Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
2.
Expert Opin Biol Ther ; 8(5): 561-7, 2008 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18407761

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A recent incident, the halting of a Phase I/II trial utilising an adeno-associated vector, highlights the fact that there are more hurdles to overcome prior to a full realisation of gene therapy in the clinical arena. METHODS: The sources of information used to prepare the paper were obtained through published work on Pubmed/Medline and materials published on the US/UK governmental agency websites. RESULTS/CONCLUSION: Over the years, two fatal incidents associated with viral vector usage have been reported. Viral vectors used as carriers for gene therapy have failed in safety trials on two occasions. Also, the human immune response and the oncogenic property of the vectors have restricted the advancement of gene therapy as a therapeutic tool. Nonetheless, gene therapy has now progressed from its infancy 'proof of concept' stage, to the next stage in which we try to overcome the problems associated with therapeutic application. However, this progression has been slow as more and more setbacks have occurred. This calls for a new perspective and radical thinking about future vector development.


Assuntos
Terapia Genética/tendências , Dependovirus/genética , Vetores Genéticos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
3.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 32(4): 402-7, 2006 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16716610

RESUMO

MATERIALS AND METHODS: 200 consecutive emergency/transfer and 150 consecutive elective patients admitted between April 2004 and January 2005, were studied. Data was obtained from departmental Morbidity and Mortality records and the computerised laboratory medicine information system. RESULTS: 261 (75%) of the 350 patients were screened for MRSA on admission (target 100%). The proportions of emergency/transfer and elective patients screened were similar (78% and 72% respectively). The prevalence of MRSA carriage detected by admission screening in emergency/transfer patients 30/153 (20%), was significantly higher (p<0.0001) than in elective patients 2/108 (2%). A simple decision analysis model suggests that gentamicin should be used when the prevalence of MRSA reaches 10% and vancomycin when the prevalence reaches 50%. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of MRSA colonisation in emergency/transfer patients has important implications for pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia , Hospitalização , Resistência a Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Portador Sadio/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Tratamento de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Admissão do Paciente , Prevalência , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA