RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Despite the publication of various national/international guidelines, several questions concerning the management of patients with asymptomatic (AsxCS) and symptomatic (SxCS) carotid stenosis remain unanswered. The aim of this international, multi-specialty, expert-based Delphi Consensus document was to address these issues to help clinicians make decisions when guidelines are unclear. METHODS: Fourteen controversial topics were identified. A three-round Delphi Consensus process was performed including 61 experts. The aim of Round 1 was to investigate the differing views and opinions regarding these unresolved topics. In Round 2, clarifications were asked from each participant. In Round 3, the questionnaire was resent to all participants for their final vote. Consensus was reached when ≥75% of experts agreed on a specific response. RESULTS: Most experts agreed that: (1) the current periprocedural/in-hospital stroke/death thresholds for performing a carotid intervention should be lowered from 6% to 4% in patients with SxCS and from 3% to 2% in patients with AsxCS; (2) the time threshold for a patient being considered "recently symptomatic" should be reduced from the current definition of "6 months" to 3 months or less; (3) 80% to 99% AsxCS carries a higher risk of stroke compared with 60% to 79% AsxCS; (4) factors beyond the grade of stenosis and symptoms should be added to the indications for revascularization in AsxCS patients (eg, plaque features of vulnerability and silent infarctions on brain computed tomography scans); and (5) shunting should be used selectively, rather than always or never. Consensus could not be reached on the remaining topics due to conflicting, inadequate, or controversial evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The present international, multi-specialty expert-based Delphi Consensus document attempted to provide responses to several unanswered/unresolved issues. However, consensus could not be achieved on some topics, highlighting areas requiring future research.
Assuntos
Estenose das Carótidas , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Estenose das Carótidas/diagnóstico , Estenose das Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagem , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Constrição PatológicaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The recommendations of international guidelines for the management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) often vary considerably and extend from a conservative approach with risk factor modification and best medical treatment (BMT) alone, to a more aggressive approach with a carotid intervention plus BMT. The aim of the current multispecialty position statement is to reconcile the conflicting views on the topic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review was performed with a focus on data from recent studies. RESULTS: Several clinical and imaging high-risk features have been identified that are associated with an increased long-term ipsilateral ischemic stroke risk in patients with ACS. Such high-risk clinical/imaging features include intraplaque hemorrhage, impaired cerebrovascular reserve, carotid plaque echolucency/ulceration/ neovascularization, a lipid-rich necrotic core, a thin or ruptured fibrous cap, silent brain infarction, a contralateral transient ischemic attack/stroke episode, male patients < 75 years and microembolic signals on transcranial Doppler. There is growing evidence that 80-99% ACS indicate a higher stroke risk than 50-79% stenoses. CONCLUSIONS: Although aggressive risk factor control and BMT should be implemented in all ACS patients, several high-risk features that may increase the risk of a future cerebrovascular event are now documented. Consequently, some guidelines recommend a prophylactic carotid intervention in high-risk patients to prevent future cerebrovascular events. Until the results of the much-anticipated randomized controlled trials emerge, the jury is still out regarding the optimal management of ACS patients.
Assuntos
Estenose das Carótidas , Estenose das Carótidas/terapia , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como AssuntoRESUMO
Background: A significant consequence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is an impaired functional capacity and deteriorated quality of life. Therefore, our study aimed to investigate the usefulness of a symptom questionnaire and walk tests for the determination of the functional capacity of patients with intermittent claudication. Patients and methods: The study included 53 patients (38 males) with stable claudication distance (50-300m). A detailed history and physical examination, ankle-brachial index (ABI), treadmill exercise test, and 6-minute walk test were performed and compared to walking impairment questionnaire (WIQ). Results: Claudication distance reported from patients' history and 6-minute walk test were significantly correlated with ABI (p=0.033, p=0.044). There were no significant correlations between ABI and treadmill walk test or WIQ. Results of WIQ were significantly correlated with the history and the most of performed walk tests: treadmill initial and maximal claudication distance (p=0.004 and 0.012, respectively) and 6-minute walk test (p=0.026). 6-minute walk test was correlated with maximal claudication distance of treadmill (p=0.018), but not with an initial claudication distance. Conclusions: The validity of WIQ is comparable to walk tests and represents the useful technique for the investigation of the functional capacity of patients with PAD. A self-report based on WIQ enables a longer period of observation. It should be routinely used as a basic diagnostic tool for the estimation of the functional capacity of PAD patients with stable intermittent claudication.
Assuntos
Qualidade de Vida , Caminhada , Índice Tornozelo-Braço , Teste de Esforço , Humanos , Claudicação Intermitente , Masculino , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a common complication following the placement of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) in patients with advanced heart failure. Secondary events arising as a result of GI bleeding have not been well-described. Furthermore, attribution of these events to bleeding is complicated by the interruption or de-intensification of antithrombotic therapy, while bleeding is controlled. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of pump thrombosis and ischemic stroke in patients with LVADs who experience GI bleeding, while on support. This was a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study of consecutive patients with LVADs implanted from January 2012 to June 2018. Patients were assigned to comparator groups based on whether they experienced GI bleeding while on LVAD support. The primary endpoint assessed was the composite of pump thrombosis or ischemic stroke. Secondary endpoints assessed included incidence of pump thrombosis or ischemic stroke. A total of 250 patients were included after screening for exclusion criteria, 101 (40.4%) in the GI bleeding group, and 149 (59.6%) in the non-bleeding group. The incidence of pump thrombosis or ischemic stroke was not significantly greater in patients experiencing GI bleeding [23 (22.8%) vs. 21 (14.1%); P = .09]; however, the incidence of ischemic stroke alone was significantly greater [17 (16.8%) vs. 10 (6.7%); P = .01]. We conclude that GI bleeding in LVAD patients may be associated with a greater risk of ischemic stroke.
Assuntos
Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Trombose/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
In patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), the ability to perform physical exercise is an essential and most important indicator of a patient's health and quality of life. In many cases, there exists a discrepancy between lower extremity blood flow, the extent of arterial occlusion shown by morphological investigation and functional impairment. Reversal of lower extremity arterial obstruction with revascularization does not always reverse functional impairment of diseased leg. Further, training exercise and drug treatment can improve functional performance although they are not associated with an improvement in arterial obstruction. Therefore, the determination of functional impairment and its recovery after different therapeutic procedures should be determined using objective tests. The most frequently used functional tests are treadmill exercise testing and a 6-minute walk test. The constant load test, in which results are expressed as a walked distance, does not always permit an accurate assessment of the full range of functional impairment of PAD patients. Recently, as a substitute for a constant-load test, the graded treadmill test is used. With this test, it is possible to identify those individuals with exercise limitations who are not caused only by deterioration of the blood flow of lower limbs. The 6-minute walk test is simple to perform and requires minimal equipment. However, the correlation between the 6-minute walk test and the graded treadmill test is relatively weak, indicating that peak performance on a graded treadmill may reflect different pathophysiological mechanisms of limitations. In conclusion: for the determination of limitations of mobility and quality of life in patients with PAD, objective measures of functional impairment are needed. The determination of functional capacity is related to the quality of life and is a useful tool for investigation of the success of revascularization of peripheral arteries and conservative treatment.
Assuntos
Doença Arterial Periférica , Teste de Esforço , Humanos , Claudicação Intermitente , Qualidade de Vida , CaminhadaRESUMO
Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is presented in various forms, including classic PHPT, characterised by increased parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion, normohormonal PHPT, and normocalcaemic PHPT. Secondary hyperparathyroidism is characterised by increased PTH secretion triggered by factors such as vitamin D deficiency and kidney failure. This review aims to discuss the involvement of hyperparathyroidism (HPT) in atherosclerosis, including peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The increased level of PTH is involved in developing subclinical and overt vascular diseases, encompassing endothelial dysfunction, vascular stiffness, hypertension, and coronary and peripheral arterial diseases. It has been consistently associated with an augmented risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, independent of classical risk factors for atherosclerosis. Chronic hypercalcemia associated with increased levels of PTH contributes to the development of calcification of vessel walls and atherosclerotic plaques. Vascular calcification can occur in the intima or media of the arterial wall and is associated with stiffness of peripheral arteries, which the formation of atherosclerotic plaques and narrowing of the vessel lumen can follow. For treating hyperparathyroidism, particularly SHPT, calcimimetics, novel phosphorus binders and novel vitamin D receptor activators are used. However, they are ineffective in severe PHPT. Therefore, parathyroidectomy remains the primary therapeutic option of PHPT.
Assuntos
Hiperparatireoidismo Primário , Hormônio Paratireóideo , Doença Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Doença Arterial Periférica/fisiopatologia , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/fisiopatologia , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/complicações , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/diagnóstico , Hormônio Paratireóideo/sangue , Animais , Fatores de Risco , Paratireoidectomia , Calcificação Vascular/fisiopatologia , Calcificação Vascular/etiologia , Hiperparatireoidismo Secundário/etiologia , Hiperparatireoidismo Secundário/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Biomarcadores/sangue , Prognóstico , Cálcio/metabolismo , Cálcio/sangueRESUMO
Antiplatelet drugs represent one of the basic options for management of patients with different atherosclerotic diseases. Aspirin is the oldest and most often prescribed antiplatelet drug. The efficacy of aspirin depends on the clinical characteristics of the treated population and probably also on the type or location of atherosclerotic disease. It seems that it is most effective in coronary patients with clinically unstable disease, less effective in prevention of cerebrovascular incidents, and its efficacy is uncertain in peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients. One of the first meta-analyses (Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration - ATC) indicated that antiplatelet drugs also significantly reduce cardiovascular events in patients with PAD. However, only one third of the PAD patients included were treated with aspirin, while the rest received other anti-platelet drugs. The latest ATC meta-analysis of randomized control trials of aspirin therapy involving patients with diabetes and PAD demonstrated no benefit of aspirin in reducing cardiovascular events. Also in patients with preclinical PAD (pathological ankle brachial index) aspirin did not result in a significant reduction of vascular events. The new anti-platelet drugs prasugrel, ticagrelor and picotamide seem to be more effective than aspirin in PAD patients, particularly in diabetic patients with PAD. In conclusion, antiplatelet drugs are effective in prevention of cardiovascular events in different atherosclerotic diseases, including PAD. However, recent studies indicated that in PAD patients aspirin is less effective than in coronary artery disease. New anti-platelet drugs showed marginal superiority over aspirin without definite advantages. Aspirin thus remains the first line of antiplatelet drug for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in PAD patients and clopidogrel as its effective alternative. Further, new studies on PAD patients are necessary to better define the role of anti-platelet agents in these patients and one of the promising ways of access to anti-platelet treatment would be personalized anti-platelet therapy.
Assuntos
Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Doença Arterial Periférica/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Progressão da Doença , Fibrinolíticos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Doença Arterial Periférica/complicações , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Varicose veins (VVs) mostly represent benign disease. However, in some cases, they can lead to serious complications including deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Besides deteriorated blood flow caused by VVs inflammation is most probably a common denominator of VVs and DVT, which promotes a procoagulant state and thrombus formation also in deep veins. Patients with VVs have increased levels of interleukins, the most specific inflammatory markers of vascular wall inflammation that promote coagulation. The studies showed that VVs may increase the risk for DVT. However, the evidence of the risk and incidence of DVT in patients with VVs and without additional risk factors is poor. The increased risk is associated with previous venous thromboembolism (VTE), malignancy, estrogen use, pregnancy and postpartum, hospitalization in the last 6 months, age, and obesity. Varicose veins represent also an increased risk for VTE during long-term immobilization and long air travel or road trip. Further, superficial venous thrombosis is related to an increased risk for DVT, particularly if the thrombus in the superficial vein extends close to the saphenofemoral or femoropopliteal junction. Increased risk for DVT is increased during and after invasive treatment of VVs. Thromboprophylaxis after invasive procedures is recommended in subjects older than 60 years and those with another thrombophilic state.
Assuntos
Embolia Pulmonar , Trombose , Varizes , Tromboembolia Venosa , Trombose Venosa , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Trombose Venosa/epidemiologia , Trombose Venosa/etiologia , Varizes/tratamento farmacológico , Embolia Pulmonar/etiologia , Embolia Pulmonar/complicações , Trombose/complicações , Fatores de Risco , Inflamação/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Delayed sternal closure may be required after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation due to coagulopathy or hemodynamic instability. There is conflicting data regarding infection risk. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of patients who received their first LVAD between May 2012 and January 2021. Patients were divided into delayed sternal closure (DSC) and primary sternal closure (PSC) groups. We used chi-squared or Fisher Exact tests, as appropriate, to compare the incidence of postoperative LVAD-related infections (mediastinal/sternal wound) and LVAD-specific infections (driveline and pump pocket) after definitive chest closure between these two groups. RESULTS: A total of 327 patients met eligibility criteria, including 127 (39%) patients that underwent DSC and 200 (61%) patients that had a PSC. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar except for an overrepresentation of men (87% vs. 75%, p = .016), Interagency Registry of Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support class I-II patients (89% vs 66%, p < .001), patients with a previous sternotomy (43% vs 13%, p < .001), and patients with chronic kidney disease (55% vs 43%, p = .030) in the DSC group. The median DSC time was 24 (IQR: 24-48) hours. The incidence of LVAD-related mediastinal/sternal wound infection was similar between the DSC and PSC groups (4.7% vs 3.0%, p = .419). There was no difference between DSC and PSC groups in the incidence of driveline infection (6.3% vs 9%, p = .411) and pump pocket infection (1.6% vs 1.5%, p =.901), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DSC does not seem to increase the incidence of LVAD-related or LVAD-specific infection rates in heart failure patients undergoing device implantation surgery.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Masculino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Esternotomia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Peripheral artery disease (PAD), defined as lower extremity arterial disease, constitutes an underestimated aspect of the menopause-associated risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Accumulation of ASCVD risk factors, such as atherogenic dyslipidaemia, diabetes, and arterial hypertension, after the transition to menopause may contribute to atherosclerotic plaque formation in peripheral arteries. However, inconsistency exists among studies as to whether transition to menopause increases the risk of PAD, although early menopause (<45 years) or premature ovarian insufficiency may accelerate peripheral atherosclerotic plaque formation. Menopausal hormone therapy may decrease the risk of PAD if administered early (i.e., within the first 5-6 years after last menstruation), whereas it has no effect in women with established ASCVD.
Assuntos
Aterosclerose , Menopausa Precoce , Doença Arterial Periférica , Placa Aterosclerótica , Insuficiência Ovariana Primária , Feminino , Humanos , Placa Aterosclerótica/complicações , Menopausa , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Doença Arterial Periférica/epidemiologia , Doença Arterial Periférica/prevenção & controle , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines do not recommend screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (AsxCS). The rationale behind this recommendation is that detection of AsxCS may lead to an unnecessary carotid intervention. In contrast, screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms is strongly recommended. METHODS: A critical analysis of the literature was performed to evaluate the implications of detecting AsxCS. RESULTS: Patients with AsxCS are at high risk for future stroke, myocardial infarction and vascular death. Population-wide screening for AsxCS should not be recommended. Additionally, screening of high-risk individuals for AsxCS with the purpose of identifying candidates for a carotid intervention is inappropriate. Instead, selective screening for AsxCS should be considered and should be viewed as an opportunity to identify individuals at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and future cardiovascular events for the timely initiation of intensive medical therapy and risk factor modification. CONCLUSIONS: Although mass screening should not be recommended, there are several arguments suggesting that selective screening for AsxCS should be considered. The rationale supporting such selective screening is to optimize risk factor control and to initiate intensive medical therapy for prevention of future cardiovascular events, rather than to identify candidates for an intervention.
Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal , Estenose das Carótidas , Endarterectomia das Carótidas , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Estenose das Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose das Carótidas/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Risco , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/epidemiologia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/complicações , Programas de Rastreamento , Doenças Assintomáticas , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
Purpose: This study aimed to identify and correlate pathological findings with clinical outcomes in patients after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) who either died or underwent a re-transplantation. Methodology and study design: Single-center retrospective analysis of primary OHT patients who died or were re-transplanted between October 2012 and July 2021. Clinical data were matched with corresponding pathological findings from endomyocardial biopsies on antibody-mediated rejection, cellular rejection, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Re-assessment of available tissue samples was performed to investigate acute myocardial injury (AMI) as a distinct phenomenon. These were correlated with clinical outcomes, which included severe primary graft dysfunction. Patients were grouped according to the presence of AMI and compared. Results: We identified 47 patients with truncated outcomes after the first OHT. The median age was 59 years, 36 patients (76%) were male, 25 patients (53%) had a prior history of cardiac operation, and 21 patients (45%) were supported with a durable assist device before OHT. Of those, AMI was identified in 22 (47%) patients (AMI group), and 25 patients had no AMI (non-AMI group). Groups were comparable in baseline and perioperative data. Histopathological observations in AMI group included a non-significant higher incidence of antibody-mediated rejection Grade 1 or higher (pAMR ≥ 1) (32% vs. 12%, P = 0.154), and non-significant lower incidence of severe acute cellular rejection (ACR ≥ 2R) (32% vs. 40%, P = 0.762). Clinical observations in the AMI group found a significantly higher occurrence of severe primary graft dysfunction (68% vs. 20%, P = 0.001) and a highly significant shorter duration from transplantation to death or re-transplantation (42 days [IQR 26, 120] vs. 1,133 days [711-1,664], P < 0.0001). Those patients had a significantly higher occurrence of cardiac-related deaths (64% vs. 24%, P = 0.020). No difference was observed in other outcomes. Conclusion: In heart transplant recipients with a truncated postoperative course leading to either death or re-transplantation, AMI in endomyocardial biopsies was a common pathological phenomenon, which correlated with the clinical occurrence of severe primary graft dysfunction. Those patients had significantly shorter survival times and higher cardiac-related deaths. The presence of AMI suggests a truncated course after OHT.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Tricuspid valve repair in left ventricular assist device implantation continues to pose a challenge and may impact the occurrence of early and late right heart failure. We investigated the effects of concomitant tricuspid repair on clinical outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective, multicentre study enrolled adult patients who received continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices between 2005 and 2017 and compared those who received concomitant tricuspid valve repair to those who did not. Primary outcomes were early right heart failure necessitating temporary ventricular assist devices and right heart failure-related rehospitalizations requiring inotropic or diuretic treatment. RESULTS: Out of 526 patients who underwent left ventricular assist device implantation, 110 (21%) received a concomitant tricuspid valve repair. Those patients were sicker, and most had moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation. A significantly higher incidence of temporary right ventricular assist devices was observed in the group with concomitant tricupid valve repair (18% vs. 11%, P = 0.049), with a significantly elevated risk for temporary right heart assist device (sHR 1.68, 95% CI 1.04-2.72; P = 0.037). After adjusting for confounders, no significant differences were found in the incidence of and risk for most clinical outcomes, including right heart failure-related rehospitalizations (P = 0.891) and death (P = 0.563). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant tricuspid valve repair, when deemed necessary in left ventricular assist device implantation, may increase the risk of early right heart failure requiring a temporary right ventricular assist device but does not impact the incidence or risk of death or rehospitalizations due to late right heart failure.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Insuficiência da Valva Tricúspide , Adulto , Humanos , Valva Tricúspide/cirurgia , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Insuficiência da Valva Tricúspide/complicações , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The optimal antithrombotic (antiplatelet or anticoagulant) treatment of patients undergoing extracranial carotid artery interventions is a subject of debate. The aim of this multidisciplinary document was to critically review the recommendations of current guidelines, taking into consideration the results of recently published studies. METHODS: The various antithrombotic strategies reported were evaluated for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients undergoing extracranial carotid artery interventions (endarterectomy, transfemoral carotid artery stenting [CAS] or transcarotid artery revascularization [TCAR]). Based on a critical review, a series of recommendations were formulated by an international expert panel. RESULTS: For asymptomatic patients, we recommend low-dose aspirin (75-100 mg/day) or clopidogrel (75 mg/day) with the primary goal to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular event rates rather than to reduce the risk of stroke. For symptomatic patients, we recommend dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) initiated within 24 h of the index event to reduce the risk of recurrent events. We suggest that following transfemoral CAS or TCAR, patients continue DAPT for 1 month after which a single antiplatelet agent is used. High level of evidence to support anticoagulant treatment for patients with carotid artery disease is lacking. CONCLUSIONS: The antithrombotic treatment offered to carotid patients should be individualized, taking into account the presence of symptoms, the type of intervention and the goal of the treatment. The duration and type of DAPT (ticagrelor instead of clopidogrel) should be evaluated in future trials.
Assuntos
Estenose das Carótidas , Endarterectomia das Carótidas , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Estenose das Carótidas/complicações , Estenose das Carótidas/terapia , Stents , Fibrinolíticos/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Clopidogrel/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Fatores de Risco , Artérias Carótidas , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
The recommendations of international guidelines for the management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) often vary considerably and extend from a conservative approach with risk factor modification and best medical treatment (BMT) alone, to a more aggressive approach with a carotid intervention plus BMT. The aim of the current multispecialty position statement was to reconcile the conflicting views on the topic. A literature review was performed with a focus on data from recent studies. Several clinical and imaging high-risk features have been identified that are associated with an increased long-term ipsilateral ischemic stroke risk in patients with ACS. Such high-risk clinical/imaging features include intraplaque hemorrhage, impaired cerebrovascular reserve, carotid plaque echolucency/ulceration/ neovascularization, a lipid-rich necrotic core, a thin or ruptured fibrous cap, silent brain infarction, a contralateral transient ischemic attack/stroke episode, male patients <75 years and microembolic signals on transcranial Doppler. There is growing evidence that 80-99% ACS indicate a higher stroke risk than 50-79% stenoses. Although aggressive risk factor control and BMT should be implemented in all ACS patients, several high-risk features that may increase the risk of a future cerebrovascular event are now documented. Consequently, some guidelines recommend a prophylactic carotid intervention in high-risk patients to prevent future cerebrovascular events. Until the results of the much-anticipated randomized controlled trials emerge, the jury is still out regarding the optimal management of ACS patients.
Assuntos
Estenose das Carótidas , Placa Aterosclerótica , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Artérias Carótidas , Estenose das Carótidas/complicações , Estenose das Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose das Carótidas/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controleRESUMO
International guidelines strongly recommend statins alone or in combination with other lipid-lowering agents to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels for patients with asymptomatic/symptomatic carotid stenosis (AsxCS/SCS). Lowering LDL-C levels is associated with significant reductions in transient ischemic attack, stroke, cardiovascular (CV) event and death rates. The aim of this multi-disciplinary overview is to summarize the benefits and risks associated with lowering LDL-C with statins or non-statin medications for Asx/SCS patients. The cerebrovascular and CV beneficial effects associated with statins, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and other non-statin lipid-lowering agents (e.g. fibrates, ezetimibe) are reviewed. The use of statins and PCSK9 inhibitors is associated with several beneficial effects for Asx/SCS patients, including carotid plaque stabilization and reduction of stroke rates. Ezetimibe and fibrates are associated with smaller reductions in stroke rates. The side-effects resulting from statin and PCSK9 inhibitor use are also highlighted. The benefits associated with lowering LDL-C with statins or non-statin lipid lowering agents (e.g. PCSK9 inhibitors) outweigh the risks and potential side-effects. Irrespective of their LDL-C levels, all Asx/SCS patients should receive high-dose statin treatment±ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors for reduction not only of LDL-C levels, but also of stroke, cardiovascular mortality and coronary event rates.
Assuntos
Anticolesterolemiantes , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Doenças das Artérias Carótidas , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Anticolesterolemiantes/efeitos adversos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Doenças das Artérias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças das Artérias Carótidas/tratamento farmacológico , LDL-Colesterol , Ezetimiba/efeitos adversos , Ácidos Fíbricos , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/efeitos adversos , Hipolipemiantes/efeitos adversos , Pró-Proteína Convertase 9RESUMO
Despite the publication of several national/international guidelines, the optimal management of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (AsxCS) remains controversial. This article compares 3 recently released guidelines (the 2020 German-Austrian, the 2021 European Stroke Organization [ESO], and the 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery [SVS] guidelines) vs the 2017 European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) guidelines regarding the optimal management of AsxCS patients.The 2017 ESVS guidelines defined specific imaging/clinical parameters that may identify patient subgroups at high future stroke risk and recommended that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) should or carotid artery stenting (CAS) may be considered for these individuals. The 2020 German-Austrian guidelines provided similar recommendations with the 2017 ESVS Guidelines. The 2021 ESO Guidelines also recommended CEA for AsxCS patients at high risk for stroke on best medical treatment (BMT), but recommended against routine use of CAS in these patients. Finally, the SVS guidelines provided a strong recommendation for CEA+BMT vs BMT alone for low-surgical risk patients with >70% AsxCS. Thus, the ESVS, German-Austrian, and ESO guidelines concurred that all AsxCS patients should receive risk factor modification and BMT, but CEA should or CAS may also be considered for certain AsxCS patient subgroups at high risk for future ipsilateral ischemic stroke.
Assuntos
Estenose das Carótidas , Endarterectomia das Carótidas , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Angioplastia/efeitos adversos , Estenose das Carótidas/complicações , Estenose das Carótidas/terapia , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Stents/efeitos adversos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Carotid atherosclerotic lesions are correlated with atherosclerotic deterioration of the arterial wall in other vascular territories and with cardiovascular events. The detection of pre-symptomatic carotid lesions like intima-media thickness (IMT) and asymptomatic carotid plaques is possible by non-invasive ultrasound duplex scanning. Current measurement guidelines suggest an average measurement of IMT within 10 mm of the segment of the common carotid artery. The thickening of intima-media appears in a long subclinical period of atherosclerosis. Therefore, the determination of IMT has emerged as one of the methods for determining early structural deterioration of the arterial wall. A close interrelationship was shown between IMT and risk factors of atherosclerosis, their duration, and intensity. Different studies demonstrated that increased IMT is a powerful predictor of coronary, cerebrovascular, and peripheral arterial occlusive disease and their complication. A recent meta-analysis indicated a minimal improvement in the risk estimation of cardiovascular events after adding IMT to the Framingham Risk Score. These findings influenced the latest ACC/AHA guidelines which again recommend the use of carotid IMT measurement for individual risk assessment. The presence of atherosclerotic plaques indicates that the atherosclerotic process is already ongoing. The findings of different studies are equivocal that carotid plaques independently predict cardiovascular events and improve risk predictions for coronary artery disease when added to the Framingham Risk Score. However, besides the size of plaque and grade of stenosis, the structure of plaque calcification, vascularization, lipid core, and the surface of plaques are important indicators of related risks for cardiovascular events.
RESUMO
The endothelium plays a crucial role in maintaining cardiovascular homeostasis. Shear stress generated by flowing blood regulates the release of substances that provide adequate tissue perfusion. The extent of damage to endothelial cells depends on locally disturbed shear stress caused by the deteriorated flow. Patients with heart failure have reduced cardiac output, which results in reduced blood flow and negative shear stress. Reduced shear stress also affects microcirculation and reduces tissue perfusion. Consequently, the production of free oxygen radicals is increased and bioavailability of nitric oxide is additionally decreased. Therefore, endothelial dysfunction is involved in the progression of heart failure and cardiovascular events. Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are used for the treatment of patients with advanced heart failure. Older pulsatile flow LVADs were mostly substituted by continuous-flow LVADs (cf-LVADs). Despite the advantages of the cf-LVADs, the loss of pulsatility leads to different complications on the micro- and macrovascular levels. One of the pathogenetic mechanisms of cardiovascular complications with cf-LVADs may be endothelial dysfunction, which after the implantation of the device does not improve and may even deteriorate. In contrast, the pulsatile pattern of LVADs on blood flow could preserve endothelial function.
Assuntos
Endotélio Vascular/fisiopatologia , Coração Auxiliar , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/fisiopatologia , Circulação Coronária/fisiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Inflamação/fisiopatologia , Fluxo Pulsátil/fisiologia , Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional/fisiologia , Estresse MecânicoRESUMO
Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is one of the most frequent manifestations of atherosclerosis with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Platelets and coagulation are involved in the progression of atherosclerosis and thromboembolic complications. PAD patients have increased prothrombotic potential, which includes platelet hyperaggregability and increased pro-coagulant state. Therefore, antithrombotic treatment is of utmost importance for the prevention of cardiovascular events in this group of patients. Aspirin is the basic antiplatelet drug, but with limited efficacy in PAD. In contrast to coronary artery disease, its effect on the prevention of cardiovascular events in PAD has been limited proven. Particularly in asymptomatic PAD, there is no evidence for risk reduction with aspirin. Clopidogrel and ticagrelor are more effective than aspirin. Clopidogrel is thus an effective alternative to aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular events in symptomatic PAD. In patients who are non-responders to clopidogrel, ticagrelor is indicated. Dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) with aspirin and ticagrelor in patients with coronary artery disease and concomitant PAD significantly decreased the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events, including adverse limb events. However, in the CHARISMA Trial, aspirin and clopidogrel were not more effective than aspirin alone and increased bleeding complications. Therefore, DAPT seems effective only in PAD accompanied by coronary artery disease. Anticoagulant treatment for symptomatic PAD with vitamin K antagonists alone or in combination with aspirin is not more effective than single antiplatelet treatment but increases the rate of major bleeding. Low dose rivaroxaban combined with aspirin in PAD patients significantly reduces cardiovascular events, including limb-threatening ischemia and limb amputations. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet treatment after percutaneous or surgical revascularization of PAD improve the patency of treated vessels. Aspirin with or without dipyridamole improved patency of infra-inguinal by-pass grafts at one year. The combination of clopidogrel with aspirin was more effective than aspirin alone in the prevention of prosthetic graft occlusions in patients undergoing below-knee by-pass-grafting. Oral vitamin K antagonists were not more effective than aspirin in the prevention of infra-inguinal by-pass occlusion. The combination of low dose rivaroxaban and aspirin was effective in preventing major adverse cardiovascular events and adverse limb events after infrainguinal endovascular or surgical revascularization in patients with intermittent claudication. However, the data on antithrombotic treatment after revascularization for limb-threatening ischemia is scanty and inconclusive. In conclusion: Antithrombotic treatment of PAD is a cornerstone for the management of these patients. Antiplatelet drugs prevent the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis and are effective also in the prevention of thromboembolic events. Simultaneous use of antiplatelet and anticoagulation drugs is accompanied by an increased risk of bleeding. However, combined treatment with aspirin and low-dose rivaroxaban is more effective than single antithrombotic treatment and safer than full-dose combined treatment.