RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic auto-inflammatory disease that is highly associated with adverse psychopathology and impaired body image. Previous studies show that patients with HS are also impacted by social stigma associated with their skin disease. Over time, these experiences can influence the way in which patients feel about themselves, leading to internalized skin bias (ISB). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Internalized Skin Bias Questionnaire (ISBQ) in an HS population and to determine the association of this instrument with markers of HS severity. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey with 72-h retest was sent to adult patients with HS from March to November 2021. Reliability for the ISBQ was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and the Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC). Construct validity was evaluated using Pearson Correlation Coefficients with similar measures. RESULTS: Internal consistency for the ISBQ instrument was 0.89 with a CCC of 0.88. The ISBQ had moderate correlation (r = 0.63) with the experienced skin stigma questionnaire as well as the BDI-II (r = 0.66) and the psychosocial subscale of the HiSQOL (r = 0.65). ISBQ scores differed significantly across different stages of disease severity (P = 0.04). There was no significant difference between those with different durations of disease (P = 0.47). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the ISBQ is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used to assess the psychosocial construct of ISB especially in a population of HS patients. Further, ISB places a prevalent negative impact on the psychopathology of patients with HS.
Assuntos
Hidradenite Supurativa , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Hidradenite Supurativa/complicações , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estigma Social , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Objective: Dermatomyositis (DM) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, decreased quality of life, and an increased incidence of psychiatric illness. We performed a pilot study to investigate whether concern about malignancy contributes to the psychosocial toll of DM.Method: Patients with a recent DM diagnosis at our institution between 2013 and 2018 and no history of DM-associated malignancy completed standardized questionnaires and a novel survey generated by our group, and participated in focus groups.Results: Seventeen patients (14 females and three males) completed the surveys. The mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score was 2.75. The mean score on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) was 5.35, with a range of 0-20. Our independent DM-specific questionnaire revealed a mean of 17.41 (range 2-40).Conclusion: Concern about the increased risk of malignancy contributes to the psychosocial toll of DM. Individual impacts are highly variable and patient specific. Clinicians should assess for depression and anxiety in patients with DM, understanding that concern for malignancy adds to the total psychosocial burden in some patients.