Hepatitis C and HIV Screening, Testing, and Risk Perceptions among South-Central Appalachian County Health Department Staff.

OBJECTIVES: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are significant public health concerns, especially given the risks for disease interactions. Rates of HCV and HIV are increasing, especially in rural areas. Local health departments (LHDs) play an important role in rural health care, offering screening, testing, and treatment for HCV and HIV. Gaps persist in LHD resources for meeting these demands, especially in Appalachia and the US South. METHODS: To explore HCV/HIV screening, testing, and treatment approaches and perspectives in south-central Appalachian North Carolina, structured telephone questionnaires were administered to communicable disease nurses and other health department staff directly involved in screening and testing. Mixed-methods data analyses were conducted and triangulated with stakeholders. RESULTS: Eighteen participants representing 19 counties completed the questionnaire, achieving a saturation sample. Participants reported barriers to screening and testing, including housing insecurity, lack of transportation and insurance, unemployment, and the isolation of living in a rural area. Divergence in perceptions of barriers between public health regions emerged, as did perceptions of who is at risk and use of stigmatizing language about people at risk for HCV/HIV. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the impact of LHD behaviors and perceptions on screening and testing, and offers recommendations to improve HCV/HIV screening and testing accessibility in south-central Appalachia, a high-risk region.

Increasing North Carolina's Workforce Capacity for Prescribing Buprenorphine Products.

BACKGROUND Inadequate access to opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment is a public health concern. Rates of opioid-related poisoning deaths are increasing in North Carolina and access to OUD treatment is especially sparse in rural areas. DEA-X-waivered providers that can prescribe buprenorphine as a medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) play an essential role in treating OUD. Increased workforce capacity to treat OUD in an evidence-based, equitable, and patient-centered way is needed. Gaps persist in continuing professional education and academic training.METHODS Description of an interdisciplinary training team effort to engage medical residencies and advanced practice provider (APP) programs across North Carolina in a set of subsidized trainings about substance use disorder treatment and medication-assisted treatment (MAT), with the goal of increasing capacity to administer MOUD, based on each program's needs. Uptake was independently evaluated.RESULTS Engagement exceeded initial goals: 72 unique trainings related to MAT were administered to 1512 providers from 30 residency and 7 APP programs. By the end of the grant period, 902 participants completed a training required to obtain a DEA-X waiver. Evaluation of training uptake identified facilitators and barriers specific to residents and APP trainees.LIMITATIONS Limitations included difficulty coordinating training with existing didactic and clinical schedules during the project time frame and challenges identifying implementation leaders at training sites.CONCLUSION This project highlights a successful and potentially replicable approach to offering structured MAT capacity-building training in combination with technical assistance (TA) within medical education programs.

The Intersection of Stress, Health, and Health Care Opportunities for Appalachian Transgender and Nonbinary People: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.

Transgender or nonbinary (TNB) individuals in the United States South experience higher rates of physical and mental health disparities when compared to their cisgender counterparts. Societal, interpersonal, and individual stigmas contribute to these disparities by increasing the levels of stress in the TNB population, which is a primary factor in higher morbidity and mortality. However, there is a paucity of research examining the impact of these stigmas on health through the lived experiences of TNB people living in Appalachia. An interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) research design was used to collect and analyze semi-structured interviews with TNB individuals living in Appalachia. Transcribed interviews were analyzed repeatedly by two analysts to identify emergent themes which focused on understanding an individual's lived experiences through interpretation. Ten participants from four Appalachian states within three Appalachian sub-regions participated in this study. Three shared healthcare themes were identified: experiences of stigma related to gender, the impact of stigma on personal wellbeing and perception of health, and the need for affirming TNB healthcare services. Respondents noted that chronic stress factors such as continual and compounding experiences of stigma and discrimination, stemming from religion or lack of affirming providers, negatively impacted their health. TNB individuals living in Appalachia experience chronic societal, interpersonal, and individual stressors that negatively impact their health. By addressing the stigmas, public health leaders, policymakers, and providers can improve access to health care and the health and quality of life of Appalachian TNB people.

Implementation of Transgender/Gender Nonbinary Care in a Family Medicine Teaching Practice.

PURPOSE: Numerous studies have shown that transgender or gender nonbinary (TGNB) individuals encounter significantly more health care barriers, including overall lack of access to gender-affirming care providers. This study describes 2 assessments of transgender care services at a large family medicine teaching practice. METHODS: Staff and providers were invited to attend an optional, practice-wide, hourlong free training session on gender-affirming care offered on 3 different dates in 2019. A structured protocol was used to collect observational data from which key takeaways from the training sessions were developed. Separately, a retrospective chart review of patients with a gender dysphoria diagnosis was completed. Charts were reviewed for adherence to regional and international organization recommendations for comprehensive transgender care. RESULTS: Three main takeaways from the training sessions included lack of knowledge or familiarity with gender terminology and expression, fear of offending patients, and employee hesitation to change behaviors when interacting with patients. On chart review, the most common interventions identified were need to schedule a follow-up visit (61.5%), need for health maintenance screenings (osteoporosis screening, 50%; Papanicolaou smear, 56.3%; mammogram, 66.7%), need for mental health screening (41.5%), need for laboratory monitoring of testosterone therapy (20%), and corrected gender markers/names listed in the appropriate place in the patient chart (16.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted hesitation to provide and lack of familiarity with transgender care among practice staff. Although some aspects of comprehensive transgender care are well implemented, maintaining follow-up, completing health maintenance and mental health screenings, and appropriate laboratory monitoring are areas for improvement.

Methods and strategies for effectively surveying the LGBTQ+ population.

The Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ) population is at a substantially elevated risk for myriad health complications, due in large part to structural and social inequities. As such, the LGBTQ population is an important demographic to survey regarding their health. As with many populations facing inequality, the LGBTQ population is often hard to sample. In light of this challenge, several approaches may be required in order to effectively surveying this population. Specifically, advances in sampling methodologies, leveraging community partnerships, and culturally aware question design appear to increase the likelihood of a successful LGBTQ-focused health survey. The Southern LGBTQ Health Study is examined as a case study in effectively conducting a large, multi-state LBTQ health survey. They used a simple snowball sampling strategy where their online health survey was distributed through a wide network of community organizations across several states. They also employed members of the LGBTQ community as "Survey Ambassadors" to help recruit their peers to participate in the study. This case study demonstrated several successful methods. Their combined sampling methodology resulted in almost 6000 respondents. Their question for sexual orientation ("Check all that apply") resulted in rich, easy to interpret data and was well received by the participants. However, this case study also provided valuable learning opportunities. Had they used a more formalized approach to their sampling, they would have had greater generalizability to their target population. Also, the use of an open-ended question regarding gender identity generated data that was not conducive to formal analysis without significant resources dedicated to cleaning the data.

Rural community pharmacist willingness to dispense Suboxone® - A secret shopper investigation in South-Central Appalachia.

Background: Buprenorphine access is limited for patients with opioid use disorder, especially in rural areas. Telephone audits have identified pharmacist limitations to the dispensing of buprenorphine particularly in independent pharmacies in comparison to chain pharmacies and in rural areas. The objective of this study was to assess rural community pharmacists' stated willingness to dispense buprenorphine-naloxone, and document potential bias and or stigma that the shopper experiences when asking about buprenorphine- naloxone. Methods: To assess pharmacist willingness, a telephone audit of 15 rural Appalachian North Carolina pharmacies was conducted. Three secret shopper scenarios were utilized including one shopper posing as a new patient, one shopper posing as an out of state patient, and one shopper first asking about buying syringes. Encounters were noted by willingness to dispense buprenorphine, and shoppers were to note any potential stigma and or bias that they experienced while asking for Suboxone®. Results: Overall, 60% of pharmacies audited indicated willingness to dispense buprenorphine without reservation, and 31% indicated willingness to dispense only under certain circumstances. Pharmacies tended to add more conditions to dispensing to the out of state patient (46%), such as only dispensing if the practitioner was from in state in comparison to the other shopper scenarios. Potential stigma and bias were encountered in 40% of the 45 encounters. Conclusion: Although pharmacies overall seemed willing to dispense, nuances regarding who pharmacies are most likely to dispense are felt in rural areas. Buprenorphine access limitations were more common in independent pharmacies and more often placed on patients from out of state. Pharmacy- directed education is necessary to reduce stigma and bias and increase patient access to buprenorphine.

The Value of Treating Opioid Use Disorder in Family Medicine: From the Patient Perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Despite evidence demonstrating that medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) reduce morbidity and mortality, the majority of patients do not receive treatment. The National Academies of Science call for more research exploring the patient's perspective of treatment modalities to increase access to individualized, patient-centered care. We aim to build on existing literature by describing patient experiences treated for OUD in a rural family medicine setting. METHODS: We employed a convenience sampling methodology to complete brief, structured interviews with thematic data analysis for 30 of 57 eligible patients receiving office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) in the primary care setting. RESULTS: Participants' experiences with OBOT were generally positive and shaped by societal structures and institutions, their life before treatment, their treatment history, and the kind of care they received in OBOT. Patients identified accessibility and privacy as advantages to receiving OBOT in primary care. DISCUSSION: This research identifies ways providers can provide individualized and effective OUD treatment within the family medicine setting.