Fecal Calprotectin May Predict Adverse Pregnancy-Related Outcomes in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: The role of fecal calprotectin in predicting pregnancy-related outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains unknown. AIM: To determine whether increased fecal calprotectin during pregnancy is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in IBD. METHODS: This is a multicenter cohort study of women with IBD who underwent fecal calprotectin monitoring during pregnancy. Fecal calprotectin levels were stratified by trimester, and adverse pregnancy-related outcomes were recorded. The Mann-Whitney U test assessed differences between continuous variables, whereas categorical variables were compared using the Chi-squared test. RESULTS: Eighty-five women with IBD were included. First trimester fecal calprotectin was higher in patients who underwent emergency Cesarean birth compared to those who had a vaginal delivery (503 ug/g, IQR 1554.3 ug/g vs. 130 ug/g, IQR 482 ug/g, p = .030, respectively) and in those who delivered infants with low birth weight compared to normal birth weight (1511 ug/g, IQR 579 ug/g vs. 168 ug/g, IQR 413 ug/g, p = .049, respectively). Third trimester fecal calprotectin was higher in those with non-elective induction of labor (334.5 ug/g, IQR 1411.0 ug/g) compared to those with spontaneous delivery (116.5 ug/g, IQR 227.1 ug/g) (p = .025). Those with a fecal calprotectin ≥ 250 ug/g in the second trimester had an increased incidence of infants with low birth weight (35.3% vs. 3.8%) (p = .049), whereas those with a fecal calprotectin ≥ 250 ug/g in the third trimester had an increased incidence of non-elective induction of labor (43.8% vs. 10.3%, p = .030). CONCLUSIONS: Fecal calprotectin may be a useful noninvasive marker to predict adverse pregnancy-related outcomes in patients with IBD.

COVID-19 Pandemic: Which IBD Patients Need to Be Scoped-Who Gets Scoped Now, Who Can Wait, and how to Resume to Normal.

Endoscopy is an essential component in the management of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. There is a risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission during endoscopic procedures. The International Organization for the study of IBD [IOIBD] has developed 11 position statements, based on an online survey, that focus on how to prioritise endoscopies in IBD patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, alternative modes for disease monitoring, and ways to triage the high number of postponed endoscopies after the pandemic. We propose to pre-screen patients for suspected or confirmed COVID-19 and test for SARS-CoV-2 before endoscopy if available. High priority endoscopies during pandemic include acute gastrointestinal bleed, acute severe ulcerative colitis, new IBD diagnosis, cholangitis in primary sclerosing cholangitis, and partial bowel obstruction. Alternative modes of monitoring using clinical symptoms, serum inflammatory markers, and faecal calprotectin should be considered during the pandemic. Prioritising access to endoscopy in the post-pandemic period should be guided by control of COVID-19 in the local community and availability of manpower and personal protective equipment. Endoscopy should be considered within 3 months after the pandemic for patients with a past history of dysplasia and endoscopic resection for dysplastic lesion. Endoscopy should be considered 3-6 months after the pandemic for assessment of postoperative recurrence or new biologic initiation. Endoscopy can be postponed until after 6 months of pandemic for routine IBD surveillance and assessment of mucosal healing.

Changes in renal function over time in patients with cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

QUESTION UNDER STUDY: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) with defibrillator back-up (CRT-D) is widely used in selected patients with moderate/severe heart failure. Renal failure is common in these patients. Data on the impact of CRT on renal function are controversial and limited by short follow-up. The aim of this study was to describe changes in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from baseline compared with 1 and 2 years after CRT implantation. METHODS: A total of 284 CRT-D patients with creatinine levels at baseline and after 1 year were identified in two prospective registries. In 149 patients, levels after 2 years were available. GFR in ml/min/1.73 m2 was estimated with the Modification Diet in Renal Disease equation and patients stratified into GFR stages 1 to 4. RESULTS: The population was predominantly male (75%), mean (± standard deviation) age was 61 ± 7 years and ejection fraction 24% ± 8 %. GFR was 63 ± 24 ml/min/1.73 m2 at implantation and 60 ± 24 ml/min/1.73 m2 after 1 year (p = 0.26). At the 2-year follow-up, GFR had decreased from 60 ± 21 to 56 ± 21 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.04). Mean GFR decreased in stages 1 and 2, remained stable in stage 3 and improved in stage 4 patients. After 2 years, GFR had decreased ≥10 ml/min/1.73 m2 in 42%, but improved in only 15% (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, mean GFR in CRT-D patients decreases at 1 and 2 years after implantation, depending in part on the initial degree of renal function. However, the chance of further substantial deterioration (≥10 ml/min/1.73 m2) is considerable.