Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 147
Filtrar
1.
Blood ; 144(4): 445-456, 2024 Jul 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728380

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: In patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), higher revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) scores at transplant are associated with worse transplant outcome and, thus, lowering IPSS-R scores by therapeutic intervention before transplantation may seem beneficial. However, there is no evidence, to date, to support this approach. In a retrospective analysis, a total of 1482 patients with MDS with sufficient data to calculate IPSS-R score at diagnosis and at time of transplantation were selected from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation transplant registry and analyzed for transplant outcome in a multivariable Cox model including IPSS-R score at diagnosis, treatment intervention, change in IPSS-R score before transplant, and several patient and transplant variables. Transplant outcome was unaffected by IPSS-R score change in untreated patients and moderately superior in patients treated with chemotherapy with improved IPSS-R score at transplant. Improved IPSS-R score after hypomethylating agents (HMAs) or other therapies showed no beneficial effect. However, when IPSS-R score progressed after chemotherapy, HMAs, or other therapies, transplant outcome was worse than without any prior treatment. Similar results were found when reduction or increase in bone marrow (BM) blasts between diagnosis and transplantation was considered. The results show a limited benefit of IPSS-R score downstaging or reduction of BM blasts after chemotherapy and no benefit for HMAs or other treatments and thus question the role of prior therapy in patients with MDS scheduled for transplantation. The model-based survival estimates should help inform decision-making for both doctors and patients.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas , Humanos , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/terapia , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/mortalidade , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/patologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Prognóstico , Adulto , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Br J Haematol ; 204(5): 1590-1592, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38563345

RESUMO

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has fundamentally changed the relapsed and refractory therapeutic landscape, but the disease remains incurable. Two CAR-T products, idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel; Abecma) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel, Carvykti), have been FDA- and EMA-approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM); both target B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), a surface glycoprotein highly expressed on MM cells. Despite deep and durable responses following CAR-T therapy, most patients will need subsequent treatment, and the optimal next-line therapy is presently unclear. Commentary on: Liu et al. Outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma receiving salvage treatment after BCMA-specific CAR-T therapy: A retrospective analysis of LEGEND-2. Br J Haematol 2024;204:1780-1789.


Assuntos
Imunoterapia Adotiva , Mieloma Múltiplo , Terapia de Salvação , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Imunoterapia Adotiva/métodos , Terapia de Salvação/métodos , Antígeno de Maturação de Linfócitos B , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos/uso terapêutico
3.
Br J Haematol ; 204(4): 1159-1175, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38390784

RESUMO

Recent treatment advancements in multiple myeloma have led to significant improvements in patient outcomes. Maintenance therapy following autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) is now standard of care and has been demonstrated to prolong and deepen treatment responses. Currently, lenalidomide remains the single agent that has been approved for maintenance post-AHCT in Europe and the USA which, if tolerated, is continued until disease progression. The treatment landscape is rapidly expanding however, and the optimal personalised maintenance approach for a patient is becoming more complex. Treatment outcomes for patients with high-risk disease remain poor and choice of maintenance in this population also remains unclear. This review article evaluates up-to-date literature regarding established maintenance approaches. It further analyses ongoing studies exploring maintenance regimens using combination and novel agents, approaches to maintenance in patients with cytogenetic high-risk disease and minimal residual disease response-adapted strategies that reflect the current evolving treatment paradigm.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Mieloma Múltiplo , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Transplante Autólogo , Lenalidomida , Resultado do Tratamento , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Transplante de Células-Tronco
4.
Br J Haematol ; 204(6): 2365-2377, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38577874

