Full Guidelines-From the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation: Perioperative management of systemic immunomodulatory agents in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic immunomodulatory agents are indicated in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Perioperative use of these medications may increase the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) and complication. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of SSI and complication in patients with chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease receiving immunomodulatory agents (tumor necrosis factor-alfa [TNF-α] inhibitors, interleukin [IL] 12/23 inhibitor, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 costimulator, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, Janus kinase inhibitors, tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, cyclosporine (CsA), and methotrexate [MTX]) undergoing surgery. METHODS: We performed a search of the MEDLINE PubMed database of patients with chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease on immune therapy undergoing surgery. RESULTS: We examined 48 new or previously unreviewed studies; the majority were retrospective studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease. CONCLUSION: For low-risk procedures, TNF-α inhibitors, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, ustekinumab, abatacept, MTX, CsA, and apremilast can safely be continued. For intermediate- and high-risk surgery, MTX, CsA, apremilast, abatacept, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, and ustekinumab are likely safe to continue; however, a case-by-case approach is advised. Acitretin can be continued for any surgery. There is insufficient evidence to make firm recommendations on tofacitinib, upadacitinib, and deucravacitinib.

Vaccination recommendations for adults receiving biologics and oral therapies for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Delphi consensus from the medical board of the National Psoriasis Foundation.

BACKGROUND: For psoriatic patients who need to receive nonlive or live vaccines, evidence-based recommendations are needed regarding whether to pause or continue systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate literature regarding vaccine efficacy and safety and to generate consensus-based recommendations for adults receiving systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis receiving nonlive or live vaccines. METHODS: Using a modified Delphi process, 22 consensus statements were developed by the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board and COVID-19 Task Force, and infectious disease experts. RESULTS: Key recommendations include continuing most oral and biologic therapies without modification for patients receiving nonlive vaccines; consider interruption of methotrexate for nonlive vaccines. For patients receiving live vaccines, discontinue most oral and biologic medications before and after administration of live vaccine. Specific recommendations include discontinuing most biologic therapies, except for abatacept, for 2-3 half-lives before live vaccine administration and deferring next dose 2-4 weeks after live vaccination. LIMITATIONS: Studies regarding infection rates after vaccination are lacking. CONCLUSION: Interruption of antipsoriatic oral and biologic therapies is generally not necessary for patients receiving nonlive vaccines. Temporary interruption of oral and biologic therapies before and after administration of live vaccines is recommended in most cases.

Phase 2a randomized clinical trial of dupilumab (anti-IL-4Rα) for alopecia areata patients.

BACKGROUND: Treatments for alopecia areata (AA) patients with extensive scalp hair loss are limited, and recent evidence supports a role for type 2 T-cell (Th2)-immune response in AA. Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody inhibiting Th2 signaling, approved for type 2 diseases including atopic dermatitis, was evaluated in AA patients. METHODS: Alopecia areata patients with and without concomitant atopic dermatitis were randomized 2:1 to receive weekly subcutaneous dupilumab (300 mg) or placebo for 24 weeks, followed by another 24-week dupilumab open-label phase. The primary outcome was change from baseline in the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score at week 24; secondary outcomes included a range of measures of hair regrowth. RESULTS: Forty and 20 patients were assigned to the dupilumab and placebo arms, respectively. At week 24, disease worsening was documented in the placebo arm, with a least-squares mean change in the SALT score of -6.5 (95% confidence-interval [CI], -10.4 to -2.6), versus a change of 2.2 (95% CI, -0.6 to 4.94) in the dupilumab arm (p < .05). After 48 weeks of dupilumab treatment, 32.5%, 22.5% and 15% of patients achieved SALT30 /SALT50 /SALT75 improvement, respectively, while in patients with baseline IgE ≥ 200 IU/ml response rates increased to 53.8%, 46.2%, and 38.5%, respectively. Moreover, baseline IgE predicts treatment response with 83% accuracy. No new safety signals were detected. CONCLUSIONS: This hypothesis-driven trial is the first to indicate the possible pathogenic role of the Th2 axis and Th2 targeting in AA patients. Patient selection based on baseline serum IgE levels may improve treatment results (Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT03359356).

Analysis of alopecia areata surveys suggests a threshold for improved patient-reported outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Although alopecia areata (AA) greatly impacts patients' quality of life (QoL), there is no adequate validation of AA-targeted QoL surveys in clinical trials, hindering sufficient representation of patient-reported outcomes. OBJECTIVES: Better understanding of patient-reported outcomes may guide treatment goals and future clinical trials. METHODS: In a recent randomized controlled trial testing dupilumab in AA, patients were administered the Alopecia Areata Quality of Life Index (AA-QLI) and the Alopecia Areata Symptom Impact Scale (AASIS) surveys, specifically evaluating QoL in patients with AA. An in-depth analysis was performed to assess the utility of these questionnaires in this patient population, both at baseline and after treatment, and to determine a threshold for improved patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: While AASIS correlated with baseline Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) scores and with therapeutic response, AA-QLI showed no correlation with AA severity before or after treatment. Itch strongly correlated with serum IgE levels across both surveys. Using various approaches to estimate a discriminative threshold for decreased impact of AA on QoL (by AASIS) following treatment, a SALT score of 20 points or less post-treatment was associated with improved patient-reported outcomes, including both AA-related symptoms and items within the daily activities/feelings domain such as 'feeling sad' and 'feeling anxious or worry'. CONCLUSIONS: AASIS is better than AA-QLI to assess patient-reported outcomes. SALT ≤ 20 following treatment should be considered as a threshold for meaningful therapeutic outcome and as a clinical endpoint in future clinical trials for AA. What is already known about this topic? Alopecia areata greatly compromises quality of life, and affected patients have increased prevalences of depression, anxiety and social phobia. Despite the significant negative impact of the disease on patients' wellbeing, validation of targeted questionnaires in alopecia areata is lacking, and a therapeutic response threshold for improved patient-reported outcomes is unknown. What does this study add? This study investigated the utility of two different alopecia areata-targeted questionnaires - Alopecia Areata Quality of Life Index and Alopecia Areata Symptom Impact Scale (AASIS) - in a clinical trial setting. AASIS was found to correlate strongly with alopecia areata severity and clinical response. What are the clinical implications of this work? Patients with ≤ 20% scalp hair loss after treatment reported improvement in multiple quality-of-life items, suggesting this as a meaningful therapeutic outcome that may guide clinicians and improve the development of future clinical trials.

Photodermatitis following knee intra-articular hylan G-F 20 injection for osteoarthritis: two cases.

Hyaluronic acid (HA) intra-articular injections are increasingly used for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Described adverse reactions of HA intra-articular injections include injection site pain or swelling. A 71-year-old man and a 65-year-old woman independently presented with photodistributed lesions shortly after receiving a repeat HA injection (hylan G-F 20) intra-articularly. A punch biopsy was performed which was consistent with a photodrug reaction or hypersensitivity reaction. Two cases are presented to describe a novel presentation of a photosensitivity reaction to HA.

Discovery of the IL-23/IL-17 Signaling Pathway and the Treatment of Psoriasis.

Psoriasis vulgaris is a common, heterogeneous, chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by thickened, red, scaly plaques and systemic inflammation. Psoriasis is also associated with multiple comorbid conditions, such as joint destruction, cardiovascular disease, stroke, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and chronic kidney disease. The discovery of IL-17-producing T cells in a mouse model of autoimmunity transformed our understanding of inflammation driven by T lymphocytes and associations with human inflammatory diseases, such as psoriasis. Under the regulation of IL-23, T cells that produce high levels of IL-17 create a self-amplifying, feed-forward inflammatory response in keratinocytes that drives the development of thickened skin lesions infiltrated with a mixture of inflammatory cell populations. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration approved multiple highly effective psoriasis therapies that disrupt IL-17 (secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab) and IL-23 (guselkumab and tildrakizumab) signaling in the skin, thus leading to a major paradigm shift in the way that psoriatic disease is managed.

Psoriasis pathogenesis and the development of novel targeted immune therapies.

