Antenatal pyelonephritis: a three-year retrospective cohort study of two Irish maternity centres.

Pyelonephritis affects 1-2% of pregnant women, and is associated with significant maternal and fetal morbidity. Antenatal pyelonephritis has been associated with PPROM (preterm premature rupture of membranes), preterm labour, low birth weight (LBW) and prematurity. A three-year retrospective dual-centre cohort study of antenatal pyelonephritis cases was conducted in two neighbouring Irish maternity hospitals - the Rotunda Hospital (RH) and the National Maternity Hospital (NMH). Patient demographics, clinical presentation, investigations, management and maternal/neonatal outcomes were recorded. A total of 47,676 deliveries (24,768 RH; 22,908 NMH) were assessed. 158 cases of antenatal pyelonephritis were identified (n = 88 RH, n = 70 NMH), with an incidence of 0.33%. The median age was 28 years. The median gestation was 27 + 6 weeks, with 51% presenting before 28 weeks' gestation. Risk factors included; obesity (18.4%), diabetes mellitus (13.3%) and self-reported clinical history of recurrent urinary tract infection (28.5%). Rate of relapse with UTI in the same pregnancy was 8.2%. Renal ultrasound was performed in 30.4%. Predominant uropathogens were Escherichia coli (60%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (11%) and Proteus mirabilis (5%). 7.5% of cases had a concurrent bloodstream infection, 13.3% of cases were complicated by sepsis and 1.9% with septic shock. Complications including PPROM (6.3%), preterm delivery < 37 weeks' gestation (11%), LBW < 2,500 g (8.2%) were comparable between sites. Delivery within 72 hours of diagnosis was noted in 7% (n = 11) of patients, of which three were preterm and one had LBW. Appropriate and prompt investigation and management of antenatal pyelonephritis is essential given the associated maternal and neonatal morbidity.

To screen or not to screen for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy: A comparative three-year retrospective review between two maternity centres.

BACKGROUND: Current national guidance in Ireland states that asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) should be screened for at 12-16 weeks' gestation and treated with a seven-day course of antimicrobials, due to the potential risk of preterm birth and low birth weight infants (LBWI), however, this is based on low quality evidence. METHODS: Over a three-year period (2018-2020), a retrospective review was undertaken in two neighbouring maternity hospitals; one of which screens for AB (Rotunda hospital (RH)) and one which does not (National Maternity Hospital (NMH)). Patients were included on the basis of fulfilling the IDSA definition for pyelonephritis and requiring admission for intravenous antibiotics. Rates of antenatal pyelonephritis were compared between hospitals, and between screened and unscreened populations. Secondary outcomes including rates of preterm births and LBWI were compared across sites. RESULTS: A total of 47,676 deliveries between the two centres (24,768 RH; 22,908 NMH) were assessed, of which 158 patients met inclusion criteria for antenatal pyelonephritis (n = 88 RH, n = 70 NMH). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of antenatal pyelonephritis (p = 0.34) or preterm births (p = 0.21) across sites. RH had a significantly higher rate of LBWI at 6.45% versus 5.68% of all births in NMH (p=<0.004). Given the screening rate in RH was below 100%, this cohort was further subdivided into 'RH screened' and 'RH unscreened'. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of antenatal pyelonephritis both between the 'NMH unscreened' group (n = 70) versus the 'RH screened' group (n = 62) (p = 0.53), or in the 'RH screened' group (n = 62) versus the 'RH unscreened' group (n = 26) (p = 0.53). CONCLUSION: Omission of a screening programme for AB in NMH did not result in higher rates of antenatal pyelonephritis, preterm birth or LBWI. Our findings may inform decision-making on screening protocols and whether selective screening (i.e. screening in high-risk patients only) could be more cost-effective without compromising best quality of care.

Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis: a 5-year retrospective review of cases in a tertiary centre in Dublin, Ireland.

AIMS: Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) is a rare, benign, inflammatory breast disorder of unknown aetiology usually affecting women of reproductive age. It classically presents as a unilateral painful breast mass. It is frequently mistaken for carcinoma or other inflammatory breast diseases. Diagnostic investigations include clinical examination, appropriate imaging and tissue sampling. A link between IGM and infection with the Corynebacterium species in particular Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii has been described. METHODS: A retrospective single-centre cohort study was conducted over a 5-year period (2017-2022); all cases of IGM were identified. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were diagnosed with IGM. Breast lump was the most common presenting complaint (n=29). The average age was 45 years. Eighteen patients had samples sent for culture and sensitivity, 11 of which had positive microbiology results indicative of Corynebacterium spp infection.An 82% resolution rate (27 of 33) was recorded in those who received either a short-antibiotic course or none at all. Eight patients reported persistent disease at 3 months, five of which had evidence of Corynebacterium spp. DISCUSSION: This 5-year review highlights the impact of IGM in a tertiary centre in Dublin, Ireland. Although no treatment guidelines exist, options include antibiotics, immunomodulators and surgery. Due to risk of fistulae and unfavourable cosmetic outcomes, surgery should be reserved for refractory IGM. We suspect that there may be a subset of patients where prolonged antibiotic therapy should be considered. Defining this subgroup requires further study, but likely includes those with cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis, relapsing disease and in whom Corynebacterium spp is recovered.

Treatment of Pasteurella multocida Cervical Epidural Abscess.

A 51-year-old left-handed Caucasian female with no significant medical history presented with a two-week history of severe neck pain and bilateral upper limb weakness. Neurological examination revealed weakness and altered sensation in the C5-T1 distribution bilaterally, more severe on the left with Medical Research Council's scale (MRC scale) of muscle power grade 3/5 and 4/5 on the right with upper motor neuron signs. Short-TI Inversion Recovery (STIR) and T2 weighted MRI imaging revealed increased signal at the C6-7 disc representing discitis, as well an anterior epidural collection from C5 to C7, with associated cord compression. The patient underwent an emergency anterior cervical corpectomy of C6, drainage of the epidural purulent collection, and insertion of a cage and plate. Some tissue and pus samples were sent to the microbiology laboratory for analysis, and the organism Pasteurella multocida was identified on all samples. The patient clinically and biochemically improved with operative management and a prolonged course of intravenous ceftriaxone. A peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line was placed and the patient was discharged on eight weeks of intravenous ceftriaxone and ongoing physical therapy.

Complexities in diagnosing and treating endophthalmitis in the post stem cell transplant setting.

Endophthalmitis is a rare but sight-threatening manifestation of systemic infection. Immunosuppression is a well-recognised risk factor for development of endophthalmitis. Determining the aetiology can be complex, particularly in the context of immunosuppression, we present the diagnostic and treatment dilemmas associated with a patient who complains of blurred vision 2 weeks following an allogeneic stem cell transplant for refractory Hodgkin's disease. We demonstrate that in the context of immunosuppression post stem cell transplantation, a broad differential should be maintained until a microbiological diagnosis can be confirmed. In particular, we evaluate how clinical suspicion can diverge from typical fundoscopic findings in the diagnosis of endophthalmitis.

Case of recurrent Achromobacter xylosoxidans bacteraemia and PICC (peripherally-inserted central catheter) line infection in an immunocompromised patient.

BACKGROUND: This report describes recurrent A. xylosoxidans bloodstream and PICC (peripherally-inserted central catheter) line infection in an immunocompromised patient. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 64-year-old female with acute promyelocytic leukaemia presented during a non-neutropenic febrile episode, and A. xylosoxidans was isolated from multiple PICC and peripheral blood cultures, and from the tip of the line on removal. The patient was treated with meropenem and a new PICC line was inserted after sterile blood cultures. Six weeks later, she represented with A. xylosoxidans from multiple cultures from the line. She was treated with piperacillin-tazobactam and the line was removed. There was no evidence of deep-seated infection. Further discussion revealed that the patient was using a sponge to clean, and a sleeve to cover her PICC-line while bathing. A. xylosoxidans was cultured from both the sponge and the swab. Whole Genome Sequencing performed on two blood culture isolated and both environmental isolates confirmed all four isolates were indistinguishable. The patient was advised not to use the sponge/sleeve in future and we have incorporated specific advice in this regard into our patient information. DISCUSSION: Achromobacter xylosoxidans is an aerobic, non-lactose fermenting gram-negative bacillus usually considered an opportunistic pathogen. It is associated with infection in immunocompromised patients, and is an emerging pathogen in catheter-related infections, sometimes associated with contaminated water. CONCLUSION: This case of recurrent A. xylosoxidans line infection highlights diagnostic and management challenges associated with catheter-related infections. Treatment is challenging because of intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms. Empiric treatment with anti-pseudomonal penicillins or carbapenems with line removal is typically required.

Streptococcus pneumoniae purulent pericarditis secondary to influenza A infection and pneumococcal pneumonia in an immunocompetent woman.

A 44-year-old previously well woman presented with features of respiratory sepsis including a productive cough and fevers, with a recent preceding influenza-like illness. She was diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia on chest radiograph, influenza infection via nasopharyngeal swab and Streptococcus pneumoniae bloodstream infection with associated purulent pericarditis. She was managed with pericardial drainage and concurrent treatment with antibiotics and made an excellent recovery. This case highlights the complications of both influenza and S. pneumoniae infections, and the importance of prevention via vaccination.

SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Health Care Workers: A Comparison of the Clinical Performance of Three Commercially Available Antibody Assays.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies are an excellent indicator of past COVID-19 infection. As the COVID-19 pandemic progresses, retained sensitivity over time is an important quality in an antibody assay that is to be used for the purpose of population seroprevalence studies. We compared 5,788 health care worker (HCW) serum samples by using two serological assays (Abbott SARS-CoV-2 anti-nucleocapsid immunoglobulin G (IgG) and Roche anti-SARS-CoV-2 anti-nucleocapsid total antibody) and a subset of samples (all Abbott assay positive or grayzone, n = 485) on Wantai SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). For 367 samples from HCW with a previous PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, we correlated the timing of infection with assay results. Overall, seroprevalence was 4.2% on Abbott and 9.5% on Roche. Of those with previously confirmed infection, 41% (150/367) and 95% (348/367) tested positive on Abbott and Roche, respectively. At 21 weeks (150 days) after confirmed infection, positivity on Abbott started to decline. Roche positivity was retained for the entire study period (33 weeks). Factors associated (P ≤ 0.050) with Abbott seronegativity in those with previous PCR-confirmed infection included sex (odds ratio [OR], 0.30 male ; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15 to 0.60), symptom severity (OR 0.19 severe symptoms; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.61), ethnicity (OR, 0.28 Asian ethnicity; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.60), and time since PCR diagnosis (OR, 2.06 for infection 6 months previously; 95% CI, 1.01 to 4.30). Wantai detected all previously confirmed infections. In our population, Roche detected antibodies up to at least 7 months after natural infection with SARS-CoV-2. This finding indicates that the Roche total antibody assay is better suited than Abbott IgG assay to population-based studies. Wantai demonstrated high sensitivity, but sample selection was biased. The relationship between serological response and functional immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection needs to be delineated. IMPORTANCE As the COVID-19 pandemic progresses, retained sensitivity over time is an important quality in an antibody assay that is to be used for the purpose of population seroprevalence studies. There is a relative paucity of published literature in this field to help guide public health specialists when planning seroprevalence studies. In this study, we compared results of 5,788 health care worker blood samples tested by using two assays (Roche and Elecsys, anti-nucleocapsid antibody) and by testing a subset on a third assay (Wantai enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] anti-spike antibody). We found significant differences in the performance of these assays, especially with distance in time from PCR-confirmed COVID-19 infection, and we feel these results may significantly impact the choice of assay for others conducting similar studies.