RESUMO

Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains an option for tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) in first chronic phase (CP1) and high-risk patients with advanced disease phases. In this European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry-based study of 1686 CML patients undergoing first allo-HCT between 2012 and 2019, outcomes were evaluated according to donor type, particularly focusing on mismatched related donors (MMRDs). Median age at allo-HCT was 46 years (IQR 36-55). Disease status was CP1 in 43%, second CP (CP2) or later in 27%, accelerated phase in 12% and blast crisis in 18%. Donor type was matched related (MRD) in 39.2%, MMRD in 8.1%, matched unrelated (MUD) in 40.2%, and mismatched unrelated (MMUD) in 12.6%. In 4 years, overall survival (OS) for MRD, MMRD, MUD and MMUD was 61%, 56%, 63% and 59% (p = 0.21); relapse-free survival (RFS) was 48%, 42%, 52% and 46% (p = 0.03); cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 33%, 37%, 27% and 30% (p = 0.07); non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 19%, 21%, 21% and 24% (p = 0.21); and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD)-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 16%, 18%, 22% and 15% (p = 0.05) respectively. On multivariate analysis, MMRD use associated with longer engraftment times and higher risk of graft failure compared to MRD or MUD. There was no statistical evidence that MMRD use associated with different OS, RFS and incidence of GvHD compared to other donor types.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva , Humanos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/terapia , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/mortalidade , Adulto , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Transplante Homólogo , Sistema de Registros , Doadores de Tecidos , Doadores não Relacionados
5.
Blood ; 140(12): 1408-1418, 2022 09 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35667047

RESUMO

To determine the survival benefit of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in chronic myelomonocytic leukemias (CMML), we assembled a retrospective cohort of CMML patients 18-70 years old diagnosed between 2000 and 2014 from an international CMML dataset (n = 730) and the EBMT registry (n = 384). The prognostic impact of allo-HCT was analyzed through univariable and multivariable time-dependent models and with a multistate model, accounting for age, sex, CMML prognostic scoring system (low or intermediate-1 grouped as lower-risk, intermediate-2 or high as higher-risk) at diagnosis, and AML transformation. In univariable analysis, lower-risk CMMLs had a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 20% with allo-HCT vs 42% without allo-HCT (P < .001). In higher-risk patients, 5-year OS was 27% with allo-HCT vs 15% without allo-HCT (P = .13). With multistate models, performing allo-HCT before AML transformation reduced OS in patients with lower-risk CMML, and a survival benefit was predicted for men with higher-risk CMML. In a multivariable analysis of lower-risk patients, performing allo-HCT before transformation to AML significantly increased the risk of death within 2 years of transplantation (hazard ratio [HR], 3.19; P < .001), with no significant change in long-term survival beyond this time point (HR, 0.98; P = .92). In higher-risk patients, allo-HCT significantly increased the risk of death in the first 2 years after transplant (HR 1.46; P = .01) but not beyond (HR, 0.60; P = .09). Performing allo-HCT before AML transformation decreases life expectancy in lower-risk patients but may be considered in higher-risk patients.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crônica , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Juvenil , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crônica/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crônica/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante Homólogo , Adulto Jovem
6.
Haematologica ; 109(8): 2619-2627, 2024 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38546696

RESUMO

There is little long-term outcome data on the efficacy of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in light chain deposition disease (LCDD). We identified 51 LCDD patients in the European Society for Blood and Bone Marrow transplantation registry who had undergone upfront ASCT between 1995 and 2021. The median serum creatinine was 280 µmol/L and 45% required renal replacement therapy (RRT) at time of transplant. The melphalan dose was 100 mg/m2 in 23%, 140 mg/m2 in 55% and 200 mg/m2 in 21%. The rate of very good partial response or better improved from 41% pretransplant to 66% at day +100 post- ASCT. In RRT-independent patients, there was a modest improvement in renal function within the first 3 months; the median estimated glomerular filtration rate increased from 44 to 51 mL/min/1.73 m2. There was no further change between 3 and 12 months post-ASCT. No patient who was RRT-independent at ASCT became RRT dependent by day + 100 post-ASCT. Median follow- up post-ASCT was 84 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 46-122). At 6-years post ASCT, overall survival was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78-98) and PFS was 44% (95% CI: 28-60). The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality was 17% (95% CI: 6-27) and 2% (95% CI: 0-6), respectively. The cumulative incidence of renal transplantation at 4 years after ASCT was 27% (95% CI: 13-41) with renal transplantation performed between 6.3 and 52.9 months post-ASCT (median 24.7 months). ASCT represents a feasible option for LCDD patients even if RRT dependent at time of transplant. Outcomes are favorable with low non-relapse mortality and good long-term overall survival.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Transplante Autólogo , Humanos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento , Idoso , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Cadeias Leves de Imunoglobulina/sangue , Paraproteinemias/terapia , Paraproteinemias/mortalidade , Paraproteinemias/diagnóstico , Seguimentos , Europa (Continente) , Sistema de Registros , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos
7.
Am J Hematol ; 99(2): 203-215, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38009469

RESUMO

Although CMML since long has been separated from MDS, many studies continue to evaluate the outcomes of both diseases after hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) together. Data evaluating outcomes of a large CMML cohort after allo-HCT compared to MDS are limited. We aim to compare outcomes of CMML to MDS patients who underwent allo-HCT between 2010 and 2018. Patients ≥18 years with CMML and MDS undergoing allo-HCT reported to the EBMT registry were analyzed. Progression to AML before allo-HCT was an exclusion criterion. Overall survival (OS), progression/relapse-free survival (PFS), relapse incidence (including progression) (REL), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were evaluated in univariable and multivariable (MVA) Cox proportional hazard models including interaction terms between disease and confounders. In total, 10832 patients who underwent allo-HCT were included in the study, there were a total of 1466 CMML, and 9366 MDS. The median age at time of allo-HCT in CMML (median 60.5, IQR 54.3-65.2 years) was significantly higher than in the MDS cohort (median 58.8, IQR 50.2-64.5 years; p < .001). A significantly higher percentage of CMML patients were male (69.4%) compared to MDS (61.2%; p < .001). There were no clinically meaningful differences in the distribution of Karnofsky score, Sorror HCT-CI score at allo-HCT, and donor type, between the CMML and MDS patients. RIC platforms were utilized in 63.9% of CMML allo-HCT, and in 61.4% of MDS patients (p = .08). In univariable analyses, we found that OS, PFS, and REL were significantly worse in CMML when compared with MDS (all p < .0001), whereas no significant difference was observed in NRM (p = .77). In multivariable analyses, the HR comparing MDS versus CMML for OS was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.74-0.88, p < .001), PFS 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.82, p < .001), relapse 0.66 (95% CI 0.59-0.74, p < .001), and NRM 0.87 (95% CI 0.78-0.98, p = .02), respectively. The association between baseline variables and outcome was found to be similar in MDS and CMML (all interaction p > .05) except for a decreasing trend over time of the risk of relapse in CMML (HR allo-HCT per year later 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.98), whereas no such trend was observed in MDS (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98-1.02). The poor outcome observed for CMML could be related to variables not measured in this study or to factors inherent to the disease itself. This study demonstrates that outcomes of CMML patients after allo-HCT are significantly worse compared to MDS. The results of this study may contribute to future recommendations for allo-HCT in CMML patients.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Feminino , Transplante Homólogo , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Doadores de Tecidos , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos
8.
Am J Hematol ; 99(11): 2084-2095, 2024 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39158218

RESUMO

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) is a commonly used treatment in multiple myeloma (MM). However, real-world global demographic and outcome data are scarce. We collected data on baseline characteristics and outcomes from 61 725 patients with newly diagnosed MM who underwent upfront AHCT between 2013 and 2017 from nine national/international registries. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), relapse incidence (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Median OS amounted to 90.2 months (95% CI 88.2-93.6) and median PFS 36.5 months (95% CI 36.1-37.0). At 24 months, cumulative RI was 33% (95% CI 32.5%-33.4%) and NRM was 2.5% (95% CI 2.3%-2.6%). In the multivariate analysis, superior outcomes were associated with younger age, IgG subtype, complete hematological response at auto-HCT, Karnofsky score of 100%, international staging scoring (ISS) stage 1, HCT-comorbidity index (CI) 0, standard cytogenetic risk, auto-HCT in recent years, and use of lenalidomide maintenance. There were differences in the baseline characteristics and outcomes between registries. While the NRM was 1%-3% at 12 months worldwide, the OS at 36 months was 69%-84%, RI at 12 months was 12%-24% and PFS at 36 months was 43%-63%. The variability in these outcomes is attributable to differences in patient and disease characteristics as well as the use of maintenance and macroeconomic factors. In conclusion, worldwide data indicate that AHCT in MM is a safe and effective therapy with an NRM of 1%-3% with considerable regional differences in OS, PFS, RI, and patient characteristics. Maintenance treatment post-AHCT had a beneficial effect on OS.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Mieloma Múltiplo , Transplante Autólogo , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Adulto , Sistema de Registros , Resultado do Tratamento , Lenalidomida/uso terapêutico , Lenalidomida/administração & dosagem , Taxa de Sobrevida
9.
Eur J Haematol ; 111(2): 181-190, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37082839

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: No adequate data exist on the impact of multiple myeloma (MM) with extramedullary disease (EMD) after autograft and maintenance therapy. METHODS: We identified 808 patients with newly diagnosed MM who received first autograft, of whom 107 had EMD (83 paraskeletal and 24 organ involvement), and who had been reported to the EBMT registry December 2018. Distribution according to type of involvement was similar between the treatment groups (p = .69). For EMD, 46 (40%) received thalidomide, 59 (51%) lenalidomide, and 11 (10%) bortezomib. RESULTS: The median follow-up from maintenance start was 44 months. Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 52% (48%-57%) for no EMD, 56% (44%-69%) for paraskeletal involvement, and 45% (22%-68%) for organ involvement (p = .146). Early PFS (within first year) appeared to be significantly worse for organ involvement (hazard ratio, 3.40), while no significant influence was found after first year from maintenance start. Three-year overall survival (OS) was 81% (77%-84%), 88% (80%-96%), and 68% (47%-89%; p = .064), respectively. With thalidomide as reference, lenalidomide was significantly associated with better PFS and OS, whereas bortezomib appeared to improve outcome specifically in EMD. CONCLUSION: Lenalidomide maintenance is standard of care for MM without EMD, whereas extramedullary organ involvement remains a significant risk factor for worse outcome, especially for early events after maintenance start.


Assuntos
Mieloma Múltiplo , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Bortezomib/uso terapêutico , Lenalidomida/uso terapêutico , Talidomida/uso terapêutico , Autoenxertos , Transplante Autólogo , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico
10.
Am J Hematol ; 98(1): 112-121, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36266607

RESUMO

Following the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), the number of patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has dramatically decreased. Imatinib was the first TKI introduced to the clinical arena, predominantly utilized in the first line setting. In cases of insufficient response, resistance, or intolerance, CML patients can subsequently be treated with either a second or third generation TKI. Between 2006 and 2016, we analyzed the impact of the use of 1, 2, or 3 TKI prior to allo-HCT for CP CML in 904 patients. A total of 323-, 371-, and 210 patients had 1, 2, or 3 TKI prior to transplant, respectively; imatinib (n = 778), dasatinib (n = 508), nilotinib (n = 353), bosutinib (n = 12), and ponatinib (n = 44). The majority had imatinib as first TKI (n = 747, 96%). Transplants were performed in CP1, n = 549, CP2, n = 306, and CP3, n = 49. With a median follow-up of 52 months, 5-year OS for the entire population was 64.4% (95% CI 60.9-67.9%), PFS 50% (95% CI 46.3-53.7%), RI 28.7% (95% CI 25.4-32.0%), and NRM 21.3% (95% CI 18.3-24.2%). No difference in OS, PFS, RI, or NRM was evident related to the number of TKI prior to allo-HCT or to the type of TKI (p = ns). Significant factors influencing OS and PFS were > CP1 versus CP1 and Karnofsky performance (KPS) score > 80 versus ≤80, highlighting CP1 patients undergoing allo-HCT have improved survival compared to >CP1 and the importance of careful allo-HCT candidate selection.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva , Leucemia Mieloide de Fase Crônica , Humanos , Mesilato de Imatinib/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamento farmacológico , Leucemia Mieloide de Fase Crônica/tratamento farmacológico
11.
Br J Haematol ; 197(1): 82-96, 2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35166376

RESUMO

Multiple myeloma (MM) accounts for 10% of haematological malignancies. Overall survival (OS) has improved in recent years due to increased use of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the treatment of newly diagnosed MM and the advent of novel agents, including proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs and monoclonal antibodies. To assess trends in ASCT including patient selection, choice of induction regimen, depth of response and survival, we performed a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing first ASCT for MM in European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation centres between 1995 and 2019. A total of 117 711 patients across 575 centres were included. The number of transplants performed increased sevenfold across the study period. The median age increased from 55 to 61 years, and the percentage of patients aged >65 years rose from 7% to 30%. Use of chemotherapy-based induction fell significantly, being largely replaced by bortezomib-based regimens. The two-year complete response rate increased from 22% to 42%. The five-year progression-free survival and OS rates increased from 28% to 31% and from 52% to 69%, respectively. Transplant mortality fell from 5.9% to 1.5%. Ongoing advances in MM treatment may challenge the future role of ASCT. However, at the current time, ASCT remains central to the MM treatment paradigm.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Mieloma Múltiplo , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Medula Óssea/patologia , Bortezomib/uso terapêutico , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante de Células-Tronco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Transplante Autólogo , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
Phys Rev Lett ; 129(12): 120505, 2022 Sep 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36179156

RESUMO

Approximation based on perturbation theory is the foundation for most of the quantitative predictions of quantum mechanics, whether in quantum many-body physics, chemistry, quantum field theory, or other domains. Quantum computing provides an alternative to the perturbation paradigm, yet state-of-the-art quantum processors with tens of noisy qubits are of limited practical utility. Here, we introduce perturbative quantum simulation, which combines the complementary strengths of the two approaches, enabling the solution of large practical quantum problems using limited noisy intermediate-scale quantum hardware. The use of a quantum processor eliminates the need to identify a solvable unperturbed Hamiltonian, while the introduction of perturbative coupling permits the quantum processor to simulate systems larger than the available number of physical qubits. We present an explicit perturbative expansion that mimics the Dyson series expansion and involves only local unitary operations, and show its optimality over other expansions under certain conditions. We numerically benchmark the method for interacting bosons, fermions, and quantum spins in different topologies, and study different physical phenomena, such as information propagation, charge-spin separation, and magnetism, on systems of up to 48 qubits only using an 8+1 qubit quantum hardware. We demonstrate our scheme on the IBM quantum cloud, verifying its noise robustness and illustrating its potential for benchmarking large quantum processors with smaller ones.

13.
Am J Hematol ; 97(5): 562-573, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35132679

RESUMO

There are limited prospective data on lenalidomide, subcutaneous bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RsqVd) in transplant-eligible/transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Reliable biomarkers for efficacy and toxicity are required to better tailor therapy. Two parallel studies were conducted by Cancer Trials Ireland (CTI; NCT02219178) and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI; NCT02441686). Patients received four 21-day cycles of RsqVd and could then receive either another 4 cycles of RsqVd or undergo autologous stem cell transplant. Postinduction/posttransplant, patients received lenalidomide maintenance, with bortezomib included for high-risk patients. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) after 4 cycles of RsqVd. Eighty-eight patients were enrolled and 84 treated across the two studies; median age was 64.7 (CTI study) and 60.0 years (DFCI study), and 59% and 57% had stage II-III disease. Pooled ORR after 4 cycles in evaluable patients was 93.5%, including 48.1% complete or very good partial responses (CTI study: 91.9%, 59.5%; DFCI study: 95.0%, 37.5%), and in the all-treated population was 85.7% (44.0%). Patients received a median of 4 (CTI study) and 8 (DFCI study) RsqVd cycles; 60% and 31% of patients (CTI study) and 33% and 51% of patients (DFCI study) underwent transplant or received further RsqVd induction, respectively. The most common toxicity was peripheral neuropathy (pooled: 68%, 7% grade 3-4; CTI study: 57%, 7%; DFCI study: 79%, 7%). Proteomics analyses indicated elevated kallikrein-6 in good versus poor responders, decreased midkine in good responders, and elevated macrophage inflammatory protein 1-alpha in patients who stopped treatment from neurotoxicity, suggesting predictive biomarkers warranting further investigation.


Assuntos
Mieloma Múltiplo , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Bortezomib/efeitos adversos , Dexametasona/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Indução , Lenalidomida/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Estudos Prospectivos
14.
Eur J Haematol ; 106(5): 708-715, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33580608

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT)-eligible myeloma patients, prolonged induction does not necessarily improve the depth of response. METHOD: We analyzed 1222 ASCT patients who were classified based on (a) the interval between induction and stem cell collection, (b) the type of induction regimen: BID (Bortezomib, IMiDs, and Dexamethasone), Bortezomib-based, or CTD (Cyclophosphamide, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone), and (c) the time to best response (Early ie, best response within 4 or 5 months, depending on the regimen vs Late; Good ie, VGPR or better vs Poor). RESULTS: The length of induction treatment required to achieve a Good response did not affect PFS (P = .65) or OS (P = .61) post-ASCT. The three types of regimen resulted in similar outcomes: median PFS 31, 27.7 and 30.8 months (P = .31), and median OS 81.7, 92.7, and 77.4 months, respectively (P = .83). On multivariate analysis, neither the type nor the duration of the induction regimen affected OS and PFS, except for Early Good Responders who had a better PFS compared to Early Poor Responders (HR = 1.21, P-value = .02). However, achieving a Good response at induction was associated with a better response (≥VGPR) post-transplant. CONCLUSION: The kinetics of response did not affect outcomes.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Duração da Terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Prognóstico , Indução de Remissão , Fatores de Tempo , Transplante Autólogo , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
Am J Hematol ; 96(10): 1186-1194, 2021 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34152630

RESUMO

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is increasingly used in older myelofibrosis (MF) patients, but its risk/benefit ratio compared to non-transplant approaches has not been evaluated in this population. We analyzed the outcomes of allo-HCT in 556 MF patients aged ≥65 years from the EBMT registry, and determined the excess mortality over the matched general population of MF patients ≥65 years managed with allo-HCT (n = 556) or conventional drug treatment (n = 176). The non-transplant cohort included patients with intermediate-2 or high risk DIPSS from the Spanish Myelofibrosis Registry. After a median follow-up of 3.4 years, the estimated 5-year survival rate, non-relapse mortality (NRM), and relapse incidence after transplantation was 40%, 37%, and 25%, respectively. Busulfan-based conditioning was associated with decreased mortality (HR: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.5-0.9) whereas the recipient CMV+/donor CMV- combination (HR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2-2.4) and the JAK2 mutated genotype (HR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1-3.5) predicted higher mortality. Busulfan-based conditioning correlated with improved survival due to less NRM, despite its higher relapse rate when compared with melphalan-based regimens. Excess mortality was higher in transplanted patients than in the non-HCT cohort in the first year of follow-up (ratio: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.13-2.80), whereas the opposite occurred between the fourth and eighth follow-up years (ratio: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.18-0.53). Comparing the excess mortality of the two treatments, male patients seemed to benefit more than females from allo-HCT, mainly due to their worse prognosis with non-transplant approaches. These findings could potentially enhance counseling and treatment decision-making in elderly transplant-eligible MF patients.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Mielofibrose Primária/terapia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Mielofibrose Primária/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Espanha/epidemiologia , Análise de Sobrevida , Transplante Homólogo
16.
Am J Hematol ; 96(1): 69-79, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33064301

RESUMO

The role of spleen size and splenectomy for the prediction of post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) outcome in myelofibrosis remains under debate. In EBMT registry, we identified a cohort of 1195 myelofibrosis patients transplanted between 2000-2017 after either fludarabine-busulfan or fludarabine-melphalan regimens. Overall, splenectomy was performed in 202 (16.9%) patients and its use decreased over time (28.3% in 2000-2009 vs 14.1% in 2010-2017 period). By multivariate analysis, splenectomy was associated with less NRM (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.93, P = .018) but increased risk of relapse (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.01-2.02, P = .042), with no significant impact on OS (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.67-1.12, P = .274). However, in subset analysis comparing the impact of splenectomy vs specific spleen sizes, for patients with progressive disease, an improved survival was seen in splenectomised subjects compared to those patients with a palpable spleen length ≥ 15 cm (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.69, P < .001), caused by a significant reduction in NRM (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14-0.49, P < .001), without significantly increased relapse risk (HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.87-2.49, P = .147). Overall, despite the possible biases typical of retrospective cohorts, this study highlights the potential detrimental effect of massive splenomegaly in transplant outcome and supports the role of splenectomy for myelofibrosis patients with progressive disease and large splenomegaly.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Mielofibrose Primária , Sistema de Registros , Baço , Esplenectomia , Aloenxertos , Bussulfano/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Melfalan/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tamanho do Órgão , Mielofibrose Primária/mortalidade , Mielofibrose Primária/patologia , Mielofibrose Primária/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Baço/patologia , Baço/cirurgia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Vidarabina/administração & dosagem , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados
17.
Handb Exp Pharmacol ; 265: 57-71, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33367950

RESUMO

Three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed human skin (RhS) models featuring fully-differentiated characteristics of in vivo human epidermis have been known for almost 40 years. In this chapter, the topic of commercial in vitro tissue models is described, taking RhS models as an example. The need for highly standardised models is evident for regulatory testing purposes, e.g. the classification and labelling of chemicals and formulations, as well as for pharmacology-oriented research and drug development. Following the standardisation of RhS model production by commercial developers, international validation studies and regulatory acceptance, 3D RhS models are now used globally in both industrial and academic research laboratories. Industrial production of standardised 3D RhS models involves GMP-compliant processes together with ISO 9001 documentation in order to control and ensure reproducibility and quality. Key biological, functional, and performance features that are addressed in industrial production include barrier properties, histological and immunohistochemical characterisation, lipid profile characterisation, and tissue viability before and after transport. An up-to-date survey of commercial RhS tissue producers and the regulatory acceptance status of major safety, hazard, and efficacy assays currently available to chemical and pharmaceutical industries is presented in this chapter. Safety and ethical concerns related to the use of human tissue in the industrial production of RhS models are discussed. Finally, innovative approaches to the production of standardised 3D RhS models including automated production, development of more representative 3D RhS models using advanced additive manufacturing tools, microfluidics technologies, and bioprinting are presented. The future outlook for 3D RhS models includes a prevalence of high-quality models which will be fabricated by end-users rather than commercial producers. These will overcome problems with shipments and customs clearance that many users still face when buying RhS from overseas commercial suppliers. Open-source technologies and commercial components for "do-it-yourself" RhS will significantly change the skin model market as well as regulatory acceptance of open-source models during the next decade. All of these developments and improvements will together allow more widespread use of in vitro RhS models for broader application as animal replacements in areas ranging from industrial and regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, to drug development and personalised medicine.


Assuntos
Pele , Animais , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
18.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 26(9): 1559-1566, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32417491

RESUMO

Melphalan at a myeloablative dose followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains the standard of care for transplant-eligible patients with myeloma. However, therapies such as new immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors and, more recently, monoclonal antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T cells are challenging the traditional role of ASCT. Which patients benefit from ASCT? Can its use be delayed until first relapse? The field is moving rapidly as novel agents lead to new patient care strategies. The place of ASCT in this changing landscape will be reviewed and reassessed.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Mieloma Múltiplo , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco , Transplante Autólogo
19.
Br J Haematol ; 190(3): 437-441, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32108327

RESUMO

Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN), unclassifiable (MPN-U) is a heterogeneous disease with regards to both clinical phenotype and disease course. Patients may initially be asymptomatic or present with leucocytosis or thrombocytosis, anaemia, progressive splenomegaly, constitutional symptom, thromboses or accelerated/blastic phase disease. Treatment strategies are variable and there are no widely accepted consensus management guidelines for MNU-U. Allogeneic Haematopoietic Cell Transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only curative strategy yet outcomes, to date, are not well defined. We hereby report on the largest retrospective study of patients with MPN-U undergoing allo-HCT, highlighting the potentially curative role and providing clinicians with robust engraftment, GvHD and outcome data to facilitate patient discussion.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Transtornos Mieloproliferativos/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Transtornos Mieloproliferativos/genética , Transtornos Mieloproliferativos/mortalidade , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco , Sociedades Científicas , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante , Transplante Homólogo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
20.
Curr Opin Oncol ; 32(5): 418-426, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32740095

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite considerable therapeutic advances over the last decade, multiple myeloma remains an incurable disease. Novel treatment strategies are urgently needed. T cells can be genetically modified to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) targeting defined surface antigens on tumor cells. To date, over 90 clinical trials investigating the use of CAR T cells in multiple myeloma have been registered. RECENT FINDINGS: Although two CD19-directed CAR T-cell products have been approved, CD19 surface expression on plasma cells is limited or absent and CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma is less advanced. B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed CAR T cells have shown promising efficacy and safety profiles in various phase I/II clinical trials. However, almost all treated patients continue to relapse. The current focus is therefore on strategies to overcome resistance mechanisms. These include the targeting of other surface antigens, refinements in T-cell signaling and dual-targeting approaches. SUMMARY: CAR T-cell therapy has finally moved into routine clinical use, the first experiments having taken place over 30 years ago. A BCMA-directed product for the treatment of multiple myeloma is expected to be approved shortly. However, further refinements of both CAR T-cell constructs and treatment protocols will be required to boost persistence, overcome resistance and reduce toxicities.


Assuntos
Imunoterapia Adotiva/métodos , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Antígenos CD19/imunologia , Ensaios Clínicos Fase I como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/imunologia , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfócitos T/genética , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfócitos T/imunologia , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos/genética , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA