Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 54(6): 1730-1741, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34278649

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Several magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences have been applied to assess injured glands but without histological validation. PURPOSE: To evaluate longitudinal changes in multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) of irradiated salivary glands in a rat model and investigate correlations between mp-MRI and histological findings. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. ANIMAL MODEL: Submandibular glands of 36 rats were radiated using a single dose of 15 Gy X-ray (irradiation [IR] group), and 6 other rats were enrolled into sham-IR group. mp-MRI were scanned 1 day after sham-IR (n = 6), or 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 weeks after IR (n = 36, 6 per subgroup). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: A 3.0-T/Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence; intravoxel incoherent motion DWI, single-shot EPI sequence; T1 mapping, dual-flip-angle gradient-echo sequence with volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination; T2 mapping, turbo spin-echo sequence. ASSESSMENT: Parameters including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D* ), perfusion fraction (f), T1 and T2 value were obtained. Histological examinations, including hematoxylin and eosin staining (for acinar cell fraction [AC%] detection), Masson's trichrome staining (for degree of fibrosis [F%] determination) and CD34-immunohistochemical staining (for microvessel density [MVD] calculation), were performed at corresponding time points. STATISTICAL TESTS: One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the mp-MRI and histological parameters among different groups. Spearman correlation analysis was applied to determine the correlation between mp-MRI and histological parameters. Two-sided P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Changes of mp-MRI parameters (ADC, D, D* , f, T1, T2) and histological results (AC%, F%, MVD) among the seven groups were all significant. ADC, D, and T2 values negatively correlated with AC% (ADC, r = -0.728; D, r = -0.773; T2, r = -0.600), f positively correlated with MVD (r = 0.496), and T1 values positively correlated with F% (r = 0.714). DATA CONCLUSION: mp-MRI might be able to noninvasively and quantitatively evaluate the dynamic pathological changes within the irradiated salivary glands. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.


Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Multiparamétrica , Animais , Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Movimento (Física) , Estudos Prospectivos , Ratos , Glândulas Salivares/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
BMC Med Imaging ; 20(1): 93, 2020 08 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32762734

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the feasibility of using simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) readout segmentation of long variable echo-trains (RESOLVE) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to assess parotid gland tumors, compared with conventional RESOLVE DWI. METHODS: From September 2018 to December 2018, 20 consecutive patients with parotid tumors who underwent MRI scan for pre-surgery evaluation were enrolled. SMS-RESOLVE DWI and conventional RESOLVE DWI were scanned with matched imaging parameters, respectively. The scan time of two DWI sequences was recorded. Qualitative (anatomical structure differentiation, lesion display, artifact, and overall image quality) and quantitative (apparent diffusion coefficient, ADC; ratio of signal-to-noise ratio, SNR ratio; ratio of contrast-to-noise ratio, CNR ratio) assessments of image quality were performed, and compared between SMS-RESOLVE DWI and conventional RESOLVE DWI by using Paired t-test. Two-sided P value less than 0.05 indicated significant difference. RESULTS: The scan time was 3 min and 41 s for SMS-RESOLVE DWI, and 5 min and 46 s for conventional RESOLVE DWI. SMS-RESOLVE DWI produced similar qualitative image quality with RESOLVE DWI (anatomical structure differentiation, P = 0.164; lesion display, P = 0.193; artifact, P = 0.330; overall image quality, P = 0.083). Meanwhile, there were no significant difference on ADCLesion (P = 0.298), ADCMasseter (P = 0.122), SNR ratio (P = 0.584) and CNR ratio (P = 0.217) between two DWI sequences. CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional RESOLVE DWI, SMS-RESOLVE DWI could provide comparable image quality using markedly reduced scan time. SMS could increase the clinical usability of RESOLVE technique for DWI of parotid gland.


Assuntos
Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Imagem Ecoplanar/métodos , Neoplasias Parotídeas/diagnóstico por imagem , Interpretação de Imagem Radiográfica Assistida por Computador/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Fatores de Tempo
3.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 277(10): 2839-2846, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32328768

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess the added value of susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) to diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the characterization of parotid gland tumors. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with pathologically confirmed parotid gland tumors, who underwent DWI and SWI for pre-surgery evaluation, were enrolled. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and degree of intratumoral susceptibility signal intensity (ITSS) were measured and compared between benign and malignant groups, and among pleomorphic adenoma (PA), Warthin tumor (WT) and malignant tumor (MT). Independent sample t test, one-way analysis of variance and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Benign parotid gland tumor showed a significantly higher mean ADC value than malignant tumors (0.836 ± 0.350 vs 0.592 ± 0.163, p = 0.001). Setting an average ADC value of 0.679 as the cut-off value, optimal differentiating performance could be obtained (AUC, 0.700; sensitivity, 62.69%; specificity, 81.82%) for differentiating malignant from benign tumors. PA showed significantly higher mean ADC and less ITSS than WT (ADC, p < 0.001; ITSS, p = 0.033) and MT (ADC, p < 0.001; ITSS, p = 0.024), while the difference between WT and MT was not significant (ADC, p = 0.826; ITSS, p = 0.539). After integration with ITSS, the diagnostic performance of ADC was improved for differentiating PA from WT (AUC 0.921 vs 0.873) and from MT (AUC 0.906 vs 0.882). CONCLUSION: SWI could provide added information to DWI and serve as a supplementary imaging marker for the characterization of parotid gland tumors.


Assuntos
Glândula Parótida , Neoplasias Parotídeas , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética , Humanos , Glândula Parótida/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Parotídeas/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
5.
Korean J Radiol ; 22(2): 243-252, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32932565

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare and correlate the findings of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and arterial spin labeling (ASL) imaging in characterizing parotid gland tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 56 patients with parotid gland tumors evaluated by MR imaging. The true diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), and fraction of perfusion (f) values of IVIM imaging and tumor-to-parotid gland signal intensity ratio (SIR) on ASL imaging were calculated. Spearman rank correlation coefficient, chi-squared, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests with the post-hoc Dunn-Bonferroni method and receiver operating characteristic curve assessments were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Malignant parotid gland tumors showed significantly lower D than benign tumors (p = 0.019). Within subgroup analyses, pleomorphic adenomas (PAs) showed significantly higher D than malignant tumors (MTs) and Warthin's tumors (WTs) (p < 0.001). The D* of WTs was significantly higher than that of PAs (p = 0.031). The f and SIR on ASL imaging of WTs were significantly higher than those of MTs and PAs (p < 0.05). Significantly positive correlation was found between SIR on ASL imaging and f (r = 0.446, p = 0.001). In comparison with f, SIR on ASL imaging showed a higher area under curve (0.853 vs. 0.891) in discriminating MTs from WTs, although the difference was not significant (p = 0.720). CONCLUSION: IVIM and ASL imaging could help differentiate parotid gland tumors. SIR on ASL imaging showed a significantly positive correlation with f. ASL imaging might hold potential to improve the ability to discriminate MTs from WTs.


Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Glândula Parótida/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Parotídeas/diagnóstico , Adenolinfoma/diagnóstico , Adenolinfoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Área Sob a Curva , Carcinoma de Células Acinares/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Acinares/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Parotídeas/diagnóstico por imagem , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Razão Sinal-Ruído , Marcadores de Spin
6.
Br J Radiol ; 93(1113): 20200052, 2020 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32649236

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of using imaging parameters (D, ß and µ) obtained from fractional order calculus (FROC) diffusion model to differentiate salivary gland tumors. METHODS: 15 b-value (0-2000 s/mm2) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was scanned in 62 patients with salivary gland tumors (47 benign and 15 malignant). Diffusion coefficient D, fractional order parameter ß (which correlates with tissue heterogeneity) and a microstructural quantity µ of the solid portion within the tumor were calculated, and compared between benign and malignant groups, or among pleomorphic adenoma (PA), Warthin's tumor (WT), and malignant tumor (MT) groups. Performance of FROC parameters for differentiation was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: None of the FROC parameters exhibited significant differences between benign and malignant group (D, p = 0.150; ß, p = 0.967; µ, p = 0.693). WT showed significantly lower D (p < 0.001) and ß (p < 0.001), while higher µ (p = 0.001) than PA. Combination of D, ß and µ showed optimal diagnostic performance (area under the curve, AUC, 0.998). MT showed significantly lower D (p = 0.001) and ß (p = 0.025) than PA, while no significant difference was found on µ (p = 0.064). Combination of D and ß showed optimal diagnostic performance (AUC, 0.933). Significant difference was found on ß (p = 0.027) between MT and WT, while not on D (p = 0.806) and µ (p = 0.789). Setting a ßof 0.615 as the cut-off value, optimal diagnostic performance could be obtained (AUC = 0.806). CONCLUSION: A non-Gaussian FROC diffusion model can serve as a noninvasive and quantitative imaging technique for differentiating salivary gland tumors. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: (1) PA showed higher D and ß and lower µ than WT. (2) PA had higher D and ß than MT. (3) WT demonstrated lower ß than MT. (4) ß, as a new FROC parameter, could offer an added value to the differentiation.


Assuntos
Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Neoplasias das Glândulas Salivares/diagnóstico por imagem , Adenolinfoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Adenolinfoma/patologia , Adenoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Adenoma/patologia , Algoritmos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Neoplasias das Glândulas Salivares/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA