Doing community-based research during dual public health emergencies (COVID and overdose).

Meaningful engagement and partnerships with people who use drugs are essential to conducting research that is relevant and impactful in supporting desired outcomes of drug consumption as well as reducing drug-related harms of overdose and COVID-19. Community-based participatory research is a key strategy for engaging communities in research that directly affects their lives. While there are growing descriptions of community-based participatory research with people who use drugs and identification of key principles for conducting research, there is a gap in relation to models and frameworks to guide research partnerships with people who use drugs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a framework for research partnerships between people who use drugs and academic researchers, collaboratively developed and implemented as part of an evaluation of a provincial prescribed safer supply initiative introduced during dual public health emergencies (overdose and COVID-19) in British Columbia, Canada. The framework shifts from having researchers choose among multiple models (advisory, partnership and employment) to incorporating multiple roles within an overall community-based participatory research approach. Advocacy by and for drug users was identified as a key role and reason for engaging in research. Overall, both academic researchers and Peer Research Associates benefited within this collaborative partnerships approach. Each offered their expertise, creating opportunities for omni-directional learning and enhancing the research. The shift from fixed models to flexible roles allows for a range of involvement that accommodates varying time, energy and resources. Facilitators of involvement include development of trust and partnering with networks of people who use drugs, equitable pay, a graduate-level research assistant dedicated to ongoing orientation and communication, technical supports as well as fluidity in roles and opportunities. Key challenges included working in geographically dispersed locations, maintaining contact and connection over the course of the project and ensuring ongoing sustainable but flexible employment.

Exploring the barriers and facilitators to community reintegration for adults following traumatic upper limb amputation: a mixed methods systematic review.

PURPOSE: Traumatic upper limb amputation (ULA) is a profound injury impacting participation in activities of daily living, including those within the community setting. The objective of this work was to review literature exploring barriers, facilitators, and experiences of community reintegration in adults following traumatic ULA. METHODS: Databases were searched using terms synonymous with the amputee population and community participation. Study methodology and reporting were evaluated using McMaster Critical Review Forms, with a convergent segregated approach to synthesis and configuration of the evidence. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies met the inclusion criteria, including quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method study designs. Restoring function and cosmesis with prostheses facilitated work participation, driving and socialisation. Positive work participation was predicted by male gender, younger age, medium-high education level and good general health. Work role and environmental modifications were common, as were vehicle modifications. Qualitative findings provided insight into social reintegration from a psychosocial perspective, particularly negotiating social situations, adjusting to ULA and re-establishing identity. The review findings are limited by the absence of valid outcome measures and clinical heterogeneity across the studies. CONCLUSION: There is a dearth of literature on community reintegration following traumatic upper limb amputation, indicating a need for further research with strong methodological rigour.Implications for RehabilitationUpper limb amputation can restrict participation in activities in the community including work, socialisation, driving, leisure, and recreation.Clinicians can support community reintegration by addressing personal and environmental factors that both facilitate or inhibit participation in community activities.Prosthetics can be a facilitator for participation in community activities through the restoration of function and cosmesis.Clinicians can facilitate return to work through work modification recommendations or supported transitions to more suitable roles.

Toward automated infrared spectral analysis in community drug checking.

The body of knowledge surrounding infrared spectral analysis of drug mixtures continues to grow alongside the physical expansion of drug checking services. Technicians trained in the analysis of spectroscopic data are essential for reasons that go beyond the accuracy of the analytical results. Significant barriers faced by people who use drugs in engaging with drug checking services include the speed and accuracy of the results, and the availability and accessibility of the service. These barriers can be overcome by the automation of interpretations. A random forest model for the detection of two compounds, MDA and fluorofentanyl, was trained and optimized with drug samples acquired at a community drug checking site. This resulted in a 79% true positive and 100% true negative rate for MDA, and 61% true positive and 97% true negative rate for fluorofentanyl. The trained models were applied to selected drug samples to demonstrate a proposed workflow for interpreting and validating model predictions. The detection of MDA was demonstrated on three mixtures: (1) MDMA and MDA, (2) MDA and dimethylsulfone, and (3) fentanyl, etizolam, and benzocaine. The classification of fluorofentanyl was applied to a drug mixture containing fentanyl, fluorofentanyl, 4-anilino-N-phenethylpiperidine, caffeine, and mannitol. Feature importance was calculated using shapely additive explanations to better explain the model predictions and k-nearest neighbors was used for visual comparison to labelled training data. This is a step toward building appropriate trust in computer-assisted interpretations in order to promote their use in a harm reduction context.

Social and community participation following traumatic lower limb amputation: an exploratory qualitative study.

PURPOSE: To explore barriers and facilitators to social and community participation experienced by people following traumatic lower limb amputation (LLA). METHODS: An exploratory qualitative study was conducted with nine adults with traumatic LLA in Victoria, Australia. Participants were a minimum of 18 months post amputation. Interview data was analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants referenced the inaccessibility of the built environment and physical challenges associated with prosthetic mobility as barriers to participation. Chronic and complex health concerns due to their injuries resulted in physical and emotional distress for some, further limiting their social and community engagement. Participants highlighted the benefit of peer-support networks and the value of supportive community groups in assisting the transition to their pre-amputation family, work and social roles. Participants also felt that a strong, positive attitude and being self-motivated were important to aid in their return to social and community participation. CONCLUSION: People following traumatic LLA experience a number of physical, psychological and environmental challenges to participation. The role of peer-support networks, community groups and personal attitudes are important facilitators to assist a return to family, work and life roles. The findings of this study have informed the development of recommendations to guide clinical practice.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPeer-support groups for people following traumatic lower limb amputation (LLA) may assist to improve their long-term adjustment to disability and community participationRetraining skills in an individual's own community should be considered when planning community-based therapy services for people following traumatic LLA.Ongoing psychosocial support including strategies to develop self-efficacy and positive mindset may improve social and community participationRegular medical and allied health reviews can be beneficial to promote early intervention for any complications that arise to minimise time off prosthesis.

Barriers and facilitators to community reintegration in adults following traumatic upper limb amputation: an exploratory study.

PURPOSE: To explore barriers and facilitators to community reintegration experienced by people following traumatic upper limb amputation (ULA). METHODS: An exploratory qualitative study was conducted with ten adults with major ULA due to trauma. Data from individual, semi-structured interviews was analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Underlying and influencing community reintegration for participants, was a process of adjustment to the impacts of amputation on everyday function and re-establishing their identity. Participants felt social networks and peer support facilitated the return to social and community activities, as did drawing on personal attributes such as positivity, resilience and self-belief. Prosthetic devices were facilitative for community reintegration by minimising visible differences and unwanted attention through restored cosmesis and in the performance of functional tasks to fulfil social norms and meaningful roles despite issues with comfort and function. Despite the adaptation and evolution of abilities, perspectives and identities, the functional impact of ULA on everyday community activities was an ongoing challenge for all participants. CONCLUSION: ULA has a significant and lifelong impact on an individual's ability to complete tasks and fulfil meaningful roles in the community. Recommendations based on the study's findings will inform clinicians to support community reintegration for people following traumatic ULA.

Rehabilitative environments and interventions that promote self-efficacy, positivity, problem-solving skills and resilience may support adjustment and community reintegration following upper limb amputation.Facilitating appropriate peer support and the strengthening of existing social supports may assist social and community reintegration.The facilitative effects of prosthetics on community participation and reintegration may be enhanced through client-centred, goal-directed and timely prosthetic provision and training.Ongoing barriers and challenges with community participation may indicate the need for ongoing therapeutic intervention and support.

Participation in Sport, Empowerment, and Safety From Violence: Critiquing the Connections Through Women's Experiences in Aotearoa/New Zealand.

Men's violence against women is a global issue, and in recent decades its relationship with sport has been examined. Much research has focused on male athletes as perpetrators, seeking to understand how sport may foster misogynistic behavior. However, paradoxically, recent research has also examined women's involvement in sport as a protective factor against gendered violence. This article explores this, drawing on the perspectives of 20 women. We argue that sport was experienced in contradictory ways, and thus, positioning women's involvement in sport as a protective factor obscures complex experiences and reinforces the narrative that women are responsible for their safety.