RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The recent COVID-19 pandemic has raised concerns about patient diagnosis and follow-up of chronically ill patients. Patients suffering from chronic illnesses, concomitantly infected by SARS-CoV-2, globally tend to have a worse prognosis and poor outcomes. Renal tropism and acute kidney injury following SARS-CoV-2 infection has recently been described in the literature, with elevated mortality rates. Furthermore, patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease, infected by SARS-CoV-2, should be monitored carefully. Here, we report the case of a 69-year-old patient with splenic marginal zone lymphoma, suffering from longstanding chronic kidney disease following SARS-CoV-2 infection. CASE PRESENTATION: A 69-year-old male patient previously diagnosed with pulmonary embolism and splenic marginal zone lymphoma (Splenomegaly, Matutes 2/5, CD5 negative and CD23 positive), was admitted to the hospital with shortness of breath, fever and asthenia. A nasopharyngeal swab test was performed in addition to a CT-scan, which confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Blood creatinine increased following SARS-CoV-2 infection at 130 µmol/l, with usual values at 95 µmol/l. The patient was discharged at home with rest and symptomatic medical treatment (paracetamol and hydration), then readmitted to the hospital in August 2020. A kidney biopsy was therefore conducted as blood creatinine levels were abnormally elevated. Immunodetection performed in a renal biopsy specimen confirmed co-localization of SARS-CoV2 nucleocapsid and protease 3C proteins with ACE2, Lewis x and sialyl-Lewis x antigens in proximal convoluted tubules and podocytes. Co-localization of structural and non-structural viral proteins clearly demonstrated viral replication in proximal convoluted tubules in this chronically ill patient. Additionally, we observed the co-localization of sialyl-Lewis x and ACE2 receptors in the same proximal convoluted tubules. Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction test performed on the kidney biopsy was negative, with very low Ct levels (above 40). The patient was finally readmitted to the haematology department for initiation of chemotherapy, including CHOP protocol and Rituximab. CONCLUSIONS: Our case emphasizes on the importance of monitoring kidney function in immunosuppressed patients and patients suffering from cancer following SARS-CoV-2 infection, through histological screening. Further studies will be required to decipher the mechanisms underlying chronic kidney disease and the putative role of sialyl-Lewis x and HBGA during SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Assuntos
COVID-19/complicações , Túbulos Renais/virologia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/virologia , SARS-CoV-2/fisiologia , Replicação Viral , Idoso , Enzima de Conversão de Angiotensina 2/análise , Biópsia , COVID-19/sangue , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Proteínas do Nucleocapsídeo de Coronavírus/análise , Creatinina/sangue , Humanos , Rim/química , Rim/patologia , Rim/virologia , Túbulos Renais/química , Túbulos Renais/patologia , Antígenos CD15/análise , Linfoma de Zona Marginal Tipo Células B/complicações , Masculino , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/patologia , Antígeno Sialil Lewis X/análise , Neoplasias Esplênicas/complicaçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in patients with coronary heart disease. The aims of this prospective study were to evaluate the prevalence of AAA and of large abdominal aorta in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome and coronary stenosis of 50% or greater. METHODS: AAA ultrasound screening was prospectively performed in 306 patients after they gave informed consent. AAA and large abdominal aorta were defined by maximum anteroposterior diameter of 30 mm or greater and of 20 to 29 mm, respectively. Patient characteristics were prospectively collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors for AAA and large abdominal aorta. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: AAAs were diagnosed in 20 patients (6.6%). Mean diameter was 33 +/- 3.7 mm, and median diameter [min--max] was 31 mm [30 - 45 mm]. All except one AAA were between 30 and 40 mm. No AAAs were detected in patients younger than 50 years. Prevalence reached 7.7% in patients older than 50 years. Using stepwise logistic regression analysis, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04. 95% confidence [CI] 1.00-1.09 per year of age, p = 0.06) and previous coronary events (OR 2.44, 95% CI 0.96-6.25, p = 0.06) showed a borderline significant association with AAA. Large infrarenal aortic diameter was observed in 32% of patients. Age (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.05 per year of age, p < 0.0001), male gender (OR 16.7, 95% CI 6.25-50.0, p < 0.0001), and overweight (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.4, p = 0.01) showed a significant independent association with large aorta. CONCLUSION: AAA and large infrarenal aorta prevalence seems high in patients with acute coronary syndrome and proven coronary stenosis of 50% or greater. Previous coronary events and older age might be associated with higher risk of AAA, and age, male gender, and obesity are significantly associated with large infrarenal aorta. If these results are confirmed in larger studies, further guidelines concerning AAA screening in this well-defined population should be considered.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/epidemiologia , Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/epidemiologia , Estenose Coronária/epidemiologia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Angiografia Coronária , Estenose Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Dilatação Patológica , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , UltrassonografiaRESUMO
Background: Metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) and metformin-induced lactic acidosis (MILA) remain controversial entities. Metformin toxic effect depends on accumulation to lead to lactic acidosis (LA), particularly during an episode of acute kidney injury (AKI). In MILA, no other condition contributing to LA is found. The aims of this study were to describe the characteristics and prognosis of AKI associated with LA in metformin users and to clarify the role of this drug in the different types of LA.Methods: We performed a French multicenter retrospective study in diabetic patients treated by metformin presenting with LA in a context of AKI in 2015. 126 nephrology units (NU) and 23 intensive care units (ICU) were contacted. We individualized MILA and MALA patients in order to illustrate the role of metformin.Results: We included 173 patients (109 MILA, 64 MALA). 103 patients presented without hemodynamic instability (82 MILA and 21 MALA) whereas 70 patients were shocked including 27 MILA. The shock was associated with death with an odds ratio (OR) of 12.92 (p < .001). Digestive disorders (DD) were strongly associated with MILA (p = .0001). MALA was significantly associated with shock (p < .0001). The mortality rate was higher in MALA (26%) when compared with MILA (7%). Dialysis performed in 133 patients was significantly associated with shock, kalemia, lactate and serum creatinine levels. In multivariate analysis, metformin level was independently associated with pH or lactate level only in MILA patients.Conclusions: MILA is associated with DD and death is due to severe refractory acidosis leading to cardiovascular collapse attributed to metformin accumulation mainly via AKI. MALA patients are more frequently shocked and death is related to their underlying condition, metformin accumulation increasing LA.
Assuntos
Acidose Láctica/induzido quimicamente , Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Metformina/efeitos adversos , Injúria Renal Aguda/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Masculino , Metformina/sangue , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia de Substituição Renal , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Surgical removal of a hemodialysis access after thrombosis is generally not performed as it remains clinically well tolerated. However, it may be the source of distal embolization. We report the case of a 43-year-old patient, kidney recipient, who presented with digital ischemia of the right hand. He had a forearm arteriovenous fistula at the right wrist which thrombosed 5 years ago. Digital ischemia was due to thrombus formation at the anastomotic site and migration into the downstream arterial bed. Heparine was initiated together with antiplatelet treatment. The ischemia resolved after a few days, no recidive was observed. Surgical ligation of the arteriovenous fistula was rapidly performed and antiplatelet treatment was maintained after surgery. After a follow-up of 6 months, the patient remained asymptomatic without new embolization. This observation underlines the necessity of clinical monitoring after access thrombosis and preventive surgical ligation might be discussed when the risk of distal embolization is high.