Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 1000, 2024 Aug 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39134950

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Germline breast cancer susceptibility gene (gBRCA) mutation in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) is not common in clinical practice. Therefore, factors that efficiently show gBRCA mutations and the real-world outcomes of olaparib maintenance therapy have not been fully established. In the present study, we clarified the indicators for the effective detection of gBRCA mutation and the efficacy and safety of olaparib as maintenance therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 84 patients with PC who underwent gBRCA testing (BRACAnalysis, Myriad Genetics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) at our institute between January 2021 and March 2022. For each patient, clinical data were extracted from medical records. RESULTS: The median patient age was 64 y (29-85 y), and 41 patients (48.8%) were male. The gBRCA mutations were identified in 10 (11.9%) patients; two patients had BRCA1 mutation and eight had BRCA2 mutation. All patients with gBRCA mutation had a family history of any cancer, and eight of them had a family history of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome (HBOC)-related cancer. The gBRCA mutation rate was higher for patients with PC with a family history of HBOC-related cancer compared to that in patients with PC having a family history of other cancers and no family history of cancer (22.9% vs. 4.1%; P = 0.014). In our study, eight out of 10 patients with gBRCA-positive PC received olaparib after platinum-based chemotherapy. The best responses to platinum-based chemotherapy included a complete response in one patient (12.5%) and a partial response in seven patients (87.5%). The median duration of treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy plus olaparib was 17.5 months (8-87 months), and the duration of treatment with olaparib maintenance therapy was 11 months (1-30 months). During olaparib maintenance therapy, three patients showed no disease progression. One of these three patients underwent conversion surgery after receiving olaparib for 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The gBRCA testing should be considered proactively, especially in patients with PC with a family history of HBOC-related cancer.


Assuntos
Proteína BRCA1 , Proteína BRCA2 , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Mutação em Linhagem Germinativa , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Ftalazinas , Piperazinas , Humanos , Ftalazinas/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Idoso , Masculino , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Piperazinas/uso terapêutico , Piperazinas/administração & dosagem , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Quimioterapia de Manutenção , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Relevância Clínica
2.
Cancer Med ; 13(18): e70249, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39315676

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Comprehensive genome profiling (CGP) has revolutionized healthcare by offering personalized medicine opportunities. However, its real-world utility and impact remain incompletely understood. This study examined the extent to which CGP leads to genomically matched therapy and its effectiveness. METHODS: We analyzed data from advanced solid tumor patients who underwent CGP panel between December 2019 and May 2023 at the Osaka International Cancer Institute. Patient demographics, specimen details, and expert panel assessments were collected. Turnaround time (TAT) and genomically matched therapy outcomes were analyzed. Gene alterations and their co-occurrence patterns were also assessed. RESULTS: Among 1437 patients, 1096 results were available for analysis. The median TAT was 63 [28-182] days. There were 667 (60.9%) cases wherein recommended clinical trials were presented and there were 12 (1.1%) cases that could be enrolled in the trial and 25 (2.3%) cases that could lead to therapies under insurance reimbursement. The median progression free survival of the trial treatment was 1.58 months (95% CI: 0.66-4.37) in clinical trials and 3.66 months (95% CI: 2.14-7.13) in treatment under insurance. Pathologic germline variants were confirmed in 15 patients (1.3%). Co-alteration of CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and MTAP was significantly observed in overall population. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of the genomically matched therapy based on the CGP panel was unsatisfactory. Expansion of clinical trials and utilization of remote clinical trials are required to ensure that the results of the CGP panel can be fully returned to patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Medicina de Precisão , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias/terapia , Japão , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Adulto Jovem , Genômica/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética
3.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(3)2023 Feb 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36765927

RESUMO

Although comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests have been covered under the Japanese national health insurance program since 2018, the utility and issues of CGP tests have not been clarified. We retrospectively reviewed 115 patients with incurable pancreatic cancer (IPC) who underwent CGP tests in a Japanese cancer referral center from November 2019 to August 2021. We evaluated the results of CGP tests, treatments based on CGP tests, and survival time. Eight cases (6.9%) were diagnosed as tumor mutation burden-high (TMB-H) and/or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H). The gene mutation rates of KRAS/TP53/CDKN2A/SMAD4 were 93.0/83.0/53.0/25.2%, respectively. Twenty-five patients (21.7%) had homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-related genetic mutations. Four patients (3.5%) having TMB-H and/or MSI-H were treated with pembrolizumab, and only two patients (1.7%) participated in the clinical trials. Patient characteristics were not significantly different between patients with and without HRD-related gene mutations. The median OS was significantly longer in the HRD (+) group than in the HRD (-) group (749 days vs. 519 days, p = 0.047). In multivariate analysis, HRD-related gene mutation was an independent prognostic factor associated with favorable OS. CGP tests for patients with IPC have the potential utility of detecting HRD-related gene mutations as prognostic factors as well as a therapeutic search.

4.
Thorac Cancer ; 13(21): 2970-2977, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36100256

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The usefulness of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) panels for thoracic malignancies after completion of the standard treatment is unclear. METHODS: The results of CGP panels for malignant thoracic diseases performed at our hospital between December 2019 and June 2022 were collected. We examined whether CGP panel results led to new treatment, correlated with the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), or revealed secondary findings related to hereditary tumors. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients were enrolled, of which 52 (86.6%) had lung cancer. In six (10%) patients, the panel results led to treatment with insurance-listed molecular-targeted agents; four patients had EGFR mutations not detected by the real-time polymerase chain reaction assay and two had MET ex.14 skipping mutations. In small-cell lung cancer, the tumor mutation burden was high in 4/6 (66.7%) patients and pembrolizumab was available. Another MET ex.14 skipping mutation was detected in two cases with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance. ICI efficacy was ≤1 year in patients with STK-11, KEAP1, and NEF2L2 mutations. A BRCA2 mutation with a high probability of germline mutation was detected in one patient. A thymic carcinoma with no detectable oncogenic mutation responded to second-line treatment with Tegafur-Gimeracil-Oteracil Potassium (TS-1) for ≥9 years. CONCLUSIONS: CGP panels are useful in thoracic malignancies, especially lung cancer, because they can detect overlooked driver mutations and genetic alterations. We believe that the significance of conducting a CGP panel prior to treatment may also exist, as it may lead to the prediction of ICI treatment efficacy.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neoplasias Torácicas , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Proteína 1 Associada a ECH Semelhante a Kelch , Fator 2 Relacionado a NF-E2/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Mutação , Receptores ErbB/genética , Genômica/métodos
5.
Mol Clin Oncol ; 14(5): 96, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33767865

RESUMO

Numerous databases for risk assessment of BRCA1/2 gene mutations contain insufficient data about Asians. Furthermore, few studies have reported the prevalence of germline BRCA1/2 mutations in Japanese patients, particularly those with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The present study was a retrospective analysis of data from patients with TNBC who underwent BRCA1/2 mutation testing at Osaka International Cancer Institute (Osaka, Japan) between October 2014 and March 2020. A total of 65 patients with TNBC underwent a test for BRCA1/2 mutations, and 13 (20.0%) had deleterious mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. Furthermore, 12 out of 29 patients with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer had deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations, and only 1 of 34 without a family history had a mutation (41.4 vs. 2.9%; P=0.014). No patients aged >60 years had BRCA1/2 mutations; however, the age of diagnosis was not a significant risk factor for BRCA1/2 mutations (P=0.60). The prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations in the present cohort of Japanese patients with TNBC was slightly higher than those reported in other larger studies from Europe and North America. Further data from large prospective studies are required to more precisely define the prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA