[Neuralgic amyotrophy: a common cause of unilateral and bilateral diaphragmatic pareses]. / Die neuralgische Amyotrophie: eine häufige Ursache uni- oder bilateraler Zwerchfellparesen.

There are several causes for unilateral or bilateral diaphragmatic paresis. The most common cause is an (intraoperative) injury to the phrenic nerve.However, in up to 20% of cases, no explanation can be found despite extensive workup. Neuralgic amyotrophy (NA, also known as Parsonage-Turner syndrome) is a common underdiagnosed multifocal autoimmune-inflammatory disease that predominantly affects proximal nerve segments of the upper extremities. Classic symptoms include acute onset of severe pain in the shoulder girdle with delayed onset of paresis of the shoulder and arm muscles. In at least 7% of cases, the phrenic nerve is also affected. Based on the annual incidence of NA of 1:1000, the entity as a cause of diaphragmatic dysfunction is probably not as uncommon as previously thought. However, clinical experience shows that this diagnosis is often not considered, and diaphragmatic paresis gets wrongly classified as idiopathic.This is particularly disastrous because in the early stage of NA, medical therapy with corticosteroids is mostly not considered and the possibility that surgical repair of the diaphragm may be performed prematurely, given that the condition may resolve spontaneously many months after symptom onset.The aim of the present article is to raise awareness of the entity of NA as a cause of diaphragmatic paresis and to establish a standardized approach to diagnosis and treatment.

Neuralgic Amyotrophy: A Commonly Overlooked Cause of Acute Shoulder Pain.

BACKGROUND: Neuralgic amyotrophy (NA) is a multifactorial, monophasic neuritis that mainly affects the nerves of the shoulder girdle. It is characterized by very severe pain and by weakness that arises some time after the pain. Its reported incidence is high (100 cases per 100 000 persons per year), but our data suggest that many or most cases are diagnosed late or not at all. METHODS: This review of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of NA is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective literature search, and on data provided by the scientific institute of AOK, a German statutory health-insurance carrier. RESULTS: It is currently thought that the combination of a genetic predisposition, an immunological trigger factor, and mechanical stress on the affected nerve segment(s) is pathophysiologically determinative. The prognosis of untreated NA is poor, with 25% of patients remaining unable to work at three years. The main form of treatment is with corticosteroids that are administered as early as possible. If there is evidence of nerve constriction or torsion, surgery may also help. There have only been six controlled cohort studies on the treatment of NA, and no randomized trials. It is not uncommon for the acute phase to develop into a chronic pain syndrome requiring multidimensional treatment. CONCLUSION: Particularly in view of the high incidence and improved therapeutic options, NA should be included in the differential diagnosis of all patients with suggestive symptoms.

Global Coagulation Testing in Acute Care Medicine: Back to Bedside?

OBJECTIVES: Detailed and decisive information about the patients' coagulation status is important in various emergency situations. Conventional global coagulation testing strategies are often used to provide a quick overview, but several limitations particularly in the trauma setting are well described. With the introduction of direct oral anticoagulations (DOACs), a milestone for several disease entities resulting in overall improved outcomes could be reached, but at the same time providing new diagnostic challenges for the emergency situation. DESIGN: As an alternative to conventional coagulation tests, there is increasing clinical and scientific interest in the use of early whole blood strategies to provide goal-directed coagulation therapies (GDCT) and hemostatic control in critically ill patients. Viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VHAs) were therefore introduced to several clinical applications and may provide as a bedside point-of-care method for faster information on the underlying hemostatic deficiency. CONCLUSION: The use of VHA-based algorithms to guide hemostatic control in emergency situations now found its way to several international guidelines for patients at risk of bleeding. With this qualitative review, we would like to focus on VHA-based GDCT and review the current evidence for its use, advantages, and challenges in the two different clinical scenarios of trauma and intracerebral bleeding/stroke management.