Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 58
Filtrar
1.
Anesth Analg ; 138(6): 1192-1204, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38295119

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Understanding the association of acute pain intensity and opioid consumption after cardiac surgery with chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) can facilitate implementation of personalized prevention measures to improve outcomes. The objectives were to (1) examine acute pain intensity and daily mg morphine equivalent dose (MME/day) trajectories after cardiac surgery, (2) identify factors associated with pain intensity and opioid consumption trajectories, and (3) assess whether pain intensity and opioid consumption trajectories are risk factors for CPSP. METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study design conducted between August 2012 and June 2020 with 1-year follow-up. A total of 1115 adults undergoing cardiac surgery were recruited from the preoperative clinic. Of the 959 participants included in the analyses, 573 completed the 1-year follow-up. Main outcomes were pain intensity scores and MME/day consumption over the first 6 postoperative days (PODs) analyzed using latent growth mixture modeling (GMM). Secondary outcome was 12-month CPSP status. RESULTS: Participants were mostly male (76%), with a mean age of 61 ± 13 years. Three distinct linear acute postoperative pain intensity trajectories were identified: "initially moderate pain intensity remaining moderate" (n = 62), "initially mild pain intensity remaining mild" (n = 221), and "initially moderate pain intensity decreasing to mild" (n = 251). Age, sex, emotional distress in response to bodily sensations, and sensitivity to pain traumatization were significantly associated with pain intensity trajectories. Three distinct opioid consumption trajectories were identified on the log MME/day: "initially high level of MME/day gradually decreasing" (n = 89), "initially low level of MME/day remaining low" (n = 108), and "initially moderate level of MME/day decreasing to low" (n = 329). Age and emotional distress in response to bodily sensations were associated with trajectory membership. Individuals in the "initially mild pain intensity remaining mild" trajectory were less likely than those in the "initially moderate pain intensity remaining moderate" trajectory to report CPSP (odds ratio [95% confidence interval, CI], 0.23 [0.06-0.88]). No significant associations were observed between opioid consumption trajectory membership and CPSP status (odds ratio [95% CI], 0.84 [0.28-2.54] and 0.95 [0.22-4.13]). CONCLUSIONS: Those with moderate pain intensity right after surgery are more likely to develop CPSP suggesting that those patients should be flagged early on in their postoperative recovery to attempt to alter their trajectory and prevent CPSP. Emotional distress in response to bodily sensations is the only consistent modifiable factor associated with both pain and opioid trajectories.


Assuntos
Dor Aguda , Analgésicos Opioides , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Dor Crônica , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória , Humanos , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/psicologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Feminino , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Dor Aguda/diagnóstico , Dor Aguda/psicologia , Idoso , Dor Crônica/psicologia , Dor Crônica/diagnóstico , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
2.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 859, 2024 Mar 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38504198

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepines are a class of medications that are being frequently prescribed in Canada but carry significant risk of harm. There has been increasing clinical interest on the potential "sparing effects" of medical cannabis as one strategy to reduce benzodiazepine use. The objective of this study as to examine the association of medical cannabis authorization with benzodiazepine usage between 2013 and 2021 in Alberta, Canada. METHODS: A propensity score matched cohort study with patients on regular benzodiazepine treatment authorized to use medical cannabis compared to controls who do not have authorization for medical cannabis. A total of 9690 medically authorized cannabis patients were matched to controls. To assess the effect of medical cannabis use on daily average diazepam equivalence (DDE), interrupted time series (ITS) analysis was used to assess the change in the trend of DDE in the 12 months before and 12 months after the authorization of medical cannabis. RESULTS: Over the follow-up period after medical cannabis authorization, there was no overall change in the DDE use in authorized medical cannabis patients compared to matched controls (- 0.08 DDE, 95% CI: - 0.41 to 0.24). Likewise, the sensitivity analysis showed that, among patients consuming ≤5 mg baseline DDE, there was no change immediately after medical cannabis authorization compared to controls (level change, - 0.04 DDE, 95% CI: - 0.12 to 0.03) per patient as well as in the month-to-month trend change (0.002 DDE, 95% CI: - 0.009 to 0.12) per patient was noted. CONCLUSIONS: This short-term study found that medical cannabis authorization had minimal effects on benzodiazepine use. Our findings may contribute ongoing evidence for clinicians regarding the potential impact of medical cannabis to reduce benzodiazepine use. HIGHLIGHTS: • Medical cannabis authorization had little to no effect on benzodiazepine usage among patients prescribed regular benzodiazepine treatment in Alberta, Canada. • Further clinical research is needed to investigate the potential impact of medical cannabis as an alternative to benzodiazepine medication.


Assuntos
Cannabis , Maconha Medicinal , Adulto , Humanos , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Maconha Medicinal/uso terapêutico , Alberta/epidemiologia , Canadá
3.
J Prosthodont ; 2023 Jul 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37422719

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Denture Stomatitis, a chronic mucosal inflammation associated with Candida albicans, is common among denture wearers. Several health conditions have been linked to chronic Candida infections. The complex, multifactorial nature of denture stomatitis requires the continuous pursuit of effective long-term solutions. The present in vitro study investigated the effect of incorporating organoselenium into 3D-printed denture base resin on C. albicans adhesion and biofilm formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty disks were fabricated using 3D-printed denture base resin and assigned to three experimental groups (10/group): disks without organoselenium (control), disks with 0.5% organoselenium (0.5%SE), and disks with 1% organoselenium (1%SE). Each disk was incubated with approximately 1 × 106 cells/mL of C. albicans for 48 h. Microbial viability (CFU/mL) was quantified by the spread plate method, while Confocal laser scanning microscopy and scanning electron microscope were performed for quantifying the biofilm thickness and examining biofilm morphology, respectively. Data were analyzed using One-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test. RESULTS: CFU/mL was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in Control when compared with 0.5%SE and 1%SE, but no significant difference between 0.5%SE and 1%SE. A similar trend was observed with biofilm thickness except that there was no significant difference between the Control and 0.5%SE. There was C. albicans biofilm adhesion on the Control disks, with yeast cells and hyphae formation, whereas on 0.5%SE and 1%SE, there was inhibition of yeast cells transition to hyphae formation. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of organoselenium into 3D-printed denture base resin was effective in reducing C. albicans biofilm formation and growth on denture base material.

4.
Can J Psychiatry ; 67(6): 470-480, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34520280

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Despite increasing rates of legalization of medical cannabis worldwide, the current evidence available on its effect on mental health outcomes including anxiety is of mixed results. This study assesses the effect of medical cannabis on generalized anxiety disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scores in adult patients between 2014 and 2019 in Ontario and Alberta, Canada. METHODS: An observational cohort study of adults authorized to use medical cannabis. The GAD-7 was administered at the time of the first visit to the clinic and subsequently over the follow-up time period of up to 3.2 years. Overall changes in GAD-7 scores were computed (mean change) and categorized as: no change (<1 point); improvement; or worsening-over time. RESULTS: A total of 37,303 patients had initial GAD-7 scores recorded and 5,075 (13.6%) patients had subsequent GAD-7 follow-up scores. The average age was 54.2 years (SD 15.7 years), 46.0% were male, and 45.6% noted anxiety symptoms at the baseline. Average GAD-7 scores were 9.11 (SD 6.6) at the baseline and after an average of 282 days of follow-up (SD 264) the average final GAD-7 score recorded was 9.04 (SD 6.6): mean change -0.23 (95% CI, -0.28 to -0.17, t[5,074]: -8.19, p-value <0.001). A total of 4,607 patients (90.8%) had no change in GAD-7 score from their initial to final follow-up, 188 (3.7%) had a clinically significant decrease, and 64 (1.3%) noted a clinically significant increase in their GAD-7 scores. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was a statistically significant decrease in GAD-7 scores over time (in particular, in the 6-12-month period). However, this change did not meet the threshold to be considered clinically significant. Thus, we did not detect clinical improvements or detriment in GAD-7 scores in medically authorized cannabis patients. However, future well-controlled clinical trials are needed to fully examine risks or benefits associated with using medical cannabis to treat anxiety conditions.


Assuntos
Cannabis , Maconha Medicinal , Adulto , Alberta , Transtornos de Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Ansiedade/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Maconha Medicinal/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário , Questionário de Saúde do Paciente
5.
Can J Psychiatry ; 67(7): 544-552, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34806435

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Poisoning from psychoactive drugs and substance use disorders (SUD) have been reported among non-medical cannabis users. However, little is known about medical cannabis users and their risk for poisoning and/or development of SUD. This study assessed the risk of emergency department (ED) visits or hospitalization for 1) poisoning by psychoactive drugs and 2) mental/behavioural disorders due to the use of psychoactive drugs and other substances, in medically authorized cannabis patients in Ontario, Canada from 2014-2017. METHODS: A cohort study of adult patients authorized for medical cannabis that were matched to population-based controls. ED visit/hospitalization were assessed with a main diagnostic code for: 1) poisoning by psychoactive drugs; 2) mental and behavioural disorder due to psychoactive drugs or other substance use. Conditional Cox proportional hazards regressions were conducted. RESULTS: 18,653 cannabis patients were matched to 51,243 controls. During a median follow-up of 243 days, the incidence rate for poisoning was 4.71 per 1,000 person-years (95%CI: 3.71-5.99) for cases and 1.73 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI: 1.36-2.19) for controls. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was 2.45 (95%CI: 1.56-3.84). For mental/behavioural disorders, the incident rates were 8.89 (95% CI: 7.47-10.57) and 5.01 (95% CI: 4.36-5.76) in the cannabis and the controls group. The aHR was 2.27 (95%CI: 1.66-3.11). No difference was observed between males and females (P-value for interaction > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study observed a short-term increased risk of ED visit/hospitalization for poisoning or for mental/behavioural disorders (from use of psychoactive drugs and other substances)- in medically authorized cannabis patients.


Assuntos
Cannabis , Maconha Medicinal , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Adulto , Cannabis/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Ontário/epidemiologia , Psicotrópicos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia
6.
Subst Use Misuse ; 57(10): 1633-1641, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35866679

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: As medical cannabis use increases in North America, establishing its safety profile is a priority. The objective of this study was to assess rates of emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations due to poisoning by cannabis, and cannabis-related mental health disorders among medically authorized cannabis patients in Ontario, Canada, between 2014 and 2017. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who received medical cannabis authorization in Ontario, Canada, using data collected in participating cannabis clinics. Outcomes included ED visit/hospitalization with a main diagnosis code for: cannabis/cannabinoid poisoning; and mental/behavioral disorders due to cannabis use. Cox proportional hazard regressions were utilized to analyze the data. RESULTS: From 29,153 patients who received medical authorization, 23,091 satisfied the inclusion criteria. During a median follow-up of 240 days, 14 patients visited the ED or were hospitalized for cannabis poisoning-with an incidence rate of 8.06 per 10,000 person-years (95% CI: 4.8-13.6). A total of 26 patients visited the ED or were hospitalized for mental and behavioral disorders due to cannabis use-with an incidence rate of 15.0 per 10,000 person-years (95% CI: 10.2-22.0). Predictors of cannabis-related mental and behavioral disorders include prior substance use disorders, other mental disorders, age, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the incidence of cannabis poisoning or cannabis-related mental and behavioral disorders was low among patients who were authorized to use cannabis for medical care. Identified predictors can help to target patients with potential risk of the studied outcomes.


Assuntos
Cannabis , Abuso de Maconha , Maconha Medicinal , Transtornos Mentais , Cannabis/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Hospitalização , Humanos , Incidência , Abuso de Maconha/epidemiologia , Maconha Medicinal/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Mentais/complicações , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Ontário/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
7.
Vet Surg ; 51(7): 1061-1069, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35929727

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and mechanical stability of sacroiliac (SI) joint stabilization using 2 short 3.5 mm cortical screws, each spanning an average of 23% of the width of the sacral body. STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric experimental study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Twenty-four canine pelvis specimens. METHODS: Pelvis specimens were prepared by disarticulation of the left SI joint and osteotomy of the left pubis and left ischium, and stabilized using a single long lag screw (LLS), 2 short lag screws (SLS) or 2 short positional screws (SPS). Computed tomography (CT) imaging was used to determine standardized screw lengths for each group and was repeated following implant insertion. Specimens were secured within a servohydraulic test frame and loaded through the acetabulum to simulate weight bearing under displacement control at 4 mm/min for 20 mm total displacement. Group mechanical testing data were compared. RESULTS: Peak load, yield load, and stiffness were more than 2 times greater in both the SLS and SPS groups when compared with the LLS group. No mechanical difference was identified between the short-screw groups. CONCLUSION: Sacroiliac luxation fixation using 2 short screws created a stronger, stiffer construct when compared with fixation using a single lag screw spanning 60% of the width of the sacral body. No mechanical advantage was observed between short screws inserted in positional vs. lag fashion. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Sacroiliac luxation fixation using 2 short screws creates a mechanically superior construct with a larger region of acceptable implant positioning and potentially reduced risk of iatrogenic injury compared with conventional fixation.


Assuntos
Doenças do Cão , Luxações Articulares , Animais , Parafusos Ósseos/veterinária , Cães , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/veterinária , Luxações Articulares/cirurgia , Luxações Articulares/veterinária , Osteotomia/veterinária , Pelve , Articulação Sacroilíaca/cirurgia
8.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 21(1): 426, 2021 09 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34507536

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cannabis is increasingly used for therapeutic purpose. However, its safety profile is not well known. This study assessed the risk of cardiovascular-related emergency department (ED) visit and hospitalization in adult patients authorized to use medical cannabis in Ontario, Canada from 2014 to 2017. METHODS: This is a longitudinal cohort study of patients who received medical cannabis authorization and followed-up in cannabis clinics, matched to population-based controls. The primary outcome was an ED visit or hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or stroke; and secondary outcome was for any cardiovascular event. Conditional Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the association between cannabis authorization and risk. RESULTS: 18,653 cannabis patients were matched to 51,243 controls. During a median follow-up of 242 days, the incidence rates for ACS or stroke were 7.19/1000 person-years and 5.67/1000 person-years in the cannabis and controls group, respectively- adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 1.44 (95% CI 1.08-1.93). When stratified by sex, the association was only statistically significant among males: aHR 1.77 (1.23-2.56). For the secondary outcome (any CV events), the aHR was 1.47 (1.26-1.72). The aHR among males and females were 1.52 (1.24-1.86) and 1.41 (1.11-1.79), respectively. Tested interaction between cannabis authorization and sex was not significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Medical cannabis authorization was associated with an increased risk of ED visits or hospitalization for CV events including stroke and ACS.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Maconha Medicinal/efeitos adversos , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/epidemiologia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário/epidemiologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
9.
BMC Public Health ; 21(1): 843, 2021 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33933061

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The opioid overdose epidemic in Canada and the United States has become a public health crisis - with exponential increases in opioid-related morbidity and mortality. Recently, there has been an increasing body of evidence focusing on the opioid-sparing effects of medical cannabis use (reduction of opioid use and reliance), and medical cannabis as a potential alternative treatment for chronic pain. The objective of this study is to assess the effect of medical cannabis authorization on opioid use (oral morphine equivalent; OME) between 2013 and 2018 in Alberta, Canada. METHODS: All adult patients defined as chronic opioid users who were authorized medical cannabis by their health care provider in Alberta, Canada from 2013 to 2018 were propensity score matched to non-authorized chronic opioid using controls. A total of 5373 medical cannabis patients were matched to controls, who were all chronic opioid users. The change in the weekly average OME of opioid drugs for medical cannabis patients relative to controls was measured. Interrupted time series (ITS) analyses was used to assess the trend change in OME during the 26 weeks (6 months) before and 52 weeks (1 year) after the authorization of medical cannabis among adult chronic opioid users. RESULTS: Average age was 52 years and 54% were female. Patients on low dose opioids (< 50 OME) had an increase in their weekly OME per week (absolute increase of 112.1 OME, 95% CI: 104.1 to 120.3); whereas higher dose users (OME > 100), showed a significant decrease over 6 months (- 435.5, 95% CI: - 596.8 to - 274.2) compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: This short-term study found that medical cannabis authorization showed intermediate effects on opioid use, which was dependent on initial opioid use. Greater observations of changes in OME appear to be in those patients who were on a high dosage of opioids (OME > 100); however, continued surveillance of patients utilizing both opioids and medical cannabis is warranted by clinicians to understand the long-term potential benefits and any harms of ongoing use.


Assuntos
Cannabis , Maconha Medicinal , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Adulto , Alberta/epidemiologia , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Maconha Medicinal/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos
10.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 28(12): 2036-2046.e1, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34077793

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine sociodemographic, surgical, and psychologic risk factors, including pain sensitivity, for persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP) after hysterectomy. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. SETTING: Canadian academic medical center. PATIENTS: Patients (N = 200) who underwent hysterectomy (vaginal, laparoscopic, robotic, or open) between 2013 and 2014. INTERVENTIONS: Participants completed preoperative questionnaires assessing baseline pain scores and psychologic factors, including the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire, Brief Pain Inventory Interference Items, the Beck Depression Inventory, the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Pain was recorded 1 and 24 hours postoperatively using the NRS. Patients were reassessed at 6 weeks postoperatively and completed the Brief Pain Inventory Interference Items, Patient Global Impression of Change, and the NRS. Patients who reported pain at 6 weeks were reassessed at 12 weeks using the above-mentioned questionnaires. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 200 study participants, 58 (32%) met the definition for PPSP (NRS ≥ 1 at 12 weeks), and 11 (6.1%) met the definition for moderate to severe postsurgical pain (NRS ≥ 4 at 12 weeks). Risk factors for PPSP included baseline pain scores, depression, pain catastrophizing, uterine mass, open surgical approach, acute postoperative pain, history of chronic pain, and having a hysterectomy due to pain. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that depression, pain catastrophizing, open surgical approach, and acute postoperative pain at 1 hour represent independent predictors of PPSP. Pain sensitivity was not associated with PPSP but was associated with acute and severe acute (NRS≥4) pain at 24 hours. CONCLUSION: Patients at risk for PPSP after hysterectomy can be identified preoperatively using validated questionnaires. This information can be used to guide targeted perioperative interventions to mitigate their risk.


Assuntos
Robótica , Canadá , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos
11.
Harm Reduct J ; 18(1): 61, 2021 06 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34103058

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: With legal access to medical cannabis in Canada since 2001, there is a need to fully characterize its use at both the individual and population levels. We draw on data from Canada's largest cohort study of medical cannabis to identify the primary reasons for medical cannabis authorization in Canada from 2014 to 2019 in two major provinces: Alberta (AB) and Ontario (ON), and review the extent that evidence supports each indication. METHODS: Self-reported baseline assessments were collected from adult patients in ON (n = 61,835) and AB (n = 3410) who were authorized medical cannabis. At baseline, sociodemographic, primary medical information, and validated clinical questionnaires were completed by patients as part of an individual assessment. Patients' reasons for seeking medical cannabis were compared to published reviews and guidelines to assess the level of evidence supporting medical cannabis use for each condition. RESULTS: Medical cannabis use in both AB and ON was similar in both demographic and reason for authorization. The most common reasons for medical cannabis authorization were: (1) pain (AB = 77%, ON = 76%) primarily due to chronic musculoskeletal, arthritic, and neuropathic pain, (2) mental health concerns (AB = 32.9%, ON = 38.7%) due to anxiety and depression, and (3) sleep problems (AB = 28%, ON = 25%). More than 50 other conditions were identified as reasons for obtaining authorization. CONCLUSION: In both AB and ON, the majority of reasons for medical cannabis authorization are not substantiated by clinical evidence to fully support its efficacy for long-term use. Ongoing epidemiological studies on medical cannabis on these treatments are warranted to fully outline its treatment benefits or risks.


Assuntos
Cannabis , Maconha Medicinal , Adulto , Alberta , Canadá , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Maconha Medicinal/uso terapêutico , Ontário/epidemiologia
12.
BMC Public Health ; 20(1): 987, 2020 Jun 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32576158

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Legal access to medical cannabis is increasing world-wide. Despite this, there is a lack of evidence surrounding its efficacy on mental health outcomes, particularly, on depression. This study assesses the effect of medical cannabis on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores in adult patients between 2014 and 2019 in Ontario and Alberta, Canada. METHODS: An observational cohort study of medically authorized cannabis patients in Ontario and Alberta. Overall change in PHQ-9 scores from baseline to follow-up were evaluated (mean change) over a time period of up to 3.2 years. RESULTS: 37,338 patients from the cohort had an initial PHQ-9 score recorded with 5103 (13.7%) patients having follow-up PHQ-9 scores. The average age was 54 yrs. (SD 15.7), 46% male, 50% noted depression at baseline. The average PHQ-9 score at baseline was 10.5 (SD 6.9), following a median follow-up time of 196 days (IQR: 77-451) the average final PHQ-9 score was 10.3 (SD 6.8) with a mean change of - 0.20 (95% CI: - 0.26, - 0.14, p-value < 0.0001). Overall, 4855 (95.1%) had no clinically significant change in their PHQ-9 score following medical cannabis use while 172 (3.4%) reported improvement and 76 (1.5%) reported worsening of their depression symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority showed no clinically important changes in PHQ-9 scores, a number of patients showed improvement or deteriorations in PHQ-9 scores. Future studies should focus on the parallel use of screening questionnaires to control for PHQ-9 sensitivity and to explore potential factors that may have attributed to the improvement in scores pre- and post- 3-6 month time period.


Assuntos
Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Maconha Medicinal/uso terapêutico , Questionário de Saúde do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Alberta , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Br J Anaesth ; 123(2): e333-e342, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31153631

RESUMO

Until recently, the belief that adequate pain management was not achievable while patients remained on buprenorphine was the impetus for the perioperative discontinuation of buprenorphine. We aimed to use an expert consensus Delphi-based survey technique to 1) specify the need for perioperative guidelines in this context and 2) offer a set of recommendations for the perioperative management of these patients. The major recommendation of this practice advisory is to continue buprenorphine therapy in the perioperative period. It is rarely appropriate to reduce the buprenorphine dose irrespective of indication or formulation. If analgesia is inadequate after optimisation of adjunct analgesic therapies, we recommend initiating a full mu agonist while continuing buprenorphine at some dose. The panel believes that before operation, physicians must distinguish between buprenorphine use for chronic pain (weaning/conversion from long-term high-dose opioids) and opioid use disorder (OUD) as the primary indication for buprenorphine therapy. Patients should ideally be discharged on buprenorphine, although not necessarily at their preoperative dose. Depending on analgesic requirements, they may be discharged on a full mu agonist. Overall, long-term buprenorphine treatment retention and harm reduction must be considered during the perioperative period when OUD is a primary diagnosis. The authors recognise that inter-patient variability will require some individualisation of clinical practice advisories. Clinical practice advisories are largely based on lower classes of evidence (level 4, level 5). Further research is required in order to implement meaningful changes in practitioner behaviour for this patient group.


Assuntos
Buprenorfina/administração & dosagem , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Técnica Delphi , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/prevenção & controle , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Manejo da Dor/métodos
14.
Can J Anaesth ; 66(2): 201-217, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30484167

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) are treated with opioid agonist-antagonists such as buprenorphine/naloxone. Perioperative management of patients on buprenorphine/naloxone is inconsistent and remains a controversial topic with mismanagement posing a significant risk to the long-term health of these patients. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search involving Medline, Medline In-Process, Embase, Cochrane Central, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycINFO, Web of Science (Clarivate), Scopus (Elsevier), CINAHL (EbscoHosst), and PubMed (NLM). RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included in the final sample, including one controlled study and four observational studies . Neither the controlled study nor the observational studies assessed addiction treatment retention, harm reduction, or long-term mortality rates as primary or secondary outcomes. Of the observational studies, authors showed equivalent peri- and postoperative pain control among buprenorphine continued patients. All but one authors described adequate analgesia among the case reports in which buprenorphine ≤ 16 mg sublingually (SL) daily was continued during the perioperative period. Long-term harm reduction was not reported with only three case reports including any long-term abstinence or relapse rates. CONCLUSIONS: The current understanding of the risks and benefits of continuing or stopping buprenorphine perioperatively is limited by a lack of high-quality evidence. Observational studies and case reports indicate no evidence against continuing buprenorphine perioperatively, especially when the dose is < 16 mg SL daily. In patients with significant potential for relapse, such as those with a recent history of OUD, the discontinuation of buprenorphine should have a strong rationale supported by patient and surgical preferences. Future studies require standardized reporting of median doses, details on the route of delivery, dosing schedules and any dosing changes, and rates of addiction relapse, including long-term morbidity and mortality where possible.


RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: Un nombre croissant de patients présentant un trouble d'utilisation des opioïdes (TUO) sont traités avec des agonistes/antagonistes des opioïdes, tels que la buprénorphine et la naloxone. La gestion périopératoire des patients sous buprénorphine/naloxone n'est pas constante et reste un sujet de controverses; de plus une mauvaise gestion pose un risque significatif pour la santé à long terme de ces patients. MéTHODES: Nous avons effectué une recherche systématique de la littérature dans les bases de données suivantes : Medline, Medline In-Process, Embase, Cochrane Central, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycINFO, Web of Science (Clarivate), Scopus (Elsevier), CINAHL (EbscoHosst) et PubMed (NLM). RéSULTATS: Dix-huit études ont été incluses dans l'échantillon final, y compris une étude contrôlée et quatre études observationnelles. Ni l'étude contrôlée ni les études observationnelles n'ont évalué la continuation du traitement de l'addiction, la réduction des préjudices infligés ou les taux de mortalité à long terme parmi les critères d'évaluation principaux ou secondaires. Dans les études observationnelles, les auteurs ont montré qu'il y avait un contrôle équivalent de la douleur en péri- et postopératoire chez les patients continuant à recevoir de la buprénorphine. Tous les auteurs sauf un ont décrit une analgésie satisfaisante dans les rapports de cas où la buprénorphine sublinguale avec une dose ≤ 16 mg par jour était maintenue pendant la période périopératoire. La réduction des préjudices à long terme n'était pas décrite; seulement trois rapports de cas indiquaient le taux d'abstinence à long terme ou les taux de rechute. CONCLUSIONS: Les connaissances actuelles des risques et avantages de la poursuite ou de l'arrêt de la buprénorphine en période périopératoire sont limitées par le manque de données probantes de grande qualité. Les études observationnelles et les rapports de cas ne fournissent pas de données probantes à l'encontre de la poursuite de la buprénorphine dans la période périopératoire, en particulier quand la dose journalière par voie sublinguale est < 16 mg. Chez les patients présentant un risque significatif de rechute, comme ceux ayant des antécédents récents de TUO, l'arrêt de la buprénorphine devrait être solidement justifié avec le soutien des préférences des patients et des équipes chirurgicales. Les futures études nécessitent une normalisation du rapport des doses médianes, des détails sur les voies d'administration, de la posologie et de sa modification et des taux de rechute, en incluant aussi, chaque fois que possible, les taux de morbidité et mortalité à long terme.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Buprenorfina/efeitos adversos , Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Combinação Buprenorfina e Naloxona , Humanos , Síndrome de Abstinência a Substâncias/epidemiologia , Síndrome de Abstinência a Substâncias/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 18(1): 482, 2017 Nov 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29166893

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Individuals with persistent musculoskeletal pain (PMP) have an increased risk of developing co-morbid health conditions and for early-mortality compared to those without pain. Despite irrefutable evidence supporting the role of physical activity in reducing these risks; there has been limited synthesis of the evidence, potentially impacting the optimisation of these forms of interventions. This review examines the effectiveness of interventions in improving levels of physical activity and the components of these interventions. METHODS: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials were included in this review. The following databases were searched from inception to March 2016: CENTRAL in the Cochrane Library, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and AMED. Two reviewers independently screened citations, assessed eligibility, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and coded intervention content using the behaviour change taxonomy (BCTTv1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques. GRADE was used to rate the quality of the evidence. RESULTS: The full text of 276 articles were assessed for eligibility, twenty studies involving 3441 participants were included in the review. Across the studies the mean number of BCTs coded was eight (range 0-16); with 'goal setting' and 'instruction on how to perform the behaviour' most frequently coded. For measures of subjective physical activity: interventions were ineffective in the short term, based on very low quality evidence; had a small effect in the medium term based on low quality evidence (SMD 0.25, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.48) and had a small effect in the longer term (SMD 0.21 95% CI 0.08 to 0.33) based on moderate quality evidence. For measures of objective physical activity: interventions were ineffective - based on very low to low quality evidence. CONCLUSIONS: There is some evidence supporting the effectiveness of interventions in improving subjectively measured physical activity however, the evidence is mostly based on low quality studies and the effects are small. Given the quality of the evidence, further research is likely/very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in effect estimates and is likely to change the estimates. Future studies should provide details on intervention components and incorporate objective measures of physical activity.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/reabilitação , Intervenção Médica Precoce/métodos , Exercício Físico/fisiologia , Dor Musculoesquelética/reabilitação , Dor Crônica/diagnóstico , Dor Crônica/epidemiologia , Humanos , Dor Musculoesquelética/diagnóstico , Dor Musculoesquelética/epidemiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
Can J Anaesth ; 63(3): 307-10, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26507533

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this case report is to describe a patient with a preoperative complex pain syndrome who underwent liver transplantation and was able to reduce his opioid consumption significantly following the initiation of treatment with medical cannabis. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 57-yr-old male with a history of hepatitis C cirrhosis underwent liver transplantation. Preoperatively, he was taking hydromorphone 2-8 mg⋅day(-1) for chronic abdominal pain. Postoperatively, he was given intravenous patient-controlled analgesia through which he received hydromorphone 30 mg⋅day(-1). Our multidisciplinary Transitional Pain Service was involved with managing his moderate to severe acute postsurgical pain in hospital and continued with weaning him from opioid medications after discharge. It was difficult to wean the patient from opioids, and he was subsequently given medical cannabis at six weeks postoperatively with remarkable effect. By the fifth postoperative month, his use of opioids had tapered to 6 mg⋅day(-1) of hydromorphone, and his functional status was excellent on this regimen. CONCLUSION: Reductions in opioid consumption were achieved with the administration of medical cannabis in a patient with acute postoperative pain superimposed on a chronic pain syndrome and receiving high doses of opioids. Concurrent benefits of initiating medical cannabis may include improvements in pain profile and functional status along with reductions in opioid-related side effects. This highlights the potential for medical cannabis as an adjunct medication for weaning patients from opioid use.


Assuntos
Dor Abdominal/tratamento farmacológico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Fígado , Maconha Medicinal/uso terapêutico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Crônica , Hepatite C/complicações , Hepatite C/cirurgia , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/cirurgia , Cirrose Hepática/virologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
17.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 12: 93, 2014 Jun 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24920518

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Refractory angina is a severe chronic disease, defined as angina which cannot be controlled by usual treatments for heart disease. This disease is frightening, debilitating, and difficult to manage. Many people suffering refractory have inadequate pain relief, continually revisit emergency departments for help, undergo repeated cardiac investigations, and struggle with obtaining appropriate care. There is no clear framework to help people understand the risks and benefits of available treatment options in Canada. Some treatments for refractory angina are invasive, while others are not covered by provincial health insurance plans. Effective care for refractory angina sufferers in Canada is critically underdeveloped; it is important that healthcare professionals and refractory angina sufferers alike understand the treatment options and their implications. This proposal builds on the recent Canadian practice guidelines for the management of refractory angina. We propose to develop a decision support tool in order to help people suffering from refractory angina make well-informed decisions about their healthcare and reduce their uncertainty about treatment options. METHODS: This project will be conducted in three phases: a) development of the support tool with input from clinical experts, the Canadian refractory angina guidelines, and people living with refractory angina, b) pilot testing of the usability of the tool, and c) formal preliminary evaluation of the effectiveness of the support tool to help people make informed decisions about treatment options. DISCUSSION: A decision support tool for refractory angina is needed and the available data suggest that by developing such a tool, we may be able to help refractory angina sufferers better understand their condition and the effectiveness of available treatment options (in their respective clinical settings) as well as their implications (e.g. risks vs. benefits). By virtue of this tool, we may also be able to facilitate identification and inclusion of patients' values and preferences in the decision making process. This is particularly important as refractory angina is an intractable condition, necessitating that the selected course of treatment be lifelong. This study will yield a much needed patient decision aid for people living with refractory angina and pilot data to support a subsequent effectiveness study.


Assuntos
Angina Pectoris/terapia , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Angina Pectoris/psicologia , Canadá , Tomada de Decisões , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Inquéritos e Questionários
18.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 14: 14, 2014 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24483947

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic stable angina (CSA) has a major negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL) including poor general health status, psychological distress, and inability to self-manage. METHODS: We used meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of self-management interventions for improving stable angina symptoms, HRQL and psychological well-being. Nine trials, involving 1,282 participants in total, were included. We used standard inverse-variance random-effects meta-analysis to combine the trials. Heterogeneity between trials was evaluated using chi-square tests for the tau-squared statistic and quantified using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: There was significant improvement in the frequency of angina symptoms (Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ], symptom diary) across trials, standardized mean difference (SMD): 0.30 (95% Confidence interval [CI] 0.14, 0.47), as well as reduction in the use of sublingual (SL) nitrates, SMD: -0.49 (95% CI -0.77, -0.20). Significant improvements for physical limitation (SAQ), SMD: 0.38 (95% CI 0.20, 0.55) and depression scores (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), SMD: -1.38 (95% CI -2.46, -0.30) were also found. The impact of SM on anxiety was uncertain due to statistical heterogeneity across trials for this outcome, I2 = 98%. SM did not improve other HRQL dimensions including angina stability, disease perception, and treatment satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: SM interventions significantly improve angina frequency and physical limitation; they also decrease the use of SL nitrates and improve depression in some cases. Further work is needed to make definitive conclusions about the impact of SM on cardiac-specific anxiety.


Assuntos
Angina Estável/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Autocuidado , Angina Estável/complicações , Angina Estável/diagnóstico , Angina Estável/psicologia , Ansiedade/etiologia , Ansiedade/prevenção & controle , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Depressão/etiologia , Depressão/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Saúde Mental , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
Neuromodulation ; 17(1): 48-53; discussion 53, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24007554

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Implanted peripheral nerve stimulation is one of the earliest developed methods of neuromodulation for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain. It is traditionally performed by surgical exposure and implantation of a paddle lead. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous placement of cylindrical leads has been proposed as an alternative. However, those leads are fragile and prone to migration. Minimally invasive paddle lead implantation may improve long-term results while minimizing surgical insult. A feasibility laboratory study was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ultrasound-guided placements of a narrow paddle lead were performed in the upper and lower extremities of a human cadaver. Ultrasonography was used to record the lead position relative to the target nerves. Dissections were performed, and digital photography was completed. Anatomic images were analyzed. RESULTS: All experiments were successfully accomplished. Although ultrasound localization of the upper extremity nerves was straightforward and clear, all procedural steps were technically easier at the lower extremity. For the latter, fewer attempts were required to maintain the lead in the desired tissue plane. Ultrasound revealed an acoustic shadowing of the underlying nerves in both the short- and long-axis views by the inserted lead. All dissections revealed a parallel to the nerve lead placement with at least four contacts facing the nerve. The lead appeared to be more mechanically stable at the lower extremity. CONCLUSIONS: This anatomic study confirmed technical feasibility of percutaneous placement of a narrow paddle-type lead for the peripheral nerve stimulation that may potentially improve stimulation and reduce migrations.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/instrumentação , Eletrodos Implantados , Nervos Periféricos/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Braço/inervação , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Perna (Membro)/inervação , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos , Manejo da Dor
20.
Am J Vet Res ; 85(7)2024 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38848749

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the fatigue and load-to-failure mechanical characteristics of an intramedullary nail with a threaded interference design (TID) in comparison to a commercially available veterinary angle-stable nail with a Morse taper bolt design (I-Loc) of an equivalent size. METHODS: 10 single interlocking screw/bolt constructs of TID and I-Loc implants were assembled using steel pipe segments and placed through 50,000 cycles of simulated, physiologic axial or torsional loading. Entry torque, postfatigue extraction torque, and 10th, 25,000th, and 50,000th cycle torsional toggle were assessed. Each construct was then loaded to failure in the same respective direction as fatigue testing. Four complete constructs of each design were then assessed using a synthetic bone analog with a 50-mm central defect via nondestructive torsional and axial loading followed by axial load to failure. RESULTS: All constructs were angle stable at all time points and withstood fatigue loading. Median insertional torque, extraction torque-to-insertion torque ratio, and torsional yield load were 33%, 33%, and 72.5% lower, respectively, for the TID interlocking screws. No differences in torsional peak load, torsional stiffness, axial yield load, axial stiffness, or axial peak load were identified. No differences in complete construct angle stability, torsional stiffness, axial peak load, axial stiffness, or axial yield load were identified. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The TID had an inferior torsional yield load when compared to I-Loc implants but generated angle stability and sustained simulated physiologic fatigue loading. The TID may be a suitable mechanism for generating angle stability in interlocking nails.


Assuntos
Pinos Ortopédicos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas , Torque , Pinos Ortopédicos/veterinária , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/instrumentação , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/métodos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/veterinária , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Teste de Materiais , Animais , Parafusos Ósseos/veterinária
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA