Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Alzheimers Dement ; 18(4): 625-634, 2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34322991

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Use of systemic hormone therapy has been positively associated with development of dementia. Little is known about the dose-dependent effect of vaginal estradiol on dementia risk. METHODS: We assessed associations between cumulative dose of vaginal estradiol tablets and dementia in a case-control study nested in a nationwide Danish cohort of women aged 50 to 60 years at study initiation, who did not use systemic hormone therapy. Each case was age-matched to 10 female controls. RESULTS: A total of 4574 dementia cases were matched to 45,740 controls. Cumulative use of vaginal estradiol tablets was not associated with all-cause dementia; adjusted hazard ratio 1.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-1.18) for low dose (< 750 mcg), 1.07 (0.94-1.21) for medium dose (750-2000 mcg), and 0.93 (0.84-1.03) for high dose (> 2000 mcg). Similarly, Alzheimer's disease (AD) only was not associated with vaginal estradiol. DISCUSSION: Exposure to vaginal estradiol tablets was not associated with all-cause dementia or AD only.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Estradiol , Estrogênios , Administração Intravaginal , Doença de Alzheimer/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Alzheimer/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos de Coortes , Estradiol/administração & dosagem , Estradiol/efeitos adversos , Estrogênios/administração & dosagem , Estrogênios/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 19(1): 751, 2019 Oct 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31653219

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Unplanned hospital admissions are costly and prevention of these has been a focus for research for decades. With this study we aimed to determine whether discharge planning including a single follow-up home visit reduces readmission rate. The intervention is not representing a new method but contributes to the evidence concerning intensity of the intervention in this patient group. METHODS: This study was a centrally randomized single-center controlled trial comparing intervention to usual care with investigator-blinded outcome assessment. Patients above the age of 65 were discharged from a single Danish hospital during 2013-2014 serving a rural and low socioeconomic area. For intervention patients study and department nurses reviewed discharge planning the day before discharge. On the day of discharge, study nurses accompanied the patient to their home, where they met with the municipal nurse. Together with the patient they reviewed cognitive skills, medicine, nutrition, mobility, functional status, and future appointments in the health care sector and intervened if appropriate. Readmission at any hospital in Denmark within 8, 30, and 180 days after discharge is reported. Secondary outcomes were time to first readmission, number of readmissions, length of stay, and readmission with Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions, visits to general practitioners, municipal services, and mortality. RESULTS: One thousand forty-nine patients aged > 65 years discharged from medical, geriatric, emergency, surgical or orthopedic departments met inclusion criteria characteristic of frailty, e.g. low functional status, need of more personal help and multiple medications. Among 945 eligible patients, 544 were randomized. Seven patients died before discharge. 56% in the intervention group and 54% in the control group were readmitted (p = 0.71) and 23% from the intervention group and 22% from the control group died within 180 days. There were no significant differences between intervention and control groups concerning other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There was no effect of a single follow-up home visit on readmission in a group of frail elderly patients discharged from hospital. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT02318680), retrospectively registered December 11, 2014.


Assuntos
Idoso Fragilizado , Visita Domiciliar , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Dinamarca , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Alta do Paciente
3.
Eur Heart J ; 39(19): 1698-1705a, 2018 05 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29165556

RESUMO

Aims: We examined the risks of all-cause mortality, stroke, major bleeding, and recurrent traumatic injury associated with resumption of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and non-VKAs oral anticoagulants (NOACs) following traumatic injury in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Methods and results: This was a Danish nationwide registry-based study (2005-16), including 4541 oral anticoagulant (OAC)-treated AF patients experiencing traumatic injury (defined as traumatic brain injury, hip fracture, or traumatic torso or abdominal injury). Within 90 days following discharge from traumatic injury, 60.6% resumed VKA (median age = 80, CHA2DS2-VASc = 4, HAS-BLED = 2), 16.7% resumed NOAC (median age = 81, CHA2DS2-VASc = 4, HAS-BLED = 2), and 22.7% did not resume OAC treatment (median age = 81, CHA2DS2-VASc = 4, HAS-BLED = 3). Switch from VKA to NOAC occurred among 9.5%. Since 2009, the trend in OAC resumption increased (P-value <0.0001), in particular with NOACs (P-value <0.0001). Follow-up started 90 days after discharge, and time-varying multiple Cox regression analyses were used for comparisons. Compared with non-resumption, VKA and NOAC resumption were associated with lower hazard [95% confidence interval (CI)] of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 0.48 (0.42-0.53) and HR 0.55 (0.47-0.66), respectively] and ischaemic stroke [HR 0.56 (0.43-0.72) and HR 0.54 (0.35-0.82), respectively], increased major bleeding hazard [HR 1.30 (1.03-1.64) and HR 1.15 (0.81-1.63), respectively], and similar hazard of recurrent traumatic injury [HR 0.93 (0.73-1.18) and HR 0.87 (0.60-1.27), respectively]. Conclusion: AF patients resuming VKA and NOAC treatment following traumatic injury have lower hazard of all-cause mortality and ischaemic stroke, increased hazard of major bleeding but without additional hazards of recurrent traumatic injury. Withholding OAC following a traumatic injury in AF patients may not be warranted.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/induzido quimicamente , Trombose/prevenção & controle , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações , Administração Oral , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Causas de Morte , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Recidiva , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inibidores
4.
JAMA ; 331(2): 160-162, 2024 01 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38109125

RESUMO

This study examines the association between use of estrogen-only therapy for perimenopausal and menopausal women and risk of dementia.


Assuntos
Demência , Terapia de Reposição de Estrogênios , Estrogênios , Menopausa , Feminino , Humanos , Terapia de Reposição de Estrogênios/efeitos adversos , Estrogênios/uso terapêutico , Pós-Menopausa
5.
BMJ ; 381: e072770, 2023 06 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37380194

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between use of menopausal hormone therapy and development of dementia according to type of hormone treatment, duration of use, and age at usage. DESIGN: Nationwide, nested case-control study. SETTING: Denmark through national registries. PARTICIPANTS: 5589 incident cases of dementia and 55 890 age matched controls were identified between 2000 and 2018 from a population of all Danish women aged 50-60 years in 2000 with no history of dementia or contraindications for use of menopausal hormone therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals for all cause dementia defined by a first time diagnosis or first time use of dementia specific medication. RESULTS: Compared with people who had never used treatment, people who had received oestrogen-progestogen therapy had an increased rate of all cause dementia (hazard ratio 1.24 (95% confidence interval 1.17 to 1.33)). Increasing durations of use yielded higher hazard ratios, ranging from 1.21 (1.09 to 1.35) for one year or less of use to 1.74 (1.45 to 2.10) for more than 12 years of use. Oestrogen-progestogen therapy was positively associated with development of dementia for both continuous (1.31 (1.18 to 1.46)) and cyclic (1.24 (1.13 to 1.35)) regimens. Associations persisted in women who received treatment at the age 55 years or younger (1.24 (1.11 to 1.40)). Findings persisted when restricted to late onset dementia (1.21 (1.12 to 1.30)) and Alzheimer's disease (1.22 (1.07 to 1.39)). CONCLUSIONS: Menopausal hormone therapy was positively associated with development of all cause dementia and Alzheimer's disease, even in women who received treatment at the age of 55 years or younger. The increased rate of dementia was similar between continuous and cyclic treatment. Further studies are warranted to determine whether these findings represent an actual effect of menopausal hormone therapy on dementia risk, or whether they reflect an underlying predisposition in women in need of these treatments.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Estrogênios , Menopausa , Progestinas , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Doença de Alzheimer/epidemiologia , Estrogênios/efeitos adversos , Estrogênios/uso terapêutico , Progestinas/efeitos adversos , Progestinas/uso terapêutico , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA