfu]) or placebo. In Part 3, a single V590 dose level (5.55 × 107 pfu) or placebo was administered to younger SARS-CoV-2 seropositive adults. Primary endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and for Parts 1 and 2 anti-SARS-CoV-2 serum neutralising antibody responses measured by 50% plaque reduction neutralisation (PRNT50) assay at Day 28. Registration NCT04569786 [P001-02]. FINDINGS: 232 participants were randomised and 219 completed the study. In seronegative participants, anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific antibody responses to V590 were low and comparable to placebo across the lower dose levels. At the highest dose level (5.55 × 107 pfu), anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific PRNT50 was 2.3-fold higher than placebo. The most frequently reported AEs were injection-site pain (38.4%), headache (15.1%) and fatigue (13.4%). INTERPRETATION: V590 was generally well-tolerated. However, Day 28 anti-SARS-Cov-2 spike-specific antibody responses in seronegative participants following a single intramuscular administration of V590 were not sufficient to warrant continued development. FUNDING: The study was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinas
15.
Hum Vaccin ; 7(7): 768-75, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21712645

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic vaccination with a quadrivalent HPV (types 6, 11, 16, 18) vaccine (qHPV) has been shown to prevent infection with HPV 6/11/16/18 and associated disease in women and more recently, in men. Here we report on the safety and reactogenicity of the qHPV vaccine in males. A total of 4,065 healthy males aged 16-26 years were enrolled into a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive qHPV vaccine or placebo at day 1, month 2, and month 6. Safety and tolerability were assessed via the collection of reported adverse experiences (AEs). All serious AEs (vaccine- or procedure-related or not) and all deaths occurring during the study were recorded. Safety analyses were conducted in all subjects who received at least one dose of vaccine or placebo. The proportion of subjects who reported at least one injection-site AE was higher in the qHPV vaccine group versus the placebo group (60.1% vs 53.7%, respectively), however most of these AEs were mild/moderate in intensity. The incidence of at least one systemic AE was comparable between the vaccine and placebo groups (31.7% vs 31.4%, respectively). There were no vaccine-related serious AEs or deaths. The occurrence of AEs did not increase with each successive injection, and among trial participants who were seropositive for at least one vaccine HPV type at enrollment, the profile of adverse events was similar to that of the entire study cohort. The qHPV vaccine was generally well tolerated in males aged 16-26 years and had a favorable safety profile.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Vacina Quadrivalente Recombinante contra HPV tipos 6, 11, 16, 18 , Papillomavirus Humano 11/imunologia , Papillomavirus Humano 16/imunologia , Papillomavirus Humano 18/imunologia , Papillomavirus Humano 6/imunologia , Humanos , Masculino , Infecções por Papillomavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/imunologia , Segurança , Adulto Jovem
16.
N Engl J Med ; 356(11): 1121-9, 2007 Mar 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17360990

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The introduction of universal varicella vaccination in 1995 has substantially reduced varicella-related morbidity and mortality in the United States. However, it remains unclear whether vaccine-induced immunity wanes over time, a condition that may result in increased susceptibility later in life, when the risk of serious complications may be greater than in childhood. METHODS: We examined 10 years (1995 to 2004) of active surveillance data from a sentinel population of 350,000 subjects to determine whether the severity and incidence of breakthrough varicella (with an onset of rash >42 days after vaccination) increased with the time since vaccination. We used multivariate logistic regression to adjust for the year of disease onset (calendar year) and the subject's age at both disease onset and vaccination. RESULTS: A total of 11,356 subjects were reported to have varicella during the surveillance period, of whom 1080 (9.5%) had breakthrough disease. Children between the ages of 8 and 12 years who had been vaccinated at least 5 years previously were significantly more likely to have moderate or severe disease than were those who had been vaccinated less than 5 years previously (risk ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 5.8). The annual rate of breakthrough varicella significantly increased with the time since vaccination, from 1.6 cases per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 1.2 to 2.0) within 1 year after vaccination to 9.0 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 6.9 to 11.7) at 5 years and 58.2 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 36.0 to 94.0) at 9 years. CONCLUSIONS: A second dose of varicella vaccine, now recommended for all children, could improve protection from both primary vaccine failure and waning vaccine-induced immunity.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Varicela/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idade de Início , Varicela/imunologia , Varicela/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Varicela/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Herpesvirus Humano 3/imunologia , Humanos , Imunização Secundária , Lactente , Modelos Logísticos , Análise Multivariada , Vigilância da População , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
17.
PLoS One ; 15(3): e0230106, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32160246

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) is characterized by repeated formation of papillomas in the respiratory tract and is caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6 and 11. Women with genital HPV infection are slow to develop weak humoral immunity, but respond robustly to the HPV vaccine. We wondered if people with RRP had a similar immune response. METHODS: A convenience cross-sectional sample of patients with RRP were recruited into one of four groups: 1) adults and adolescents with active RRP, 2) children with active RRP, 3) RRP patients who had undergone HPV vaccination prior to enrollment and, 4) people with RRP who were in remission. Anti-HPV6 and HPV11 serology was determined by cLIA on a single blood draw. RESULTS: Of the 70 subjects enrolled, 36, 16, 8, and 10, were in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. 47% of participants aged >11 years and 81% aged ≤11 years possessed no antibodies against HPV6 or HPV11 (ie. double seronegative). 61% of patients in remission were double seronegative. All participants who had received HPV vaccine previously were seropositive to at least one of these low risk HPV types (ie none of them were double seronegative). Among patients who had active RRP and never had HPV vaccination (n = 52) there was an association between duration of symptoms and seropositivity. Of those who were seropositive, the geometric mean duration of symptoms was 11 years compared to 4.7 years for those who were seronegative (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: People with RRP are capable of developing a humoral response to HPV6 and HPV11. That response appears to be robust when initiated by the HPV vaccine, but either nonexistent or slow to develop in response to infection. Most in remission do not have demonstrable antibody levels against HPV6 or HPV11.


Assuntos
Papillomavirus Humano 11/imunologia , Papillomavirus Humano 6/imunologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/patologia , Infecções Respiratórias/patologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Papillomavirus/imunologia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/imunologia , Infecções Respiratórias/imunologia , Adulto Jovem
18.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 6(8)2019 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31375837

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The optimum diagnostic test method for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) remains controversial due to variation in accuracy in identifying true CDI. This post hoc analysis examined the impact of CDI diagnostic testing methodology on efficacy outcomes in phase 3 MODIFY I/II trials. METHODS: In MODIFY I/II (NCT01241552/NCT01513239), participants received bezlotoxumab (10 mg/kg) or placebo during anti-CDI treatment for primary/recurrent CDI (rCDI). Using MODIFY I/II pooled data, initial clinical cure (ICC) and rCDI were assessed in participants diagnosed at baseline using direct detection methods (enzyme immunoassay [EIA]/cell cytotoxicity assay [CCA]) or indirect methods to determine toxin-producing ability (toxin gene polymerase chain reaction [tgPCR]/toxigenic culture). RESULTS: Of 1554 participants who received bezlotoxumab or placebo in MODIFY I/II, 781 (50.3%) and 773 (49.7%) were diagnosed by tgPCR/toxigenic culture and toxin EIA/CCA, respectively. Participants diagnosed by toxin EIA/CCA were more likely to be inpatients, older, and have severe CDI. In bezlotoxumab recipients, ICC rates were slightly higher in the toxin EIA/CCA subgroup (81.7%) vs tgPCR/toxigenic culture (78.4%). Bezlotoxumab significantly reduced the rCDI rate vs placebo in both subgroups; however, the magnitude of reduction was substantially larger in participants diagnosed by toxin EIA/CCA (relative difference, -46.6%) vs tgPCR/toxigenic culture (-29.1%). In bezlotoxumab recipients, the rCDI rate was lower in the toxin EIA/CCA subgroup (17.6%) vs tgPCR/toxigenic culture (23.6%; absolute difference, -6.0%; 95% confidence interval, -12.4 to 0.3; relative difference, -25.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic tests that detect fecal C. difficile toxins are of fundamental importance to accurately diagnosing CDI, including in clinical trial design, ensuring that therapeutic efficacy is not underestimated.

19.
MMWR Recomm Rep ; 56(RR-4): 1-40, 2007 Jun 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17585291

RESUMO

Two live, attenuated varicella zoster virus-containing vaccines are available in the United States for prevention of varicella: 1) a single-antigen varicella vaccine (VARIVAX, Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey), which was licensed in the United States in 1995 for use among healthy children aged > or = 12 months, adolescents, and adults; and 2) a combination measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella vaccine (ProQuad, Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey), which was licensed in the United States in 2005 for use among healthy children aged 12 months-12 years. Initial Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations for prevention of varicella issued in 1995 (CDC. Prevention of varicella: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices [ACIP]. MMWR 1996;45 [No. RR-11]) included routine vaccination of children aged 12-18 months, catch-up vaccination of susceptible children aged 19 months-12 years, and vaccination of susceptible persons who have close contact with persons at high risk for serious complications (e.g., health-care personnel and family contacts of immunocompromised persons). One dose of vaccine was recommended for children aged 12 months-12 years and 2 doses, 4-8 weeks apart, for persons aged > or = 13 years. In 1999, ACIP updated the recommendations (CDC. Prevention of varicella: updated recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices [ACIP]. MMWR 1999;48 [No. RR-6]) to include establishing child care and school entry requirements, use of the vaccine following exposure and for outbreak control, use of the vaccine for certain children infected with human immunodeficiency virus, and vaccination of adolescents and adults at high risk for exposure or transmission. In June 2005 and June 2006, ACIP adopted new recommendations regarding the use of live, attenuated varicella vaccines for prevention of varicella. This report revises, updates, and replaces the 1996 and 1999 ACIP statements for prevention of varicella. The new recommendations include 1) implementation of a routine 2-dose varicella vaccination program for children, with the first dose administered at age 12-15 months and the second dose at age 4-6 years; 2) a second dose catch-up varicella vaccination for children, adolescents, and adults who previously had received 1 dose; 3) routine vaccination of all healthy persons aged > or = 13 years without evidence of immunity; 4) prenatal assessment and postpartum vaccination; 5) expanding the use of the varicella vaccine for HIV-infected children with age-specific CD4+ T lymphocyte percentages of 15%-24% and adolescents and adults with CD4+ T lymphocyte counts > or = 200 cells/microL; and 6) establishing middle school, high school, and college entry vaccination requirements. ACIP also approved criteria for evidence of immunity to varicella.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Varicela , Varicela/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola , Aciclovir/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais/biossíntese , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Varicela/economia , Varicela/epidemiologia , Vacina contra Varicela/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Varicela/efeitos adversos , Vacina contra Varicela/economia , Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Vacina contra Varicela/provisão & distribuição , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Armazenamento de Medicamentos , Herpes Zoster/epidemiologia , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Lactente , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/efeitos adversos , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/economia , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/imunologia , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/provisão & distribuição , Vacinas Combinadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Combinadas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Combinadas/economia , Vacinas Combinadas/imunologia , Vacinas Combinadas/provisão & distribuição
20.
Public Health Rep ; 122(2): 155-9, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17357357

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Exposure to varicella zoster virus through close contact with people with chickenpox was suggested to boost specific immunity, reducing the risk of herpes zoster (HZ). Since the introduction of the varicella immunization program in the US in 1995, varicella morbidity has decreased substantially. This article examines incidence and risk factors associated with self-reported HZ disease and whether exposure to chickenpox within the previous decade reduces the risk of shingles in this age group. METHODS: In 2004, a national random-digit dial telephone survey was used to obtain information on self-reported HZ disease, demographic characteristics, and exposure to children with chickenpox in the past decade. National estimates of the incidence of shingles disease were calculated. RESULTS: Incidence rate of self-reported HZ was 19 per 1,000 population per year. White individuals were 3.5 times more likely to report shingles than Hispanic individuals (p<0.01). Previous exposure to chickenpox did not protect against HZ disease in this population. Seven percent of adults > or =65 years of age reported exposure to children with chickenpox in the past decade. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of HZ among individuals > or =65 years of age in the U.S. may be higher than previously described in the literature, with whites being at higher risk for the disease. Currently, the potential contribution of exposure to chickenpox as a mechanism for maintaining cell-mediated immunity against HZ may be limited to a small percentage of the population. Vaccination against HZ may represent the best means of decreasing this disease burden.


Assuntos
Exposição Ambiental , Herpes Zoster/epidemiologia , Herpesvirus Humano 3/imunologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pré-Escolar , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Herpes Zoster/imunologia , Herpes Zoster/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Entrevistas como Assunto , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA