Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Infect Dis ; 201(8): 1183-91, 2010 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20214479

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The smallpox vaccine is associated with more serious adverse events than any other live attenuated vaccine in use today. Although studies have examined serum cytokine levels in primary vaccine recipients at 1 and 3-5 weeks after vaccination with the smallpox vaccine, serial measurements have not been performed, and studies in revaccinated subjects have not been conducted. METHODS: We analyzed cytokine responses in both primary vaccine recipients and revaccinated subjects every other day for 2 weeks after vaccination. RESULTS: Primary vaccine recipients had maximal levels of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor on days 6-7 after vaccination; peak levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, soluble TNF receptor 1, interferon (IFN)-gamma, IFN-inducible protein-10 (IP-10), interleukin (IL)-6, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 on days 8-9 after vaccination; peak levels of soluble TNF receptor 2 and monokine induced by IFN-gamma (MIG) on days 10-11 after vaccination; and peak levels of granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor on days 12-13 after vaccination. Primary vaccine recipients were significantly more likely to have higher peak levels of IFN-gamma, IP-10, and MIG after vaccination than were revaccinated subjects. Primary vaccine recipients were significantly more likely to have fatigue, lymphadenopathy, and headache, as well as a longer duration of these symptoms and more hours missed from work, compared with revaccinated subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The increased frequency and duration of symptoms observed in primary vaccine recipients, compared with revaccinated subjects, paralleled the increases in serum cytokine levels in these individuals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00325975.


Assuntos
Citocinas/sangue , Vacina Antivariólica/farmacologia , Adulto , Quimiocina CXCL10/sangue , Feminino , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/sangue , Humanos , Interferon gama/sangue , Interferons/sangue , Interleucinas/sangue , Cinética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monocinas/sangue , Receptores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/sangue , Vacina Antivariólica/administração & dosagem , Vacina Antivariólica/efeitos adversos , Vacina Antivariólica/imunologia , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/sangue , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Virol ; 83(22): 11857-61, 2009 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19740997

RESUMO

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) establishes a latent infection in B cells in the blood, and the latent EBV load in healthy individuals is generally stable over time, maintaining a "set point." It is unknown if the EBV load changes after long-term antiviral therapy in healthy individuals. We treated volunteers with either valacyclovir (valaciclovir) or no antiviral therapy for 1 year and measured the amount of EBV DNA in B cells every 3 months with a novel, highly sensitive assay. The number of EBV-infected B cells decreased in subjects receiving valacyclovir (half-life of 11 months; P = 0.02) but not in controls (half-life of 31 years; P = 0.86). The difference in the slopes of the lines for the number of EBV-infected B cells over time for the valacyclovir group versus the control group approached significance (P = 0.054). In contrast, the number of EBV DNA copies per B cell remained unchanged in both groups (P = 0.62 and P = 0.92 for the control and valacyclovir groups, respectively). Valacyclovir reduces the frequency of EBV-infected B cells when administered over a long period and, in theory, might allow eradication of EBV from the body if reinfection does not occur.


Assuntos
Aciclovir/análogos & derivados , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Linfócitos B/virologia , DNA Viral/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr/tratamento farmacológico , Herpesvirus Humano 4/efeitos dos fármacos , Valina/análogos & derivados , Aciclovir/administração & dosagem , Aciclovir/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Linfócitos B/efeitos dos fármacos , DNA Viral/biossíntese , Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr/virologia , Humanos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Fatores de Tempo , Valaciclovir , Valina/administração & dosagem , Valina/uso terapêutico , Carga Viral
3.
Vaccine ; 25(23): 4571-4, 2007 Jun 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17493714

RESUMO

The authors of a recent study [Savona MR, Dela Cruz WP, Jones MS, Thornton JA, Xia D, Hadfield TL, et al. Detection of vaccinia DNA in the blood following smallpox vaccination. JAMA 2006; 295:1898-1900] suggested that the duration of deferral for blood donations by smallpox vaccinees should be extended, based on detection of vaccinia virus DNA in five blood samples by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the potential for viremia. We found that 4 of 202 blood specimens (from 3 of 27 smallpox vaccinees) were positive for vaccinia virus DNA by PCR; none were positive for virus by culture. Throat swabs were negative by PCR and culture. Thus, while some blood specimens contained vaccinia virus DNA, infectious virus was not detected. Current guidelines for deferral of blood donation in vaccinees seem appropriate.


Assuntos
DNA Viral/sangue , Vacina Antivariólica/imunologia , Vaccinia virus/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Faringe/virologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Vacinação , Vaccinia virus/genética
4.
J Clin Microbiol ; 43(9): 4602-6, 2005 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16145113

RESUMO

We analyzed a shell vial culture assay (SVA), real-time PCR, and a direct fluorescent antibody assay (DFA) for rapid detection of vaccinia virus from vaccination sites of Dryvax vaccine recipients. Of 47 samples assayed, 100% were positive by PCR, 89% were positive by SVA, and 40% were positive by DFA. DFA was limited by the need for adequate numbers of cells, with 32% of samples inadequate for interpretation. DFA performed better with specimens from patients who had not previously received the vaccine. PCR was positive for longer times postvaccination than was SVA. Infectious virus could be recovered after 45 min of acetone fixation of shell vial coverslips. Commercially available polyclonal antibodies cross-reacted with other orthopoxviruses and herpes simplex 1, but commercially available monoclonal antibodies were specific for vaccinia virus. In summary, PCR was the most sensitive test for detecting vaccinia virus in clinical specimens, while the DFA was the most rapid but the least sensitive test.


Assuntos
Pele/virologia , Vacina Antivariólica/efeitos adversos , Vaccinia virus/isolamento & purificação , Vacínia/virologia , Animais , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Linhagem Celular , Chlorocebus aethiops , Cricetinae , Técnica Direta de Fluorescência para Anticorpo , Células HeLa , Humanos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Pele/citologia , Pele/patologia , Varíola/prevenção & controle , Vacina Antivariólica/administração & dosagem , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Vaccinia virus/genética , Vaccinia virus/imunologia , Cultura de Vírus
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA