The impact of foetal restrictions on mode of delivery in women with inherited bleeding disorders.

OBJECTIVES: Management of pregnancy in women with congenital bleeding disorders (CBD) is challenging and requires understanding of risks conferred to both the mother and the foetus. Some elements of labour management are considered to increase the risk of neonatal bleeding and are not recommended for neonates at risk of a significant bleeding disorder. The impact of these restrictions on obstetric outcomes in women with CBD is unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed obstetric outcomes in a large cohort of women with CBD attending a specialised obstetric/haematology antenatal clinic over a 6-year period. RESULTS: Ninety-four pregnancies in 76 women with a wide variety of CBDs were assessed. Foetal precautions were recommended in the majority of cases (88%). Twenty (21.2%) were delivered by elective Caesarean section (CS), predominantly for obstetric indications. Of the 63 women who laboured with foetal precautions in place, 6 (10%) had a CS that was performed because of these precautions. There was no neonatal bleeding but primary postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) occurred in 12.2% of women. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that foetal precautions in labour recommended for women with CBDs will influence mode of delivery in approximately 10% of cases. This is important information for counselling these women about labour and delivery.

Managing endometrioma to optimize future fertility.

The management of endometriomas in women wishing to preserve their fertility is complex. While surgery can help to achieve pregnancy in some, it may also have a detrimental effect on a woman's ovarian reserve. The present article reviews the impact of endometriomas on fertility and the different management approaches that should be considered in women who wish to preserve their fertility. This study also reviews the role of assisted reproduction in the setting of endometriomas, and the evolving role of oocyte cryopreservation for this benign but progressive disease. Using evidence from the latest guidelines and major publications, we emphasize the need to consider the woman's future fertility when navigating the diverse range of management strategies available, and outline an evidence-based framework to help facilitate fertility-friendly discussion, counseling and management of this complex disease.

Analgesia, anaesthesia and obstetric outcome in women with inherited bleeding disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Vertebral canal haematoma (VCH) complicates 1 in 168,000 obstetric epidurals (Ruppen et al., 2006). This risk is increased in women with inherited bleeding disorders (IBD). The impact of a contraindication to regional anaesthesia on pain management and obstetric outcome in these women is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine anaesthetic use and obstetric outcomes in a cohort of women with IBD. STUDY DESIGN: 97 women with IBD that delivered 130 babies at the CWIUH from Jan 2011 to Dec 2016 were identified from a maternal medicine database. Multidisciplinary planning of peripartum care was communicated to labour ward staff using a simple checklist. The primary bleeding disorders were: Von Willebrands disease (VWD) Type 1 27 (27.8%); VWD Type 2A 3 (3.8%); Low VWF 3 (3.8%); Bleeding disorder of unknown aetiology (BDUA) 19 (19.6%); deficiency of Factors VII, VIII, IX, X, and XI 13 (13.4%); Carriers of Factor VIII, IX, X, XIII deficiency 17 (17.5%); 5 had combined deficiencies (5.2%) and there was one platelet function defect. 9 had a family history of a bleeding disorder (9.3%). Haemostatic support, analgesia, mode of delivery and maternal and fetal outcomes were compared between pregnancies where regional anaesthesia was permitted and those that were not using the Chi-squared test. RESULTS: When pregnancies where regional anaesthesia was not recommended (49) were compared with pregnancies where regional anaesthesia was considered safe (81), the women were more likely to see an anaesthetist before labour 46 (94%) vs 46 (61%): p < 0.001; to require prophylactic haemostatic support for delivery 30 (61%) vs 1 (1%): p < 0.001; to use a remifentanil infusion 15 (31%) vs 0: p < 0.001, and have general anaesthesia for Caesarean Section (CS) 10 (20%) vs 1(1%): p < 0.001. Vaginal birth 35 (71%) vs 53(65%): p = 0.4 and CS rates 14 (29%) vs 26 (32%) p = 0.28 were similar. Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) was more common 11 (24%) vs 9(12%) vs p = 0.07 but not statistically so. There were no cases of neonatal bleeding or VCH. CONCLUSION: Contraindication to neuraxial blockade in labouring women with IBD does not influence mode of delivery. This information is reassuring to these women who may be anxious about delivery without regional anaesthesia.