Comparison of histomorphometric and radiographic effects of growth guidance with tension-band devices (eight-Plate and FlexTack) in a pig model.

Background and purpose - Temporary hemiepiphysiodesis for growth modulation in skeletally immature patients is a long-known technique. Recently the use of tension-band devices has become popular. This study compares 2 tension-band implants (eight-Plate and FlexTack) regarding their effects on the growth plate.Animals and methods - 12 pigs in 2 equally sized groups (A and B) were investigated. The right proximal medial tibia was treated with either eight-Plate or FlexTack. The left tibia of the same pig was treated with the opposite implant. After 9 weeks all implants were removed. Animals in group B were then hosted for another 5 weeks. Histomorphometric analysis of the growth plate was carried out after 9 and 14 weeks, respectively. Radiographs were taken at implantation, removal, and after 14 weeks.Results - Both tension-band devices achieved a statistically significant and clinically relevant growth inhibition, whereas the effect appeared to be more distinct after the use of FlexTack. Implant-related complications or physeal damage was not observed. After implant removal, rebound phenomenon was radiologically observed in all cases. The growth plates treated with eight-Plate showed a paradox reversal of the zonal distributions, with an increase of the proliferative zones at the previously arrested medial aspect of the physis and a decrease laterally.Interpretation - Both eight-Plate and FlexTack proved to be appropriate devices for growth-guiding treatment. The radiographic evaluation showed a change in angular axes after treatment with each implant, while the correction appeared to be faster with FlexTack. The paradox cartilaginous reaction observed after removal of the eight-Plate might be a histopathological correlate for rebound phenomenon.

Redundant nerve roots in lumbar spinal stenosis: inter- and intra-rater reliability of an MRI-based classification.

PURPOSE: Patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) have a longer symptom history, more severe stenosis, and worse postoperative outcomes, when redundant nerve roots (RNRs) are evident in the preoperative MRI. The objective was to test the inter- and intra-rater reliability of an MRI-based classification for RNR. METHODS: This is a retrospective reliability study. A neuroradiologist, an orthopedic surgeon, a neurosurgeon, and three orthopedic surgeons in-training classified RNR on 126 preoperative MRIs of patients with LSS admitted for microsurgical decompression. On sagittal and axial T2-weighted images, the following four categories were classified: allocation (A) of the key stenotic level, shape (S), extension (E), and direction (D) of the RNR. A second read with cases ordered differently was performed 4 weeks later. Fleiss and Cohen's kappa procedures were used to determine reliability. RESULTS: The allocation, shape, extension, and direction (ASED) classification showed moderate to almost perfect inter-rater reliability, with kappa values (95% CI) of 0.86 (0.83, 0.90), 0.62 (0.57, 0.66), 0.56 (0.51, 0.60), and 0.66 (0.63, 0.70) for allocation, shape, extension, and direction, respectively. Intra-rater reliability was almost perfect, with kappa values of 0.90 (0.88, 0.92), 0.86 (0.84, 0.88), and 0.84 (0.81, 0.87) for shape, extension, and direction, respectively. Intra-rater kappa values were similar for junior and senior raters. Kappa values for inter-rater reliability were similar between the first and second reads (p = 0.06) among junior raters and improved among senior raters (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The MRI-based classification of RNR showed moderate-to-almost perfect inter-rater and almost perfect intra-rater reliability.

Comparison of Temporary Epiphysiodesis With RigidTacks™ and Blount-Staples in a Porcine Animal Model Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

RigidTack™ is a newly developed implant for total temporary epiphyseodesis. The implant combines the technical advantages of the traditionally used rigid Blount-staples and the newer flexible eight-plates™. Thus, the implant is rigid like the Blount-staples, which may be a biomechanical advantage in temporary epiphyseodesis, and has an easy and guided implantation technique like the eight-plate™. As in eight-plates™, supposedly only two RigidTacks™ are sufficient for temporary epiphyseodesis compared to six Blount-staples in traditional treatment. The goal of this study was to compare Blount-staples and RigidTacks™ in regard to the total potential of growth arrest, the occurrence of postoperative implant-associated complications, secondary angular deformities, and central joint deformations. Twelve pigs were allocated in two groups (n = 6) for treatment of the proximal tibia. Total temporary epiphysiodesis was performed with either four Blount-staples or two RigidTacks™. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-scans were performed before and 14 weeks after surgery, and the amount and distribution of growth arrest were evaluated by measuring the interphyseal distance in nine defined zones. Total temporary epiphysiodesis with two RigidTacks™ resulted in a similar amount of growth arrest as that of four Blount-staples. No significant coronal or sagittal angular deformities or joint deformities were observed in either group; however, one secondary loosening of a Blount-staple occurred. The study concluded that Blount-staples and RigidTacks™ are adequate implants for total temporary epiphysiodesis. Whether or not the precise implant-placement through the guided implantation technique of RigidTacks™ and a reduced number of implants indeed lead to a reduction of secondary angular deformities has to be investigated in further clinical trials. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research® published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res 38:946-953, 2020.

The clinical significance of redundant nerve roots of the cauda equina in lumbar spinal stenosis patients: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is the most performed spine surgery procedure in patients older than 65 years. Around 40% of LSS patients scheduled for decompression surgery have evidence of redundant nerve roots (RNR) of the cauda equina on their magnetic resonance images (MRI). Little is known about the clinical significance of RNR in LSS patients. The objective was to assess the effects of RNR on clinical scores and recovery in older adults diagnosed with LSS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in April 2018 on PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). Prospective and retrospective cohort studies undertaken to assess differences in clinical outcomes in patients diagnosed with LSS with versus without evidence of RNR on their MRIs were selected. Two authors independently selected studies, abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. We calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) for continuous variables and odds ratio (OR) for variables reported in frequencies. RESULTS: Seven studies comprising a total of 1046 LSS patients were included in the meta-analysis. LSS patients with evidence of RNR (RNR+) were older, WMD 5.7 95% CI [2.2-9.2], p = 0.001, had smaller cross sectional area (CSA) of the stenotic level, WMD -12.2 95% CI [-17.7 to -6.7], p < 0.0001 and longer symptom onset duration, WMD 13.2 95% CI [-0.2-26.7], p = 0.05. The pooled preoperative clinical score in the RNR + group was worse but the difference was not statistically significant, WMD -3.8 95% CI [-7.9 to 0.2], p = 0.07. After decompression surgery RNR + patients had worse clinical scores, -4.7 95% CI [-7.3 to -2.1], p = 0.0004 and lower recovery rates, -9.8 95% CI [-14.8 to -4.7], p = 0.0001. CONCLUSION: There is limited quality evidence that RNR + patients are older, have a longer symptom history and present higher degrees of lumbar stenosis as given by the narrow CSA in comparison to RNR- patients. After decompression surgery RNR + patients have worse clinical scores and lower recovery rates. In view of these results RNR can be seen as a negative prognostic factor in LSS patients.