Relationship between serum vitamin D level and sarcopenia in chronic liver disease.

AIM: Although the association of vitamin D with primary sarcopenia has been extensively investigated, its relationship with secondary sarcopenia in patients with liver disease remains unclear. This study aimed to identify factors associated with sarcopenia in patients with chronic liver disease with a focus on serum vitamin D levels. METHODS: The study included 204 patients with chronic liver disease. Independent factors significantly associated with sarcopenia were determined using multiple logistic regression analysis. The sarcopenia diagnosis was based on the sarcopenia criteria proposed by the Japan Society of Hepatology. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25[OH]D3 ) levels to represent serum vitamin D levels were measured using double-antibody radioimmunoassay, and vitamin D deficiency was defined as a serum 25(OH)D3 level of ≤20 ng/mL. RESULTS: The prevalence of sarcopenia in the cirrhotic patients (28/76, 36.8%) was significantly higher than that in the non-cirrhotic patients (18/128, 14.1%; P = 2.48 × 10-4 ). Sarcopenia was diagnosed in 44 (27.5%) of the 160 patients with vitamin D deficiency, and two (4.5%) of the 44 patients without vitamin D deficiency (P = 4.90 × 10-3 ). On multivariate analysis, advanced age (odds ratio 1.11; P = 2.10 × 10-4 ), low body mass index (odds ratio 1.42; p = 2.08 × 10-5 ), and low serum 25(OH)D3 level (odds ratio 1.13; p = 1.20 × 10-2 ) were significant, independent factors associated with sarcopenia. Serum 25(OH)D3 was positively correlated with grip strength and skeletal muscle mass index. CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia complicated by chronic liver disease was associated with advanced age, low body mass index, and low serum 25(OH)D3 level.

Efficacy of direct-acting antiviral treatment in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis: A multicenter study.

AIM: Although the development of new direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has markedly advanced, the effects of cirrhosis on DAA treatment remain unclear. We aimed to clarify the impact of cirrhosis on DAA treatment of patients infected with HCV. METHODS: This large-scale, multicenter, retrospective study consisted of 2130 HCV genotype 1b-infected patients who were treated with one of the following DAA combination therapies: asunaprevir/daclatasvir (ASV/DCV), ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF), or paritaprevir/ombitasvir/ritonavir (PTV/OBV/r). Ninety-two patients (4.3%) previously received DAA-based treatment. Seven hundred and forty-five patients (34.9%) had cirrhosis. RESULTS: Overall, the sustained virologic response (SVR) rate was 93.0%. The SVR rates in patients who received ASV/DCV, LDV/SOF, or PTV/OBV/r were 90.0%, 96.9%, and 97.6%, respectively. The SVR rate in patients with cirrhosis (89.1%) was significantly lower than that in patients without cirrhosis (95.1%, P = 6.94 × 10-7 ). In the multivariate analysis for the overall cohort, absence of cirrhosis (P = 1.26 × 10-3 ), no previous DAA-based treatment (P = 2.54 × 10-14 ), low HCV-RNA levels (P = 1.64 × 10-6 ), wild-type non-structural protein 5A L31/Y93 (P = 7.33 × 10-13 ), and DAA regimen (LDV/SOF or PTV/OBV/r) (P = 1.92 × 10-14 ) were independent factors contributing to SVR. Except for patients with DAA-based treatment history, absence of cirrhosis (P = 2.15 × 10-3 ; odds ratio, 2.51) was an independent factor contributing to SVR in 2038 DAA-naïve patients. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the presence of cirrhosis reduces the SVR rate of DAA treatment, regardless of the type of DAA treatment.

Sequential therapy from entecavir to tenofovir alafenamide versus continuous entecavir monotherapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), as well as entecavir (ETV), is widely used as first-line treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis B, there are only a few studies comparing sequential therapy from ETV to TAF and continuous ETV monotherapy in patients with maintained virologic response to ETV. METHODS: In a retrospective multicenter study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of sequential therapy from ETV to TAF (ETV-TAF group) and compared them with continuous ETV monotherapy (ETV group), using propensity score matching, in chronic hepatitis B patients. RESULTS: From 442 patients, we analyzed 142 patients from each group comprising 71 patients matched for several data, including age, HBV genotype, hepatitis B envelope antigen, cirrhosis, alanine aminotransferase, platelet count, prior ETV monotherapy period, and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) change during prior ETV monotherapy. In the ETV-TAF group, HBsAg levels significantly decreased from baseline to 48 weeks after switching to TAF (-0.02 log IU/mL, P = 0.038). HBcrAg levels also significantly decreased after switching to TAF (-0.1 log IU/mL, P = 0.004). However, there were no significant differences in the reduction of HBsAg and HBcrAg levels between the ETV-TAF and ETV groups. There was no significant difference in the change of estimated glomerular filtration rate levels from baseline to 48 weeks between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicated that the efficacy, especially of the HBsAg-reducing action, and safety of sequential therapy from ETV to TAF were similar to those of continuous ETV monotherapy among chronic hepatitis B patients with maintained virologic response to ETV.