Trends in sedation-analgesia practices in pediatric liver transplant patients admitted postoperatively to the pediatric intensive care unit: An analysis of data from the pediatric health information system (PHIS) database.

BACKGROUND: Children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), after liver transplantation, frequently require analgesia and sedation in the immediate postoperative period. Our objective was to assess trends and variations in sedation and analgesia used in this cohort. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective cohort study using the Pediatric Health Information System from 2012 to 2022. RESULTS: During the study period, 3963 patients with liver transplantation were admitted to the PICU from 32 US children's hospitals with a median age of 2 years [IQR: 0.00, 10.00]. 54 percent of patients received mechanical ventilation (MV). Compared with patients without MV, those with MV were more likely to receive morphine (57% vs 49%, p < .001), fentanyl (57% vs 44%), midazolam (45% vs 31%), lorazepam (39% vs. 24%), dexmedetomidine (38% vs 30%), and ketamine (25% vs 12%), all p < .001. Vasopressor usage was also higher in MV patients (22% vs. 35%, p < .001). During the study period, there was an increasing trend in the utilization of dexmedetomidine and ketamine, but the use of benzodiazepine decreased (p < .001). CONCLUSION: About 50% of patients who undergo liver transplant are placed on MV in the PICU postoperatively and receive a greater amount of benzodiazepines in comparison with those without MV. The overall utilization of dexmedetomidine and ketamine was more frequent, whereas the administration of benzodiazepines was less during the study period. Pediatric intensivists have a distinctive opportunity to collaborate with the liver transplant team to develop comprehensive guidelines for sedation and analgesia, aimed at enhancing the quality of care provided to these patients.

Management of complex pediatric and adolescent liver trauma: adult vs pediatric level 1 trauma centers.

PURPOSE: Management of high-grade pediatric and adolescent liver trauma can be complex. Studies suggest that variation exists at adult (ATC) vs pediatric trauma centers (PTC); however, there is limited granular comparative data. We sought to describe and compare the management and outcomes of complex pediatric and adolescent liver trauma between a level 1 ATC and two PTCs in a large metropolitan city. METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric and adolescent (age < 21 years) patients with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Grade 4 and 5 liver injuries managed at an ATC and PTCs between 2016 and 2022 was performed. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were obtained at the ATC and PTCs. Primary outcomes included rates of operative management and use of interventional radiology (IR). Secondary outcomes included packed red blood cell (pRBC) utilization, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS. RESULTS: One hundred forty-four patients were identified, seventy-five at the ATC and sixty-nine at the PTC. The cohort was predominantly black (65.5%) males (63.5%). Six injuries (8.7%) at the PTC and forty-five (60%) injuries at the ATC were penetrating trauma. Comparing only blunt trauma, ATC patients had higher Injury Severity Score (median 37 vs 26) and ages (20 years vs 9 years). ATC patients were more likely to undergo operative management (26.7% vs 11.0%, p = 0.016) and utilized IR more (51.9% vs 4.8%, p < 0.001) compared to the PTC. The patients managed at the ATC required higher rates of pRBC transfusions though not statistically significant (p = 0.06). There were no differences in mortality, ICU, or hospital LOS. CONCLUSION: Our retrospective review of high-grade pediatric and adolescent liver trauma demonstrated higher rates of IR and operating room use at the ATC compared to the PTC in the setting of higher Injury Severity Score and age. While the PTC successfully managed > 95% of Grade 4/5 liver injuries non-operatively, prospective data are needed to determine the optimal algorithm for management in the older adolescent population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Feature selection and causal analysis for microbiome studies in the presence of confounding using standardization.

BACKGROUND: Microbiome studies have uncovered associations between microbes and human, animal, and plant health outcomes. This has led to an interest in developing microbial interventions for treatment of disease and optimization of crop yields which requires identification of microbiome features that impact the outcome in the population of interest. That task is challenging because of the high dimensionality of microbiome data and the confounding that results from the complex and dynamic interactions among host, environment, and microbiome. In the presence of such confounding, variable selection and estimation procedures may have unsatisfactory performance in identifying microbial features with an effect on the outcome. RESULTS: In this manuscript, we aim to estimate population-level effects of individual microbiome features while controlling for confounding by a categorical variable. Due to the high dimensionality and confounding-induced correlation between features, we propose feature screening, selection, and estimation conditional on each stratum of the confounder followed by a standardization approach to estimation of population-level effects of individual features. Comprehensive simulation studies demonstrate the advantages of our approach in recovering relevant features. Utilizing a potential-outcomes framework, we outline assumptions required to ascribe causal, rather than associational, interpretations to the identified microbiome effects. We conducted an agricultural study of the rhizosphere microbiome of sorghum in which nitrogen fertilizer application is a confounding variable. In this study, the proposed approach identified microbial taxa that are consistent with biological understanding of potential plant-microbe interactions. CONCLUSIONS: Standardization enables more accurate identification of individual microbiome features with an effect on the outcome of interest compared to other variable selection and estimation procedures when there is confounding by a categorical variable.

Using structural-nested models to estimate the effect of cluster-level adherence on individual-level outcomes with a three-armed cluster-randomized trial.

Much attention has been paid to estimating the causal effect of adherence to a randomized protocol using instrumental variables to adjust for unmeasured confounding. Researchers tend to use the instrumental variable within one of the three main frameworks: regression with an endogenous variable, principal stratification, or structural-nested modeling. We found in our literature review that even in simple settings, causal interpretations of analyses with endogenous regressors can be ambiguous or rely on a strong assumption that can be difficult to interpret. Principal stratification and structural-nested modeling are alternative frameworks that render unambiguous causal interpretations based on assumptions that are, arguably, easier to interpret. Our interest stems from a wish to estimate the effect of cluster-level adherence on individual-level binary outcomes with a three-armed cluster-randomized trial and polytomous adherence. Principal stratification approaches to this problem are quite challenging because of the sheer number of principal strata involved. Therefore, we developed a structural-nested modeling approach and, in the process, extended the methodology to accommodate cluster-randomized trials with unequal probability of selecting individuals. Furthermore, we developed a method to implement the approach with relatively simple programming. The approach works quite well, but when the structural-nested model does not fit the data, there is no solution to the estimating equation. We investigate the performance of the approach using simulated data, and we also use the approach to estimate the effect on pupil absence of school-level adherence to a randomized water, sanitation, and hygiene intervention in western Kenya.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Thoracoscopic and Open Repair For Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes for thoracoscopic repair of EA/TEF and compare with open repair. METHODS: Patients who underwent EA/TEF repair during 2000-2020 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with delayed repair were excluded. Demographic, operative, outcome data was collected. Outcomes were compared using Wilcoxon-rank sum tests for continuous, Chi-squared/Fisher's exact tests for categorical data. RESULTS: There were 104 patients with primary repair, 49 (47.1%) underwent thoracoscopic repair per surgeon's choice. Type C accounted for 101 (97.1%) of the cases. Gestational age and birth weight were higher in the thoracoscopy group (p = 0.001). The rate of ≥3 VACTERL anomalies was higher in the OR group (p = 0.016). Operative time, rate of anastomotic leak, time to first oral feeding were similar (p > 0.05). Thoracoscopy group had decreased length of ventilation (p = 0.026) and length of stay (p = 0.029). The incidence of anastomotic stricture was higher in the thoracoscopy group (p = 0.012). Recurrent TEF was one case in each group. Rates of tube feeding at discharge and in first year were similar (p > 0.05), rate in third year was decreased (p = 0.032) in the thoracoscopy group. Rates of anti-reflux medication in first and third years, and fundoplication rate were similar (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Many of the short- and long-term outcomes are comparable between thoracoscopic and open repair of EA/TEF. Length of ventilation, length of stay are decreased in the thoracoscopy group. Anastomotic stricture is higher, the need for long-term tube feeding is lower after thoracoscopic repair. Although these results could be affected by selection bias, they are still promising for advancing thoracoscopic repair of EA/TEF safely and efficiently. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Parenting style in the NICU is stable, measurable, and predictive of 2-year parenting style.

Objective: To establish psychometric properties of Baby Care Questionnaire (BCQ) in preterm infants, individual level stability of BCQ scores from NICU to 2 years corrected gestational age (CGA), and to determine whether early BCQ scores predict 2-year parenting styles. Study design: In this prospective study, the BCQ assessed early parental structure and attunement at 4 time points between NICU and 2-years CGA. The Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSDQ) at 2-years evaluated authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive parenting styles. Intraclass correlations analyzed reliability and Reliable Change Index (RCI) studied individual-level stability. Multivariate regression examined predictive properties. Results: n=162 parent/preterm infant dyads were followed sequentially. Cronbach's α BCQ structure and attunement were 0.9 and 0.8. RCI showed high individual level stability of both constructs. Higher early structure scores were associated higher 2-year authoritative scores. Conclusions: Early parenting characteristics beginning in the NICU are stable in infancy, measurable, reliable, and predictive of 2-year parenting styles. Early parental structure correlates with 2-year authoritative parenting style.

Reducing the percentage of surviving infants with acute symptomatic seizures discharged on anti-seizure medication.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of inclusion of an anti-seizure medication (ASM) weaning protocol in a neonatal seizure pathway on the percent of infants discharged on ASMs. STUDY DESIGN: This cohort study included surviving infants with acute symptomatic seizures treated with ASMs across three institutions. We evaluated infants in 2 epochs, pre- and post-implementation of the ASM weaning protocol. The primary outcome was discharge on ASM. RESULTS: Of 116 included infants, the percent of infants discharged on ASMs was 69% in epoch 1 versus 34% in epoch 2 (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between epochs in recurrence of seizures after discharge by 1 year of age (p = 0.125). There was an annual decrease in the percent of infants discharged on ASM across all institutions. CONCLUSION: Inclusion of a formal ASM weaning protocol as part of an institutional seizure pathway reduced percent of infants with acute symptomatic seizures discharged on ASM.

Clinical Predictors of Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation vs Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Extremely and Very Low Birth Weight Neonates.

PURPOSE: Spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) are distinct disease processes associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Initial treatment, laparotomy (LP) versus peritoneal drainage (PD), is disease specific however it can be difficult to distinguish these diagnoses preoperatively. We investigated clinical characteristics associated with each diagnosis and constructed a scoring algorithm for accurate preoperative diagnosis. METHODS: A cohort of extreme and very low birth weight (<1500 g) neonates surgically treated for SIP or NEC between 07/2004-09/2022 were reviewed. Clinical characteristics included gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW), feeding history, physical exam, and laboratory/radiological findings. Intraoperative diagnosis was used to determine SIP vs NEC. Pre-drain diagnosis was used for patients treated with PD only. RESULTS: 338 neonates were managed for SIP (n = 269, 79.6%) vs NEC (n = 69, 20.4%). PD was definitive treatment in 146 (43.2%) patients and 75 (22.2%) patients were treated with upfront LP. Characteristics associated with SIP included younger GA, younger age at initial laparotomy or drainage (ALD), and history of trophic or no feeds. Multivariate logistic regression determined pneumatosis, abdominal wall erythema, higher ALD and history of feeds to be highly predictive of NEC. A 0-8-point scale was designed based on these characteristics with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.819 (95% CI 0.756-0.882) for the diagnosis of NEC. A threshold score of 1.5 had a 95.2% specificity for NEC. CONCLUSION: Utilizing clinical characteristics associated with SIP & NEC we developed a scoring system designed to assist surgeons accurately distinguish SIP vs NEC in neonates. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Chart Review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Contrasting pediatric specialty provider opinion between contextualized and structured radiology reports.

BACKGROUND: Structured reporting (SR) replaced narrative (free text) reporting and utilizes templated headings and subheadings with findings typically based on the anatomy included in the examination. Its use has been widely advocated by radiology and non-radiology organizations as the new reporting standard. There are, however, shortcomings to SR, such as templated text not addressing a specific clinical indication. Contextual reporting (CR) fills this gap. CR is a type of SR which is tailored to a narrow clinical indication by including pertinent positive and negative findings for that specific clinical entity. OBJECTIVE: This study assesses provider preferences for CR as compared to SR in the pediatric practice environment using a survey methodology. METHODS & MATERIALS: Surveys with examples of SR and CR reports were sent electronically to two groups. One group was focused on neurological diseases and included pediatric specialists in neurosurgery, neurology, ENT, ED, and ophthalmology (190 people), referred to as the pediatric neuroimaging group. The pediatric neuroimaging group survey contained examples of CR and SR reports of an orbital CT for orbital cellulitis and a head CT for stroke. The other group was focused on gastrointestinal diseases, and included pediatric specialists in gastroenterology, general surgery, and the ED (159 people), referred to as the pediatric gastrointestinal (GI) imaging group. The pediatric GI imaging group survey contained example reports of an abdominal CT for appendicitis and an MRI enterography for Crohn's disease. Surveys utilizing a 5-point Likert scale were analyzed via Fischer's exact test with a p-value deemed statistically significant at less than 0.05. RESULTS: 349 individuals were contacted to participate in the survey. There were 81 (23 %, 81/349) survey respondents; 41 (22 %, 41/190) from the neuro group, and 40 (25 %, 40/159) from the GI group. 56 % (45/81) of all respondents preferred CR reports over traditional SR reports, while 29 % (23/81) did not. Most respondents (59 %, 48/81) indicated that CR reports are easier to interpret than traditional SR reports. Respondents from the pediatric neuroimaging group favored CR reports to a lesser degree (44 %, 36/81) compared to respondents from the pediatric GI imaging group (68 %, 55/81). CONCLUSIONS: We learned from this survey that it would be beneficial to be very intentional about selecting clinical indications where CR would be most valued rather than trying to develop CR for any specific clinical indication. The study results indicate it is reasonable to continue further efforts at exploring the utility of contextualized reports.

Validation of a screening panel for pediatric metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease using metabolomics.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), formerly known as NAFLD, is the most common liver disease in children. Liver biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis, although more efficient screening methods are needed. We previously developed a novel NAFLD screening panel in youth using machine learning applied to high-resolution metabolomics and clinical phenotype data. Our objective was to validate this panel in a separate cohort, which consisted of a combined cross-sectional sample of 161 children with stored frozen samples (75% male, 12.8±2.6 years of age, body mass index 31.0±7.0 kg/m2, 81% with MASLD, 58% Hispanic race/ethnicity). METHODS: Clinical data were collected from all children, and high-resolution metabolomics was performed using their fasting serum samples. MASLD was assessed by MRI-proton density fat fraction or liver biopsy and cardiometabolic factors. Our previously developed panel included waist circumference, triglycerides, whole-body insulin sensitivity index, 3 amino acids, 2 phospholipids, dihydrothymine, and 2 unknowns. To improve feasibility, a simplified version without the unknowns was utilized in the present study. Since the panel was modified, the data were split into training (67%) and test (33%) sets to assess the validity of the panel. RESULTS: Our present highest-performing modified model, with 4 clinical variables and 8 metabolomics features, achieved an AUROC of 0.92, 95% sensitivity, and 80% specificity for detecting MASLD in the test set. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, this panel has promising potential for use as a screening tool for MASLD in youth.