Psoriasis is caused by a complex interplay between the immune system, psoriasis-associated susceptibility loci, autoantigens, and multiple environmental factors. Over the last 2 decades, research has unequivocally shown that psoriasis represents a bona fide T cell-mediated disease primarily driven by pathogenic T cells that produce high levels of IL-17 in response to IL-23. The discovery of the central role for the IL-23/type 17 T-cell axis in the development of psoriasis has led to a major paradigm shift in the pathogenic model for this condition. The activation and upregulation of IL-17 in prepsoriatic skin produces a "feed forward" inflammatory response in keratinocytes that is self-amplifying and drives the development of mature psoriatic plaques by inducing epidermal hyperplasia, epidermal cell proliferation, and recruitment of leukocyte subsets into the skin. Clinical trial data for mAbs against IL-17 signaling (secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab) and newer IL-23p19 antagonists (tildrakizumab, guselkumab, and risankizumab) underscore the central role of these cytokines as predominant drivers of psoriatic disease. Currently, we are witnessing a translational revolution in the treatment and management of psoriasis. Emerging bispecific antibodies offer the potential for even better disease control, whereas small-molecule drugs offer future alternatives to the use of biologics and less costly long-term disease management.

Autoantigens ADAMTSL5 and LL37 are significantly upregulated in active Psoriasis and localized with keratinocytes, dendritic cells and other leukocytes.

Psoriasis is a common immune-mediated disease that affects 2%-4% of individuals in North America and Europe. In the past decade, advances in research have led to an improved understanding of immune pathways involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis and has spurred the development of targeted therapeutics. Recently, three psoriasis autoantigens have been described: cathelicidin (LL37), a disintegrin and metalloprotease domain containing thrombospondin type 1 motif-like 5 (ADAMTSL5), and lipid antigens generated by phospholipase A2 (PLA2) group IVD (PLA2G4D). It is important to establish the expression, regulation and therapeutic modulation of these psoriasis autoantigens. In this study, we performed immunohistochemistry and two-colour immunofluorescence on non-lesional and lesional psoriasis skin to characterize ADAMTSL5 and LL37, and their co-expression with T cells, dendritic cells, neutrophils and macrophages, which are the main immune cells that drive this disease. Our results showed that ADAMTSL5 and LL37 are significantly (P<.05) increased in lesional skin and are co-expressed by many dendritic cells, macrophages and some T cells in the dermis. Gene expression analysis showed significant (P<.05) upregulation of LL37 in lesional skin and significant downregulation following treatment with etanercept. ADAMTSL5 and LL37 are also significantly decreased by IL-17 or TNF-α blockade, suggesting feed-forward induction of psoriasis autoantigens by disease-related cytokines.

Expanding the Psoriasis Framework: Immunopathogenesis and Treatment Updates.

Psoriasis is a chronic heterogeneous condition with multiple available treatment options that have resulted in dramatic disease improvements for patients. IL-23/IL-17 signaling is the central immune signaling pathway driving psoriasis, though recent research has uncovered other key contributing signals such as IL-17C, IL-17F, IL-36, and tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2). Novel therapeutic targets inhibiting these cytokines have expanded our understanding of the pathogenesis of psoriasis. IL-23/IL-17 signaling is critical for the development of epidermal hyperplasia and the mature psoriatic plaque in susceptible individuals. Increased IL-17 and IL-23 expression works synergistically with other cytokines, such as IL-12, IL-22, IL-36, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and interferon (IFN), to help create a self-sustaining, feed-forward circuit in keratinocytes, which contributes to the chronicity of the disease. This clinical review highlights recent discoveries in the immunopathogenesis of psoriasis and summarizes new antipsoriasis therapies targeting IL-36, IL-17F, aryl hydrocarbon receptors (AHRs), phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4), and TYK2 signaling. Despite recent success in the treatment of psoriasis, continued research is needed to further advance disease understanding and shape management strategies.

The Psoriasis Treatment Pipeline: An Overview and Update.

Significant research advances in our understanding of psoriatic disease have led to the development of several highly selective, effective, and safe topical and systemic treatments. These treatments have led to unprecedented levels of disease clearance and control for most patients with psoriasis with cutaneous disease. However, there remains a need for improved treatments for those patients with recalcitrant disease, psoriatic arthritis, or nonplaque disease variants. Recently approved therapies and investigational products in ongoing clinical development programs that target IL-17A/F, IL-23, TYK2, PDE4, AhR or IL-36 cytokine signaling are improving the clinician's ability to care for a broader range of patients affected by psoriasis.

Sustained Improvements in Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life Through 5 Years Among Ixekizumab-Treated Patients with Complete Clearance of Scalp Psoriasis by Week 60.

INTRODUCTION: Ixekizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin-17A, is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Since scalp psoriasis can be burdensome and challenging to treat with non-systemic therapies, this post hoc analysis focused on scalp psoriasis in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and baseline scalp involvement. The analysis considered a holistic concept of clearance through 5 years of ixekizumab treatment. METHODS: Ixekizumab-treated patients with baseline scalp involvement were pooled from three multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials (integrated UNCOVER-1/2 and UNCOVER-3). Analyses were performed on a subpopulation of patients who achieved complete resolution of scalp psoriasis at Week 60 (i.e., Week 60 Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index [PSSI-0] responders) and on the overall patient population (i.e., Week 60 PSSI-0 responders and non-responders), which was used as a reference. Clinical outcomes (PSSI), patient-reported outcomes (Itch Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] score, Skin Pain Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]), quality of life (Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI]), and concurrent outcomes were assessed from baseline through 5 years. Descriptive statistics of observed data were reported. RESULTS: After 60 weeks of ixekizumab treatment, 88.4% (UNCOVER-1/2) and 75.9% (UNCOVER-3) of patients with baseline scalp involvement achieved complete clearance (PSSI-0) of scalp psoriasis. Substantial improvements in the clinical outcomes (PSSI), patient-reported outcomes (Itch NRS, Skin Pain VAS), and quality of life (DLQI) were achieved by Week 60 and sustained through Week 264 in the Week 60 PSSI-0 responders and in the overall patient population. Additionally, a significant proportion of Week 60 PSSI-0 responders achieved concurrent complete scalp and skin clearance and quality of life improvement through 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Continued treatment with ixekizumab provided long-term sustained scalp clearance over 5 years to patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and baseline scalp involvement, and holistic improvements occurred across clinical outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, and quality of life. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBERS: NCT01474512 (UNCOVER-1), NCT01597245 (UNCOVER-2), and NCT01646177 (UNCOVER-3).

Exploring the Clinical Features, Immunopathogenesis and Approach to Diagnosis for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis [Podcast].

Generalized pustular psoriasis is a rare presentation of psoriatic disease and is characterized by the acute onset of diffuse superficial pustules on the skin. These pustules can often coalesce, forming what's known as 'lakes of pus' that are most often seen on the trunk and on skin folds. GPP flares are often accompanied by systemic symptoms, including fever, malaise, and edema. The interleukin (IL)-36 pathway plays a central role in the development of GPP, although several other genes may be associated. The rarity of GPP makes its diagnosis challenging and it could be mistaken for an infectious condition or other types of pustular psoriasis, including unstable forms of plaque psoriasis that may present with pustules. Performing a thorough skin examination and obtaining a detailed history are vital to exclude these differential diagnoses. Incorrect or late diagnosis, inadequate or delayed treatment, and lack of specialist referrals may contribute to increased disease severity and can have a debilitating impact on patients' quality of life. In this podcast, two US-based dermatologists discuss the clinical characteristics of GPP, highlight the central role of IL-36 in immunopathogenesis, and share practical approaches to recognizing and diagnosing the disease.

Exploring the Quality-of-Life Impact, Disease Burden, and Management Challenges of GPP: The Provider and Patient Perspective [Podcast].

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, chronic, and debilitating disease characterized by flares of widespread erythema, desquamation, and pustule formation. GPP flares can be accompanied by systemic symptoms including fever, fatigue, malaise, and skin pain; severe cases may be fatal if untreated. Although GPP may occur concurrently with plaque psoriasis, they represent two distinct inflammatory conditions. Patients with GPP experience a substantial burden of disease, and the impact of GPP on an individual's mental health and quality-of-life (QoL) goes far beyond skin pain and discomfort. The rarity of GPP may result in a misdiagnosis, as the sudden onset of skin pustules may be mistaken for a primary infection. Misdiagnosis with a subsequent delay in treatment has tremendous negative consequences for the affected patient. In September 2022, spesolimab became the first FDA-approved medication in the US for the treatment of GPP flares in adults. Spesolimab has since been approved by regulatory agencies in numerous countries, including Japan, Mainland China, and the EU. Prior to spesolimab, the clinical management of GPP relied on the off-label use of systemic or biologic therapies approved for plaque psoriasis or other inflammatory conditions. There is a need for increased education among healthcare providers regarding the clinical diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapeutic management of this rare disease, including the other novel GPP-specific therapies in development. In this podcast, two dermatologists and a patient who has plaque psoriasis and GPP discuss the clinical presentation, symptoms, disease burden, QoL impacts, diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic strategies for the management of GPP.

The role of the interleukin-36 axis in generalized pustular psoriasis: a review of the mechanism of action of spesolimab.

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, chronic, inflammatory skin disorder characterized by recurrent flares associated with skin erythema, desquamation, and widespread superficial sterile pustules, which may be severe ("lakes of pus"). Systemic symptoms are often present, including malaise, fever, and skin pain. In GPP, innate immune responses are driven by abnormal activation of the interleukin (IL)-36-chemokine-neutrophil axis and excessive neutrophil infiltration. This review highlights the IL-36 pathway in the context of the IL-1 superfamily and describes how unopposed IL-36 signaling can lead to the development of GPP. Targeted inhibition of the IL-36 receptor (IL-36R) is an attractive therapeutic strategy in the treatment of GPP, including flare prevention and sustained disease control. Spesolimab is a first-in-class, humanized, monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to the IL-36R and antagonizes IL-36 signaling. Spesolimab was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in September 2022 to treat GPP flares in adults and was subsequently approved for GPP flare treatment in other countries across the world. Anti-IL-36R therapy, such as spesolimab, can mitigate flares and address flare prevention in GPP, presumably through rebalancing IL-36 signaling and modulating the pro-inflammatory response of the downstream effectors.

Treatment Strategies for Chronic Pruritus and Eczema/Dermatitis in Older Adults Under the Category of Chronic Eczematous Eruptions of Aging (CEEA).

Chronic eczematous eruptions of aging (CEEA) refers to a heterogenous group of longstanding, pruritic eczematous dermatoses with an unidentified etiology, or those which do not meet strict disease criteria. The literature has not yet established a single ubiquitous disease or term for these eruptions in adults over the age of 65 years. Instead, CEEA is attributed various names, including immunologic eruption of aging, and eruption of immunosenescence. Atopic dermatitis in the elderly, eczema in the elderly, and late- or adult-onset atopic dermatitis or eczema likely also fall under the umbrella of CEEA, given that older patients often do not meet strict criteria for atopic dermatitis. As a reflection of such terminological heterogeneity, CEEA does not have a standardized workup algorithm. This lack of uniformity can obscure the ability to study and understand appropriate treatments for this condition. Yet, as providers become increasingly aware of CEEA and more comfortable in making this diagnosis in older adults, it is necessary that dermatologists understand the safety and efficacy of common CEEA treatments in this population. Here, we discuss special considerations, challenges, and recommendations for treating older adults with CEEA with topical and systemic therapeutics. We provide an overview of therapeutic strategies and potential barriers to treatment and discuss the essential role of shared decision making when caring for this patient population.

National Psoriasis Foundation Telemedicine Task Force guidance for management of psoriatic disease via telemedicine.

Telemedicine emerged as an alternative care delivery system used to offer effective long-term management to patients with chronic, inflammatory conditions such as psoriatic disease. Teledermatology can provide reliable clinical information through thorough history-taking and virtual evaluations that include patient-provided images and disease activity assessment tools that may help accurately diagnose and manage patients with psoriasis. The integration of validated screening tools for psoriatic arthritis and effective teledermatology practices may improve access to specialists, thus avoiding preventable delays in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis. Although the provision of telehealthcare should not completely replace high quality, in-person dermatologic or rheumatologic visits, the convenience and collaborative nature of teledermatology may lead to expanded access and expedited care in the appropriate setting, whether it be in a virtual or in-person visit.