Prevalence, progression, and management of advanced chronic kidney disease in a cohort of people living with HIV.

BACKGROUND: Advanced kidney disease is an emerging problem in people living with HIV despite sustained viral suppression. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study to identify people living with HIV with advanced kidney disease according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria and to assess disease progression over a 48-week period following the offer of targeted multidisciplinary management. RESULTS: From our cohort of 3090 individuals, 55 (1.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-2.25) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most were male (83.6%), and the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 58 (53.25-66.75) years. Nadir CD4 T-cell count was 135.5 (IQR 43.5-262.75) cells/µl, current CD4 T-cell count was 574 (IQR 438.5-816) cells/µl, and 96% had maintained HIV viral suppression. The most frequent comorbidity was arterial hypertension (85.5%). Inadequate antiretroviral dose was detected in three individuals (5.5%), and drug-drug interactions were recorded in eight (14.5%), mainly involving the use of cobicistat (n = 5 [9%]). Four individuals (7%) required modification of their concomitant treatment. Seven (13%) had to start or resume follow-up with a nephrologist. Nine participants (16.4%) experienced an improvement in kidney disease stage, three individuals (5.5%) underwent renal transplantation, and one (2%) started haemodialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that a multidisciplinary approach, including a critical review of treatment and evaluation of specific requirements, could be useful for anticipating drug-drug interactions and toxicities and for reducing death and hospitalization in people living with HIV with advanced kidney disease.

Kidney transplant outcomes in elderly recipients with controlled donation after circulatory death or donation after brain death donors: a registry cohort study.

The number of kidney transplant (KT) procedures with controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) donors has exponentially increased in Spain in recent years, with a parallel increase in donor and recipient acceptance criteria. The outcomes of cDCD-KT have been reported to be comparable to those of KT with donation after brain death (DBD) donors. However, studies in elderly recipients have yielded contradictory results. We performed a registry analysis of 852 KT recipients aged ≥65 years (575 in the DBD-KT group, 277 in the cDCD-KT group) in Catalonia, Spain. Clinical outcomes and survival were compared between DBD-KT and cDCD-KT recipients. The donor and recipient ages were similar between the two groups (71.5 ± 8.7 years for donors, 70.8 ± 4.1 years for recipients). Delayed graft function (DGF) was more frequent among cDCD-KT recipients, without a difference in the rate of primary nonfunction. The 3-year patient and death-censored graft survival rates were similar between DBD-KT and cDCD-KT recipients (78.8% vs. 76.4% and 90.3% vs. 86.6%, respectively). In multivariable analysis, previous cardiovascular disease and DGF were independent risk factors for patient death. The type of donation (cDCD vs. DBD) was not an independent risk factor for patient survival or graft loss. cDCD-KT and DBD-KT provide comparable patient and graft survival in elderly recipients.

Proteomic Characterization of Urinary Extracellular Vesicles from Kidney-Transplanted Patients Treated with Calcineurin Inhibitors.

Use of immunosuppressive drugs is still unavoidable in kidney-transplanted patients. Since their discovery, calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have been considered the first-line immunosuppressive agents, in spite of their known nephrotoxicity. Chronic CNI toxicity (CNIT) may lead to kidney fibrosis, a threatening scenario for graft survival. However, there is still controversy regarding CNIT diagnosis, monitoring and therapeutic management, and their specific effects at the molecular level are not fully known. Aiming to better characterize CNIT patients, in the present study, we collected urine from kidney-transplanted patients treated with CNI who (i) had a normal kidney function, (ii) suffered CNIT, or (iii) presented interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA). Urinary extracellular vesicles (uEV) were enriched and the proteome was analyzed to get insight into changes happening during CNI. Members of the uroplakin and plakin families were significantly upregulated in the CNIT group, suggesting an important role in CNIT processes. Although biomarkers cannot be asserted from this single pilot study, our results evidence the potential of uEV as a source of non-invasive protein biomarkers for a better detection and monitoring of this renal alteration in kidney-transplanted patients.

Early outcomes of kidney transplantation from elderly donors after circulatory death (GEODAS study).

BACKGROUND: Spain has dramatically increased the number of controlled circulatory death donors (cDCD). The initial selection criteria for considering cDCD for kidney transplantation (KT) have been expanded progressively, with practically no limits in donor age during the last years. We aimed to analyze the early clinical outcomes using expanded (> 65 years) cDCD in comparison with standard ones. METHODS: Observational multicenter study including 19 transplant centers in Spain. We performed a systematic inclusion in a central database of every KT from expanded cDCD at each participant unit from January-2012 to January-2017. Surgical procedures and immunosuppressive protocols were based on local practices. Data was analyzed in the central office using logistic and Cox regression or competitive-risk models for multivariate analysis. Median time of follow-up was 18.1 months. RESULTS: 561 KT were performed with kidneys from cDCD, 135 from donors older than 65 years. As expected, recipients from older cDCD were also older (65.8 (SD 8.8) vs 53.7 (SD 11.4) years; p < 0.001) and with higher comorbidity. At 1 year, no differences were found amongst older and younger cDCD KT recipients in terms of serum creatinine (1.6 (SD 0.7) vs 1.5 (SD 0.8) mg/dl; p = 0.29). Non-death censored graft survival was inferior, but death-censored graft survival was not different (95.5 vs 98.2% respectively; p = 0.481). They also presented a trend towards higher delayed graft function (55.4 vs 46.7%; p = 0.09) but a similar rate of primary non-function (3.7 vs 3.1%; p = 0.71), and acute rejection (3.0 vs 6.3%; p = 0.135). In the multivariate analysis, in short follow-up, donor age was not related with worse survival or poor kidney function (eGFR < 30 ml/min). CONCLUSIONS: The use of kidneys from expanded cDCD is increasing for older and comorbid patients. Short-term graft outcomes are similar for expanded and standard cDCD, so they constitute a good-enough source of kidneys to improve the options of KT wait-listed patients.

Molecular profile of urine extracellular vesicles from normo-functional kidneys reveal minimal differences between living and deceased donors.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation (KTx) is the best therapeutic approach for chronic kidney diseases leading to irreversible kidney failure. Considering the origin of the graft, several studies have reported differences between living (LD) and deceased donors (DD) in graft and patient survival. These differences seem to be related to multiple factors including, donor age and time of cold ischemia among others. Many of transplanted organs come from old-aged DDs, in which pre-transplant biopsy is recommended. However, kidney biopsy has several limitations, and there is a need to develop alternatives to assess the status of a kidney before transplantation. As the analysis of urinary extracellular vesicles (uEVs) rendered promising results as non-invasive biomarkers of kidney-related pathologies, this pilot study aimed to investigate whether profiling uEVs of LDs and DDs may be of help to assess the quality of the kidney before nephrectomy. METHODS: uEVs from 5 living donors and 7 deceased donors were isolated by size-exclusion chromatography, and their protein and miRNA content were analysed by liquid chromatography followed by mass spectrometry and next generation sequencing, respectively. Then, hierarchical clustering and venn diagrams were done with Perseus software and InteractiVenn tool. Specific EVs data bases were also used for Gene Ontology analysis. RESULTS: Next generation sequencing revealed that uEVs from DDs contained less miRNAs than LDs, but most of the DD-expressed miRNAs were shared with LDs (96%). Only miR-326 (targeting the apoptotic-related Bcl2) was found significantly over-represented in LD. Focusing on the protein content, we detected a low intra-group correlation in both types of donors. Despite these differences, hierarchical clustering of either miRNA or protein data could not identify a differential profile between LDs and DDs. Of note, 90% of transplanted patients had a functional graft after a year from KTx. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study we found that, in normo-functional grafts, minor differences in uEVs profile could not discriminate between LDs and DDs.

Update of the recommendations on the management of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) in kidney transplant patients.

SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) has had a significant impact on transplant activity in our country. Mortality and the risk of complications associated with COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients (KT) were expected to be higher due to their immunosuppressed condition and the frequent associated comorbidities. Since the beginning of the pandemic in March 2020 we have rapidly improved our knowledge about the epidemiology, clinical features and management of COVID-19 post-transplant, resulting in a better prognosis for our patients. KT units have been able to adapt their programs to this new reality, normalizing both donation and transplantation activity in our country. This manuscript presents a proposal to update the general recommendations for the prevention and treatment of infection in this highly vulnerable population such as KT.

Remdesivir in kidney transplant patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Remdesivir is the only antiviral treatment that has been shown to be useful against SARS-CoV-2 infection. It shorts hospitalization time compared to placebo. Its effects in Kidney transplant (KT) patients are limited to some published cases. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study that included all KT patients admitted between August 01, 2020 and December 31, 2020 with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia who received remdesivir. The objective of this study was to describe the experience of a cohort of KT patients treated with remdesivir. DISCUSSION: A total of 37 KT patients developed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 7 of them received treatment with remdesivir. The rest of the patients did not receive the drug due to either CKD-EPI less than 30 mL/min or they did not present clinical criteria. In addition to remdesivir, all pacients received dexamethasone and anticoagulation therapy. 4 were men, the median age was 59 (53-71) years. Median time from transplantation was 43 (16-82) months. Chest X-rays of all patients showed pulmonary infiltrates and required low oxygen flow therapy upon admission, requiring high flow nasal therapy in 3 cases. Only 2 cases presented deterioration of the graft function, not requiring hemodialysis in any case, and all recovered renal function at hospital discharge. 2 patients rise up 1.5 times the liver function test. No patient died or required admission to the critical care unit. Median days of admission was 12 (9-27) days. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the use of remdesivir could be useful in KT patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia without side effects. Additional studies are necessary with a larger number of patients to improve the knowledge of this drug in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

[Remdesivir in kidney transplant patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia]. / Remdesivir en pacientes trasplantados renales con neumonía por SARS-CoV-2.

Background: Remdesivir is the only antiviral treatment that has been shown to be useful against SARS-CoV-2 infection. It shorts hospitalization time compared to placebo. Its effects in kidney transplant (KT) patients are limited to some published cases. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study that included all KT patients admitted between August 1st, 2020 and December 31st, 2020 with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia who received remdesivir.The objective of this study was to describe the experience of a cohort of KT patients treated with remdesivir. Discussion: A total of 37 KT patients developed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 7 of them received treatment with remdesivir. The rest of the patients did not receive the drug due to either CKD-EPI less than 30 mL/min or they did not present clinical criteria. In addition to remdesivir, all patients received dexamethasone and anticoagulation therapy. 4 were men, the median age was 59 (53-71) years. Median time from transplantation was 43 (16-82) months. Chest X-rays of all patients showed pulmonary infiltrates and required low-oxygen flow therapy upon admission, requiring high-flow nasal therapy in 3 cases. Only 2 cases presented deterioration of the graft function, not requiring hemodialysis in any case, and all recovered renal function at hospital discharge. 2 patients rise up 1.5 times the liver function test. No patient died or required admission to the critical care unit. Median days of admission was 12 (9-27) days. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the use of remdesivir could be useful in KT patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia without side effects. Additional studies are necessary with a larger number of patients to improve the knowledge of this drug in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

[Update of the recommendations on the management of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) in kidney transplant patients.] / Actualización de las recomendaciones en el manejo de la pandemia por coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) en pacientes con trasplante renal.

SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) has had a significant impact on transplant activity in our country. Mortality and the risk of complications associated with COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients (KT) were expected to be higher due to their immunosuppressed condition and the frequent associated comorbidities. Since the beginning of the pandemic in March 2020 we have rapidly improved our knowledge about the epidemiology, clinical features and management of COVID-19 post-transplant, resulting in a better prognosis for our patients. KT units have been able to adapt their programs to this new reality, normalizing both donation and transplantation activity in our country.This manuscript presents a proposal to update the general recommendations for the prevention and treatment of infection in this highly vulnerable population such as KT.

Routine Biomarkers for the Severity of COVID-19 Pneumonia May Present Differently in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is based on the patient's clinical status and levels of inflammatory biomarkers. The comparative activity of these biomarkers in kidney transplant (KT) patients with COVID-19 pneumonia from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and non-SARS-CoV-2 etiologies is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical presentation and inflammatory parameters at admission of KT patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and those with non-COVID-19 pneumonia over the same period. METHODS: Biomarkers were measured and compared between KT patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (n = 57) and non-COVID-19 pneumonia (n = 20) from March 2020 to March 2021. RESULTS: Both groups showed comparable demographics. The KT patients with COVID-19 had fewer neutrophils (6824 ± 5000 vs 8969 ± 4206; P = .09) than the non-COVID group, although there was no significant difference in the lymphocyte count. Non-COVID-19 pneumonia was associated with higher d-dimer (median, 921 [interquartile range (IQR), 495-1680] vs median, 2215 [IQR, 879-3934]; P = 0.09) and interleukin-6 (median, 35 [IQR, 20-128] vs median, 222 [IQR, 38-500]; P = 0.006) levels. The ferritin level was higher in the COVID-19 group (median, 809 [IQR, 442-1,330] vs median, 377 [IQR, 276-885]; P = 0.008). In multivariable analysis, only d-dimer (hazard ratio [HR], 1; 95% confidence interval [CI],1-1.002; P = .02) and ferritin (HR, 1; 95% CI, 0.9-0.9; P = .02) increase the statistic signification. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 pneumonia in KT patients shows a different presentation of inflammatory biomarkers than other non-COVID pneumonias. It could be useful to identify KT patients with COVID-19. More detailed studies are necessary to understand the presentation of biomarkers in KT with COVID-19.

Urinary vitronectin identifies patients with high levels of fibrosis in kidney grafts.

BACKGROUND: In kidney transplantation, fibrosis represents the final and irreversible consequence of the pathogenic mechanisms that lead to graft failure, and in the late stages it irremediably precedes the loss of renal function. The invasiveness of kidney biopsy prevents this condition from being frequently monitored, while clinical data are rather unspecific. The objective of this study was to find noninvasive biomarkers of kidney rejection. METHODS: We carried out proteomic analysis of the urinary Extracellular Vesicles (uEVs) from a cohort of kidney transplant recipients (n = 23) classified according to their biopsy-based diagnosis and clinical parameters as interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA), acute cellular rejection (ACR), calcineurin inhibitors toxicity (CNIT) and normal kidney function (NKF). RESULTS: Shotgun mass spectrometry of uEV-proteins identified differential expression of several proteins among these different groups. Up to 23 of these proteins were re-evaluated using targeted proteomics in a new independent cohort of patients (n = 41) classified in the same diagnostic groups. Among other results, we found a differential expression of vitronectin (VTN) in patients displaying chronic interstitial and tubular lesions (ci and ct mean > 2 according to Banff criteria). These results were further confirmed by a pilot study using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). CONCLUSION: Urinary vitronectin levels are a potential stand-alone biomarker to monitor fibrotic changes in kidney transplant recipients in a non-invasive fashion.

Kidney transplant from controlled donors following circulatory death: Results from the GEODAS-3 multicentre study. / Trasplante renal con órganos procedentes de donación tras parada circulatoria controlada: resultados del estudio multicéntrico GEODAS-3.

INTRODUCTION: Many European countries have transplant programmes with controlled donors after cardiac death (cDCD). Twenty-two centres are part of GEODAS group. We analysed clinical results from a nephrological perspective. METHODS: Observational, retrospective and multicentre study with systematic inclusion of all kidney transplant recipients from cDCD, following local protocols regarding extraction and immunosuppression. RESULTS: A total of 335 cDCD donors (mean age 57.2 years) whose deaths were mainly due to cardiovascular events were included. Finally, 566 recipients (mean age 56.5 years; 91.9% first kidney transplant) were analysed with a median of follow-up of 1.9 years. Induction therapy was almost universal (thymoglobulin 67.4%; simulect 32.8%) with maintenance with prednisone-MMF-tacrolimus (91.3%) or combinations with mTOR (6.5%). Mean cold ischaemia time (CIT) was 12.3h. Approximately 3.4% (n=19) of recipients experienced primary non-function, essentially associated with CIT (only CIT ≥ 14 h was associated with primary non-function). Delayed graft function (DGF) was 48.8%. DGF risk factors were CIT ≥ 14 h OR 1.6, previous haemodialysis (vs. peritoneal dialysis) OR 2.1 and donor age OR 1.01 (per year). Twenty-one patients (3.7%) died with a functioning graft, with a recipient and death-censored graft survival at 2-years of 95% and 95.1%, respectively. The estimated glomerular filtration rate at one year of follow-up was 60.9 ml/min. CONCLUSIONS: CIT is a modifiable factor for improving the incidence of primary non-function in kidney transplant arising from cDCD. cDCD kidney transplant recipients have higher delayed graft function rate, but the same patient and graft survival compared to brain-dead donation in historical references. These results are convincing enough to continue fostering this type of donation.

Inflammation and oxidation: do they improve after kidney transplantation? Relationship with mortality after transplantation.

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are characterized by a state of inflammation and oxidative stress that seems to improve after kidney transplantation (KT). Nevertheless, there is controversy regarding what is the best marker that better define inflammation and specially oxidative stress. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the biomarkers which are associated with improvements in inflammation and lipid peroxidation in patients who have undergone KT. To evaluate the relationship between inflammation, lipid peroxidation and mortality in KT. PATIENTS: 196 KT (between 2003 and 2008). 67.9% men; median age: 51.9 years. Inflammation markers analyzed previous KT and 3 months after KT: c-reactive protein(CRP), interleukin 6(IL-6), tumor necrosis factor alpha(TNFα), soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor alpha(sTNFRα), soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R). Lipid peroxidation markers analyzed: oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) and anti-oxLDL antibodies. Calculation of glomerular filtration rate after KT: MDRD equation. RESULTS: Following KT, there is a significant decrease in CRP (p = 0.006), IL-6 (p = 0.0037), TNFα (p < 0.0001), sTNFRα (p < 0.0001) and sIL-2R (p < 0.0001), while levels of oxLDL increase after KT (p < 0.0001) and there is not a significantly difference in anti-oxLDL. 12.8% of the patients had died in 2012. These patients had higher levels of IL-6 (p = 0.011) and sTNFRα (p < 0.006) after KT and a lower MDRD (p < 0.0001), hemoglobin (p = 0.012) and albumin (p = 0.007). We observed no statistically differences in the levels of markers previous KT. Of the patients who died, the 43.5% of them had anti-oxLDL antibody levels greater than 75th percentile (P75: 3781 UI/ml, p = 0.028). In the multivariate analysis, age (OR:1.12; p = 0.0129), MDRD (OR:0.92; p = 0.013) and P75 of anti-oxLDL(OR: 5.19; p = 0.026) were independent risk factors for mortality. Independent risk factors for survival were: P75 of IL-6 (HR: 2.45; p = 0.027), oxLDL (HR:19.85; p = 0.002) and anti-oxLDL (HR: 9.55; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: KT improved inflammation but not lipid oxidative state. KT patients who died had a higher inflammatory state (with higher levels of IL-6 and sTNFRα), a worse lipid oxidative state and a worse renal function 3 months after KT. Age, anti-oxLDL and renal function at 3 months after KT were independent risk factors for mortality.

Remdesivir en pacientes trasplantados renales con neumonía por SARS-CoV-2 / Remdesivir in kidney transplant patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia

Introducción: El remdesivir es el único tratamiento antiviral que ha demostrado ser útil frente al SARS-CoV-2 acortando el tiempo de hospitalización frente a placebo. Su efecto en pacientes trasplantados renales (TR) se limita a algunos casos publicados.Material y métodosEstudio retrospectivo observacional de los pacientes TR que ingresaron entre el 1 de agosto de 2020 hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2020 con neumonía por SARS-CoV-2 y recibieron remdesivir.El objetivo es describir la experiencia de una cohorte de pacientes TR con neumonía por SARS-CoV-2 tratados con remdesivir.Resultados37 pacientes TR ingresaron por infección secundaria a SARS-CoV-2, 7 de ellos recibieron tratamiento con remdesivir. El resto de pacientes fueron excluidos por CKD-EPI menor a 30mL/min o por no presentar criterios clínicos. Además de remdesivir, todos recibieron dexametasona y anticoagulación. Cuatro eran hombres, siendo la mediana de edad de 59 (53-71) años. La mediana de tiempo post-trasplante fue de 43 (16-82) meses. Todos los pacientes presentaban neumonía y requirieron oxigenoterapia de bajo flujo al ingreso, precisando en tres de ellos oxigenoterapia de alto flujo durante el ingreso. Dos presentaron deterioro de la función del injerto al diagnóstico, no precisando en ningún caso hemodiálisis, y recuperándose al alta. Dos pacientes elevaron 1,5 veces el valor normal de las transaminasas. Ningún paciente falleció ni precisó ingreso en unidad de críticos. La mediana de días de ingreso fue de 12 (9-27) días.ConclusionesNuestro estudio sugiere que el uso de remdesivir podría ser útil en los pacientes TR con neumonía por SARS-CoV-2 sin presentar efectos secundarios. Son necesarios más estudios con un mayor número de pacientes para ampliar el conocimiento de este fármaco en la infección por SARS-CoV-2. (AU)

Background: Remdesivir is the only antiviral treatment that has been shown to be useful against SARS-CoV-2 infection. It shorts hospitalization time compared to placebo. Its effects in kidney transplant (KT) patients are limited to some published cases.MethodsWe performed a retrospective observational study that included all KT patients admitted between August 1st, 2020 and December 31st, 2020 with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia who received remdesivir.The objective of this study was to describe the experience of a cohort of KT patients treated with remdesivir.DiscussionA total of 37 KT patients developed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 7 of them received treatment with remdesivir. The rest of the patients did not receive the drug due to either CKD-EPI less than 30mL/min or they did not present clinical criteria. In addition to remdesivir, all patients received dexamethasone and anticoagulation therapy. 4 were men, the median age was 59 (53–71) years. Median time from transplantation was 43 (16–82) months. Chest X-rays of all patients showed pulmonary infiltrates and required low-oxygen flow therapy upon admission, requiring high-flow nasal therapy in 3 cases. Only 2 cases presented deterioration of the graft function, not requiring hemodialysis in any case, and all recovered renal function at hospital discharge. 2 patients rise up 1.5 times the liver function test. No patient died or required admission to the critical care unit. Median days of admission was 12 (9–27) days.ConclusionsOur study suggests that the use of remdesivir could be useful in KT patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia without side effects. Additional studies are necessary with a larger number of patients to improve the knowledge of this drug in SARS-CoV-2 infection. (AU)

Impact of protease inhibitors on the evolution of urinary markers: Subanalyses from an observational cross-sectional study.

Kidney injury (defined as the presence of albuminuria, proteinuria, glycosuria [without hyperglycemia], hematuria, and/or renal hypophosphatemia) is an emerging problem in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients, although few data are available on the role of protease inhibitors (PIs) in this condition.To determine the time to kidney injury in a cohort of HIV-infected patients receiving a PI-containing regimen.We report the results of a subanalysis of a published cross-sectional study. The subanalysis included only patients receiving PI-containing regimens for more than 6 months (377 of the overall 970 patients). We determined associated factors and constructed receiver operating characteristic curves to estimate time to kidney injury depending on the PI used.The percentage of patients with kidney injury was 27.7% for darunavir, 27.9% for lopinavir, and 30% for atazanavir. Time to kidney injury was as follows: 229 days for atazanavir/ritonavir (area under the curve [AUC], 0.639; sensitivity, 0.89; specificity, 0.41); 332 days for atazanavir/ritonavir plus tenofovir (AUC, 0.603; sensitivity, 0.75; and specificity, 0.29); 318 days for nonboosted atazanavir (AUC, 0.581; sensitivity, 0.89; and specificity, 0.29); 478 days for lopinavir/ritonavir (AUC, 0.566; sensitivity, 0.864; and specificity, 0.44); 1339 days for lopinavir/ritonavir plus tenofovir (AUC, 0.667; sensitivity, 0.86; and specificity, 0.77); 283 days for darunavir/ritonavir (AUC, 0.523; sensitivity, 0.80; and specificity, 0.261); and 286 days for darunavir/ritonavir plus tenofovir (AUC, 0.446; sensitivity, 0.789; and specificity, 0.245). The use of lopinavir/ritonavir without tenofovir was a protective factor (odds ratio = 1.772; 95%CI, 1.070-2.93; P = 0.026).For all PIs, the percentage of patients with kidney injury exceeded 27%, irrespective of tenofovir use. The longest time to kidney injury was recorded with lopinavir/ritonavir. These results demonstrate the need for renal monitoring, including urine samples, in patients receiving a PI-based regimen, even when tenofovir is not used concomitantly.

Validation of a simplified medication adherence questionnaire in a large cohort of HIV-infected patients: the GEEMA Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of the simplified medication adherence questionnaire (SMAQ) in identifying non-adherent patients. DESIGN: Prospective observational study of adherence. The six-item SMAQ was developed. The following aspects were evaluated: (i) criterion validity, comparison with electronic adherence monitoring; (ii) construct validity, association between adherence, as defined by the SMAQ, and virological outcomes; and (iii) reliability, internal consistency and reproducibility. PATIENTS: A group of 3004 unselected HIV patients who had initiated nelfinavir therapy combined with other antiretroviral drugs [21% naive, 15% protease inhibitor (PI)-naive, 64% PI-experienced] between January 1998 and December 1999 were enrolled in 69 hospitals in Spain. The SMAQ was administered at months 3, 6 and 12. RESULTS: The SMAQ showed 72% sensitivity, 91% specificity and a likelihood ratio of 7.94 to identified non-adherent patients, compared with the medication-event monitoring system (40 patients evaluated). At month 12, 1797 patients were evaluated, of whom 32.3% were defined as non-adherent; viral load < 500 copies/ml found in 68.3% of the adherent, and 46% of the non-adherent patients. A logistic regression analysis of PI-naive patients was performed, including age, sex, baseline viral load > 5 log10/ml, CD4 cell count < 200 x 10(6)/l, and non-adherence as independent variables. Non-adherence was the only significant risk factor in failing to achieve virological suppression. Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient was 0.75, and overall inter-observer agreement was 88.2%. CONCLUSION: The SMAQ appears to be an adequate instrument with which to assess adherence in HIV-infected patients, and may be applied in most clinical settings.

High prevalence of signs of renal damage despite normal renal function in a cohort of HIV-infected patients: evaluation of associated factors.

Renal disorders are an emerging problem in HIV-infected patients. We performed a cross-sectional study of the first 1000 HIV-infected patients attended at our HIV unit who agreed to participate. We determined the frequency of renal alterations and its related risk factors. Summary statistics and logistic regression were applied. The study sample comprised 970 patients with complete data. Most were white (94%) and men (76%). Median (IQR) age was 48 (42-53) years. Hypertension was diagnosed in 19%, dyslipidemia in 27%, and diabetes mellitus in 3%. According to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD EPI) equation, 29 patients (3%) had an eGFR<60 ml/min/1.73 m(2); 18 of them (62%) presented altered albumin/creatinine and protein/creatinine (UPC or UAC) ratios. Of the patients with eGFR>60 mL/min, it was present in 293 (30%), 38 of whom (7.1%) had UPC>300 mg/g. Increased risk of renal abnormalities was correlated with hypertension (OR, 1.821 [95%CI, 1.292;2.564]; p=0.001), age (OR, 1.015 [95%CI, 1.001;1.030], per one year; p=0.040), and use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plus protease inhibitor (PI), (OR, 1.401 [95%CI, 1.078;1.821]; p=0.012). Current CD4 cell count was a protective factor (OR, 0.9995 [95%CI, 0.9991;0.9999], per one cell; p=0.035). A considerable proportion of patients presented altered UPC or UAC ratios, despite having an eGFR>60 mL/min. CD4 cell count was a protective factor; age, hypertension, and use of TDF plus PIs were risk factors for renal abnormalities. Based on our results, screen of renal abnormalities should be considered in all HIV-infected patients to detect these alterations early.