Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Ano de publicação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vet Hum Toxicol ; 31(6): 543-54, 1989 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2694585

RESUMO

People are exposed to a staggering assortment of chemicals and foreign substances. Potential health risks accompany these exposures. Intelligent, informed decisions are needed on which risks can and should be reduced, eliminated, or simply ignored. Therefore, a method of determining the attendant human health risks involved in chemical exposure is necessary. This need has resulted in the evolution of the risk assessment process which was developed to aid in identifying, characterizing and quantifying risks. Risk assessment today is an essential component of regulatory decision-making. In the context of chemical exposure, risk assessment is an evaluation of the risk in human exposure to chemicals in the environment. Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) is the use of experimental laboratory data and/or human epidemiological data in a process to derive a quantitative value for the estimate of the probability of harm occurring to exposed human populations. It is a sophisticated process involving an array of techniques that can be used to identify potential risks to human health. There are 4 components involved in the formalized risk assessment process--hazard identification, toxicity assessment, exposure assessment and risk characterization. These 4 steps collectively address each of 6 key areas identified as essential in characterizing a risk situation involving a chemical exposure. The process of risk estimation involves uncertainties because there are always gaps in knowledge or a lack in understanding mechanisms. These crucial gaps in knowledge are filled when extrapolations, models or assumptions are used. The uncertainties inherent in the risk assessment process are the basis of arguments against the use of the process. Many of these sources of uncertainty inherent in the risk assessment process are examined herein. These include, but are not limited to, modeling methods, understanding mechanisms and pharmacodynamics, exposure data, assumptions and extrapolations. Some new techniques and approaches being applied to the risk assessment process are examined. These include improved models for extrapolating data and quantifying risks, improved laboratory techniques for investigating pharmacodynamic and mechanistic pathways and advancements in quality and application of epidemiological data. The actual concept of uncertainty is being examined and attempts are being made to directly address, quantify and manage uncertainty.


Assuntos
Substâncias Perigosas , Risco , Animais , Humanos
2.
Fundam Appl Toxicol ; 20(3): 360-4, 1993 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8504910

RESUMO

The acute cardiotoxic potential of single dosages of FddA (2'-fluoro-2',3'-dideoxyadenosine) and FddI (2'-fluoro-2',3'-dideoxyinosine) was investigated in 6- to 9-week-old rats. Both nucleoside analogs were administered orally at 1000 and 2000 mg/kg and intravenously at 500 or 1000 mg/kg. For comparative purposes, additional groups of rats received 2'-deoxyadenosine or the 2-fluororibose moiety common to both the FddA and FddI molecules. The effects of two adenosine receptor antagonists, caffeine and theophylline, on the cardiotoxicity induced by FddA were also investigated. Deaths occurred within a few hours to a few days in FddA-treated rats given 2000 mg/kg orally or 500 mg/kg intravenously and in FddI-treated rats given 1000 mg/kg intravenously. Microscopic examination of the hearts revealed myocardial degeneration and necrosis for all rats that died and myocardial fibrosis for many survivors. No deaths or cardiac lesions were observed after administration of 2'-deoxyadenosine or the 2-fluororibose moiety. FddA was more cardiotoxic than FddI in rats at equivalent dosages administered either orally or intravenously. Based on the anatomic findings, all deaths were attributed to cardiac lesions. The administration of high, oral dosages of caffeine and theophylline accentuated the acute cardiotoxicity of FddA in rats.


Assuntos
Antivirais/toxicidade , Didanosina/análogos & derivados , Didanosina/toxicidade , Didesoxiadenosina/análogos & derivados , Cardiopatias/induzido quimicamente , Administração Oral , Animais , Comportamento Animal/efeitos dos fármacos , Peso Corporal/efeitos dos fármacos , Didesoxiadenosina/toxicidade , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Cardiopatias/patologia , Injeções Intravenosas , Masculino , Miocárdio/patologia , Necrose/induzido quimicamente , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Xantinas/toxicidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA